Hello, 1. I will post the question of the assignment for you with all the instru

Hello,
1. I will post the question of the assignment for you with all the instructions need it for please read it carefully and do it as my teacher wants.
2. I need a APA formatted for this assignment please
3. I need it all from your writing and I don’t need any plagiarism.
4. Read the rubric carefully because it shows how my teacher is going to grade the assignment.
Instructions:
Conflict Resolution
This assignment will guide you through a difficult topic — conflict resolution. You will apply what you’ve learned this week on Leading and Controlling while also consolidating Planning and Organizing from previous weeks in order to fully integrate the functions of management into dealing with an all-to-real problem that managers face regularly.
Step 1: Identify a company of your choice. It may be in any industry, private, public, or non-profit. Next, either speak with a manager in-person or research the company online to learn the company’s culture and to gauge employee engagement.
Step 2: You are a middle manager at the company you have chosen as the subject of this final written assignment. Write a business Case Study that addresses and solves the stated problem of Conflict Resolution at your company.
Step 3: Using your personal experiences, rank the Bad Boss Behaviors that are listed below from 1-12. The top ranked Behavior is “1.” It is the behavior that is the worst morale killer in the entire company. That behavior makes you want to quit your job tomorrow!. The behavior ranked “12′ adversely affects morale, but in your mind, is better than all the rest of the behaviors. Your ranked listing will appear as an Appendix placed at the end of your report, after your Reference page.
Step 4: Write your report as follows.
Start with an Executive Summary. See the “How to Write an Executive Summary” doc. (found in Brightspace under the Content tab > Week Four )
Next write your Introduction. It will briefly describe the business situation at the company. It also contains the stated business problem your study will address. Finally, provide a brief summary of the topics covered in your business Case Study.
Perform an in-depth analysis of the internal conflict at the company you discovered through your research (i.e., what is causing morale to decline).
Identify and discuss a Management Theory that could be used to increase the company’s efficiency and effectiveness. Then briefly address each aspect (or function) of management and its role in solving the Employer-Employee Conflict at your company. (Use each function as a paragraph sub-heading.):Planning
Organizing
Leading
Controlling
From your research, briefly discuss how your company’s culture has affected employee engagement?
Conclude by using your top 3 Bad Boss Behaviors (from your list) to make constructive recommendations to your boss (me) that would resolve the current Employer-Employee conflict at our company.
Since this is your final Signature Assignment, you will include a one-page type-written Executive Summary as a stand-alone synopsis of your business case study. Use the APA formatting guidelines contained in the “How to Write an Executive Summary” document mentioned in Step 4, Item 1. above.
The Executive Summary will be marked as page 1 and will appear after your Cover page. It is followed by your Introduction and the first page of your written report (page 2.)
Be sure to use paragraph headings to introduce a new topic of your report. (e.g., Introduction, Internal Conflict, Management Theories, Corporate Culture etc.).
And finally, don’t forget to include an Appendix that contains your ranking of Bad Boss Behaviors (see Step 3 above).
Guidelines:
This assignment is considered a complete Business Case Study. Therefore, your report should be written as a formal business report of your analysis.
This report must be 3-5 type-written pages (Does not include your Cover page, Executive Summary, Reference page and your Appendix). Use single-space, Font size- 12, Font style – Times New Roman.
Note: After 5 typed pages, your boss will stop reading your report. So be brief and be persuasive.
Use Internal references (e.g. textbook, readings, lectures, etc.) and External references (e.g. other published works) to add credibility to your statements.
Since this is a real-time analysis, write in the present tense to describe your findings and recommended actions (except when describing past events).
Current APA format is required.Use Headings and Sub-headings where appropriate.
Exception: DO NOT include an Abstract or a Table of Contents for this report.
DO NOT divulge any company proprietary information. If necessary, use a pseudonym for your company’s name and for key personnel mentioned in your report.
NU Library resource for APA guidance: https://nu.libguides.com/citations/APA
__________________________________________________________________________
Bad Boss Behaviors (Loussararian, 2013)
The Skeptic – Does not believe that employees will do what they say.
The Comparer – Compares one employee’s performance to another’s.
The Information Disseminator – Will not share all the information necessary to complete a project.
The Recognizer – Slow to recognize employees’ performance and shortfalls.
The Know It All – Lacks all of the information, but acts like he does.
The Late Night Worker – Expects that because he checks emails after the normal work day, everyone should also stay behind and work late doing nothing useful.
The Over Committer – Tries to be the fix-it-all-Manager for the organization.
The Creditor – Quickly takes credit for everyone else’s work.
The “Over” Talker – Talks over everyone during meetings. Believes he/she has all the answers.
The Executor – Rushes everyone through a project just to check it off his list of things to do.
Talker Out of Both Sides of His Mouth – Says one thing but means something else.
The Conclusion Jumper – Always makes up his mind quickly without all the necessary information.
Loussararian, E. (2013). When Bosses Go Wild: Preventing Employee Morale Knockouts. ISBN-13: ‎978-0615885780.
Rubric Name: Conflict Resolution rubric
Print
CriteriaOutstandingCommendable
Acceptable
Marginal
Failing
Missing/Unacceptable
Criterion Score
Executive Summary & Introduction (10%)
2.5 points
Clear description of of events. Written as a business problem statement. Ends with an overview of what follows. Executive Summary covers problem statement, what you did, what you found, and your recommendations — all on ONE page.
2.13 points
Complete description provided. Clear presentation of the business issue/problem & some details that will be used in the analysis. Overview of the sections that will follow.
1.88 points
Description is somewhat complete; however, more depth &/or length are needed. Lacking details or overview.
1.63 points
Brief with some depth, fails to meet some criteria. Lacking details and missing overview
1.25 points
Some description provided but lacking major details of the case and including unrelated information.
0 points
Score of Executive Summary & Introduction (10%),
/ 2.5
Analysis of Conflict (20%)
5 points
In-depth analysis of question. Exceptional integration of the business case and course material. Analysis of the internal conflict is very detailed and specifically addresses how it causes moreale to decline.
4.25 points
In-depth analysis of question. Good integration of the business case and course material. Analysis of the internal conflict is detailed and specifically addresses how it causes moreale to decline.
3.75 points
Overview analysis of question. Limited integration of the business case and course material. Analysis of the internal conflict is somewhat detailed and slightly addresses how it causes moreale to decline.
2.75 points
Minimal analysis of question. Limited integration of the business case and course material. Analysis of the internal conflict has minimal detail or does not address how it causes moreale to decline.
2.5 points
Little analysis of question. No integration of the business case and course material. Analysis of the internal conflict has minimal detail and does not address how it causes moreale to decline.
0 points
Score of Analysis of Conflict (20%),
/ 5
Management Theories for Improvement (25%)
6.25 points
In-depth analysis of question. Exceptional integration of the business case and course material. Each of the four functions of managers are addressed in detail. Each section specifically addresses impact to efficiency and effectiveness.
5.31 points
In-depth analysis of question. Good integration of the business case and course material. Each of the four functions of managers are addressed in detail. Most sections specifically address impact to efficiency and effectiveness.
4.69 points
Overview analysis of question. Limited integration of the business case and course material. Each of the four functions of managers are addressed in some detail. Only a couple of sections specifically address impact to efficiency and effectiveness.
4.06 points
Minimal analysis of question. Limited integration of the business case and course material. Each of the four functions of managers are addressed in minimal detail. Just one section (or a combined overview) specifically addresses impact to efficiency and effectiveness.
3.13 points
Little analysis of question. No integration of the business case and course material. Not all of the four functions of managers are addressed. Only a combined overview has limited insight to efficiency and effectiveness.
0 points
Score of Management Theories for Improvement (25%),
/ 6.25
Culture and Recommendations (10%)
2.5 points
In-depth analysis of question. Exceptional integration of the business case and course material. Organizational culture is clearly linked to employee engagement. Top 3 Bad Boss Behaviors are used to create clear recommendations for resolving conflict. (Others are ranked in Appendix.)
2.13 points
Organizational culture is clearly linked to employee engagement. Top 3 Bad Boss Behaviors are used, but not well connected, to create recommendations for resolving conflict. (Others are ranked in Appendix.)
1.88 points
Organizational culture is somewhat connected to employee engagement. Top 3 Bad Boss Behaviors are used to create only a few recommendations for resolving conflict, without strong connections. (or others are NOT ranked in Appendix.)
1.63 points
Organizational culture is limited in its connection to employee engagement. Top 3 Bad Boss Behaviors are used to create only a few recommendations for resolving conflict, without any clear connections. (or others are NOT ranked in Appendix.)
1.25 points
Organizational culture is very limited in its connection to employee engagement. Bad Boss Behaviors are NOT used in creating recommendations for resolving conflict. (or others are NOT ranked in Appendix.)
0 points
Score of Culture and Recommendations (10%),
/ 2.5
Conclusion (5%)
1.25 points
Clear summary of key points and recommendations. Ends with strong action statement.
1.06 points
Summary of all key points and recommendations. Ending isn’t action or big-picture.
0.94 points
Summary of most key points and recommendations. Ending isn’t action or big-picture.
0.81 points
Summary of some key points and some recommendations. Ending isn’t action or big-picture.
0.63 points
Summary of some key points. Missing recommendations. Order is not the same as the report. Ending isn’t action or big-picture.
0 points
Score of Conclusion (5%),
/ 1.25
Critical Thinking and Support (10%)
2.5 points
A clear, logical connection is made between the data, analysis & recommendations. Claims are supported by reputable sources, both from class and external to the course material.
2.13 points
A logical connection is made between the data, analysis & recommendations, but may not be clear at all times. A few class and external sources are used. All are reputable.
1.88 points
Most of the time a logical connection is made between the data, analysis & recommendations, but may not be clear at all times. Only a few sources are used, or all from the course material. Not all sources are reputable.
1.63 points
Several logical discrepancies are made, and several points may not be clear. Only a couple of sources are used, or none are reputable.
1.25 points
Many discrepancies are note or no connection between data and analysis, or between analysis and recommendations are noted. Only 1 class reference is used, or none are reputable.
0 points
Score of Critical Thinking and Support (10%),
/ 2.5
APA Guidelines and Organization (10%)
2.5 points
Cover Page, title, headings & page numbers properly formatted. Questions used as main heading, plus Introduction & Conclusion. Correct quoting, paraphrasing, style & formatting followed.
2.13 points
Cover Page, title, headings & page numbers properly formatted. Questions used as main heading, plus Introduction & Conclusion. Correct quoting, paraphrasing, style & formatting followed.
1.88 points
Missing Cover Page, title or pages numbers. Questions not repeated as headings. Missing some in-text citations &/or quoting/para- phrasing errors.
1.63 points
Missing Cover Page, or title, page number and headings. Questions are not repeated as headings. APA Style guidelines not followed in many areas.
1.25 points
Some structure in formatting is consistent in the document, but not in accordance with APA guidelines. Report does not flow with the questions.
0 points
Score of APA Guidelines and Organization (10%),
/ 2.5
Grammar, Spelling & Mechanics (10%)
2.5 points
No errors. Paragraphs and sentences are properly structured to promote understanding by the reader.
2.13 points
Few minor errors or one major error. Paragraphs and sentences are properly structured to promote understanding by the reader.
1.88 points
Some minor errors or a couple of major errors. Most paragraphs and most sentences are properly structured to promote understanding by the reader.
1.63 points
Several errors. Lacking paragraph structure to support flow. Sentence structure in mostly correct.
1.25 points
Many errors. Some sentences difficult to understand due to errors.
0 points
Score of Grammar, Spelling & Mechanics (10%),
/ 2.5
TotalScore of Conflict Resolution rubric,
/ 25
Overall Score
Outstanding23.13 points minimum
Commendable21.25 points minimum
Acceptable18.75 points minimum
Marginal16.25 points minimum
Failing12.5 points minimum
Missing/Unacceptable
0 points minimum