Category: Science

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 500–700 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Discuss the following for this assignment:
What are the major safety initiatives or priorities in your workplace?
What safety issues are not being addressed?
As a leader, how can you create successful change in your department?
Support your decision with evidence using at least 2 current (within the last 7 years) peer-reviewed journals.

Anodzing is process of thick oxed layer of aluminium during anodzing. a clean aluminium article s is made the anode and it’s electrolysed with dillute sulphuric acid

1st Paper ~ Ted Kennedy Incident:
Ted Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Incident: What Really Happened | HISTORY
Links to an external site.
You must use your textbook as a source, and you must also use five other additional outside sources for your paper (a total of at least 6), and three of these should be scholarly in nature. For example, you may use the internet, academic journal databases, books, encyclopedias, videos, newspapers, etc. So, a minimum of six (6) sources are required.
Both Research papers must consist of the following – No Abstract
– Must Use in 1st Paragraph ~ Title of The Paper as the heading for first paragraph
*** This is an introduction that contains the thesis in last sentence but does not have an Introduction as a heading, but the Title of the Paper
* Must Use the subheadings (do not include hint underneath) listed in order below in your paper for organization, consistency and coherency of the overall paper:
Description of the research subject(hint ~ Write an overview of the subject you are researching for that paper)
Analysis of the crime event or events(hint ~ your decision on what crime or crime events you want to write on for that paper based on your research)
Description of media involvement and coverage(hint ~ write to the media coverage, how much, what venue, what did they cover, did it change over time, i.e., during the event, trial, etc.)
Perspective concerning the media influence
(hint: What is your perspective (not your Opinion) based on your research backed up with citations and sources on how the media influenced this matter? It could be what impact it had while it was going on, afterward, trials, currently, etc.).
Conclusion (hint ~ The paper’s conclusion wraps it all up for the reader who is your grade)
** (Overall the last hint ~ Review APA Module Again before submitting the papers ~ I structured this approach so that one segment flows nicely into the next one. Again, sentences should not be more than 25-30 words. Paragraphs approx. 5 sentences. Use APA 7 citations and references). Be sure to use proper paragraphs and indent your paragraphs.
Format
Each paper must be in APA 7 format (NO ABSTRACT) and include a title page, body *Thesis is the last sentence in the first paragraph of the body* (include subheadings above), and references/work cited page. Intext citations are required when citing your sources and must be in the correct APA format. Be sure to use proper paragraphs and indent your paragraphs.The length of the body of each paper is to be 1500, written in 12-point font and double-spaced, papers should be a minimum of 1500 words, not counting the title page, and reference page. Papers are to be submitted through the canvas course website.
Assignment Submission Policies
Submissions are to be submitted in MS Word or Adobe PDF.
When submitting an assignment, you are responsible for saving a copy before submitting it, in the event the Course website computer system malfunctions. Save the assignment on your computer hard drive or a removable medium then submit the assignment.
Save the file in the format “LASTNAME_FIRSTNAME-FINALPAPER” without the # symbol in the file name.
All writing assignments will be submitted to turnitin.com through the course link on the Course website. All work must be original to you and done for the first time this semester for this class./courses/279856/files/27704952?wrap=1 No AI work will be permi
Actions Providing 2 Sample Papers to help you with this class:Sample Paper CCJ3032.pdfActionsSample Paper 2 CCJ3032.pdfActions
this is the textbook
Jewkes, Y., and Linneman, T. (2018) Media and Crime in the U.S., Sage Publications.

i will provide you with a high quality explanation to each of you problem in easiest way possible.
You’ll get quick and well response for you query and all the answers will be genuine and error less.
Hope you’ll approach me❤

Touchstone: Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock Lab Report
ASSIGNMENT: In this unit, you will complete the lab titled Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock. Now it is time to write up your lab report describing the hypothesis and conclusions you drew from the lab experience.
By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:
Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic
Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation
Explain any obtained results
Discuss the conclusions and implications
Download the lab report file. IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone.
Lab Report – Sensory Transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock
The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided and submit it as a Word file. Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Directions
Step 1: Download and review the lab report file.
Step 2: Complete the simulation and fill in each part of the lab report file as you work through the Activity. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.
Follow the process presented to you in the How to Write a Lab Report lesson to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.
Step 3: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.
Step 4: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.
Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.
❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?B. Rubric
Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)
Objective and Hypothesis
Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable). (18%)Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words.Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific.Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation.Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words.Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Background Knowledge
Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation. (18%)
Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear.Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Summary and Steps
Summarize the steps taken in the simulation. (18%)
Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab.Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically.Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation, or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Results
Explain the obtained results from the simulation. (18%)
Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected, and why.Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation, and if the results were expected or unexpected.Explains some of the results of the simulation, but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conclusions and Implications
Discusses the conclusions and implications of the simulation. (18%)
Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
Conventions and Proofreading
Submission follows conventions for standard written English. (10%)
There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability.There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability.There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability.Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.
C. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name and the date.
Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.
D. Additional Resources
The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
How to Write a Lab Report lesson
Activity Page

Discussion Fats
1. Instructions: Read the scenario, and post your answers to the questions that follow. Posts must be at least 5-6 sentences in length.
Advertisements often claim that fats are bad. Your classmate Mike asks, “If fats are so bad for us, why do we need to have any in our diets?” How would you answer him?
2. Which of the following would you recommend?
Energy (kcal) Total fat (grams) Saturated fat (grams) Cholesterol (mg)
Regular ground beef, 3.5 oz cooked 273 18 7 82
Ground chuck, 3.5 oz cooked 232 14 5 86
Ground round, 3.5 oz cooked 204 11 4 82
Ground sirloin, 3.5 oz cooked 164 6 3 76
Review the table above. Taking into consideration the nutrition information listed for each type of ground beef, cooking methods, and expense, select which type you would recommend. Explain the reasons behind your recommendation.

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Astronomy project based on stars visibility state to state due to pollution.
Requirements: Please be sure to carefully follow and address all of the requirements listed and provided in the attached document Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.

This is a two part assignment please keep separately.
Part 1 Blacks in Social Sciences
Answer in red font.
During the mid and later decades of the twentieth century, the perspectives and contributions of people of color were introduced. For the fields of history, sociology and psychology, identify two (2) black scholars who made an impact in their respective fields. Discuss in detail their particular subfield/area of research and explain how they shaped the field.
**NOTE: Kenneth and Mamie Clark were African American psychologists who studied children’s perceptions of race. Their research was influential in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education. These 2 scholars worked as a team on the same research.Hence for the purposes of this assignment, Kenneth and Mamie Clark would count as 1 scholar, not 2 separate ones since they worked on the same project. You would have to find an additional one to count as your second scholar. Also the above example may not be used.**
1.History:
2.Sociology:
3.Psychology:
Part 2 Venn Diagram
This is a Venn Diagram
There are several disciplines in the Social Sciences. In being labeled as a Social Science, these disciplines have similarities while also having differences. In a Venn Diagram, show the similarities and differences between the following disciplines. Complete two separate Venn Diagrams.
One will compare/ contrast History and Sociology
The other will compare/contrast Psychology and Political Science
You should two circles with a minimum of 3 points in each space (circle).
Follow the instructions in the YouTube video on how to develop a Venn Diagram. It is not necessary to do the last step and save it as a jpeg document. I require the assignment to be saved as a World document.
Link to video instructions https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=smart+art+ven…

I have a word document with links and information. Make another word document with the needed info. ||||||||| You must research the life history for each animal that is listed for your project and list HOW your project will avoid, minimize and/or mitigate based on their life history (i.e. occurrence in the area, breeding, feeding, spawning, etc). List Best Management Practices you will use to Avoid, Minimize, and/or Mitigate the potential effects of your project on the environment. Include a table that depicts the impact and how the Best Management Practices you will use to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate that impact. Figures Photos of site and other figures if they are useful (if you refer to them in your text). Cite sources of figures, whether you took them or found online. All sources of information Document each resource and note what information you gleaned from it. This can include people, online references, technical documents, news articles, etc. (Include working URLs, dates of interviews, agency names, etc.) THESE NEED TO BE BASED AROUND TRANSPORTATION< PUBLIC SERVICES AND< UTILITIES. The word file has good information.

Hello Class,
One of my personal strengths related to professional presentations is my ability to express myself clearly. This skill is very important when you are talking about the effect of technology on prenatal education, which is a very complicated subject. The information can be understood by both healthcare professionals and patients. This clarity allows people to make the right decisions that will result in good patient care and outcomes. To further enhance this strength, the process of continuous learning is of great importance. Participating in advanced communication workshops and getting feedback from peers on presentations can improve my skill at explaining complex data clearly and effectively (Seals et al., 2022). The main thing that should be improved in communication is clarity, in order to be sure that the results of the research are understood and applied correctly in clinical settings. This allows stakeholders to make decisions based on the information they have, which can result in better healthcare results.
On the other hand, a personal weakness I have is the anxiety that I feel when I have to give presentations. This anxiety, at times, can hamper my delivery, thus affecting the effectiveness of the presentation, especially in situations with high stakes. To overcome this weakness, I can be mindful of the techniques of stress and relaxation that I will be using before presentations, such as meditation or deep breathing. These techniques are useful for soothing nerves, increasing focus, and enhancing the overall presentation delivery. Growing the ability to manage anxiety is of great importance for career development. Confidence in the presentation can change the audience’s trust and engagement, which is very important in healthcare settings where the stakes involve the patients’ outcomes (Fisher et al., 2021).
Improving these presentation skills is directly linked to effectively communicating the findings of the study. In a population of pregnant women who are seeking antenatal care, how does the use of technology in prenatal education programs compare to traditional face-to-face education in influencing knowledge and pregnancy outcomes? The clarity of the effectiveness of technology in prenatal education can be enhanced, which in turn will encourage the adoption of it (Liew et al., 202). Thus, lessening presentation anxiety will make these findings be delivered confidently; thus, trust and further research into innovative educational methods in prenatal care will be encouraged. These advancements not only support the development of professionals but also increase the influence of research on the improvement of prenatal care practices.
References
Fisher, C., Flew, T., Park, S., Lee, J. Y., & Dulleck, U. (2021). Improving trust in news: Audience solutions. Journalism Practice, 15(10), 1497-1515. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512786.2020.1787859
Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., Yoo, N. E., Gan, C. L., & Lee, Y. Y. (2023). Let’s talk about Sex!: AI and relational factors in the adoption of a chatbot conveying sexual and reproductive health information. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 100323. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958823000568
Seals, D. R. (2022). Talking the talk: tips for effective oral presentations in biomedical research. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 323(4), R496-R511. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpregu.00179.2022
Requirements: 150 words | .doc file
student’s comment
Hi thanks for your help
Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include citation and reference