Below you will also see the attached files if you can’t access them within the a

Below you will also see the attached files if you can’t access them within the assignment.
Create a professional presentation in the format of a Research Poster presentation. You must use a FAU poster template(ATTACHED BELOW) and include a
condensed nursing situation, background for and significance of the project (including appropriate citations), a PICOT question, summary of evidence and recommendations, and a description of the plan for implementation and evaluation of the project. The identified problem and its potential solutions must be demonstrated through the presentation.
A sample poster presentation is in the assignment instructions and below
write an abstract for their poster. Be sure to review How to Prepare an AbstractActions. Abstracts are submitted to conferences in your application to present your work. Once accepted, the abstract is often listed in the conference proceedings.
The poster content must adhere to APA 7th edition criteria for grammar, citations and references.
Poster presentations will be delivered to the class utilizing the 3-minute thesis format, recorded with a voice-over, and uploaded to the discussion board.
POSTER PRESENTATION
Create a professional presentation in the format of a Research Poster presentation. You must use a FAU poster template(ATTACHED BELOW)
and include a condensed nursing situation, background for and significance of the project (including appropriate citations), a PICOT question>>>>(PICOT QUESTION: In postoperative adult patients (P), how does the implementation of a multimodal pain management protocol (I) compared to opioid-based pain management practices (C) affect improved pain control and reduced opioid use (O) within 48 hours postoperatively (T)?), summary of evidence and recommendations, and a description of the plan for implementation and evaluation of the project. The identified problem and its potential solutions must be demonstrated through the presentation. Sample poster presentations are below.
Here is a published article to use as an example for content within each heading: Mindfulness and Self-Regulation in a Summer Camp Setting_EBP Project-1.pdf
Actions

Database Flowchart: Since you are not doing a full Literature Review, you will use your articles (3 OF THE ARTICLES PROVIDED BELOW) or the poster flowchart. Please refer to the attached visual example for reference on how to craft a flowchart Flowchart Example.docx
Actions

Articles for presentation and flowchart: You need a minimum of 6 articles(3 ARTICLES ARE PROVIDED BELOW YOU WILL NEED TO RESEARCH THE REMAINING ARTICLES) with at least 3 of the articles must come from peer-reviewed, scholarly nursing journals. If you are unable to find at least 3 articles within nursing journals:
a) Identify 1-2 evidence-based cumulative, summary articles to add to the evidence — i.e., systematic reviews, meta-syntheses or meta- analyses
The article(s) must come from professional, peer-reviewed journals.
Be current (published within the last 5 – 7 years)
b) Identify 4-5 single, primary research study articles that speak to your problem/issues>>>>>(problem/issues: In postoperative adult patients (P), how does the implementation of a multimodal pain management protocol (I) compared to opioid-based pain management practices (C) affect improved pain control and reduced opioid use (O) within 48 hours postoperatively (T)?)
Must be reports of single, primary research studies. The research articles you identify should meet the following criteria:Be current (published within the last 5 – 7 years)
Be complete reports of single, primary research studies
Published in a peer-reviewed, scholarly journalsFor example: Nursing Research, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, and Applied Nursing Research ARE scholarly nursing journals (peer-reviewed, research study publication).
You are required to upload one PDF copy of each of your 6 selected research articles. See the below for the grading rubric.
FAU Poster Template –> Poster Template.pptx
Actions

The poster headers should reflect the background for and significance of the project (including appropriate citations), a PICOT question>>>>>(PICOT QUESTION: In postoperative adult patients (P), how does the implementation of a multimodal pain management protocol (I) compared to opioid-based pain management practices (C) affect improved pain control and reduced opioid use (O) within 48 hours postoperatively (T)?), summary of evidence and recommendations, and a description of the plan for implementation and evaluation of the project, and references. QR codes are acceptable links to the references if you need the space.
You will upload your Group Poster Presentation with your 3-minute voice-over here: Assignment 3A: Group EBP Poster Presentations
Please note the grading rubric below – this is the basis of your grade for the project. It is important that every aspect of the rubric is covered in your presentation. Here are exemplars of a poster:
Poster Example 1 NUR4937.pptx
Actions
Poster Example 2 NUR4937-1.pptx
Actions

Poster Example 3 NUR4937.pptx
Actions

Poster Example 4 NUR4937.pptx
Actions

FAQs
Q: Can I use images?
A: Posters can include visuals.
Q: What kind of images should I use?
A: You can use figures from the article, such as a Forest Plot from a meta-analysis (Show the overall direction of the findings and shows the specific studies that supported the direction towards treatment or the control). Always provide citation for images. For photos, you must consider copyright even when obtained from free sites such as Flicker. For photos, you must provide credit to the photographer. I often take photos myself and credit them accordingly.
Some questions to keep in mind as you craft your Poster Presentation:
1. Presents aims/purpose
2. Organized poster into logical sections
3. Used graphics, figures, tables, or illustrations in lieu of text as appropriate
4. Brief headings and subheadings
5. Used bulleted phrases or short sentences
6. Selected a professional design or organization template
7. Uses contrast between lettering and background
8. Easy to read fonts (e.g. Calibri, Arial) throughout
9. Used bold for emphasis and underlined URLs for websites and email only
10. Used active tense (e.g. Findings show…) and plain language
11. Limits text blocks <40 words 12. Evidence-based summary provided 13. Implications for practice provided 14. Recommendations for research provided 15. Recommendations for health policy as appropriate 16. References shown or a reference handout 17. Institutional Branding at the top (if appropriate) 18. Provides acknowledgment of others Rubric NUR4937 EBP Presentation CriteriaRatingsPts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract, Nursing Situation, PICOT question, BackgroundAbstract 2 pts, Nursing Situation 2 pts, PICOT question 1 point, Background 2 pts 7 to >1.0 ptsThe presentation includes an introduction to a nursing problem or issue. The problem or issue is adequately defined, the prevalence is clearly stated and the significance of the problem including the PICOT question is fully described. Appropriate references are used to support the significance and prevalence of the problem.
1 to >0.0 ptsThere is an identification of a nursing problem or issue, but it is not well defined and/or its significance and prevalence is not well stated. The references used in the introduction include the articles reviewed for this presentation or are not from professional sources or not relevant to the topic.
0 ptsCentral problem not identified.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplications & Recommendations for Practice/Research
6 to >2.0 ptsSpecific recommendations for practice change using an evidence-based practice model is clearly stated and are firmly grounded in quality and level of the evidence reviewed. The evidence used to support the recommendations is clearly made
2 to >0.0 ptsRecommendations for practice change are not clearly described, the evidence-based model is incorrectly used and the recommendation stated is not firmly grounded in the evidence reviewed. The support for the recommendations is not clear. .
0 ptsRecommendations may be present but is likely to be only a few lines of summary. Demonstrates serious inadequacy.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGuideline/Policy/ Protocol
6 to >2.4 ptsThe closing statement(s) in the conclusion clearly stated what you have learned. The recommendation for practice change is based on the evidence reviewed in the evidence table.
2.4 to >0.0 ptsThere is inadequate presentation for the practice change. The practice change is not based on the evidence reviewed in the evidence table.
0 ptsThere is no presentation of the guideline, protocol, or policy in relation to the evidence reviewed in the evidence table.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA/Grammar
4 to >2.4 ptsDemonstrates full control of APA format and style including proper citation format. Virtually free of sentence level errors: grammatical, typographical, and word choice.
2.4 to >0.0 ptsAdequately adheres to APA forms and style including proper citation format, with likely deviations and lapses. May contain some consistent patterns of sentence level error: grammatical, typographical, and word choice. Pervasiveness of error does not impede
0 ptsPresentation demonstrates serious inadequacy in APA/grammar
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeState of the Evidence
7 to >2.5 ptsSpecific evidence report for practice. Includes at least 1 systematic review, single primary research study, and other substantive literature
2.5 to >0.0 ptsSpecific evidence report for practice. Includes 3 systematic reviews, single primary research study, and other substantive literature. The evidence is not firmly grounded in the evidence reviewed. The support for the recommendations is not clear. .
0 ptsSome evidence may be present but is likely to be only a few lines of summary. Demonstrates serious inadequacy.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodologyMethod of evidence retrieval, project plan
5 to >2.4 ptsUsed a systematic approach shown with a flow chart retaining literature or rejecting. Determined the final N for evidence review. Specified the databases and the keywords used.
2.4 to >0.0 ptsUsed a systematic approach shown with a flow chart retaining literature or rejecting. Determined the final N for evidence review. Specified the databases and missed a useful database or less than 2 used. Missing some keywords used.
0 ptsUnable to determine the methodology. Missing major elements.
5 pts
Total Points: 35