Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an exp

Learning Goal: I’m working on a business law discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.BUS-225: Legal Environment of BusinessI will provide the book link. Getting StartedTo establish a cause of action for negligence, a plaintiff must first prove that the defendant owed a legal duty of care to the plaintiff. Next, the plaintiff must show that the defendant breached that duty of care and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of the harm suffered by the plaintiff. Finally, the plaintiff must prove they suffered recognizable damages for which the court can provide recovery.Upon successful completion of the course material, you will be able to:Explain the elements of negligence.
ResourcesTextbook: Business Law and the Legal Environment
Radio broadcast: It’s a Duel: Do Violent Video Games Affect Kids?
Webpage: JAMES v. MEOW MEDIA INC
Background InformationConsider the following scenario:Best Herbals, Inc.Best Herbals, Inc., sells natural remedy medicines. Although the company is aware that its diet pills pose a risk of heart damage, the company decides not to update its product label warning because it is too costly and may damage sales. As a result of Best Herbal’s business decision, one of its consumers, Tonya, suffers a heart attack after ingesting the diet pills. Tonya eventually recovers from the heart attack, but her hospitalization causes her to miss two weeks of work.In this scenario, Best Herbals, Inc., owes a duty to warn consumers of possible side effects associated with its products. The company breached its duty by failing to warn its customers of possible side effects. It is foreseeable that a customer would be injured by the lack of a warning. The harm Tonya suffered was a direct result of the company’s breach. Best Herbals, Inc., must compensate Tonya for her injury (heart attack) and damages incurred (hospital bill and lost wages).As this lesson’s media on video game violence illustrates, actual causation is one of the most difficult negligence elements to prove. The plaintiff must show that the defendant’s act or omission was the cause in fact of the harm suffered by the plaintiff. That is, the plaintiff must establish that “but for” the defendant’s action or inaction, the plaintiff would not have been harmed. In the case of video games, causation is difficult to prove because of conflicting research about the impact video games have on kids.InstructionsReview the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
In your textbook Business Law and the Legal Environment, read section 7.1 “Purpose of Tort Laws” and section 7.3 “Negligence” from Chapter 7, “Introduction to Tort Law”.
Listen to the National Public Radio presentation “It’s a Duel: Do Violent Video Games Affect Kids?” You can also read the transcript on the web page.Make note of at least two opposing viewpoints about how violent video games affect kids.
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:Explain the elements of negligence and why the plaintiffs felt the defendants were negligent.
Why did the appeals court rule in favor of the defendants in this case?
In your opinion, do you believe the defendants owed a duty of care to the plaintiffs? Explain your viewpoint.
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
Your postings also should:Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ide