Category: Science

Your Module 2 Discussion consists of four (4) parts. First frame a research question on your topic of interest for this course. Formulate your question using the PICO (T) question template. PICO Template Screenshot Next, create a research problem statement using generative artificial intelligence (AI) software (ChatGPT).https://chatgpt.com/auth/login Copy the AI research statement into the table in the assignment template. Evaluate and critique the AI-generated statement. What is missing? What could be articulated more clearly? Does the statement convey your thoughts and ideas related to your research question? Next, create a new research question statement using your own words and ideas and place it into the table next to the AI-generated statement. AI Generated Problem Statement template screenshot Paste both the PICO question table and the research questions tables into the discussion board box. Write a short paragraph describing your experience writing a research question using AI. Would you recommend this method, why or why not? After completing and posting your four-part initial post, evaluate one of your peer’s questions and offer one affirmation and one suggestion for improvement related to their topic or research problem statement. Guidelines Both the initial and the peer response should include at least one evidence-based reference cited in APA 7th edition. Utilize this PICO and Research Problem Statement Template

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Frame a Research Question Using the PICO (T) Template

• P (Population): Define the population or group you want to study.
• I (Intervention): Identify the intervention, exposure, or variable of interest.
• C (Comparison): Include a comparison group, if applicable.
• O (Outcome): Specify the measurable outcomes.
• (T) (Time): Add a timeframe for the study, if relevant.

Example:

Research Topic: Nurse burnout and patient outcomes

• P: Nurses working in hospital settings
• I: Implementing stress reduction programs
• C: Standard nurse workload without additional support
• O: Reduced nurse burnout and improved patient care quality
• T: Over 6 months

PICO Question: In nurses working in hospital settings (P), how does implementing stress reduction programs (I) compared to standard nurse workload (C) affect nurse burnout and patient care quality (O) over 6 months (T)?

Step 2: Generate an AI-Generated Problem Statement

• Use ChatGPT or a similar tool to create a problem statement based on your PICO question.
• Example Prompt for AI: “Write a research problem statement about the impact of stress reduction programs on nurse burnout and patient care quality in hospitals.”
• Paste the AI-generated problem statement into the table provided in the assignment template.

Step 3: Critique the AI-Generated Statement

• Evaluate the AI-generated statement:
  • Strengths: Does it align with your PICO question? Is it clear and focused?
  • Weaknesses: What is missing? Is the context or specificity lacking?
• Write a brief critique and include it in the discussion.

Step 4: Write a New Problem Statement in Your Own Words

• Rewrite the problem statement to reflect your unique perspective.
• Focus on adding details or clarifying points that the AI missed.
• Place the new problem statement in the table next to the AI-generated version.

Step 5: Paste Tables into the Discussion Post

• Include both the PICO Question Table and the Research Problem Statement Table in your post. Use the provided template for formatting.

Step 6: Describe Your Experience Using AI

• Write a short paragraph discussing your experience with AI for writing research questions.
  • Did the AI help generate ideas?
  • Were there limitations in the AI’s understanding of your topic?
  • Would you recommend this method to others, and why?

Step 7: Engage with a Peer’s Post

• Review one peer’s post and provide:
  • One affirmation: Highlight what they did well (e.g., clarity, alignment with the PICO framework).
  • One suggestion: Offer constructive feedback for improvement (e.g., refining the research problem or making outcomes more specific).

Step 8: Include an Evidence-Based Reference

• Both your initial post and peer response should include at least one evidence-based reference cited in APA 7th edition.
• Example:
  

  American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

Crystal healing
Research:
Conduct thorough research on the chosen pseudoscience topic using credible sources such as scientific journals, books, reputable websites, and articles that critically evaluate the claims of the pseudoscience.
Identify the key claims made by proponents of the pseudoscience.
Investigate the origins and history of the pseudoscientific belief.
Analyze the evidence (or lack thereof) supporting these claims and the scientific consensus on the topic.
Consider the psychological, social, and cultural reasons why people believe in this pseudoscience.
PowerPoint Slide Creation:
Create a single PowerPoint slide that summarizes your findings. The slide should include the following elements:
Title: The name of the pseudoscience.
Background: Brief descriiption and origins of the pseudoscience.
Key Claims: Major assertions made by proponents.
Scientific Evaluation: Analysis of the evidence and the scientific consensus.
Impact: The societal, psychological, or cultural impact of the pseudoscience.
References: List of credible sources used for research.

Chapter 2 – What′s in the Box?? This assignment will help you to think like a scientist. Ask someone to place 2-3 items in a sealed box before you begin the assignment – no peeking in the box! Your task is to figure out what is inside the box without opening it. You will use observations, develop and execute a strategy, and then draw conclusions based on your findings. A good real-world analogy for the box experiment is the study of black holes in astronomy. Just as you will infer the contents of the sealed box without directly observing them, scientists infer the properties and existence of black holes by observing their effects on nearby stars and light, rather than seeing the black holes themselves. Both scenarios require indirect observation, hypothesis formation, and creative use of available tools to draw conclusions about the unknown. Your goal for this experiment should be to write thoughtful answers and engage deeply with the process. Remember, this is a learning experience. Book Used:Science & Society ISBN: 9781449685027 Authors: Peter Daempfle Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Publishers Publication Date: 2012-12-13
Sample Outline (do not copy and do not use A1)
This assignment will help you to think like a scientist. Ask someone to place 2-3 items in a sealed box before you begin the assignment – no peeking in the box! Your task is to figure out what is inside the box without opening it. You will use observations, develop and execute a strategy, and then draw conclusions based on your findings.
A good real-world analogy for the box experiment is the study of black holes in astronomy. Just as you will infer the contents of the sealed box without directly observing them, scientists infer the properties and existence of black holes by observing their effects on nearby stars and light, rather than seeing the black holes themselves. Both scenarios require indirect observation, hypothesis formation, and creative use of available tools to draw conclusions about the unknown.
Your goal for this experiment should be to write thoughtful answers and engage deeply with the process. Remember, this is a learning experience.
Part 1: Observations and Initial Thoughts
Observations
Write down your observations of the box and any clues about what might be inside.
Example: ″The box is small, lightweight, and makes a rattling sound when shaken.″
Observation Methods
Describe how you made your observations.
Example: ″I listened closely while shaking the box and noticed a rattling sound.″
Additional Observation Methods
Consider other methods of observation that could help but aren’t available right now (like X-rays or scanning technology).
Example: ″Using an X-ray scanner could give a visual of the items inside without opening the box.″
Importance of Observations
Explain why making observations is crucial in scientific inquiry.
Example: ″Observations are the first step in the scientific method, allowing us to gather data and form hypotheses.″
Part 2: Developing a Strategy
Strategy Planning
Think about how you want to approach the problem and write down the strategy you will use to figure out what is in the box.
Example: ″I plan to shake the box gently, listen for sounds, weigh it, and use a magnet to see if any items are metallic.″
Experimental Plan
Outline the steps of your planned experiment.
Example:
Shake the box gently and note the sounds.
Weigh the box and compare it to known weights.
Test the box with a magnet.
Record all observations carefully.
Part 3: Performing the Experiment
Execution and Documentation
Perform your experiment and document each step.
Example:
Shook the box and heard a soft thud.
Weighed the box: 150 grams.
Magnet test: no reaction.
Noted down all observations.
Part 4: Conclusion and Analysis
Conclusion
Based on your observations and experiment, what items do you think are in the box?
Example: ″I think the box contains a small rubber ball and a few pebbles.″
Reflect on Observations
Define what it means to make observations in the context of scientific reasoning.
Example: ″Making observations involves using our senses and tools to gather data about the world around us.″
Summarizing Methods
Summarize the methods you used to solve the problem into simple steps.
Example: ″I used shaking, weighing, and a magnet test to gather information about the box′s contents.″
Part 5: Reflection
500-Word Reflection
Reflect on the box experiment using terms, concepts, and theories from Chapters 1, 2, and 5.
Explain how the experiment exemplifies the scientific process, detailing your thinking, procedures, and what you learned.
Reflection Rubric:
Explanation of how the experiment demonstrates scientific principles (up to 20 points).
Use of textbook terms and concepts in context (up to 20 points).
Desсrіption of your thinking process and procedures (up to 20 points).
Personal feedback on what you learned (up to 20 points).
Essay is 500+ words in length (up to 20 points).
When you check your word count, make sure you highlight only the text for your essay. Do not include your name, title, etc. You can easily check your word count in the Review tab in Microsoft Word.
Submit your essay in .doc, .docx or .pdf file format (PAGES files will NOT be accepted) by 11:59pm on the due date.

Milestone 2 Requirements​
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. CT.​
Content: Review the Milestone 2 Rubric before submitting your assignment and reach out to your instructor if you have questions.
References: At least 3 scholarly articles or webpages.
Style: APA
Web Link: https://cyberactive.bellevue.edu/ultra/courses/_533518_1/outline/launchFrame?contentId=_16402791_ https:~2F~2Fcontent.bellevue.edu~2Fcst~2FNS~2F105-ultra~2Fwk-4-articulate
Descriiption
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic Details: Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one-paragraph) synopsis of real science provided by the source. You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites, but a minimum of three is required.  Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or web pages. The following resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style. If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be sure to include the URL for each source.
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic (Week 4)
Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a
citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one paragraph) synopsis of real science
provided by the source.
You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites but a minimum
of three is required.
Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or webpages. The following
resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style.
If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be
sure to include the URL for each source.
Milestone Content
Question:
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic Details:

Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one-paragraph) synopsis of real science provided by the source.
You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites, but a minimum of three is required.
Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or web pages. The following resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style.
If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be sure to include the URL for each source.
Click on the link below to view an overview of the Martian Term Project.
Web Link: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/webpage-website-references
Is Life Out There?
“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.” – Arthur C. Clarke
Is there life out there? Are we alone, or are there other planets out there with life? These are big questions that have been a cornerstone of science fiction. Science itself is also interested in this question. So, is there life out there, and how do we look for it? This is what we are exploring this week.

Milestone 2 Requirements​
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. CT.​
Content: Review the Milestone 2 Rubric before submitting your assignment and reach out to your instructor if you have questions.
References: At least 3 scholarly articles or webpages.
Style: APA
Web Link: https://cyberactive.bellevue.edu/ultra/courses/_533518_1/outline/launchFrame?contentId=_16402791_ https:~2F~2Fcontent.bellevue.edu~2Fcst~2FNS~2F105-ultra~2Fwk-4-articulate
Descriiption
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic Details: Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one-paragraph) synopsis of real science provided by the source. You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites, but a minimum of three is required.  Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or web pages. The following resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style. If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be sure to include the URL for each source.
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic (Week 4)
Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a
citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one paragraph) synopsis of real science
provided by the source.
You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites but a minimum
of three is required.
Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or webpages. The following
resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style.
If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be
sure to include the URL for each source.
Milestone Content
Question:
Milestone 2: Literature Review on Topic Details:

Find 3 scholarly articles or webpages related to your selected book topic. Include a citation for the articles/websites and a brief (one-paragraph) synopsis of real science provided by the source.
You are encouraged to share more than three scholarly articles/websites, but a minimum of three is required.
Most of your citations will probably be from web articles or web pages. The following resource will help with citing: Webpage on a website references APA Style.
If you are unsure how to format your citation, your instructor will provide feedback. Be sure to include the URL for each source.
Click on the link below to view an overview of the Martian Term Project.
Web Link: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples/webpage-website-references
Is Life Out There?
“Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.” – Arthur C. Clarke
Is there life out there? Are we alone, or are there other planets out there with life? These are big questions that have been a cornerstone of science fiction. Science itself is also interested in this question. So, is there life out there, and how do we look for it? This is what we are exploring this week.

Please review all documents and let me know which topic you choose (use one of the topics provided in the paper guideline (“argumentative research paper 2” attachment). This is an argumentative research paper for a History of Science college course, senior level. Please see all attachments and read carefully as well as reach out to me with additional questions. The paper guideline is the attachment labeled “Argumentative Research Paper 2” which includes some topics you can choose from to expand upon, CHOOSE ONLY 1 TOPIC. In addition to the final paper, I need to submit a Draft or paper plan before submitting this final research paper (THE PAPER PLAN WILL ALSO BE GRADED SO PLEASE INCLUDE IT AS A SEPARATE DOCUMENT); please see the attachment labeled “Paper Plan(required) OR Full Draft (optional) for Paper 2”, this tells you what the paper plan or draft should include for submission as well as the attachment labeled “Example Paper Plan” is an example paper plan layout that the instructor wants us to follow. (Do not pay attention to the due dates on the attachments, the DRAFT/PAPER PLAN is due Nov15 and the actual FINAL PAPER is due Nov 22) but I want both back by Nov 14 to make sure its ok and have enough time to send the the TAs to review it. I’ve attached all the lecture PowerPoints from Module 2 labeled “lec 6-1, lec 7-1, lec 8-2″, lec 9-2”, as this research paper is also based on information we covered in Module 2, BUT DO NOT USE THE ATTACHED LECTURE POWERPOINTS AS A CITATION/SOURCE, I merely attached it to give you an idea of what this course and module was about so far. Please do not use more than two scholarly sources in this argumentative paper, as the instructor does not want us to use too many sources. Let me know if you have questions so I can try to get answers from the instructor or TA. Thank you in advance.

A need an innovative work that could be equivalent to a published research paper
Important Info

The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.

Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Write a brief description.
Clinical cell significance
What are the presence of RBC’s in the urine associated with?
What are the presence of eosinophil’s in the urine associated with? And what is the preferred stain for viewing?
What is a clue cell?
Where do transitional epithelial cells originate. And what are they associated with?
What do the presence of renal tubular epithelial cells indicate?

Write a brief description.
Clinical cell significance
What are the presence of RBC’s in the urine associated with?
What are the presence of eosinophil’s in the urine associated with? And what is the preferred stain for viewing?
What is a clue cell?
Where do transitional epithelial cells originate. And what are they associated with?
What do the presence of renal tubular epithelial cells indicate?

Our first step onto the battlefield that is written argumentation is the Polemic Argument. This is the most common type of argument today. You can find millions of these types of arguments on Facebook.
Purpose: To express a semi-informed opinion about one of the topics we chose in class.
Audience: Your peers, but keep in mind that your strong opinion will only be embraced by a few.
Voice: Semi-formal, Academic
Emphasis: Problems stemming from Abortion, Racial Justice, Mental Health, and Gambling.
Support: One or two articles used to bring credibility to your claim. These can be somewhat out of context if it is necessary to take them out of context.
Organization: See Polemic Argument in a Nutshell hand out.
Format: MLA format; In-text citations; Works Cited Page; 750-
1000 words
The polemic form is a “strident presentation of an opinion… [or] a strident attack on or refutation of the opinion or perspective offered by someone else on a current social concern.” The polemic allows writers to present their positions more forcefully than other argumentative forms: the writer can express anger, frustration, or even humorous exasperation at the response to a current issue. The polemic is normally brief (similar to and frequently appearing as an op-ed) and can employ humor and irony, but it must present an alternative solution to the problem or a call to action