Session 3 Reading Notes (Ch 6 & 7) Review Questions 6.1 What are the two psychos

Session 3 Reading Notes (Ch 6 & 7)
Review Questions
6.1 What are the two psychosocial tasks of infancy and toddlerhood, according to Erikson’s theory?
How can parents promote positive psychosocial development during infancy and toddlerhood?
6.2 What are examples of basic and self-conscious emotions?
How do infants regulate their emotions?
How do social interactions influence emotional development?
Describe cultural influences on emotional development
6.3 What is temperament?
What are three temperament styles?
What are three dimensions of temperament?
How stable is temperament?
How does goodness of fit influence emotional development?
What are cultural differences in temperament?
6.4 What is attachment? How do researchers measure infant attachment?
What are four patterns of infant attachment?
Describe cultural influences on attachment.
What are ways of promoting a secure parent–child attachment bond?
6.5 What is self-awareness, and how is it measured in infancy?
What is self-concept and when does it first emerge?
How does self-control develop?
Each week you will write reading notes on the assigned chapters. These will be a combination of summary (3 pages, 75%), and comments/reflections (1 page, 25%). The notes should be a Minimum of 4 FULL and a maximum of 8 full double spaced type-written, or word-processed pages (10-12 point font size, and maximum 1-inch margins).
Completeness will also be evaluated on how adequately the student covered all significant material, their questions or insight on that material, and any immediate reflections/responses to the material as they read it.
In your summary, focus on the general points and logic of the material. In your comments and reactions, mention Four things (Two from each chapter) that you specifically learned and want to remember from the course material. I encourage you to also include your reactions to the material, including connecting the course material to your own experiences and to material that you have encountered in other courses or in your profession.
Rubric
Reading Notes Rubric
Reading Notes Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of session material
Summary of session material
32 pts
The summary of the material is original, focused, unambiguous, and concise (i.e., without extra material). The writing could serve as a superior guide to the material.
26 pts
The summary of the material is clear, and reasonably well focused. The writing could serve as accurate, basic guide to the topic or problem; that is, the writing accurately explains the topic/problem. A typical summary.
20 pts
The summary of the material is somewhat clear and focused. The writing provides a minimally acceptable guide to the material, with the paper primarily restating the reading material.
10 pts
The summary of the material is limited, and not well focused. The writing contains most of the basic ideas appropriate to the material, but the ideas are not expressed well enough to be a safe guide to the readings.
5 pts
The summary of the material does not meaningfully exist. The writing contains only a small fraction of the ideas appropriate to the material, with noticeable omissions or errors, or the ideas are not presented clearly.
32 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis, comments, and reactions
8 pts
The paper not only explains the material, but goes beyond to analyze the underlying nature of the topic in a skillful fashion. The analysis of the material is original, focused, and concise, and goes beyond to analyze the underlying nature of the topic in an even-handed, skillful fashion. The session material is well connected to other course material and student experience.
6 pts
The analysis of the material is clear and reasonably focused. The analysis accurately explains the topic/problem, but does not provide any substantive analysis of the topic/problem or any connections to other material or student experience. A typical analysis/reaction.
4 pts
The analysis of the material is limited and not well focused. The analysis and reactions are not expressed well enough to be a safe guide for someone else to use. There is minimal connection to student experience or to other material from outside the course.
2 pts
There is a lack of analysis of the topic beyond the basic ideas. There is little to no connection to student experience or to other material from outside the course.
1 pts
The analysis of the material is limited and not well focused. The analysis and reactions are not expressed well enough to be a safe guide for another person.
8 pts
Total Points: 40