Subject is ABA Therapy Overview For this assignment, you will demonstrate the sk

Subject is ABA Therapy
Overview
For this assignment, you will demonstrate the skills needed for conducting an indirect assessment. This generally is how practitioners begin the FBA. Although the indirect assessment does not require you to observe the target behaviors, it is a critical component of the FBA because it allows you to build rapport with the stakeholders. The information gathered in this part of the analysis will also inform your descriiptive and/or experimental analysis. Be sure to incorporate values of compassion and cultural humility when conducting the indirect assessment. You can refer to the Capella Compassion Code [DOCX] Download Capella Compassion Code [DOCX] for more details.
Part 1: Selecting the Tool or Method
Considering the highest priority problem behavior from your last assignment, select a method to conduct the indirect assessment. You will need to select an interview tool for your assignment. You have the choice of using the FAI or the IISCA Open-Ended Interview. You may use this assignment as an opportunity to include a checklist or survey tool such as the FAST, FAI, QABF, or the MAS for practice. Please note even if you use one of these checklists or surveys, you will still need an interview. The interview is required but the checklist or surveys are not required (just optional). Document the advantages and limitations of the selected interview tool. Provide a rationale for why you have selected this tool for your indirect assessment. Be sure to consider compassionate approaches when selecting your indirect assessment.
Part 2: Gathering and Summarizing Information
If you chose a fellow learner, friend, or family member, summarize the information collected from interviews with stakeholders and/or completed checklists and surveys. If you chose a character from a T.V. show or movie, you will need to infer the information in your summary. Remember the information obtained from the indirect assessment should inform the procedures taken in the experimental analysis in Week 8. In this summary, provide examples of approaches you took from the Capella Compassion Code [DOCX] Download Capella Compassion Code [DOCX] to demonstrate how you took into consideration compassionate assessment methods while gathering this information. You should also present a visual display of the summarized information. Include the completed checklists or interviews as part of your assignment.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines. Review Evidence and APA Links to an external site. for more information on how to cite your sources.
Resources: A sufficient number of scholarly or professional resources. Resources should include the course texts, and a combination of seminal works.
Length: 3–4 double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Refer to the MS in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research Guide Links to an external site. for help finding resources.
Refer to the Indirect Assessment rubric to ensure you understand the grading criteria for this assignment.
Week 3 Assignment 1 – Indirect Assessment
Week 3 Assignment 1 – Indirect Assessment
Criteria Ratings Pts
Accurately describe the interview tool (for example, FAI or IISCA) selected for the indirect assessment.
view longer descriiption
12 to >10.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Accurately describes at least one interview tool (for example, FAI or IISCA) used to conduct the indirect assessment and justifies the selection with supporting evidence.
10.2 to >8.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Accurately describes at least one interview tool (for example, FAI or IISCA).
8.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Partially describes at least one interview tool (for example, FAI or IISCA) used to conduct the indirect assessment but does not provide a complete descriiption or the information is incorrect.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not describe at least one interview tool (for example, FAI or IISCA) used to conduct the indirect assessment
/ 12 pts
Accurately describe the advantages and limitations of the interview tool selected.
view longer descriiption
12 to >10.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Accurately describes the advantages and limitations of the interview tool selected and provides supporting evidence.
10.2 to >8.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Accurately describes the advantages and limitations of the interview tool selected.
8.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Partially describes the advantages and limitations of the interview tool selected, but some of the information is inaccurate or missing.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not describe the advantages and limitations of the interview tool selected.
/ 12 pts
Explain the rationale for why this particular interview tool was selected.
view longer descriiption
12 to >10.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains the rationale for why the interview tool used to conduct an indirect assessment has been selected and provides supporting evidence.
10.2 to >8.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains the rationale for why the interview tool used to conduct an indirect assessment has been selected.
8.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Attempts to explain the rationale for why the interview tool used has been selected, but the explanation is inaccurate or incomplete.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not explain the rationale for why the interview tool used to conduct an indirect assessment has been selected.
/ 12 pts
Explain how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting and implementing the assessment procedures.
view longer descriiption
12 to >10.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Explains how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting and implementing the assessment procedures and provides specific examples.
10.2 to >8.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Explains how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting and implementing the assessment procedures.
8.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Attempts to explain how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting and implementing the assessment procedures, but the explanation was unclear or incomplete.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not explain how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting or implementing the assessment procedures.
/ 12 pts
Provide the completed interview.
view longer descriiption
12 to >10.2 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Provides the interview containing information with no errors or missing information.
10.2 to >8.4 pts
PROFICIENT
Provides the interview with minor errors.
8.4 to >0 pts
BASIC
Provides the interview, but it is incomplete or is inaccurately filled out.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not provide interview.
/ 12 pts
Summarize the information gathered from the indirect assessment correctly.
view longer descriiption
20 to >17 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Summarizes the information gathered from the indirect assessment correctly and provides a visual display.
17 to >14 pts
PROFICIENT
Summarizes the information gathered from the indirect assessment correctly.
14 to >0 pts
BASIC
Summarizes the information gathered, but it does not align with the completed survey, checklist, or interview.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not summarize the information gathered from the indirect assessment.
/ 20 pts
Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
view longer descriiption
10 to >8.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that contains no significant grammatical or mechanical errors and follows assignment guidelines.
8.5 to >7 pts
PROFICIENT
Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Demonstrates minimally acceptable writing style, but still has instances of disorganization, grammatical or mechanical errors, or does not follow all assignment guidelines.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not demonstrate an academic writing style.
/ 10 pts
Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
view longer descriiption
10 to >8.5 pts
DISTINGUISHED
Develops a paper that is fully compliant with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
8.5 to >7 pts
PROFICIENT
Demonstrates compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
7 to >0 pts
BASIC
Demonstrates minimally acceptable compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
0 pts
NON_PERFORMANCE
Does not demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
/ 10 pts