After listening to the excerpt linked below from Radiolab’s episode “Blame” on n

After listening to the excerpt linked below from Radiolab’s episode “Blame” on neurolaw (and referencing the readings & lectures posted this week), please answer these questions:
How would d’Holbach respond to the problem/issue the podcast raised, and how do you know (i.e., what parts of the reading indicate this to you)?
In your opinion, should advances in neuroscience be taken into account in criminal legal cases? Are the determinists right that the concept of ‘blame’ is outdated? Why/why not?
Post an answer of at least 150 words, and 1 response to a classmate of at least 75 words.
Excerpt on neurolaw from Radiolab’s “Blame” episode:
****IMPORTANT**** REPLY REQUIRED OR I WILL NOT RELEASE THE WHOLE PAYMEANT