Category: Writing

Assignment Brief: Trend, Issue, and Innovation
Select ONE trend category as a focus (political, economic, social, technological,
environmental, legal, or demographic). Choose a Topic within that category that
you are interested in and that pertains to human services.
Write as though the Executive Director or Chair of the Board of an organization
requires the information and will depend on your analysis and recommendations
to make wise strategic decisions for the organization or sector. [1400 words, APA, NO AI, NO plag]

Compose an essay of 2,900 words (not including bibliography) for one of the below essay questions
Essay titles:
1. Evaluate the utility of the work of Habermas for understanding how public relations might develop a stronger ethical underpinning to practice.
2. Rhetorical paradigms for scholarship in PR acknowledge the widespread use of a) rhetorical advocacy and b) dialogue in public relations practice. Critically assess Robert Heath’s claims that such practices play an important role in making “society effective”.
3. How can we understand public relations as a form of cultural intermediary work?
4. “Public affairs and lobbying are tools that ensure the rich and powerful always get their way”: Evaluate and discuss the evidence in academic literature for accepting or rejecting this statement.
5. How does the concept of the information subsidy help us explore the relationship between the mass media and public relations?
6. Critically apply the literature on framing to analyse how at least two organisations have attempted to influence public policy debate in your national context.
7. Critically assess the impact on the media of the deployment of public relations by governments in contemporary liberal democratic societies. In your answer you should analyse the roles and relationships of at least two of the following; journalists, Government Information Officers (GIOs) and Special Advisers (SpAds).

*** Words count = 2,900 words.
*** In-Text Citations and Referencing using Harvard style.

The links should now be working on the Module 7 assignment.
REVISED Module 7 Prompt:
1.Pew Research Study: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
1. Using that study, locate a specific state of the US and examine a religious trend within that region.
2. As you examine its trends, what is significant about that region’s results?
3. Using the survey questionnaire, what kind of questions reflect why you found this region worth discussing on this response?
2. Link to the study’s questionnaire: II (pewforum.org)
3. Link to demographic info: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/
4. Upload to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday 10/6/24
GENERAL RESPONSE CRITERIA:
1. The response must be at least 300 words (approximately 1 full page) and demonstrate course-related knowledge.
2. Provide multiple citations from the course textbook.
1. Cite Hark. Cite Hark again. Cite Hark like a fanboy/girl.
3. The response requires academic writing style and formatting that corresponds with your particular discipline.
4. This should be a double-spaced document written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Top 10 Ways To Avoid Losing Points On A RSCH201 Writing Assignment
Keep this list handy while writing your paper:
Early on, mention the author’s full name(s) the first time that you mention them. A last name can be used afterwards.
Early on, provide the full name of the main reference article. Afterwards, “the study” or “the research” or a shortened version like “in Unaware…”
Provide Hark tie-ins and citations. This is a freebie and absolutely necessary.
References must include the main article, Hark and any other sources if required (usually not required).
Follow format instructions – font size, spacing etc… Make sure you have the proper heading / cover page (name, date etc…)
Word counts are a minimum. Quality beats quantity, but minimums will help you with quality. Provide this number at the end of your response – without title page or references.
Avoid personal references (“I think…”) in an academic context unless the prompt specifically asks what you think.
Do not judge or provide a critique of the research unless you have standing to do so. Are you competent in this field?
Avoid too much detail in the data – this can be found in the paper and does not have to be listed in your response – unless you are making a very specific point.
Answer the prompts point by point. This is what you will be graded on. Did you fully answer the queries?

Compose an essay of 2,900 words (not including bibliography) for one of the below essay questions
Essay titles:
1. Evaluate the utility of the work of Habermas for understanding how public relations might develop a stronger ethical underpinning to practice.
2. Rhetorical paradigms for scholarship in PR acknowledge the widespread use of a) rhetorical advocacy and b) dialogue in public relations practice. Critically assess Robert Heath’s claims that such practices play an important role in making “society effective”.
3. How can we understand public relations as a form of cultural intermediary work?
4. “Public affairs and lobbying are tools that ensure the rich and powerful always get their way”: Evaluate and discuss the evidence in academic literature for accepting or rejecting this statement.
5. How does the concept of the information subsidy help us explore the relationship between the mass media and public relations?
6. Critically apply the literature on framing to analyse how at least two organisations have attempted to influence public policy debate in your national context.
7. Critically assess the impact on the media of the deployment of public relations by governments in contemporary liberal democratic societies. In your answer you should analyse the roles and relationships of at least two of the following; journalists, Government Information Officers (GIOs) and Special Advisers (SpAds).

*** Words count = 2,900 words.
*** In-Text Citations and Referencing using Harvard style.

The links should now be working on the Module 7 assignment.
REVISED Module 7 Prompt:
1.Pew Research Study: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
1. Using that study, locate a specific state of the US and examine a religious trend within that region.
2. As you examine its trends, what is significant about that region’s results?
3. Using the survey questionnaire, what kind of questions reflect why you found this region worth discussing on this response?
2. Link to the study’s questionnaire: II (pewforum.org)
3. Link to demographic info: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/
4. Upload to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday 10/6/24
GENERAL RESPONSE CRITERIA:
1. The response must be at least 300 words (approximately 1 full page) and demonstrate course-related knowledge.
2. Provide multiple citations from the course textbook.
1. Cite Hark. Cite Hark again. Cite Hark like a fanboy/girl.
3. The response requires academic writing style and formatting that corresponds with your particular discipline.
4. This should be a double-spaced document written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Top 10 Ways To Avoid Losing Points On A RSCH201 Writing Assignment
Keep this list handy while writing your paper:
Early on, mention the author’s full name(s) the first time that you mention them. A last name can be used afterwards.
Early on, provide the full name of the main reference article. Afterwards, “the study” or “the research” or a shortened version like “in Unaware…”
Provide Hark tie-ins and citations. This is a freebie and absolutely necessary.
References must include the main article, Hark and any other sources if required (usually not required).
Follow format instructions – font size, spacing etc… Make sure you have the proper heading / cover page (name, date etc…)
Word counts are a minimum. Quality beats quantity, but minimums will help you with quality. Provide this number at the end of your response – without title page or references.
Avoid personal references (“I think…”) in an academic context unless the prompt specifically asks what you think.
Do not judge or provide a critique of the research unless you have standing to do so. Are you competent in this field?
Avoid too much detail in the data – this can be found in the paper and does not have to be listed in your response – unless you are making a very specific point.
Answer the prompts point by point. This is what you will be graded on. Did you fully answer the queries?

Compose an essay of 2,900 words (not including bibliography) for one of the below essay questions
Essay titles:
1. Evaluate the utility of the work of Habermas for understanding how public relations might develop a stronger ethical underpinning to practice.
2. Rhetorical paradigms for scholarship in PR acknowledge the widespread use of a) rhetorical advocacy and b) dialogue in public relations practice. Critically assess Robert Heath’s claims that such practices play an important role in making “society effective”.
3. How can we understand public relations as a form of cultural intermediary work?
4. “Public affairs and lobbying are tools that ensure the rich and powerful always get their way”: Evaluate and discuss the evidence in academic literature for accepting or rejecting this statement.
5. How does the concept of the information subsidy help us explore the relationship between the mass media and public relations?
6. Critically apply the literature on framing to analyse how at least two organisations have attempted to influence public policy debate in your national context.
7. Critically assess the impact on the media of the deployment of public relations by governments in contemporary liberal democratic societies. In your answer you should analyse the roles and relationships of at least two of the following; journalists, Government Information Officers (GIOs) and Special Advisers (SpAds).

*** Words count = 2,900 words.
*** In-Text Citations and Referencing using Harvard style.

The links should now be working on the Module 7 assignment.
REVISED Module 7 Prompt:
1.Pew Research Study: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
1. Using that study, locate a specific state of the US and examine a religious trend within that region.
2. As you examine its trends, what is significant about that region’s results?
3. Using the survey questionnaire, what kind of questions reflect why you found this region worth discussing on this response?
2. Link to the study’s questionnaire: II (pewforum.org)
3. Link to demographic info: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/
4. Upload to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday 10/6/24
GENERAL RESPONSE CRITERIA:
1. The response must be at least 300 words (approximately 1 full page) and demonstrate course-related knowledge.
2. Provide multiple citations from the course textbook.
1. Cite Hark. Cite Hark again. Cite Hark like a fanboy/girl.
3. The response requires academic writing style and formatting that corresponds with your particular discipline.
4. This should be a double-spaced document written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Top 10 Ways To Avoid Losing Points On A RSCH201 Writing Assignment
Keep this list handy while writing your paper:
Early on, mention the author’s full name(s) the first time that you mention them. A last name can be used afterwards.
Early on, provide the full name of the main reference article. Afterwards, “the study” or “the research” or a shortened version like “in Unaware…”
Provide Hark tie-ins and citations. This is a freebie and absolutely necessary.
References must include the main article, Hark and any other sources if required (usually not required).
Follow format instructions – font size, spacing etc… Make sure you have the proper heading / cover page (name, date etc…)
Word counts are a minimum. Quality beats quantity, but minimums will help you with quality. Provide this number at the end of your response – without title page or references.
Avoid personal references (“I think…”) in an academic context unless the prompt specifically asks what you think.
Do not judge or provide a critique of the research unless you have standing to do so. Are you competent in this field?
Avoid too much detail in the data – this can be found in the paper and does not have to be listed in your response – unless you are making a very specific point.
Answer the prompts point by point. This is what you will be graded on. Did you fully answer the queries?

Compose an essay of 2,900 words (not including bibliography) for one of the below essay questions
Essay titles:
1. Evaluate the utility of the work of Habermas for understanding how public relations might develop a stronger ethical underpinning to practice.
2. Rhetorical paradigms for scholarship in PR acknowledge the widespread use of a) rhetorical advocacy and b) dialogue in public relations practice. Critically assess Robert Heath’s claims that such practices play an important role in making “society effective”.
3. How can we understand public relations as a form of cultural intermediary work?
4. “Public affairs and lobbying are tools that ensure the rich and powerful always get their way”: Evaluate and discuss the evidence in academic literature for accepting or rejecting this statement.
5. How does the concept of the information subsidy help us explore the relationship between the mass media and public relations?
6. Critically apply the literature on framing to analyse how at least two organisations have attempted to influence public policy debate in your national context.
7. Critically assess the impact on the media of the deployment of public relations by governments in contemporary liberal democratic societies. In your answer you should analyse the roles and relationships of at least two of the following; journalists, Government Information Officers (GIOs) and Special Advisers (SpAds).

*** Words count = 2,900 words.
*** In-Text Citations and Referencing using Harvard style.

Compose an essay of 2,900 words (not including bibliography) for one of the below essay questions
Essay titles:
1. Evaluate the utility of the work of Habermas for understanding how public relations might develop a stronger ethical underpinning to practice.
2. Rhetorical paradigms for scholarship in PR acknowledge the widespread use of a) rhetorical advocacy and b) dialogue in public relations practice. Critically assess Robert Heath’s claims that such practices play an important role in making “society effective”.
3. How can we understand public relations as a form of cultural intermediary work?
4. “Public affairs and lobbying are tools that ensure the rich and powerful always get their way”: Evaluate and discuss the evidence in academic literature for accepting or rejecting this statement.
5. How does the concept of the information subsidy help us explore the relationship between the mass media and public relations?
6. Critically apply the literature on framing to analyse how at least two organisations have attempted to influence public policy debate in your national context.
7. Critically assess the impact on the media of the deployment of public relations by governments in contemporary liberal democratic societies. In your answer you should analyse the roles and relationships of at least two of the following; journalists, Government Information Officers (GIOs) and Special Advisers (SpAds).

*** Words count = 2,900 words.
*** In-Text Citations and Referencing using Harvard style.

The links should now be working on the Module 7 assignment.
REVISED Module 7 Prompt:
1.Pew Research Study: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
1. Using that study, locate a specific state of the US and examine a religious trend within that region.
2. As you examine its trends, what is significant about that region’s results?
3. Using the survey questionnaire, what kind of questions reflect why you found this region worth discussing on this response?
2. Link to the study’s questionnaire: II (pewforum.org)
3. Link to demographic info: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/
4. Upload to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday 10/6/24
GENERAL RESPONSE CRITERIA:
1. The response must be at least 300 words (approximately 1 full page) and demonstrate course-related knowledge.
2. Provide multiple citations from the course textbook.
1. Cite Hark. Cite Hark again. Cite Hark like a fanboy/girl.
3. The response requires academic writing style and formatting that corresponds with your particular discipline.
4. This should be a double-spaced document written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Top 10 Ways To Avoid Losing Points On A RSCH201 Writing Assignment
Keep this list handy while writing your paper:
Early on, mention the author’s full name(s) the first time that you mention them. A last name can be used afterwards.
Early on, provide the full name of the main reference article. Afterwards, “the study” or “the research” or a shortened version like “in Unaware…”
Provide Hark tie-ins and citations. This is a freebie and absolutely necessary.
References must include the main article, Hark and any other sources if required (usually not required).
Follow format instructions – font size, spacing etc… Make sure you have the proper heading / cover page (name, date etc…)
Word counts are a minimum. Quality beats quantity, but minimums will help you with quality. Provide this number at the end of your response – without title page or references.
Avoid personal references (“I think…”) in an academic context unless the prompt specifically asks what you think.
Do not judge or provide a critique of the research unless you have standing to do so. Are you competent in this field?
Avoid too much detail in the data – this can be found in the paper and does not have to be listed in your response – unless you are making a very specific point.
Answer the prompts point by point. This is what you will be graded on. Did you fully answer the queries?