Write a 250-word response to the essay below with 2 sources and bluebook citatio

Write a 250-word response to the essay below with 2 sources and bluebook citation.
Pituitary Extract Allocation Critique
The scarce resource allocation in society presents an ethical dilemma, demanding extensive and reasoned decision consideration from all perspectives. Law and economics present a jurisprudential system encompassing diverse attributes, as denoted in this critique. Based on the resource allocation application, the law and economics analyze the economic justification as it evaluates efficiency, incentives, and wealth maximization. The pituitary extract case, a scarce and expensive commodity, has insinuated debate on whom to receive it based on the child from a low-income family at risk of dwarfism and rich family seeking of child’s marginal height benefits purporting the athletic performance. Applying the law and economic concept includes an evangelical Christian principle application to unraveling the puzzle. The ethical consideration in the aspect gives an insight into the potential conflicts linked to economic efficiency and the Christian principles outlined below.
Laws and Economic Perspective
The laws and economic perspective pinpoint the pituitary extract allocation based on efficiency and societal welfare. For instance, Barbara, in his article, outlines the application of law and economic perspectives in our society. Barbara Dufková, How economic inequality and poverty concerns are reflected in efficiency-based competition laws: A developing country perspective, 24 (2022). The argument on this perspective lies in the resource allocation based on maximizing the social benefits accrued. According to the case study, the economic law argument rests on the rich family’s ability to purchase the extract based on its value, creating the economic incentive for the market to allocate the resource efficiently. Therefore, the economic perspective in the scenario approves the resource allocation to the family, which the society reaps the maximum benefits. As per the scenario, the provision of extract to the rich family’s child has the maximum benefit as the child gains a marginal height benefit hence the athletic prowess leading to greater societal benefits.
The legal and economic approach also considers voluntary transactions and the concept of market forces. According to this perspective, the approach argues for individual preferences and the ultimate willingness to pay as a reflection of the value placed on the goods and services ascribed. Based on the case scenario, the rich family has placed a significant value on their decision to purchase the extract as it demonstrates a willingness to part with a substantial amount of money for the small additional height needed for their son. The height added to their son will make him fit for football. Hence, the economic viewpoint argues that resource allocation to the individuals who demonstrate their value on the resources, hence the most efficient resource distribution.
Evangelical Christian Critique
Although the law and economic perspective offers a framework for analyzing the resource allocation based on the economic value and maximum benefits reaped, it differs from the evangelical Christian worldview. By embracing the Christian virtues, James Skillen understood the evangelical Christian perspective in society’s resource allocation. James W. Skillen, Social Justice, political science, Christian thought, Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Social Justice 88 (2020). The evangelical Christian worldview distinctly accords a critical perspective questioning the resource allocation based on human dignity, equality, justice, compassion, and the ultimate stewardship responsibility of resources. The evangelical Christian worldview hence critically contrasts resource allocation.
Human Dignity
Human dignity accounts for the fundamental concept underlying ethical application and worldviews. The evangelical Christian perspective embraces this virtue in its teaching as it implies recognizing the intrinsic worth and human being value. According to the virtual proposition, all individuals possess inherent rights, freedoms, and respect irrespective of their socioeconomic status and abilities. This principle fundamentally shapes the ethical considerations and decision-making in the law and economics based on optimizing social welfare and enhancing human dignity. Therefore, the evangelical Christian worldview recognizes human dignity in every creation as a reflection of God’s image. According to this belief, society’s inherent value and significance transcend its economic contributions and capabilities.
Resource allocation centers on applying human dignity to equal opportunities for all. Although the law and economics prioritize the pituitary extract resource allocation to rich family’ child based on the purchase ability, it raises ethical concerns from an evangelical Christian viewpoint. The evangelical Christian viewpoint hence postulates on considering the dignity of the poor child’s family on the verge of becoming dwarf should they fail to acquire the expensive extract. Failing to recognize their resource allocation undermines intrinsic worth and human dignity. Besides, the law and economics should strive to create a just and equitable society that upholds all individuals’ dignity, especially from marginalized regions.
Equality
Equality fundamentally governs the law and economic perspective as embroiled in the evangelical Christian worldview. This concept entails a fair and impartial treatment of all individuals irrespective of their characteristics and circumstances. It encompasses of according of equal rights, opportunities, and resource accessibility alongside the elimination of discrimination and the promotion of an inclusive society. The law and economic perspective incorporate equality of the opportunities available as opposed to the outcomes equality hence presupposes the creation of equal chances for all individuals based on their abilities and efforts with disregard the wealth, social status, and background. Hence, the principle argues that all individuals receive equal opportunities to thrive.
The evangelical Christian perspective contrasts the law and economics perspective by highlighting extending equality beyond opportunity. Therefore, this proposition extends from merely equal opportunities to equality based on value, dignity, and treatment. As articulated in the Christian faith, equality comprises all individuals in the society created in God’s image, hence the inherent worth and value, including the legal, economic, social, and political dimensions. Hence, this perspective challenges addressing the various systemic barriers and societal injustices contributing to the social and economic inequalities infringing resource accessibility. Therefore, the evangelical Christian perspective includes considering the marginalized individuals in society as it advocates for policies promoting social justice and equitable resource allocation. This context hence calls for the provision of the pituitary extract in their affordability just, similar to the provision of the extract to the rich who can access the resource.
Justice and Compassion
Justice and compassion are central in the law and economic perspective alongside the evangelical Christian worldview. For instance, John Witte was influential in postulating justice and compassion in resource allocation. John Witte, Human dignity, equality and liberty in Protestant thought, Human Dignity in the Judaeo-Christian Tradition 56 (2019). The principle governs the resource distribution in both perspectives by affirming the common goal of enhancing fairness and addressing social inequalities alongside the social welfare consideration. The resource allocation as exemplified by the pituitary extract, the law, and economic perspective embraces the consideration of prioritizing the efficiency and the market influences. In this perspective, the law and economics focus on maximizing social welfare and resource allocation as per the economic value; hence the decision on whom should receive the extract rests on the ability to pay a higher price only favoring the rich family.
The evangelical Christian worldview contrasts the law and economic perspective by championing care for the less fortunate hence the compassion for those in need and seeking justice for individuals within the marginalized regions. This perspective recognizes the inherent worth and dignity of the individuals in society irrespective of socioeconomic status. The evangelical Christian critique postulates on justice and compassion guiding the decision-making for the pituitary extract scenario. According to the evangelical Christian virtues, resource allocation should focus on addressing economic efficiencies and the vulnerable population needs, such as the risk of dwarfism. Therefore, addressing the additional benefits accorded to the rich and disregarding the life quality improvement among the poor undermines the justice and compassion principles. Justice based on the Christian perspective argues for fair and equitable resource allocation, including the marginalized population. The justice would therefore call for consideration of the potential long-term impacts of denying the poor child extract and social and economic inequalities at play hence addressing them fairly. Compassion consequently calls for love and care to those in need through active engagement amongst the suffering individuals. The poor child entails caring for their needs and circumstances, alleviating the challenges through necessary resource provision.