Attend to all parts of the question and give a thorough account, explaining the

Attend to all parts of the question and give a thorough account, explaining the respective positions. You will also want to argue for one approach over another, offering reasons that would appeal to the fair-minded or neutral reader, one interested solely in learning the truth.
On New Year’s Eve, Sober Stan swerves to avoid a deer, hits a patch of ice on the road, and accidentally plows into a family of four out for a walk, killing them all. On the following morning Drunk Dan, inebriated after a night of partying, loses control of his vehicle and plows into a different family of four, killing them all.
Was Sober Stan free to do otherwise? Is he morally responsible for the deaths? Was Drunk Dan free to do otherwise? Is he morally responsible for the deaths?
Briefly explain hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism, and show how proponents of each approach would answer all of the above questions. Along the way, you’ll want to be sure to explain the difference between compatibilism and incompatibilism. At the end, which approach seems strongest to you here? Why? Elaborate fully.
Do not quote other sources — either from within the files or from without –. Put matters in your own words. Evidence that work has been appropriated directly from elsewhere will resign in a zero on the assignment and in some cases a failing grade in the class.