Post #2: Response Post Instructions (500 words required other than reference) 1)

Post #2: Response Post Instructions (500 words required other than reference)
1) Review the MSN Discussion Question Grading Rubric. (attached)
2) Read a selection of your colleagues’ initial posts. (Attached)
Case study -used by the colleague -her complete work attached
Group A: Case Study
Jasmine is a 67-year-old female patient who presents for follow-up for her hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Her PMH includes a diagnosis of aortic stenosis diagnosed 2 years ago, IBS, and a seizure disorder. Her family history includes her father, who died at age 55 years of myocardial infarction and her mother, who is deceased, who had hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. Her social history is positive for smoking 1 PPD for 30 years; she quit 9 years ago. She is negative for alcohol and drug use. She lives in a two-bedroom condominium on one floor.
Response Post Instructions
4) Analyze your colleague’s objective findings for the case. Determine if you would reject any or add any and discuss why.
5) Analyze your colleague’s discussion on the etiology and risk factors of the case. Discuss if you would reject any or add any and discuss why.
6) Analyze your colleague’s discussion on the effects of aging in the case. Discuss if you would reject any or add any and discuss why.
The initial post requires 500 or more words, supported by at least three scholarly references. Proofreading for spelling, grammar and punctuation are needed – along with APA formatting for the references. Post your response by the due date.
Justify your rationale with the use of credible sources, as well as any professional experiences which further develop your response. Examples of credible sources include clinical practice guidelines, peer-reviewed journal articles, research studies, and professional, non-biased websites. Textbooks are not to be used as the only source of supporting information in your posts.
The MSN Program supports the use of sources published in the past 5 years as a benchmark. However, foundational works may be quite old but still worth citing when you are establishing the context for your own work. This type of source may be used, but may not be included in the number of required sources published in the past 5 years.
Please refer to the Course Expectations document for the scoring rubric for discussion posts. Refer to your APA Manual or apastyle.org for assistance.
Your discussions will be evaluated on content, participation, writing, and scholarly support. No more than 5% of the post’s total word count should consist of direct quotes and all work not cited should be original. Your main post must cover the points and questions as noted in the discussion directions. Your responses to the opposing question’s initial responses should enhance the discussion by posing new questions, offering new ways to consider the issues being discussed, introducing new sources of information based on research, and building on ideas shared by your classmates.