it is 4 page of the template but just to fill. Each question need 1-2 sentences

it is 4 page of the template but just to fill. Each question need 1-2 sentences
Assignment Item Response
IMPORTANT NOTE: Simply answering an item does not mean
you will earn credit. Points will be deducted for answers that
are vague or erroneous. It is possible that vague or incorrect
answers will receive no points. Please make sure your
answers are clear, accurate and specific. We will review the
article abstract to check for the accuracy of the answers you
provide on this assignment.
1. Purpose of the study: Review the
Abstract, Background, Introduction
and/or Review of Literature section
from the research article. In 1-2
sentences, write what was the
purpose, objective, or aim of the
study.
2. Identify the theoretical
framework for the study: Review
the article’s Theoretical framework
section and identify the key factors
from the theory that support the
research design. Discuss each key
factor individually and explain why
these factors are essential and
how they impact the research
design. Discuss why the use of a
theoretical framework is essential
in research design, give specific
examples and citations to support
your position.
3. Type of Research Study
Design: Review the Abstract,
Background, Introduction, Review of
2
2
Literature and/or methods section
from the article. In 1 sentence,
classify the research design for the
study. Please select ONLY one of
these: 1) RCT/Experimental, 2)
Quasi-experimental, or 3) non-
experimental.
4. Level of Evidence: Review the
Levels of Evidence that different
research articles provide. 1 one-
sentence, classify the level of
evidence the article you selected
provides. Explain your rationale,
provide citations and references.
5. Sample: Review the methods section
of your selected research article. In 1
sentence, describe the sample for the
study: 1) provide the sample size and
if applicable the 2) age, and 3)
gender. In 3-5 sentences discuss the
role of Power Analysis and why it is
important in research.
6. Independent and Dependent
Variable/s: From the abstract, the
introduction, or the methods section of
the research article, provide in 1-2
sentences the independent and
dependent variable/s of the study.
7. Operational Definition of
Independent Variable: Review the
method section of your selected
research article. In 1-5 sentences,
describe how the independent
variables were operationalized.
3
3
8. Operational Definition/s of
Dependent Variable/s: What are the
operational definitions for the
dependent variables. Provide your
answer in 1-5 sentences.
9. Sampling method: Review the
method section. In 1 sentence,
describe what kind of sampling was
used to get participants into the study.
For example, did the researchers use
convenience or purpose, random
selection, sampling, snowball
sampling?
10. Ethics: Review the method section.
In 1-2 sentences, describe the
protection provided to human subjects
or the IRB process. If applicable, in 1
sentence describe any ethical, legal
or human subject issues you think are
worth mentioning.
11. Statistics: Review the data analysis
section, the result section, and look at
the tables in the article. In 3-5
sentences, state what descriptive and
inferential statistics were used in this
study.
12. Results: Review the result section. In
3-5 sentences describe the results of
the study.
13. Discussion: Review the discussion
section, provide a synopsis of the
discussion, what did they learn, what
was the impact of the study, did they
get the results they were looking for,
what kind of issues occurred, is there
4
4
a need for future studies, and why or
why not?
14. Limitations: What were the key
points identified in the limitations
section?
15. Conclusion: What did the
researchers conclude?
Objectives
Critique published research
Analyze the purpose, characteristics, and limitations of major types of scientific inquiry
Evaluate the application of the results of research studies as applied to nursing care situations
Road map
Carefully read the assignment instructions
Open and read through the template/form for this assignment.
If you do not use this template you will earn a 0 on the assignment.
Only documents with the extensions doc, docx, or pdf will be uploaded.
You will not be able to upload documents with the .pages extension.
You only have one (1) attempt for this assignment.
Review the grading rubric at the bottom of the page.
1. Article
Locate the article in Appendix A of your textbook
Article Title: Nursing case management, peer coaching, and hepatitis A and B vaccine completion among homeless men recently released on parole
Research Article Appraisal
Research Article Appraisal
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of the study
1. Purpose of the study: Review the Abstract, Background, Introduction and/or Review of Literature section from the research article. In 1-2 sentences, write what was the purpose, objective, or aim of the study.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework
2. Identify the theoretical framework for the study: Review the article’s Theoretical framework section and identify the key factors from the theory that support the research design. Discuss each key factor individually and explain why these factors are essential and how they impact the research design. Discuss why the use of a theoretical framework is essential in research design, give specific examples and citations to support your position.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeType of research study design
3. Type of Research Study Design: Review the Abstract, Background, Introduction, Review of Literature and/or methods section from the article. In 1 sentence, classify the research design for the study. Please select ONLY one of these: 1) RCT/Experimental, 2) Quasi-experimental, or 3) non-experimental.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevel of evidence
4. Level of Evidence: Review the Levels of Evidence that different research articles provide. 1 one-sentence, classify the level of evidence the article you selected provides. Explain your rationale, provide citations and references.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample
5. Sample: Review the methods section of your selected research article. In 1 sentence, describe the sample for the study: 1) provide the sample size and if applicable the 2) age, and 3) gender. In 3-5 sentences discuss the role of Power Analysis and why it is important in research.
15 pts
Met expectations
8 pts
Partially met expectations
4 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expetations
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIndependent and dependent variables
6. Independent and Dependent Variable/s: From the abstract, the introduction, or the methods section of the research article, provide in 1-2 sentences the independent and dependent variable/s of the study.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally meets expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOperational Definition of independent Variable/s
7. Operational Definition of Independent Variable: Review the method section of your selected research article. In 1-5 sentences, describe how the independent variables were operationalized.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOperational definition of Dependent variables
8. Operational Definition/s of Dependent Variable/s: What are the operational definitions for the dependent variables. Provide your answer in 1-5 sentences.
10 pts
Met expectations
5 pts
Partially met expectations
3 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSampling method
9. Sampling method: Review the method section. In 1 sentence, describe what kind of sampling was used to get participants into the study. For example, did the researchers use convenience or purpose, random selection, sampling, snowball sampling?
2 pts
Met expectations
1 pts
Partially met expectations
0.5 pts
Minimally meets expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthics
Ethics: Review the method section. In 1-2 sentences, describe the protection provided to human subjects or the IRB process. If applicable, in 1 sentence describe any ethical, legal or human subject issues you think are worth mentioning.
3 pts
Met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatistics
11. Statistics: Review the data analysis section, the result section, and look at the tables in the article. In 3-5 sentences, state what descriptive and inferential statistics were used in this study.
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults
12. Results: Review the result section. In 3-5 sentences describe the results of the study.
10 pts
Met expectations
6 pts
Partially met expectations
4 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion
13. Discussion: Review the discussion section, provide a synopsis of the discussion, what did they learn, what was the impact of the study, did they get the results they were looking for, what kind of issues occurred, is there a need for future studies, and why or why not?
10 pts
Met expectations
6 pts
Partially met expectations
4 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations
14. Limitations: What were the key points identified in the limitations section?
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially meets e
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
15. Conclusion: What did the researchers conclude?
5 pts
Met expectations
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
Did not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
APA format, citations, and references listed. Proper spelling and grammar.
5 pts
Full Marks
3 pts
Partially met expectations
2 pts
Minimally met expectations
0 pts
No Marks
5 pts
Total Points: 100

Simply answering an item does not mean you will earn credit. Points will be deducted for answers that are vague or erroneous. It is possible that vague or incorrect answers will receive no points. Please make sure your answers are clear, accurate, and specific.
Please review the grading rubric and ask a question if you need any clarification on this assignment.