Category: Sociology

For this discussion you should read Chapter 4 in the text book on gender as a performance, and also read the article Bullying and “Doing” Gender and review the website Doing GenderBased on your review of these resources, please address the following:
What does “doing gender” mean?
What are examples of “doing gender” that you see every day?
Describe at least two ways that we learn how to appropriately perform our gender.
What is one way that you, in the past week, have “done” gender?
Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length.

instead of china i picked india// sociology assignment, please make sure the tables arent too detailed// it has to be an essay (2-3 pages) and 5 tables completed from the file// also make sure they reference info in the reference table (in the document you would of seen theres 5 tables that needs to be filled in im not sure if you can see the two that i have already completed but delete what i wrote, snd then for secrtion two i want a essay)// FOR THE ATTACHED SCREENSHOT OF THE TABLE – make sure they do it according to the heading (if that doesnt work for them they can do their own one but if they can that would bo good)

In a personal reflection essay (500-600 words), think about your behavior and roles in important groups throughout your life such as your family of origin, friendship groups, social groups, sports teams, work groups, and therapy groups. Address the following: Explain the patterns to the roles you have played across various types of groups. Explain the effects of culture, race, age, gender, religion, family dynamics, and sexual orientation on group dynamics, development and structure. Explain any changes in your roles you’ve noticed over time or in different types of groups. How do you understand both the patterns and the changes? How does your experience impact your interaction with clients?

When you enter into a new situation, what information do you look for to understand what is going on? Think back to the last few times you found yourself in a situation you didn’t fully understand, or a context that was completely new to you, describe what you did when you entered the situation, in order to figure out what was going on. What did you look at or for? Did you ask questions? Did you imitate how others were acting? How do you know how to behave in any given situation. Give at least three examples from your own life. How do you wish to be perceived? What do you want people to think about you when they look at you or meet you for the first time? In what ways do you express whatever you wrote for the answer to the last questions? Are there things that you don’t already do, that you could start doing, to increase the likelihood that people will perceive you how you want to be perceived?

What does this episode teach us about society? What information is presented? How was the information gathered? What is the perspective of the hosts or story-tellers? In what ways is the episode a commentary on society? Does the narrative have some historical and/or cultural significance? What additional thoughts and opinions do you have about the episode? What did it make you think about?

This journal entry is to help you start thinking through stratification, as we head into the next couple weeks of class. Aim for a brief paragraph in response to each of the following questions.
Remember to cite connections to ideas you are using from our text (Connerly et al. 2021).
1) What is social stratification? What scenes from the Wealth Divide video most caught your attention, and why? How do those scenes help us understand stratification?
2) How could you connect any parts from the video to what we’re covering in class this week regarding class, stratification, mobility, or life chances? Be sure to explain what those terms mean as you discuss them.
3) What is the difference between social stratification in general and global stratification? How can they both affect life chances?
4) What scenes or parts most stood out to you in the video regarding global stratification, patterns, or relationships? How could you use ideas from Chapter 10 to talk about those parts? Again, be sure to explain any terms as you use them.
5) So far, do you find the conflict theory or structural functionalist take on social class stratification more convincing, and why? What do you think symbolic-interactionists might say about class stratification?
6) How did our discussion of global objects affect how you would describe your own placement in the world in terms of global stratification? How do you fit into class strata in global terms?

Course Alignment:
This assignment corresponds to the Module Learning Objectives:
Define social stratification
Describe the consequences that membership in dominant and subordinate groups has for individuals
Define Class, Socioeconomic Status, and Life Chances
Describe how social mobility works in the U.S. AND in a global context
Apply functionalist, conflict theory, and interactionist perspectives to explain social stratification

Purpose of the Assignment:
The purpose of this assignment is to have you evaluate sociological research design. You will do this by identifying flaws and proposing solutions to those flaws in validity, reliability, and generalizability found in the research methodology of the provided research scenario. You will also demonstrate your sociological understanding of groups and leadership.
Through this assignment, you will practice skills necessary to evaluate research you could possibly come across in real-world situations (in the news, social media, in current/future jobs, etc…).
Research Scenario:
Here are the results of a rather poorly designed sociology study that investigated group leadership dynamics. The study suffered from significant methodological flaws, limiting the reliability and generalizability of the findings. The researcher chose a small convenience sample from personal friends. The sample had 8 women and 3 men. Participants were given a brief questionnaire with open-ended questions and no survey. None of the participants was a group leader themselves. Each participant defined “group” and “leadership” according to their own personal understanding of the terms. Despite these limitations, the study reported some preliminary observations, which should be interpreted with caution.
Group Leadership Styles
The study explored different leadership styles observed within groups. Based on self-report questionnaires, participants reported a mix of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire leadership styles in their groups. No definitions of these leadership styles were provided to participants.
Communication Patterns
Participants provided anecdotal evidence of various communication patterns within their groups. Some groups reported open and effective communication, fostering collaboration and decision-making. Conversely, others mentioned challenges with communication, such as dominance of certain members or lack of participation. (Anecdotal
evidence is personal stories that are collected because they seem interesting and related to the topic.)
Group Cohesion
The study assessed group cohesion by asking participants to describe their
perceived sense of unity and cooperation within their groups. The results indicated a range of
experiences, with some groups reporting high levels of cohesion and others reporting low levels.
Impact of Leadership on Group Performance
Participants were asked about the perceived impact of leadership on group performance. While some participants believed that effective leadership positively influenced group outcomes, others reported no significant relationship
between leadership and performance. There was no standardized measurement of performance.
Gender and Leadership
The study explored the potential influence of gender on leadership dynamics within the groups. participants provided subjective accounts of gender-related experiences in the workplace, including stereotypes and biases they think might impact leadership roles.
Results of this Study
The study only provides preliminary and insufficient insights into group leadership dynamics. Future research with improved research methods is necessary to deepen our understanding of group leadership and its impact on various outcomes.
You must use the resources listed below to address all the following questions in essay format.
Chapter 2 on Sociological Research attached in pdf
Chapter 6 on Groups and Organization attched in pdf
Groups, Group Dynamics, and Leadership attached in pdf
Formal Organizations attached in pdf
You MUST include properly formatted in-text citations and end-of-paper references/bibliography to connect to the required resources used for support. As a reminder, this is a graded part of the paper. Failure to include these elements in your paper will result in a loss of points.
For more information on how to properly format in-text and end-of-paper references/bibliography, please refer to the Citations section found in the course resources tab.
Formatting your Writing Assignment:
Introduction (Paragraph 1): Identify 3 flaws in the research design that might impact the validity, reliability, and generalizability of the research outcomes. Explain why they are flaws. Define all terms and concepts (use your materials and in-text citations).
Flaw 1 (Paragraph 2): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 1 (use your materials and in-text citations).
Flaw 2 (Paragraph 3): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 2 (use your materials and in-text citations).
Flaw 3 (Paragraph 4): describe how the research design could be improved to address and eliminate flaw 3 (use your materials and in-text citations).
Conclusion (Paragraph 5): Answer the following questions.
What do you think would be a good way to study group leadership dynamics?
What aspects of groups and leadership do you think are the most important to study?
What specific research methodologies would you choose?

Each response should be about 2-3 pages (12 pt. font, standard margins, double-spaced). Do not repeat the question in your answer.

1. What does this episode teach us about society? 2. What information is presented? 3. How was the information gathered? 4. What is the perspective of the hosts or story-tellers? 5. In what ways is the episode a commentary on society? 6. Does the narrative have some historical and/ or cultural significance? 7. What additional thoughts and opinions you have about the episode? What did it make you think about?

2 year on the management speciality, course name: Innovation in Society
* Take Back the Future Project-It was a team project about Innovations, our chosen topic was: Ai in education
*No GPT or any other AI should be detected
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)