ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
Answer the below question.
Consider Composite Warfare and Mission Command, how are the two command and control philosophies complementary? Where do you see potential areas of confusion or friction if a Marine force is attempting to use both?
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
Two distinct but related command and control theories that have been widely embraced by military organizations around the world are Composite Warfare and Mission Command. Mission Command places a greater emphasis on delegating power and decision-making to the lowest level practicable than Composite Warfare, which emphasizes the integration of various capabilities to achieve a single goal.
These two strategies may appear to be at odds with one another at first, but they work best together in several ways. For instance, decentralized decision-making is a crucial component of Mission Command and is frequently utilized in Composite Warfare. Mission Command, which is essential in Composite Warfare, allows a Marine force to quickly respond to changing circumstances and adapt to the enemy’s tactics by delegating authority and decision-making to the lowest level practicable.
Additionally, a critical component of Composite Warfare, Mission Command enables leaders to ensure that their subordinates have a clear understanding of their goals. In composite warfare, several capabilities are combined to accomplish a single goal, and this goal must be made apparent to all troops engaged. By ensuring that each Marine is aware of their responsibility and how it fits into the larger objective, objective Command offers a framework for accomplishing this.
However, using Composite Warfare and Mission Command simultaneously could lead to misunderstandings and conflict. The devolution of authority is one possible source of misunderstanding. While in Mission Command, decision-making power is allocated to specific commanders, in Composite Warfare, it is frequently shared among various units. This can make it unclear as to who is ultimately in charge of making a given choice.
The integration of various capacities is another possible source of conflict. While Mission Command emphasizes delegating power and making decisions, Composite Warfare emphasizes the integration of several capabilities to accomplish a single goal. This could lead to a situation where various units are working toward separate goals instead of a single goal, which could be harmful to the success of the mission as a whole.
Finally, it should be noted that even though Composite Warfare and Mission Command complement command and control concepts, combining the two could result in misunderstandings and conflict. Marine forces must make sure that there is clear communication of objectives, that delegation of power is established, and that all units are working toward a common goal to overcome these difficulties. This will enable Marine units to successfully use Composite Warfare and Mission Command to accomplish their goals on the battlefield.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount