Category: Writing

Your Task: Develop an “intake” briefing for a group of software engineers who have been tasked with developing a standard set of security review processes for virtual teams. The purpose of these processes is to ensure that compliance for software security requirements is verified resulting in software applications and software-based products where security is “built in.” The company also intends that these processes be used towards the organization’s achievement of Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Level 3 — Defined.
Background: Software development is a complex task, especially as technology changes at the speed of light, environments evolve, and more expectations are placed upon vendors who want to be competitive within the software market. Many software development organizations also depend upon virtual teams whose members are geographically dispersed. This complexity also makes implementing and testing security features (for software applications) much more challenging.
Format: This week, the format for your deliverable (posting) will be “Talking Points.” Talking points are presented in outline format and contain the content that you would put on slides in a slide deck. Your outline should include 5 to 7 major points (“slide titles”) followed by 3 to 5 supporting points for each. Remember to put enough information into the talking points that your peer reviewers can understand what you intend to cover in each section of your briefing. Remember to introduce the topic at the beginning, present your analysis, and then close your briefing with an appropriate summary. Include a list of sources (3 or more) which attendees could refer to if they wish to fact check your work.

I need you to write two recommendation letters, each with a word count of 350 words.You need to play two roles to write two different recommendation letters. You must write in the format of a recommendation letter for graduate school applications.
The first role you need to play is Shengbin Gao. He is an professor at Anhui university of science and technology. You need to stand from the perspective of a professor to praise my academic excellence at school. My undergraduate major is English. You need to say that I performed very well in class, including excellent teamwork, etc. Then you should recommend me to study MA International Language Education (Teaching English as a Second Language) at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. You have to say that I am very suitable for this professional background. This recommendation letter mainly praises how excellent I was academically during my undergraduate studies at Anhui university of science and technology.
The second role you need to play is Lijuan Liu. She is a secondary teacher at Xueji Training Institution. I once worked as intern English tutor at Xueji Training Institution. You need to write this recommendation letter from Lijuan Liu’s perspective. The main content of the recommendation letter is to praise my excellent performance during the internship. Mainly write about how excellent my job as an intern tutor is and how strong my work abilities are. My internship job at that time was to teach students New Concept 2 English classes and help them improve their abilities in listening, speaking, reading, and writing. You also need to write that I get along well with the students and they really like me as an intern tutor. Finally, you must recommend me to study MA International Language Education (Teaching English as a Second Language) at The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. You have to say that I am very suitable for this professional background.
The actual content of each letter needs to be 700 words, excluding information on recommenders, etc. No AI writing is allowed, and 100% originality must be guaranteed.

I need you to write two recommendation letters, each with a word count of 350 words.You need to play two roles to write two different recommendation letters. You must write in the format of a recommendation letter for graduate school applications.
The first role you need to play is Shengbin Gao. He is a professor at Anhui university of science and technology. You need to stand from the perspective of a professor to praise my academic excellence at school. My undergraduate major is English. You need to say that I performed very well in class, including excellent teamwork, etc. Then you should recommend me to study MA English Studies for the Professions (English Language Teaching) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. You have to say that I am very suitable for this professional background. This recommendation letter mainly praises how excellent I was academically during my undergraduate studies at Anhui university of science and technology.
The second role you need to play is Lijuan Liu. She is a secondary teacher at Xueji Training Institution. I once worked as intern English tutor at Xueji Training Institution. You need to write this recommendation letter from Lijuan Liu’s perspective. The main content of the recommendation letter is to praise my excellent performance during the internship. Mainly write about how excellent my job as an intern tutor is and how strong my work abilities are. My internship job at that time was to teach students New Concept 2 English classes and help them improve their abilities in listening, speaking, reading, and writing. You also need to write that I get along well with the students and they really like me as an intern tutor. Finally, you must recommend me to study MA English Studies for the Professions (English Language Teaching) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. You have to say that I am very suitable for this professional background.
The actual content of each letter needs to be 700 words, excluding information on recommenders, etc. No AI writing is allowed, and 100% originality must be guaranteed.

After doing the readings, seeing the class lectures, and watching the film for the week, reflect on all the material we went over and write a response to it – your reactions, new information you may have learned, were surprised by or felt was significant, critiques, revelations (did the video change your previously held views or perceptions?), etc. Do any of these ideas relate to your own life or beliefs? Be specific rather than general (e.g. use examples from videos/readings in your discussion). You will be graded on grammar/spelling as well, so please write them as professional and academic papers. These should be 400 words minimum (no maximum) and uploaded to Canvas as a word doc, pdf, or txt file.
For this week, break your response into three sections:
1. Discuss the ideas from the primary Jain scriptures – “There is No Creator”, “The Plurality of Souls” & “All Creation Groans Together in Torment” – what are your main take aways? Do you agree or disagree with any of their arguments? Why or why not?
2. Next look closely at Buddhism, particularly the ideas from the 4 Noble Truths on suffering, the idea of Anatman/Sunyata, and Dependent Origination. While I discuss briefly in my lecture, they are discussed in more detail in the readings. What are your thoughts on these concepts?
3. Finally, give any insights you may have gotten from the “Story of India EP2: Power of Ideas” documentary, as well as anything you thought was interesting from my lecture.
Previous

Answer all the 8 question in 1-2 sentence. ( My major is mechanical engineering, From Saudi Arabia, The company i hope to join is Aramco)
How would you describe your level of familiarity with the companies or the industry you hope to join after graduation?
How did you achieve this knowledge? (Insight from family members or friends is a possible answer.)
What sources do you currently follow on social media related to your career?
Take the time to find at least one or two additional sources and share them here as links.
What sources do you use outside of social media to get news related to your profession? List them as links, if possible, here:
Roughly, how many family members and friends work in the same sorts of careers/jobs/professions that you hope to join?
In your own personal opinion, do you think you have a balanced view of your company/industry/profession that includes numerous points of views and many perspectives.
How could you better understand your company/industry/profession by incorporating other points of view than those provided by the usual sources, social media accounts and people you usually rely on for your information?

Introduction
Clearly define the problem, issue, or desired topic that was researched.
Starts out broad and becomes more and more specific.
Body
Present the relevant literature and ideas.
Identify relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature.
Possible solutions to any problem(s) identified.
Conclusion
References (12 sources –Journals and books not older than 2016)
–
APA format, double spaced, 12-pt font, Times New Roman style, 1-inch margins top, bottom, left and right sides.
– Cite sources in text, possibly one citation per paragraph. Paper should be written in 3rd person
follow my outline, use very relevant sources
NO AI
NO Plag
cite the paper extensively — it is a research paper.
2450 words
Follow my outline

You are to write a one-page report each about 2 performance, and what you enjoyed, learned, and thought about the programming/production. In this report, you should be able to identify two musical elements (basic elements).
I will send the link for performance

Please read the Zinczenko vs, Balko pdf and write summarize BOTH Balko and Zinczenko as writers who have different perspectives on the debate about food and health. Please do not use Al or chatGPT or internet. Make sure the mini essay by own words and please use simple words as international student not as professional writer. I will upload the assigment file and there are adiitional files may help you.

Write an essay of 3-5 pages (APA style, Times New Roman, 1.5 spacing, 1-inch margins; introduction, main body, conclusions, cover page, and running head-include case study name) which answers the following questions:
*choose one of the following case
*attached the cases and module 3&4.
Case 1:
Turnaround and Transformation: Leadership and Risk at Boston’s Institute of Contemporary Art
Analyze the ethical considerations and public service values demonstrated in Jill Medvedow’s leadership of the ICA transformation. Discuss how her approach aligns with or challenges traditional public service ethics. Consider the following:
How did Medvedow balance organizational needs with public interest?
What public service values are evident in her decision-making process?
How did she navigate potential conflicts between different stakeholder interests?
Connect your analysis to concepts from Modules 1-4, particularly focusing on public service foundations, organizational theory, and public service ethics and values.
Case2: Boeing’s 737 MAX 8 Disasters
Analyze the ethical implications of Boeing’s decision-making process in the development and certification of the 737 MAX. Consider the following:
How did Boeing’s corporate culture influence ethical decision-making?
What public service values were compromised in this case?
How could stronger ethical frameworks in both Boeing and the FAA have potentially prevented these disasters?
Connect your analysis to concepts from Modules 1-4, particularly focusing on public service foundations, organizational theory, and public service ethics and values.
Please make connections to materials, course readings, recommended readings, and other relevant sources

In what ways has your study of the history of psychology contributed to your understanding of the complexity and multidimensionality of human behavior and mental processes helped you to define a research problem or question that addresses a gap or overlooked aspect in your field of study?
Go to DiscussionSubmit DQ Response