Step 1: Write a rough draft of your essay and include it in this assignment. Please note that I am not reading these rough drafts, but I want to make sure that everyone has one written so that they can spend some time editing and revising. So a rough draft is part of this grade. (20 pts)
Step 2: Review the rubric for the essay, then answer each of the following questions. You must be specific; you can’t say “I reviewed the PowerPoint.” You also can’t say “I haven’t used one yet.” Your answer must clearly show that you know the rules.
Copy and paste your sentences that show that you’ve used the following components, then answer the questions. (25 points) Do not forget this part! Also, do NOT put your answers in quotes (except, of course, for answers 3 and 4 when you are including quotes). Highlighting your sentences in your rough draft for me to find does not fulfill this part of the assignment.
1. What is your creative title? How do you know you’ve written it correctly? (See Titles PowerPoint) Write the title with your answer.
2. How do you know the appositive is used and punctuated correctly? (See Appositives PowerPoint) Write your appositive with your answer.
3. How do you know you used the colon quote correctly? (See Varying Quotes PowerPoint) Write your colon quote with your answer.
4. How do you know you’ve used the embedded quote correctly? (See Varying Quotes PowerPoint) Write your embedded quote with your answer.
5. How do you know you’ve used the semicolon sentence correctly? (See semicolon section in textbook). Write your semicolon sentence with your answer.
The rough draft, questions, and sentences must be submitted on the same document. Rough draft on top, questions and sentences right below. (5 points for submitting on same document)
5 points for formatting your responses like the sample below.
Your answers to the questions should be formatted like this. (Note: Your sample on one line without quotation marks –unless actually designating a direct quote– and the answer to the question on the next line.)
1. What is your creative title? How do you know you’ve written it correctly? (See Titles PowerPoint)
Bucs Beat the Saints in a Decisive Victory
I know my title is written correctly because all significant words are capitalized and key words from the essay are used.
Category: Writing
Research has determined that explicit and systematic reading instruction is esse
Research has determined that explicit and systematic reading instruction is essential for students to become proficient readers, whether beginning readers, struggling readers, or high-performing students. Systematic instruction follows a logical sequence from beginning to progressively more advanced skills. Explicit instruction does not assume that children will learn the core components of reading on their own, but instead provides a controlled and supportive environment in which to learn the skills correctly the first time. These skills are taught through modeling, guided practice with immediate, corrective feedback, and sufficient repetition in multiple contexts to support mastery and automaticity, including differentiation to meet the needs of all learners.
View the videos, “Literacy Lesson First Grade” and “3rd Grade Main Idea Lesson.” Create a graphic organizer to compare and contrast how the two teachers used the following five components of effective literacy instruction:
Explicit instruction with modeling
Systematic instruction with scaffolding
Student practice with multiple opportunities
Assessment and progress monitoring
Feedback
Write a 250-500 word analysis addressing the following questions:
How was each lesson taught effectively?
How could modeling have been improved?
How did each teacher address exceptionalities (ELL, gifted and talented, special education) during the lessons?
How did each teacher scaffold the lesson to meet students’ various needs?
Support this assignment with 2-3 scholarly resources.
Based on Lecture 1, and the 4 news articles (PDFs), Buck 2012 (PDF), Sells 2007
Based on Lecture 1, and the 4 news articles (PDFs), Buck 2012 (PDF), Sells 2007 (PDF) & Sachedina 2006 (PDF), answer the following questions in about 2 paragraphs each, or more, if specified by the prompt. A paragraph consists of about 5-7 sentences.
1) Based on the Module One lecture, explain what is meant by the “Muhammadi Revolution,” and then describe at least two changes that the Muhammadi Revolution brought to pre-Islamic Arabian society. After this, identify three points from the lecture that stood out to you. Make sure that these points come from different sections of the lecture as a way to demonstrate that you engaged with the entire lecture. Re-state these three points in your own words and, for each one, explain how these points expanded your knowledge about the Qur’an and/or Islam as a whole. Please note if and how each point either countered or reinforced your expectations about the Qur’an and Islam.
2) Based on the lecture and news articles on the Qur’an controversy, discuss at least three misconceptions about Islam and Muslims. For each point, counter it with information that would lead to a more accurate understanding.
3) This question should be based mainly on your reading of Sells (2007), keeping in mind that readings from this book were at the center of a national-level controversy. If you were a new undergraduate at university who did not enroll in a Qur’an class and these excerpts were included as part of your freshman orientation, required reading, what would your reaction be and why?
4) Also based on Sells (2007), describe in your own words, at least three important lessons Sell’s reading taught you about the Qur’an, its topics, its language, its sound qualities, and the meaning of its surahs. After reading Sells (2007), Buck (2012), and revisiting the news articles, discussion and lecture expand upon your initial discussion post about the Qur’an controversy. Drawing upon Buck (2012) and at least one of your classmates’ discussion posts, elaborate upon at least two new insights you have developed regarding the 2002 controversy about teaching the Qur’an. With this, discuss how the Buck (2012) and. What role did the stereotyping of the Muslims Islamophobia, and political events play in this controversy? Or, if you believe that this has nothing to do with Islamophobia, stereotyping, or politics, explain your position. In your own words, explain how controversies such as this could negatively impact teaching courses on the Qur’an or Islam in general. If yes, highlight at least one reason to support your viewpoint. Or, if you do not believe that this controversy is likely to have a negative impact on undergraduate education, explain why not.
5) Based on Sachedina (2006), explain in your own words what the Qur’an teaches us about other world religions? Then, drawing on at least two examples from the reading, discuss how the Qur’an offers a model of coexistence among Muslims and non-Muslims.
watch it here: https://youtu.be/XhceEJ1R_vY?t=1. For this weeks discussion, refl
watch it here: https://youtu.be/XhceEJ1R_vY?t=1.
For this weeks discussion, reflect on what you observed in Sound and Fury. Describe what you saw in terms of:
Audism
The three views of deafness
Medical
Social
Cultural-Linguistic
What struggles do the Deaf individuals go through?
What struggles do the families of Deaf individuals go through?
In addition, I would like everyone to address the question posed at the end of the movie – Is not implanting a Deaf child with a cochlear implant abuse?
Prepare a 4-page environmental analysis briefing report that examines environmen
Prepare a 4-page environmental analysis briefing report that examines environmental issues that affect the health care organization you have selected, including the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats you have identified for the organization.
For this assessment, use the Environmental Analysis Briefing Report Assessment Template [DOCX] to prepare a 4- page briefing report. Imagine creating this report for your CEO to review. Keep your report precise, clear, and professional.
Provide a brief introduction to this report and its purpose.
Use the factor from the AHA’s most recent Environmental Scan report you chose for the first assessment and evaluate 3 environmental issues you feel best relate to this factor and your organization.
Using a tool of your choice or a tool your current workplace uses (e.g., TOWS, SWOT, PESTEL, et cetera), evaluate where the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats exist related to this factor.
Explain the tool you chose for the internal and external analysis and why you chose it.For example, if you chose workforce as your factor, what tool would you use to determine the issues?
Explain the environmental issues you identified using the tool you chose and that are related to the AHA factor you chose. Explain how these issues impact the growth of the organization and why.
Explain your plan to address the issues identified in your analysis.
Use evidence to support your assertions about how you would address the issues.For example, for workforce, you might consider SHRM as one of your resources.
Depending on the factor chosen, consider additional data and resources from reputable sources and associations such as the American Hospital Association (AHA), American College of Health care Executives (ACHE), National Center for Health care Leadership (NHCL), National Institutes of Health (NIH), et cetera.
Attach the tool you used as an appendix after the reference page of your report.
Supporting Evidence: Include at least 5 academic or scholarly sources that match their in-text citations.
Write a reflection on Brene Brown: The Wholehearted Inventory.assessment res Did
Write a reflection on Brene Brown: The Wholehearted Inventory.assessment res Did you learn anything about yourself with this assessment? Discuss one or two of the guideposts and how you might integrate suggestions into your leadership development in terms of cultivating and letting go. How might this assessment assist in the development of a team mindset?
Requirements: 1/2 page
Length:1250-1500 words The company that I want to talk about is (Etihad Airways)
Length:1250-1500 words
The company that I want to talk about is (Etihad Airways)
This video defines the 7S Frameworks
Write the paper in simple language; don’t make it formal (as a student
Objective: This assignment requires you to critically analyze an organization using the McKinsey 7S Framework. You will explore how the elements of the framework interact to influence organizational effectiveness, strategic alignment, and the role of individuals and departments within the organization.
Part 1: Application of the 7S Framework (750-1000 words)
Instructions: Select a UAE-based company you are familiar with which is Etihad Airways. Apply each element of the 7S Framework (Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Style, Staff, Skills) to analyze the organization. For each ‘S’, follow the steps below and tag the relevant Learning Outcomes (LOs).
Describe the current state of each element within the organization
Analyze how each element affects the company’s performance (e.g., contributing to success or causing challenges).
Evaluate the effectiveness of these elements in their current state.
Identify the gaps that could prevent alignment and effectiveness within the organization.
Their strategy
Part 2: Strategic Action Plan of Recommendations (500 words)
Instructions: Based on your analysis in Part 1, develop a Strategic Action Plan of Recommendations that outlines the steps the organization should take to address the identified gaps and enhance its overall alignment and effectiveness according to the 7S Framework.
Your Strategic Action Plan should include the following sections:
**Action Steps: **Identify specific actions that the organization should take to address the gaps or weaknesses you identified in Part 1.
**Responsible Parties: **Identify who within the organization would be responsible for implementing each action.
Measuring Effectiveness: Describe how you would measure the success of each recommendation. What changes would you expect in the organization? Include specific indicators of success.
Identify the gap, improving the issues, and how to fill it up, look for gaps, and come up with recommendation, solution and how to fill the gaps.
LO Tagging Requirement
#OrgStructure: Analyze and apply organizational design principles.
#ProcessSystem: Differentiate effective and efficient processes and control systems.
#StrategicAlignment: Align organizational strategy with structures and processes.
#HumansInOrgs: Analyze the success (or failure) of a firm at the level of individuals and teams.
#ProfessionalWorkProduct: Follows the established guidelines for the task and academic conventions in writing and presentations.
Use footnotes or annotations to indicate where you are addressing specific LOs.
After you make a point that addresses a specific LO, insert a footnote with the LO tag. Example: “The company’s shift to a hybrid structure has enhanced collaboration across departments, fostering innovation.”
Writing Tips:
** Be Specific:** Use concrete examples from your selected organization to support your analysis and recommendations.
– Tag Thoughtfully: Ensure that the LO tags are relevant and clearly linked to the points you are making.
– Proofread: Carefully review your paper for clarity, coherence, and correct LO tagging.
Task summary: Please watch the following news article that is geared towards edu
Task summary: Please watch the following news article that is geared towards education majors and answer the questions in 50 words each for a total of 400 words, MLA-style. Please number your responses.
Full order description:
📋 MAIN DETAILS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5aexyCekZM&t=2s
Questions for the Brief Analysis
1. Please give an overview of the initiative. Feel free to copy + paste from the transcripts below video. As always, include quotation marks and a in-text citation when quoting the article (Nawaz and Quevas).
2. Are the facts that outline the initiative complete? Are they detailed enough? is there any information missing? Explain your decision.
3. Please provide at least 2 pieces of background information on statistics of need and shortages of substitute teachers, as well as any background information on National Guard deployment (again, feel free to copy + paste from the transcripts )
4. Does this background information help in understanding the need for such the call for National Guard to serve as substitute teachers? Does the background information give an understanding of the success of the deployment? Explain your decision.
5. How may people give statements? List each person’s name and their affiliation.
6. Rank each individual giving a statement in terms of expertise in education. Hint: National Guard members and students are not experts in education, although they can inform the article.
7. What is the emotional appeal of the video (list any part that you believe had humor or was a “feel good”? Is there a bias in the reporting?
8. Is the emotional appeal appropriate (does it overshadow the facts or statements?)
in CONR 602, 603, and 604, you learned foundational skills such as the importanc
in CONR 602, 603, and 604, you learned foundational skills such as the importance of empathy, differentiating between positions and interests, and how to acknowledge and reframe emotions. Reflecting on that knowledge and on this week’s readings, respond to the following prompts:
Introduction
Why is it important for a conflict-competent leader to master the basic skills of integrative negotiation and mediation in the workplace? Provide at least one example of a time when you used these skills in the workplace. If you have not used integrative negotiation or mediation in your workplace setting, discuss how they might have been useful in a previous workplace conflict situation.
Describe a scenario in which you used or witnessed someone else use empathetic listening skills to resolve a workplace conflict.
Reflect on a time in your work life when the differentiation between positions and interests provided (or could have provided) a path to positive conflict resolution.
Reflect on a time when the reframing of emotions helped (or would have helped) to resolve a workplace conflict.
Conclusion
Paper Specs
Create a cover page with your name, course number, assignment title, word count, and date.
Paper should be 1600 – 1700 words.
Do not include cover page, headings, quotes, or references in your word count.
Include a subheading for each rubric line.
Do not quote your sources. Paraphrase, cite, and reference using APA format.
Double-space your paper.
Use 12-point Times New Roman font.
Submit your completed paper as a Word document files
Assignment 4: The Conflict-Competent Leader
Assignment 4: The Conflict-Competent Leader
CriteriaRatingsPts
Introduction/ 2.5 pts
Student thoroughly reflected on how mastery of basic integrative negotiation and mediation skills contribute to conflict competency in a workplace leader and provided an appropriate example of how s/he has used or might be able to use them.
/ 20 pts
Student described an experience of witnessing the use of empathetic listening skills to resolve a workplace conflict.
/ 20 pts
Student displayed a thorough knowledge of the difference between issues and interests by providing a detailed and appropriate example.
/ 20 pts
Student provided an appropriate example of reframing emotions in a workplace conflict with sufficient detail to demonstrate a strong understanding of the concept.
/ 20 pts
Conclusion
/ 2.5 pts
Paper is 1600-1700 words in length (excluding headings, prompts, quotes, and reference page), is formatted according to APA guidelines, and includes in-text citations and a reference page. Papers without citations and a reference page will be returned for a rewrite with deductions taken for late submission.
/ 7.5 pts
Paper exceeds basic writing standards including grammar, usage, spelling, punctuation, and organization.
/ 7.5 pts
PART 1—- Referencing Harvest of Empire, discuss your thoughts and feelings about
PART 1—-
Referencing Harvest of Empire, discuss your thoughts and feelings about the role American foreign policy has played in the immigration of Latinos to America. Use specific examples to support your response.
Individual responses to discussion questions should be 150-200 words. Each response to classmates must follow 3CQ format: One compliment, one comment, one connection (for example, to your own experience), and one question.
PART 2——-
Your final assignment in this class will be a comparative essay on two or more groups we have discussed this term Click the following link for guidelines: ETHN-HIST 107 Comparative Analysis Essay Prompt.docx (1).pdf
To help prepare you organize your thoughts and essay contents, please complete the essay outline: Comparative Essay Outline (rev.).docx by Sunday September 22nd.
Your outline should include your thesis statement, the sources you plan to use listed in MLA format, as well as the themes/concepts you plan to use to support your thesis. I will provide feedback within one week after submission date.
PART 3——-
For this week, you will approach your reading response slightly different. Instead of a paragraph formatted response, please provide responses to the questions below for Takaki Chapter 7 and OER Chapter 6:4 Racialization and Identity. Each reading should have its own response to the questions. This means you will follow this same format twice. Each entry is worth 20 points for a combined total of 40 points. Be sure to use complete sentences when providing your responses.
1. What is the title of reading and the author(s).
2. Provide a two-three sentence summary–what is it about?
3. Please list three main points from reading.
4. What are two things you learned and/or are taking away from reading.
5. What is one question you have about this reading?