Annotated Bibliography Write your annotated bibliographies in response to both t

Annotated Bibliography
Write your annotated bibliographies in response to both the articles listed below
Duck, J. (1993). Managing Change: The Art of Balancing. Harvard Business Review. Nov/Dec 93, 71(6), 109-118.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge age. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4) 298-318.
Click on Annotated Bibliography and look closer at the 3 areas that you need to address.
Be clear:
1. Critical Summary of Article
2. Critical Analysis of Research Methodology
3. Critical Analysis of the Results and Conclusions
Do this for both articles.
The preparation of Annotated Bibliographies is an important part It allows you, as
As a result, you need to use academically refereed or peer-reviewed journals to search for related research. You should look for research that both supports and contradicts your research efforts. In reviewing this additional research, you need to go beyond simply reading the articles to complete critical analyses of the purpose, research methods, and results documented in the article.
Each annotated bibliography includes the following three components. As this is your one opportunity to provide objective analysis, you need to use the 500 words. It is required that citations be included in the annotated bibliography as what you are writing comes directly from the article. Each paragraph should be cited. Failure to do so will result in a significant deduction of points. You may not use direct quotes in this assignment as everything should be paraphrased with the appropriate citations.
• Critical Summary of Article (150-200 words)
o Summarize the major themes of the journal article.
o Define the research problem being addressed by the author(s).
o Describe and discuss the relationships among the research problem, research questions, and hypotheses.
• Critical Analysis of Research Methodology (150-200 words)
o Comment on whether the author(s) used appropriate research methods to complete the research – be specific.
o Describe the specific research methods used – go beyond just stating whether a qualitative or quantitative model was used.
o Describe whether the author(s) used a sample and how the sample was determined – as appropriate. State whether the sample design was appropriate for the study.
o Describe the variables or functions measured and whether these variables or functions were appropriate for the study.
o Discuss whether the data collection process and analyses were done properly. Reference related statistics, if used in the study.
o Summarize whether the research methods support the conclusions reached by the author(s).
o You cannot indicate that there is no research method in this assignment. You cannot say there is not disciplined research methodology. If an article does not have an identifiable methodology, please find another article.
• Critical Analysis of the Results and Conclusions (100- 150 words)
o Summarize the results and conclusions of the article.
o Discuss how these results either support or do not support your research.
Please follow these requirements:
• Use correct APA citation in referencing the journal article.
• Use APA formatting guidelines (e.g. headings, line spacing in the annotation).
• Use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Annotation Tips
The following tips are provided to help complete the annotation
• Start each annotation at the top of a new page.
• Start with the correct APA reference for the article. This comes before your analysis begins. You must cite within the assignment.
• Include all three level one headings: (1) Critical Summary of Article, (2) Critical Analysis of Research Method, (3) Critical Analysis of the Results and Conclusions.
• Write clearly and focus on the critical parts of the research.
• Use these general guidelines on keeping the annotation to 5
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 1
Provides a comprehensive critical summary of the article.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 2
Provides a comprehensive critical summary of the article.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 1
Provides a comprehensive critical analysis of the research methods.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 2
Provides a comprehensive critical analysis of the research methods.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 1
Provides a critical summary of the results and conclusions to include a discussion of how this study supports or does not support your research.
Annotated Bibliography 2
Provides a critical summary of the results and conclusions to include a discussion of how this study supports or does not support your research.
Annotated Bibliography 1
Demonstrates an understanding of APA and includes excellent sentence structure and grammar.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Annotated Bibliography 2
Demonstrates an understanding of APA and includes excellent sentence structure and grammar.
Duck, J. (1993). Managing Change: The Art of Balancing. Harvard Business Review. Nov/Dec 93, 71(6), 109-118.
Rost, J. (2005). 21st Century Leadership: An Interview with Joseph Rost. See https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjLzaml0bnkAhXQTd8KHTR3DHIQFjAAegQIBRAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fintegralleadershipreview.com%2F5633-a-fresh-perspective-21st-century-leadership-an-interview-with-joseph-rost%2F&usg=AOvVaw0kbfU63aXuRgB6rFQojBSI
(Links to an external site.)
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge age.
Download Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge age.
The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4) 298-318.