Please i need form you 1- propose a method to reduce waste or increase recycling

Please i need form you
1- propose a method to reduce waste or increase recycling rate over the already existing technologies in the literature, and show by theory and experiment that it is correct.
There are only way to solve this problem : invent new technologies that reduce the environmental impact.
Please check the Additional materials.
Here is my draft with my professor this is the most important comments and guidelines
1-name of the file (The research objective) ,
My professor comments are :
It seems that the style of your paper or presentation consists of the following,
Find a credible document and determine the facts as stated in it.
Next, create your own opinion from multiple facts.
In the conclusion, you summarize your opinion as a problem statement.
First of all, research is not a survey nor report. Internationally, the indicators used for research evaluation are originality, novelty, and credibility. In other words, if you create your own opinion by collecting the ideas of others that already exist, it is not research. That is called a critique. Especially in the field of engineering, it is essential to propose a new technology to solve a problem. Listing questions does not constitute research. The reason is that the problem has not been solved by your research.
A literature review is not done to find answers to a research question, but to find out how far others have gone in solving the same problem. If there is literature that has the same idea as yours, it means that the research has already been done and there is no need to do a new research. Reliability can also be obtained by checking the evaluation of your proposed technology through experiments and simulations.
I did reply
With regard to emissions, I presume we are narrowing the scope to those related to oil. Therefore, which option suits my thesis ,How about green well-completions to recover a significant portion of the product that would have been fared, or vented, thereby increasing emissions? This technology would not only reduce volatile organic compounds and methane emissions, but would also improve water recovery for reuse in the oil processing cycle.
What advice thoughts, or input?
How about using renewable sources of energy to minimize emissions arising from enhanced oil recovery?
Alternatively, should the approach relate to emission reduction in the actual product? Reduced emission completions (or green completions) may recoup the costs of isolating natural gas from the flow-back liquid .
There are numerous approaches to problem; that’s why I sought your clarification/approval.
However, since the topic deals with emission reduction technology, or recycling, I have narrowed down the topic to containing the menace from the source.
Given the environmental cost of venting and flaring (combustion of hydrocarbons that would have otherwise been vented), green well completion seems to be the most viable option to offset the loss of natural gas and other hydrocarbon streams that would have otherwise been vented, or flared during hydro-fracking. This process filters out and recycles water for future fracturing tasks. In essence, REC focuses on product recovery, and emission reduction during the oil/gas production phase.
Benefits of this approach: The process reduces:
1) Methane and VOC emissions (unlike venting).
2) PM25, oxides of nitrogen, and carbon monoxide (relative to flaring).
Since the research is open-ended, and a prerequisite for a dissertation to follow thereafter, please i need yore approval to start.
2-My professor reply me
I will send you the attached file as an example of a science and technology paper.(Name of file 1-article )
The problem that this paper focuses on is defined as “every vertical well is only partially completed
a larger pressure drop of fluid flow caused by restricted regions, thus increasing the skin factor”. “optimizing skin factor variables is devising and
testing suitable partial penetration skin and comparing completion options” is the point of view that can solve the problem, and “The work developed a simple correlation for predicting the partial penetration skin factor for perforated” is shown as their unique idea. Finally, they conducted a comparison experiment and came to the conclusion that “Compared to other approaches, the novel correlation
performs well by providing estimates for the partial penetration skin factor that are relatively close to those obtained
by the tested models. “.
In this way, the paper explains what the problem is, how they came up with the new idea, and shows the effectiveness of the idea.
3- professor send this
Neither you nor I have any knowledge of the chemistry involved in the well completion technique, and it would be very difficult to conduct experiments to prove the correctness of the idea. For these reason, I do not recommend changing the theme to Well completion. The paper I have given you today should be read as an example of a scientific and technical paper. You do not need to understand the detailed contents, but you do need to understand the structure of the chapters (how to refer to past research, define the problem from past technology and the problem you are trying to solve, propose your new idea, and prove the correctness of your idea).
I don’t agree to change the theme easily when we encounter some unknown matter. I strongly recommend that we continue with the current trend and continue with the theme on waste reduction. In Saudi Arabia, the price of oil is very low, which makes the cost of recycling relatively very high. This is the reason why the recycling rate is capped. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, it is important to develop technologies that will lower the recycling cost than the technologies used in other countries.
One thing to consider when thinking of a solution to this problem. Saudi Arabia has long hours of sunshine, so solar power can provide inexpensive electricity. This power can be used to reduce recycling costs. The idea is that the difference in sunlight hours will be the difference between the recycling costs in other countries.
However, it should be shown in your research what recycling process should use solar energy and how much recycling cost can be reduced by this technology.
Lastly there is attached material show what is have been present to my professor .
1- Presentation 1
Comments by professor about it
This is a feed-back for your today’s presentation material.
P6
As I pointed out before, this graph is a cheating graph. The scale on the vertical axis intentionally limits the range so that the values appear to be increasing, when in fact the percentage increase is a low value.
P8
The main theme of your master’s thesis is to propose ways to increase the recycling rate in Saudi Arabia, where the cost of using crude oil is extremely low. ethics needs to be increased, but no matter how much the public perception changes, the recycling rate will not increase if there are economic constraints.
P10
I don’t understand the meaning of the calculation. The recycling rate is the amount of waste recycled divided by the total amount of waste, so the percentage shown is not the recycling rate.
P13
First of all, in order to clarify the method of the research, you should have calculated the social cost by adding external costs based on the theory of environmental economics. the figure of P10 should be the result of the calculation of P13.
2-Presentation 2 name ( Economics of recycling )