Category: Social work

PLEASE make sure to follow ALL of the directions. If you are not the best at APA formatting, then this may not be the assignment for you. If you do like to research and add references, this is not the assignment for you. This teacher is very picky when it comes to how the students turn in the assignments. You going to need to peer review references, and this assignment can be written in simple language. There is no need to use the big fantasy wording. Let me know if I forgot to send you a document. Each reference that is used must be assessable to me. It must include the URL so I can go back and read the material of the reference. If I think the reference is irrelevant to the topic, I will ask for it to be replaced with a more relevant one

In your paper, please follow closely the guidelines set forth in the 7th edition of the
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. When typing your
proposal, use third person, impersonal tense. Avoid using repetitious concept/language/
terminology. For example, the words “I,” “the author,’ or “this project,” appearing more
than twice in a page is not acceptable. There will always be overlapping sections and
words; therefore, it is imperative that you word the overlapping concepts/terms/
repetitions differently when you repeat them.
PAPER 1(PART I): Problem Statement/Introduction Section (EPAS 2.1.6).
The following discussions must be included in this section: (Grade = 12.5%)
 Introduction. 1. Give a background statement regarding the problem you want
to explore; 2. address your interest-why you become interested in this
problem; and 3. how your research topic may contribute to advance
knowledge, practice or policy considerations to the social work profession. 4.
What is your research question? (1.5% of total grade).
 Background. Provide brief current statistical data (include numbers, percents,
or ratios) concerning prevalence, antecedent, incidence, and other pertaining
information that support your interest. Government documents tend to be
very useful for this section. DO NOT overlap this section with the Literature
Review Section, which means the background here in Paper 1 is the recent
history in the last 2-5 years whereas in the literature review Paper 2 section,
the background is distant history (100+ years). (3% of total grade).
 Rationale/Reason. A. Present several assumptions regarding your study. The
following are examples of assumptions: Assumption 1: This study includes
female only respondents, which then excludes males and the potential
differences between the two groups. Assumption 2: The study sample is
primarily or only from rural or only from urban areas; therefore both rural and
urban areas are not equally represented in the study. Or another similar
methodological assumption might be around quantitative versus qualitative
studies specifying that quantitative studies lack in-depth meaning and can only
describe phenomena. Assumption 3: This is an English speaking only study.
Non-English speakers may not be able to participate since study documents
are not translated into other languages; therefore, this study is likely to have a
higher proportion of Caucasian and English speaking only respondents.
Assumption 4: Child welfare workers are mostly women (over 80%) trained
in the social work profession. This sub-section on assumptions is short but
precise. B. Then state your goal(s) and objective(s) of your study here. State at
least (1) one goal and (2) one objective of the study here. The goal of the
study is a statement that describes or is a description of the main intent of the
study. In other words, what is the purpose of the study? The objective is a
statement or statements of a measure of something that is required to achieve
the purpose (the goal) of your study. The objective is a measure of some
progress that is required to achieve or to get to the purpose/destination/end
point of the study. C. Write the significance of your proposal to the profession
of social work. In other words, why should the social work profession be
involved or work with the social problem you selected? Provide one of the
principles from the Code of Ethics and a recent reference to the Code of
Ethics from NASW (3% of total grade).
2
 Theoretical framework. 1. Identify the name of the theory that you want to
use as a guide. Describe the theory you select for your project, including the
components mentioned and use one or more references of those who
originally created and developed the theory. For example, if using Systems
Theory, then describe the theory at the micro, mezzo and macro levels. 2.
Then write a sub-section entitled: “Application of Theory (NAME THE
THEORY),” pose your main research question here in the form of a question.
A. In other words, what is your research question? B. Then, use the
components or parts of the theory(s) to apply to your research question.
Sometimes, only one component or part of the theory applies to your research
question. It is acceptable to have only a partial theory application and the
reason authors may use a second theory to fill or explain another part of the
research question not fully addressed by the first theory. Use the theory(s)
you have selected and describe how it applies or guides your research
question. Keep in mind that I am only requiring and even suggesting that you
use only one theory even if it doesn’t apply very well to your research
question because I would rather you learn how to describe and apply one
theory well than describe and apply two or more theories poorly (5% of total
grade).
Suggested page length: 5 pages
Submit PAPER 1 (PART I) under assignments in Canvas for Paper 1. Only one
paper per group is submitted by one group member representing the entire group.
Please do not submit more than one paper per group. Put all the names of each
group member on top of the page for each group.
PAPER 2: PARTS II-V (Grade = 12.5%)
Submit a revised version of Part (Paper) 1 on Canvas under Assignment for Paper 1
if correcting areas from my feedback for revised grade. Submit the Final Draft
Parts II-V (Paper 2) on Canvas under Assignment for Paper 2.
Paper 1 of the assignment needs to be submitted under Paper 1 Assignment in
Canvas, if your group made changes since you first submitted. The person in the
group who submitted Paper 1 needs to be the same person to submit again the
revised Paper 1 to be consistent with the rubric under Paper 1.
PAPER 2 (PART II): Literature Review Section (EPAS 2.1.6). (Grade = 4%).
Your literature review should include at least 10 sources that are primarily research and
synthesis articles that are relevant to your topic. DO NOT do a book report here. What
you need to do is to state who conducted the research (the reference such as: Jones, 2024;
Smith & Franklin, 2021) and what was/were found that is relevant to your research aims

PLEASE make sure to follow ALL of the directions. If you are not the best at APA formatting, then this may not be the assignment for you. If you do like to research and add references, this is not the assignment for you. This teacher is very picky when it comes to how the students turn in the assignments. You going to need to peer review references, and this assignment can be written in simple language. There is no need to use the big fantasy wording. Let me know if I forgot to send you a document. Each reference that is used must be assessable to me. It must include the URL so I can go back and read the material of the reference. If I think the reference is irrelevant to the topic, I will ask for it to be replaced with a more relevant one

The purpose of the Chapter Review assignment is to help you summarize information covered in the course material. Think of this assignment as a tool to link what you learned to real life situations. It is especially useful for you to focus on complex concepts, terms, and subject areas. However, the primary goal is to assist you in learning how to develop and enhance social work practice skills used to work with older adults and their families.I. Chapter 3 (Be sure to submit a copy of the image or a direct link to the image)
Conduct a web image search using the phrase “Older Adults Active Aging”. Briefly describe the image and critique it in comparison to the definition of Actively Aging presented in Chapter 3. (This paragraph should include an introduction with an academic reference to support the topic of “active aging”. No “I” (first person) or personal statements.
II. Chapter 4 (Be sure to insert a direct link of information about your state’s advance directives)
Find information on advance directives for your assigned state (Iowa) and provide a short summary about the advance directives from your assigned state. What are the strengths and weaknesses of advance directive policy in your assigned state? Does your state acknowledge advance directives from other states? Does your sate honor Five Wishes (see handout and video in Learning Unit 5. Also, you must submit the link and/or document that describes the state’s advance directives. Include academic references to support your information. This paragraph should include a reference citation linked to the advance directives from your assigned state.
III. Read and respond to at least two reflective Questions instead of three. (You may select to use your reflective responses on Chapter 3 or Chapter 4 or one response to each Chapter.
IV. Conclusion (Conclusion should be a summary of both Chapter 3 & 4). Avoid using “I” or making personal statements. No “I” (first person) or personal statements.
NOTE: You will submit three documents for this assignment (Paper, your assigned state advance directives and a copy of the image (Chapter 3)
Reflective Questions:
1.What did I notice in the article?
2. How did I feel about what was discussed in the article?
Class book: Chonody, J. & Teater, B. (2018). Social Work Practice with Older Adults: An Actively Aging Framework for Practice (1st Edition),

PLEASE make sure to follow ALL of the directions. If you are not the best at APA formatting, then this may not be the assignment for you. If you do like to research and add references, this is not the assignment for you. This teacher is very picky when it comes to how the students turn in the assignments. You going to need to peer review references, and this assignment can be written in simple language. There is no need to use the big fantasy wording. Let me know if I forgot to send you a document. Each reference that is used must be assessable to me. It must include the URL so I can go back and read the material of the reference. If I think the reference is irrelevant to the topic, I will ask for it to be replaced with a more relevant one.

Ive also attached a word doc explaining. Details for outline (answers to questions Ive included and they need to be expanded upon for questions 1-7; also references for diagnosis support needed). For remaining items, up to 19, I will get back to you with more details as to how much detail is needed for these.

Recall the KWL Chart that we discussed in the Module 3 Lecture. Now, enter your own KWL chart into the discussion board. What do you know about neurodevelopmental disorders? What do you want to know about them? Complete the “what did you learn” box after you complete the reading.
I have attached the lecture for this week
Think of a time when you did not feel welcome in a new place.
1-What were the borders that prevented you from feeling welcome?
2-Were these physical and/or mental borders that prevented you from feeling welcome?
3- Given the political nature of national borders and all of the policies and laws that govern who can cross borders, when, and for how long, how can you apply this exercise to better understanding and empathizing with immigrant and refugee clients, while at the same time keeping professional boundaries?

You will need to view the video and read the article covering cognitive distortions. Knowing that everyone has cognitive distortion from time to time, evil, then write a post describing a minimum of three examples of times you have had or still have cognitive distortions and you’re thinking. Be sure to describe the situation, the cognitive distortion, and its impact on your mood and behaviors. For the second part of the discussion, you will need to consider what the Bible says about our thought life. You will need at least two verses where the Bible instruct us on how to manage our thought life and provide your own insights about the verses. You will need to state how you can apply the verses to your life.

A SWOT analysis is a valuable tool for evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with your chosen theory for the Personal and Professional Theory Analysis paper. Keep in mind that you are required to use the theory that you selected in Week 4 and will be used for the Recorded Presentation and Theory Demonstration as well.
This analysis will help you gain a deeper understanding of the theory and how this knowledge and insight can be applied to the PPTA. In addition, this assignment will allow an opportunity for the instructor to review your selection and determine if you are on target with your understanding before beginning the PPTA. The instructions for the PPTA are linked below and it is imperative that you familiarize yourself with the requirements of that assignment before selecting a theory. There is a very quick turnaround time from your submission of this assignment, the instructor’s review and feedback, and when the PPTA is due.
Link – SWK 5430 Personal and Professional Theory Analysis Paper Rubric and Instructions (Core Assignment) F24.docx Download SWK 5430 Personal and Professional Theory Analysis Paper Rubric and Instructions (Core Assignment) F24.docx
Below is a detailed overview of each of the components in a SWOT analysis and instructions for the assignment will follow.
S – Strengths: It is important to begin by identifying the strengths of the theory you are considering as there are often aspects of the theory that give it advantages when being applied to certain issues or problems. For example, a theory may have a strong empirical foundation, extensive research support, or the ability to be applied in various situations. The strengths often make the theory more credible and applicable in generalist practice settings.
W – Weaknesses: Every theory, even the most common and widely accepted ones, has limitations and weaknesses that a SWOT analysis can uncover. These weaknesses can include gaps in the literature, biases, and an inability to be applied in generalist practice settings or with diverse populations. By understanding the weaknesses or limitations of a theory, one can make a more critical analysis of the theory and make an informed decision on whether or not it can be applied in practice. For the PPTA assignment, you will need to know both the strengths and weaknesses of a theory as well as how it compares to one other theory.
O – Opportunities: In a SWOT analysis, the O can vary depending on what you are analyzing. For this assignment, opportunities will refer to an analysis of ways to improve the effectiveness of the chosen theory or new opportunities and settings in which it can be applied. For example, if you shared that a weakness of a theory is that there is little literature on its application to individuals residing in rural areas, what opportunities exist to apply this theory when working with rural populations in a way that is innovative and equitable? In a SWOT analysis, it is important to use critical thinking and imagine ways that evidenced-based theories can be applied in an ever-changing society comprised of diverse groups and communities.
T – Threats: As you are learning, there are several factors that can create barriers when incorporating theory into practice. A SWOT analysis of a theory can help you to be proactive by planning for threats that could hinder the effectiveness of your chosen theory. These threats could include the theory’s inability to account for cultural norms, diversity, or intersectionality, or a lack of resources for the client or practitioner; just to name a few examples. It is important to consider the obstacles that would impact how to implement the theory or how the theory will be received by clients. When we understand potential threats, we can account for them and develop strategies to overcome them.

Below are instructions for completing Critical Thinking Reflection #2 – SWOT Analysis – the template is linked immediately following the instructions.
1. Review the instructions for the PPTA assignment BEFORE completing this assignment.
2. Using your chosen theory, search for two peer-reviewed journal articles to complete the SWOT analysis.
The two peer-reviewed journal articles must be dated 5–7 years (2016 – 2024).
3. Using the template (with included prompts), complete a SWOT analysis of your chosen theory, and submit it to Canvas. You must complete your responses directly within the template.
Ensure that you incorporate the two peer-reviewed journal articles and the textbook (when applicable).
Notes about the assignment:
Your responses do not need to be in paragraph form and can be written out in detailed bullet points. Just ensure you have answered the questions/prompts thoroughly to avoid a deduction in points.
This assignment is meant to give you a head start on your PPTA paper, so you are using critical thinking to begin brainstorming and conceptualizing your thoughts for the PPTA assignment.
Please use APA 7th edition formatting when completing the assignment; specifically, around citing your two peer-reviewed journal articles.

SWOT Analysis Template – SWK 5430 Critical Thinking Reflection #2 – SWOT Analysis Template (F24).docx Download SWK 5430 Critical Thinking Reflection #2 – SWOT Analysis Template (F24).docx
Rubric
SWK 5430 Critical Thinking Reflection #2 -SWOT Analysis (F23)
SWK 5430 Critical Thinking Reflection #2 -SWOT Analysis (F23)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Brief Explanation of Chosen Theory
Include a brief explanation of why you chose this theory (in two to three sentences):
4 pts
Excellent
Provides a clear and concise explanation of why the theory was chosen, demonstrating a deep understanding of its relevance and applicability.
3 pts
Proficient
Provides a satisfactory explanation of why the theory was chosen, demonstrating an understanding of its relevance and applicability.
2 pts
Developing
Provides a limited explanation of why the theory was chosen, demonstrating some understanding of its relevance and applicability.
0 pts
No Present
Does not provide a clear explanation of why the theory was chosen or demonstrates a lack of understanding of its relevance and applicability.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References: 2 Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles and Textbook
The two peer-reviewed journal articles must be dated 5–7 years (2016 – 2023). You can also use the textbook in addition to the 2 journal articles if you feel it is applicable.
4 pts
Excellent
Includes two peer-reviewed journal articles and the textbook (if applicable), all properly cited and dated between 2016 and 2023.
3 pts
Proficient
Includes two peer-reviewed journal articles and the textbook (if applicable), with minor citation errors or one reference slightly outside the specified date range.
2 pts
Developing
Includes only one peer-reviewed journal article and the textbook (if applicable), with significant citation errors or both references slightly outside the specified date range.
0 pts
No Present
Includes no peer-reviewed journal articles or the textbook (if applicable), or references are improperly cited.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Strengths – Strengths of Chosen Theory
List three strengths of your chosen theory and why you consider them to be strengths. These can include strengths identified by the authors of your chosen peer-reviewed journal articles or the text.
4 pts
Excellent
Identifies and explains three clear strengths of the chosen theory, providing solid reasoning for considering them as strengths.
3 pts
Proficient
Identifies and explains two strengths of the chosen theory, providing reasonable reasoning for considering them as strengths.
2 pts
Developing
Identifies and explains one strength of the chosen theory, with limited or unclear reasoning for considering it as a strength.
0 pts
No Present
Does not identify or explain any strengths of the chosen theory.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Weakness – Limitations of Chosen Theory (Peer-reviewed Articles)
What did the authors of your peer reviewed journal article(s) identify as limitations of your chosen theory?
4 pts
Excellent
Accurately summarizes the limitations identified in both peer-reviewed journal articles, providing insightful analysis and understanding of their impact.
3 pts
Proficient
Accurately summarizes the limitations identified in one peer-reviewed journal article, providing appropriate analysis of their impact.
2 pts
Developing
Attempts to summarize the limitations identified in the peer-reviewed journal articles, but with some inaccuracies or limited analysis.
0 pts
No Present
Does not accurately summarize or analyze the limitations identified in the peer-reviewed journal articles.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Weakness – Limitation of Chosen Theory
What do you feel is a limitation of your chosen theory?
4 pts
Excellent
Clearly identifies and explains a significant limitation of the chosen theory, demonstrating critical thinking and understanding of its impact.
3 pts
Proficient
Identifies and explains a limitation of the chosen theory, but with limited critical thinking or understanding of its impact.
2 pts
Developing
Identifies a limitation of the chosen theory, but with limited or unclear explanation of its impact.
0 pts
No Present
Does not identify or explain a limitation of the chosen theory.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Weakness – Ineffective in Practice Settings
Name at least one practice setting that your chosen theory may not be effective with and why.
4 pts
Excellent
Accurately identifies and thoroughly explains at least one practice setting where the chosen theory may not be effective, providing compelling reasoning.
3 pts
Proficient
Accurately identifies and explains at least one practice setting where the chosen theory may not be effective, providing reasonable reasoning.
2 pts
Developing
Identifies at least one practice setting where the chosen theory may not be effective, but with limited or unclear reasoning.
0 pts
No Present
Does not identify or explain any practice settings where the chosen theory may not be effective.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Weakness – Ineffectiveness with Client Populations
Name at least one client population that your chosen theory may not be effective with and why.
4 pts
Excellent
Accurately identifies and thoroughly explains at least one client population where the chosen theory may not be effective, providing compelling reasoning.
3 pts
Proficient
Accurately identifies and explains at least one client population where the chosen theory may not be effective, providing reasonable reasoning.
2 pts
Developing
Identifies at least one client population where the chosen theory may not be effective, but with limited or unclear reasoning.
0 pts
No Present
Does not identify or explain any client populations where the chosen theory may not be effective.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Weakness – Relation to Cultural Competency/Humility
Could increasing cultural competency or cultural humility address a weakness of your chosen theory? Why or why not?
4 pts
Excellent
Provides a detailed and insightful analysis of how increasing cultural competency or cultural humility could address a weakness of the chosen theory, with strong reasoning.
3 pts
Proficient
Provides a satisfactory analysis of how increasing cultural competency or cultural humility could address a weakness of the chosen theory, with reasonable reasoning.
2 pts
Developing
Attempts to analyze how increasing cultural competency or cultural humility could address a weakness of the chosen theory, but with limited or unclear reasoning.
0 pts
No Present
Does not provide an analysis of how increasing cultural competency or cultural humility could address a weakness of the chosen theory.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Opportunities – Innovative Ideas/Opportunities
Using your responses from the “W” section of your analysis, share three innovative ideas or opportunities you feel would improve the effectiveness of your chosen theory and address those weaknesses/limitations. These should be based on your own understanding of the theory and overall insight and not those of the peer-reviewed journal authors.
4 pts
Excellent
Shares three innovative ideas or opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the chosen theory and address its weaknesses/limitations, demonstrating creativity and critical thinking.
3 pts
Proficient
Shares two innovative ideas or opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the chosen theory and address its weaknesses/limitations, demonstrating reasonable creativity and critical thinking.
2 pts
Developing
Shares one innovative idea or opportunity to improve the effectiveness of the chosen theory and address its weaknesses/limitations, with limited creativity or critical thinking.
0 pts
No Present
Does not share any innovative ideas or opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the chosen theory and address its weaknesses/limitations.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Threats – Barriers/Threats to Implementation
List two barriers (or threats) that would prevent the effective implementation of this theory in practice settings and provide two strategies to address/manage those threats.
4 pts
Excellent
Identifies two barriers or threats that could prevent the effective implementation of the chosen theory in practice settings, and provides two well-reasoned strategies to address/manage those threats.
3 pts
Proficient
Identifies two barriers or threats that could prevent the effective implementation of the chosen theory in practice settings, and provides two reasonable strategies to address/manage those threats.
2 pts
Developing
Identifies one barrier or threat that could prevent the effective implementation of the chosen theory in practice settings, and provides one strategy to address/manage that threat.
0 pts
No Present
Does not identify any barriers or threats to the effective implementation of the chosen theory in practice settings, or does not provide any strategies to address/manage those threats.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Threats – Addressing Social Justice
Do you feel as though your chosen theory addresses issues of social justice? Why or why not?
4 pts
Excellent
Provides a comprehensive analysis of whether the chosen theory addresses issues of social justice, with strong reasoning and examples to support the argument.
3 pts
Proficient
Provides a satisfactory analysis of whether the chosen theory addresses issues of social justice, with reasonable reasoning and examples to support the argument.
2 pts
Developing
Attempts to analyze whether the chosen theory addresses issues of social justice, but with limited or unclear reasoning or examples.
0 pts
No Present
Does not provide an analysis of whether the chosen theory addresses issues of social justice.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Threats – Incorporation of Spirituality
Does this theory allow for the incorporation of spirituality?
4 pts
Excellent
Provides a thorough analysis of whether the chosen theory allows for the incorporation of spirituality, with strong reasoning and examples to support the argument.
3 pts
Proficient
Provides a satisfactory analysis of whether the chosen theory allows for the incorporation of spirituality, with reasonable reasoning and examples to support the argument.
2 pts
Developing
Attempts to analyze whether the chosen theory allows for the incorporation of spirituality, but with limited or unclear reasoning or examples.
0 pts
No Present
Does not provide an analysis of whether the chosen theory allows for the incorporation of spirituality.
4 pts

Submit a 2-page paper (not including title page and references) in which you address the following:
Define organizational culture. Identify elements of the culture at People First San Diego using data from the organization’s website.
Analyze People First San Diego’s location, population served, and demographics of the population and staff using data from the organization’s website. With these factors in mind, describe the cultural competencies you would need to work in this organization.
As a leader, explain the specific steps you would take to support a culture of equity and inclusion within the organization. Provide examples and draw from the Learning Resources in your explanation.
Use the Learning Resources to support your Assignment. Make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.