Category: Sociology

Overview
Throughout this course, we discuss trends and patterns in homicide locally in our own world region, but we also emphasize the importance of locating our experiences in the global context. The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to learn about homicide in another country or world region to better understand how homicide in Canada differs (or not) from other regions of the world and why this might be the case. It will also provide you with the opportunity to demonstrate what you have learned in the first 5 units of the course by incorporating course materials where appropriate and relevant to your discussion. Course materials may include required readings, lecture notes, videos, news links and so on.
The main question you are addressing in this assignment is, in what way do trends and patterns in, and explanations for, homicide in Canada differ from other parts of the world? Are trends and patterns similar in some respects but different in other characteristics? How might these similarities and differences be explained? Do explanations vary cross-nationally?
By this stage, you have now read Chapter 20, Homicide in Canada (required reading in Units 2 and 3).
In the next two weeks, you will be introduced to various theoretical understandings or explanations for why homicides occur (required readings in Units 4 and 5).
This assignment asks you to use this new knowledge and understanding to examine how homicide in Canada compares to other world regions.
Instructions
By the end of Week 3, you will select one of the four countries/world regions listed below to compare and contrast similarities and differences in trends and patterns, as well as explanations, between that country/world region and Canada. You will make your selection by self-enrolling in the relevant group using the Groups tool in CourseLink. There will be an equal, but limited, number of spaces available for each country, available on a first-come-first-served basis, beginning in Week 2.
Chapter 28 South Africa
After introducing your basic thesis statement about whether trends/patterns/explanations for homicide are more similar or more different and why between Canada and the country/world region you are focusing on, your paper may include the following to expand on this thesis statement:
A comparison of the reliability and validity of data sources in each country and how this compares to what you now know about homicide data;
A comparison of victim, perpetrator and incident characteristics in each country and how this compares to what you now know about homicide in general;
A discussion of the social and political context in each country that may contribute to levels of homicide (currently and/or over time), who perpetrates these killings, their primary victims, and what these homicides look like (e.g. cause of death, location of killing, etc.).
A reflection on whether explanations or theories of homicide differ in each country and why this might be the case; and/or,
A reflection on what the authors identify as future research priorities and how they are similar or different in each country.
These are meant as suggestions only. You may identify other elements that are important for comparison.
Important Caveat: Please note that your ability to address the above points will depend on the country you are comparing to Canada and what information has been included by the author. Remember, often what an author focuses on in describing homicide in their country underscores what they see as most relevant or pertinent to understanding the phenomenon in their part of the world. As such, you might also identify what is missing from their discussion that was highlighted in the chapter on Canada and vice versa.
Assignment Expectations
You are expected to incorporate course materials where possible and appropriate from Units 1 through 5 inclusive to support your statements or discussion points. Note: You are not expected to use external resources – those outside course materials – to do this assignment and you will not receive credit for doing so.
Proper referencing style is expected when referring to any course materials. Use the referencing style that is most familiar to you and be consistent throughout.
You must submit your assignment in Times New Roman, 12 pt., double-spaced (and, yes, we can tell the difference 😊), using standard 8 x 11 format.
The assignment must be 4 pages in length exactly (1000 words exactly and should be double spaced apa-7 style owl prude (not including references) including reference it should be 5 pages exactly.
Warning: Papers longer than specified or those that do not follow guidelines will be returned to you and late penalties will apply until a revised paper is resubmitted.
Tip: Please keep in mind that it may take several readings to pinpoint the areas that you wish to discuss and decide how you will support your statements using the knowledge gained in this course so far. Therefore, give yourself time to engage with both chapters and think about what you wish to highlight in your assignment.
Grading Expectations
Table 2 – Rubric for Assessing the Comparing Homicide Locally and Globally Assignment
Component
Level 1 (Excellent)
24-30 (A-range)
Introduction/Thesis statement
Main finding/thesis statement of paper accurately introduced
Evidence
Provides significant evidence to support the main argument(s); draws significantly from course materials
Grasp of Sources Cite
Demonstrates strong understanding of the course materials cited
Conclusion
Clearly synthesizes and reframes key points from paper
Organization
Organization and structure of paper flows smoothly with clear transitions between points/arguments made
Clarity and Writing
Language is accessible and clear; correct grammar and clear writing throughout
READING-1 (DOCX-1 ATTACHED IS) very important
Chapter 20, Homicide in Canada Reference link is https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924501.ch20
READING-2 (DOCX-2 ATTACHED IS) very important
CHAPTER -28
Homicide in South Africa Reference link is – https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924501.ch28
READING -3 ( docx -3 attached is ) very important
BOOK THE HANDBOOK OF HOMOCIDE. Reference link is – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9…
Reading -4 ( docx -4 attached is )
Handbook of Homicide. Homicide in Canada [Read pages 348-349] Dawson, M..pdf Reference link is – https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?action=…
Reading – 5 ( docx -5 attached is ) very important
Juristat. Homicide in Canada, 2022. Catalogue no. 85-002-X. [Gov’t publication, infographic].
Reading -6 ( docx -6 attached is )
Canadian homicide rates: A comparison of two data sources. Reference link is https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?action=…
Reading 7 ( docx -7 attached is ) very important
Homicide trends in Canada, 2022 Reference link is https://ares.lib.uoguelph.ca/ares/ares.dll?action=…
DOCX-8 ATTACHED IS GRADING RUBRIC
NO OTHER OUTSOURCE HAS TO BE USED.
please start reading instructions mam
and guidelines and you have to answer to this i am proving the grading rubrics everything write in own words donot use AI AND CHATGPT AS MAM HAS THE SOFTAWARE TO DETECT.EACH AND EVERY single LINE and each and every single word.
I Have also attached the grading rubric photo which is in form of image grading rubric is very much important you have to follow each and every instruction very carefully.
only these sources which i have provided HAVE TO BE USED NO OTHER SOURCETO BE USED READ INSTRUCTIONS Very Very carefully.

This is an outline only. The instructions are attached. My attempt to start the outline starts on page 3 but I did not get very far.

I have attached three article, can you please do a report for all three?
Structure: You can format your report using bullet points or paragraphs. Aim for 500 to
750 words (excluding the topic statement and article citations).
Report Guidelines: within documents

Purpose
This assignment will enable you to examine some of the underlying reasons why certain problems persist even though their harmful effects and remedies are well known. This lesson is in line with the assertion that what is a social problem for some people is beneficial to others.
Directions
The initial post and the comments have different due dates. Please pay attention to the different due dates.
Part 1: Initial Response
In your post, identify and explain 1 (one) reason why alcohol and tobacco consumption are permitted on such a grand scale in the United States even though both drugs are the cause of thousands of deaths each year. It is important to provide supporting evidence for your claims. Create a title that reflects the specific reason being examined.
Part 2: Comments
Reply to one post by a fellow student. The reply must be substantive by adding more knowledge or raising critical questions and answers to stretch our knowledge.
Submission
Post your initial response by clicking the Reply button below, and then participate in the discussion. You can find the discussion forum by clicking the Discussions link in Course Navigation as well.
Grading
This assignment is worth 20 points toward your course grade. Your initial posting is worth 15 points and the one (1) reply is worth 5 points. This assignment will be graded according to the following Discussion Forum Grading Criteria:
SOC 268 Discussion 3 Grading RubricGrading CriteriaPoints
Initial Response:
Clearly identifies and explains the significant variable relevant to forum topic(s).
Clearly provides the required supporting empirical evidence.
12 points
Comments to one (1) other student’s posting. 5 points
Uses APA Style to cite and to reference sources. Free of grammatical and spelling errors.

Read textbookch6 and follow instructions below
Using Chapter 6 from Desmond and Emibayer, address the following questions:
How are hustling and white collar crime a reflection of the economic disadvantage and advantages, respectively?
What conditions contribute to poor women, immigrant women, and minority women’s vulnerability to domestic violence, and/or difficulty seeking assistance from domestic violence?

Read articles and follow the instructions below
These response papers should be written in Times New Roman 12 size font. The assignment
must be single spaced and be no less than 1 page with 1-inch margins. One full page does not
include papers that have excessive spacing, double spaced name and class information, or any
sort of manipulation of spacing. When you do the assignment correctly, it is more than likely
your paper will be closer to 1.5 pages.
Each response paper should engage with all readings and include analysis. By analysis, I expect
you to make connections between the readings and point out broader themes. You may also bring
into your analysis current events that speak to themes in the readings and weekly topic. If you are
confused about what is considered an analysis, do ask questions.
At the end of the response paper, 4 discussion questions should be included. These questions can
be ones that you think would stimulate class discussion and/or a question you have pertaining to
the reading or topic. These papers are graded as 0, 1, or 2 points

Question Prompts for Documentary Film Analysis
(Based off of a worksheet developed by TeachWithMovies.com)
Please note that you do not have to respond to every question. Address the questions that make most sense to you. Remember to include analysis and not simply a summary.
Read the questions before you watch the film so that you will know what to look for while you watch. It is preferable to respond to the questions once the film is over so that you keep your attention on the film’s story.
Briefly describe what the film is about and the position that it advocates.
Describe the progression of the film: how it begins, what stages it passes through, and how it concludes.
List six facts described in the film that impressed you and explain how each fact relates to the film’s premise or theme.
In your own words, what techniques did the filmmakers use to convince you of the position that the film supports?
Describe the reasoning the film outlines in support of the position advocated by the film? Was it strong, weak, convincing, misleading? Describe the argument put forward in the film and why you thought the reasoning was either strong or weak.
Describe any cinematic moments presented in particular scenes, images, or sounds that you felt were the most compelling and convincing.
If the filmmakers asked how this film could be improved, what would you tell them? Describe the changes you would suggest in detail.
Did the film change your mind about any aspect of the subject that it presents? What information, argument or persuasive technique caused you to change your mind?
Please watch video https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/a-song-for-cesar-about-the-documentary/28373/

After reading “Disparities in Health and Health Care 5 Key Questions and Answers | KFF.pdf” Please answer the following:
In your own words tell me what you think “health disparity” or Health Inequality means.
Health disparities are driven by numerous social and economic Inequities. Please tell me which you think has the greatest impact on health (and health disparities) and why? Please back up your assertion with research or statistics.
Which races, even after the passage of the affordable care act, are most likely to be uninsured and/or locked out of health care?
How does COVID-19 and its variants impact races differently? Why are racial minorities more likely to get and die from COVID?
How has the current administration attempted to improve things?

After reading “Implicit Bias and Racial Disparities in Health Care.pdf” Please answer the following:
1. If “black” Americans had the same quality of insurance, made the same amount of money, and were exposed to pollutants about the same as “white” Americans would they live as long as each other? Why or why not?
2. Please list (in bullet format) the various ways that black receive lesser care by physicians than other races?
3. What is implicit bias and how does it play a role in healthcare (particular regarding physicians)?
After reading “U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective” and “Reducing disparities in Health Care” please answer the following:
1. How is the U.S. life expectancy doing compared to other most industrialized nations? Why? What factors make this so?
2. Is throwing money at the problem of health care disparities the answer? Why or why not?

You should read the outside materials on Drugs prior to completing this discussion board (Why we should not decriminalize marijuana & FAQs from the National Drug Control Policy (White House Committee). You also need to watch the CNN documentary on Marijuana use. Now I want you to do your own research on why we SHOULD legalize it (even if you don’t agree with it).
1. What was the best source you found for legalizing marijuana?

2. What is the best argument for legalizing Marijuana?

3. What are some of the compelling reasons to legalize marijuana from the documentary?

4. What are some of the compelling reasons to making it illegal?

5. You will note that advocates for legalization point out that 40% of Americans have tried marijuana and opponents point out that only about 10% of Americans are currently using marijuana. How do you reconcile these two statistics and why is each side using them? Do most Americans favor legalization?

6. Which states currently have some type of reform about marijuana use and what are they (you could do this in chart format or bullet).

7. Finally, what was your opinion on the subject coming into the class and where do you stand on it now? Should there be reform and if so how? Would you increase medicinal use, place an age limit on it, totally ban it, etc.)? If you were Matt and Page Figgy and lived in a state where medicinal use was illegal would you have your child still use cannibas?

Question Prompts for Documentary Film Analysis
(Based off of a worksheet developed by TeachWithMovies.com)
Please note that you do not have to respond to every question. Address the questions that make most sense to you. Remember to include analysis and not simply a summary.
Read the questions before you watch the film so that you will know what to look for while you watch. It is preferable to respond to the questions once the film is over so that you keep your attention on the film’s story.
Briefly describe what the film is about and the position that it advocates.
Describe the progression of the film: how it begins, what stages it passes through, and how it concludes.
List six facts described in the film that impressed you and explain how each fact relates to the film’s premise or theme.
In your own words, what techniques did the filmmakers use to convince you of the position that the film supports?
Describe the reasoning the film outlines in support of the position advocated by the film? Was it strong, weak, convincing, misleading? Describe the argument put forward in the film and why you thought the reasoning was either strong or weak.
Describe any cinematic moments presented in particular scenes, images, or sounds that you felt were the most compelling and convincing.
If the filmmakers asked how this film could be improved, what would you tell them? Describe the changes you would suggest in detail.
Did the film change your mind about any aspect of the subject that it presents? What information, argument or persuasive technique caused you to change your mind?
Please watch video https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/a-song-for-cesar-about-the-documentary/28373/