What, if anything, can the Rational choice theory (criminology) usefully add to our understanding of a contemporary crimes like terrorism, safety and security.
Terrorism is suicidal and, is popularly seen as “irrational,” but many political scientists argue otherwise.
This paper should aim to distinguish different senses of irrationality.
Moreover, how rational choices affect the typical terrorist sympathizer, and the active terrorists arguably stray from narrow self-interest and rational expectations, and how suicidal terrorists probably violate both.
Discuss it in an analytical way and using a minimum of 20 reference
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount