Please answer this template base on scenario. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages

Please answer this template base on scenario. Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
<
<
Reflective Journal Template – Topic Reflection
<

<
Topic
<

<
Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
<
<
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
<
<
Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
<
<

<
What are the key points of contention on this topic?
<

<

<

<

<

<

<
What side of the argument (stance) do you take on this topic?
<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<
What strong points does the other side of this topic have?
<

<

<

<

<

<
What were the three most important things you took away from the topic?
<

<
1.
<

<
2.
<

<
3.
<

<
Which ethical theory (of the 6 approved ones ONLY – Kant; Act Utilitarianism; Rule Utilitarianism; Care Ethics; Virtue Ethics; and Social Contract) would you apply to this topic to defend your stance? Explain fully. 250 words.
<
A) In this reflection you must first define the key terms of the debate (for example, define what Euthanasia/Abortion/Stem Cell/Public Health/PreNatal Testing/Animal Research/Health Care, etc. means and what are the different types depending on which topic you are discussing)
<
B) Define and explain the ethical theory you chose (show me you know exactly what the theory is and does – in your own words)
<
C) Present the evidence both pro and con and follow up how using your ethical theory is the best way to determine whether or not your stance is really ethical
<
D) Conclusion – any final thoughts and opinions would go here
<
E) 2 to 3 resources as support for your evidence (text book counts as 1)
<
<
<
<
Scenario:
<
<
Good afternoon everyone. Thank you for coming to today’s session.The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome
<
(AIDS) present massive, global threats to human health.And, discussions about HIV and AIDS bring up many ethics issues based on the marginalized populations most affected by the disease, because HIV and AIDS are tied to poverty, the sex trade, and other social issues that make progress difficult and education essential.The question we will be discussing today is, “What immediate course or courses of action should we take to slow the spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa?”We would like to come to a consensus on this matter and publicize our recommendations.
<
<
(Dr. Meadows) We need to get more condoms into the less developed areas of Africa, where AIDS is running rampant. Condom use decreases the likelihood of contracting HIV tenfold. We also need to address real-world issues such as resistance in the supply chain. Of course we want to stress education above all else, but education alone is nowhere near effective enough to combat this problem.
<
<
<
(Dr. Williams) I agree that condom use is vital, but we also need to implement mandatory HIV testing in some areas. It is potentially intrusive, but without it, no practical way exists to stop the spread of HIV and AIDS. Mandatory testing would bring huge benefits to both individuals and society, as the early detection and treatment of HIV has proven to be a successful way to limit the transmission of the virus to others, and to improve the survival rates of HIV-positive patients. You mentioned resistance issues with the condom supply chain, and I agree. Some of the charitable organizations currently distributing goods in Africa refuse to distribute condoms for religious reasons, so we can’t depend on condom distribution alone. People who don’t undergo testing will remain ignorant of their status and will continue to spread the infection in the community. We must have mandatory testing to convince infected persons to use condoms.
<
<
Thank you, Dr. Williams.
<
<
<
Can you please share with our audience just how many people are infected with HIV?
<
<
Dr. Williams According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were about 2.3 million new infections in 2012, worldwide. That’s more than 6,300 new HIV infections per day.
<
<
<
Those numbers are staggering. For more information and statistics on HIV infections, visit the links provided in the Resources tab.
<
<
<
(Dr. meadows) Circumventing a supply problem by committing a human rights violation is not an ethical solution, Dr. Williams. Mandatory HIV testing would have disastrous consequences for a person whose results are disclosed publically. It would expose HIV-positive people to stigmas and dangers related to their professions, sexual orientations, or others’ fears. A mandatory HIV-testing strategy ignores basic human rights to privacy and confidentiality as well as the concept of informed consent. Testing should happen, but it needs to be voluntary, accessible, and available with a guarantee that identifying information will not be released without consent.
<
<
You’ve heard Dr. Meadow’s arguments.
<
Click the thought bubble icon to see her opinions.
<
<
<
(Dr. Williams) The current average life expectancy in Zambia is 33 years. That’s the lowest in the world, and AIDS is a major contributing factor. Mandatory testing can identify those who pose the greatest threat to the health of the population. We have to keep the greater good in mind here. What good are policies if people are still dying in such huge numbers? I agree that education and condoms can be parts of the solution, but the tests must be done.
<
<
You’ve heard Dr. William’s opening argument.
<
Click the thought bubble icon to see her opinions.
<
<
Dr. Williams. A member of our audience wants to know if condom distribution programs work.
<
<
(Dr. William)10 out of 11 studies found that condom distribution programs increased condom use among participants. However, these studies rely on self-reported information regarding condom use.
<
<
Thank you.
<
<
A. Dr. Meadows is correct. We need to start with the least invasive approaches, such as awareness campaigns. Abstinence campaigns also present no cost to personal liberties, and should be part of that plan. There is no question that abstinence works; no sex means no sexually transmitted disease. The last thing we want to do is to encourage even more promiscuity than already exists.
<
B. I agree with Dr. Meadows. We have to address this problem in terms of tackling the supply chain problem and getting more condoms out to more people. There is a real difficulty in getting people to change long-held beliefs that prevent them from seeing that condom distribution is ethical. HIV education, condom availability, and voluntary testing should lead the charge here. And we should always first consider testing programs that we can implement with the least possible harm to personal freedoms, such as using codes rather than names to identify patients in order to keep their health information private and protected.
<
C. The likelihood that our recommendation will alter the Catholic Church’s position is close to nil. We can hope the church will embrace a more liberal policy with regard to condom distribution, but we can’t make “hope” an ethical position. We should start a campaign to support the use of condoms and make it known to the public and to those who donate to charities. People should not donate to charitable groups with religious dictates that serve as public health impediments.
<
D. Dr. Williams is right. Testing is too important to ignore. Keeping testing voluntary will mean that the people who need to be tested the most will avoid being tested out of fear of the stigma associated with the disease. Some things come at a price, and mandatory testing is the price we must pay to ensure a healthier population moving forward.
<