answer this in 250 words (don’t use external sources only the pdf uploaded – don’t use google it will be counted as plagiarism your original thoughts only based on the reading uploaded): Tooze argues for a materialist interpretation of the 12 year history of the Third Reich that merges economic and military history. This means he wants to understand the motivations of the Nazi elite as both emerging from, and constrained by, material economic conditions. However, he does not deny the importance of the 70+ year study of ideology and culture that has long characterized scholarship on Nazi Germany. How does what you read stress the material motivations behind the Nazi elite’s rebuilding of the German military, their waging of WWII, and their execution of the Holocaust and other atrocities in eastern Europe? How does Tooze’s analysis emphasize economic constraints on Germany’s options as both a determinant of the Nazi elite’s actions and a cause of the actual historical outcomes under consideration? Do you feel that ideological and cultural considerations are given adequate weight in Tooze’s explanation of the events between 1933-45?
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount