Category: Psychology homework help

1. Define thinking.
2. Describe several ways in which we represent information in our minds.
3. Explain the difference between logical and natural concepts.
4. Identify and describe mental strategies we can use to solve problems more effectively.
5. Identify and describe mental roadblocks that impede problem-solving and decision-making.
6. Describe the basic processes of creative thought and explain the difference between divergent and convergent thinking.
7. How can you apply skills of problem-solving to become a creative problem solver in everyday life? (Please give at least 3 examples)
8. Identify and describe the basic components of language and the milestones in language development and describe the roles of nature and nurture in language development.
9. Evaluate the linguistic relativity hypothesis and whether language is unique to humans.
10. Define intelligence, identify different tests of intelligence, and evaluate the characteristics of a good test of intelligence
11. Evaluate gender differences in cognitive abilities.
12. Describe the characteristics of the two extremes of intelligence and the misuse of intelligence tests.
13. Describe the major theories of intelligence and evaluate the roles of heredity and environment in intelligence.

This guide will help you break down each question in your assignment to ensure you provide a thorough response to each topic. Let’s dive into each section systematically.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

1. Define Thinking

• Start with a clear definition: Thinking is the mental process of manipulating information to form concepts, make decisions, solve problems, or engage in creative processes.
• Briefly discuss the role of cognition in day-to-day tasks and decision-making.

---

2. Representing Information in Our Minds

• Mental Images: Visual representations of objects or events.
• Concepts: Mental groupings of similar objects, events, or people (e.g., the concept of “dog”).
• Prototypes: A best example or average representation of a category (e.g., a “robin” being a prototype for “bird”).
• Schemas: Organized knowledge structures that help us interpret information based on prior experience (e.g., a restaurant schema).

---

3. Logical vs. Natural Concepts

• Logical Concepts: Clearly defined rules or characteristics, e.g., a “triangle” has three sides.
• Natural Concepts: Not as rigid or defined by strict rules; based on common features and shared characteristics (e.g., “furniture” has no exact definition but generally includes objects like chairs, tables, etc.).

---

4. Mental Strategies for Problem Solving

• Algorithms: Step-by-step procedures that guarantee a solution.
• Heuristics: Mental shortcuts or “rules of thumb” that may lead to a solution but are not guaranteed to be correct.
• Insight: Sudden realization or “aha moment.”
• Means-End Analysis: Breaking down a problem into smaller, more manageable steps.

---

5. Mental Roadblocks in Problem-Solving and Decision-Making

• Functional Fixedness: The inability to see an object being used in a new way.
• Confirmation Bias: The tendency to look for information that confirms one’s preconceptions.
• Mental Set: The tendency to approach a problem in a particular way because it has worked in the past, even if it’s no longer effective.
• Overconfidence Bias: Believing that one’s knowledge or abilities are better than they actually are.

---

6. Creative Thought and Divergent vs. Convergent Thinking

• Creative Thought: Involves thinking outside of the box, combining ideas in new ways, and approaching problems from fresh angles.
• Divergent Thinking: Generating multiple, varied solutions to a problem.
• Convergent Thinking: Narrowing down multiple solutions to find the best one.

---

7. Applying Problem-Solving Skills for Creative Solutions

• Example 1: Organizing a Project: Use brainstorming (divergent thinking) to generate creative ideas, then apply convergent thinking to select the most practical one.
• Example 2: Resolving a Conflict: Look for a creative solution by understanding both sides (thinking outside the box) and using decision-making strategies to find common ground.
• Example 3: Solving a Design Problem: Using mental imagery and heuristic shortcuts, come up with innovative solutions that can simplify the design while ensuring functionality.

---

8. Basic Components of Language and Language Development

• Phonemes: Basic units of sound.
• Morphemes: Smallest units of meaning (e.g., “unhappiness” has three morphemes).
• Syntax: Sentence structure.
• Semantics: Meaning of words and sentences.
• Milestones in Language Development: Babbling, one-word speech, two-word speech, and more complex sentence structures.
• Nature vs. Nurture: Both genetics and environment play a crucial role in language acquisition.

---

9. Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis and Language Uniqueness

• Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis: Suggests that the language we speak shapes the way we think.
• Is Language Unique to Humans?: While humans have complex language abilities, some animals exhibit communication systems, but human language is unique due to its abstract structure, grammar, and creativity.

---

10. Define Intelligence and Intelligence Tests

• Intelligence Definition: The ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and adapt to new situations.
• Types of Intelligence Tests:
  • IQ Tests: Measure general intelligence.
  • Aptitude Tests: Predict future performance.
  • Achievement Tests: Measure knowledge in specific areas.
• Characteristics of a Good Test: Validity (measuring what it is supposed to measure), reliability (consistent results), and fairness (absence of bias).

---

11. Gender Differences in Cognitive Abilities

• Discuss research showing some differences in cognitive abilities (e.g., women tend to excel in verbal tasks, men in spatial tasks), while emphasizing that such differences are often small and influenced by cultural factors.

---

12. Intelligence Extremes and Misuse of Intelligence Tests

• High Intelligence: Characteristics of gifted individuals, including faster learning, creativity, and advanced problem-solving skills.
• Low Intelligence: Characteristics of individuals with intellectual disabilities, including challenges in adaptive behavior.
• Misuse of Intelligence Tests: Discuss how intelligence tests can be misused for discriminatory purposes or fail to capture the full range of human abilities.

---

13. Theories of Intelligence and Heredity vs. Environment

• Spearman’s G Factor: General intelligence.
• Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences: Multiple, independent types of intelligence (e.g., musical, linguistic, spatial).
• Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory: Analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.
• Heredity vs. Environment: Both genetic factors (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) contribute to the development of intelligence, with studies showing their interaction.

---

14. Conclusion

• Summarize the key points discussed, reinforcing the importance of understanding how thinking, problem-solving, language, and intelligence work.
• Mention the interplay of nature and nurture in cognitive development and the importance of recognizing diversity in cognitive abilities.

---

Final Steps Before Submission

✅ Ensure proper APA or MLA formatting for citations.
✅ Review for clarity, accuracy, and logical flow.
✅ Proofread for grammatical correctness and sentence structure.

By following this guide, you’ll have a well-organized paper that addresses each question thoroughly and effectively. Happy writing! 😊

1. Define the concept of motivation and describe several major theories of motivation.
2. Identify different types of psychosocial needs.
3. Describe Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and identify the needs at each level in the hierarchy.
4. Explain how hunger and appetite are regulated.
5. Identify causal factors in obesity.
6. Identify and describe the types and causes of eating disorders.
7. Identify and describe the four phases of the sexual response cycle.
8. Describe how researchers characterize the continuum of sexual orientation.
9. Describe the causes of sexual dysfunctions.
10. Identify the three components of emotions and the six basic emotional expressions.
11. Describe the roles of gender and cultural factors in emotions.
12. Identify factors involved in human happiness.
13. Explain how the brain processes emotions.
14. Describe the major theories of emotion and identify the major theorists.
15. Define emotional intelligence and evaluate its importance.
16. Describe the polygraph technique and evaluate its reliability.
17. Apply techniques of anger management for controlling anger.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

This guide will help you structure your paper systematically, covering all required topics in an organized and coherent manner.

---

1. Introduction

• Define motivation and emotion as core psychological concepts.
• Explain why understanding these topics is essential in psychology.
• Provide a thesis statement outlining the key areas your paper will cover.

---

2. Motivation and Major Theories

• Definition of Motivation: Explain motivation as the internal process that initiates, directs, and sustains goal-directed behavior.
• Major Theories of Motivation:
  • Incentive Theory: External rewards drive behavior.
  • Drive Reduction Theory: Biological needs create tension, motivating actions to restore balance.
  • Arousal Theory: People seek optimal levels of arousal.
  • Self-Determination Theory: Focuses on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

---

3. Psychosocial Needs

• Define psychosocial needs as social and psychological factors that influence behavior.
• Examples: Need for affiliation, achievement, and power.

---

4. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

• Explain Maslow’s pyramid structure:
  1. Physiological Needs – Food, water, shelter.
  2. Safety Needs – Security, stability.
  3. Love/Belonging – Relationships, social connections.
  4. Esteem Needs – Self-worth, accomplishment.
  5. Self-Actualization – Personal growth and fulfillment.

---

5. Hunger and Appetite Regulation

• Biological factors: Hypothalamus, hormones (ghrelin, leptin, insulin).
• Psychological and environmental influences.

---

6. Causes of Obesity

• Genetics, metabolism, lifestyle, socioeconomic factors, and psychological influences.

---

7. Types and Causes of Eating Disorders

• Anorexia Nervosa – Fear of gaining weight, restrictive eating.
• Bulimia Nervosa – Binge eating followed by purging.
• Binge-Eating Disorder – Frequent overeating without purging.
• Causes: Genetic, psychological, societal pressures.

---

8. Sexual Response Cycle

• Four phases (Masters & Johnson):
  1. Excitement – Physical arousal begins.
  2. Plateau – Heightened arousal.
  3. Orgasm – Peak of pleasure.
  4. Resolution – Body returns to resting state.

---

9. Continuum of Sexual Orientation

• Spectrum from heterosexuality to homosexuality, including bisexuality, asexuality.

---

10. Causes of Sexual Dysfunctions

• Biological (hormonal imbalances, medical conditions).
• Psychological (anxiety, trauma).
• Social (relationship issues, cultural beliefs).

---

11. Components of Emotion & Basic Emotional Expressions

• Three Components: Physiological, behavioral, and cognitive.
• Six Basic Emotions (Ekman): Happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, disgust.

---

12. Gender & Cultural Influences on Emotion

• Gender differences in emotional expression.
• Cultural norms shape emotional display rules.

---

13. Factors in Human Happiness

• Genetics, relationships, life circumstances, mindset, and gratitude.

---

14. How the Brain Processes Emotion

• Role of Amygdala (fear, aggression).
• Prefrontal Cortex (emotion regulation).
• Limbic System (overall emotional processing).

---

15. Theories of Emotion & Major Theorists

• James-Lange Theory – Emotions arise from physiological responses.
• Cannon-Bard Theory – Emotions and physiological responses occur simultaneously.
• Schachter-Singer (Two-Factor) Theory – Emotion depends on physiological arousal + cognitive interpretation.

---

16. Emotional Intelligence & Its Importance

• Defined as the ability to understand and manage emotions.
• Benefits: Better relationships, leadership skills, self-regulation.

---

17. Polygraph Technique & Its Reliability

• Measures physiological responses (heart rate, sweating).
• Criticism: Not 100% accurate due to anxiety/misinterpretation.

---

18. Anger Management Techniques

• Deep breathing, cognitive restructuring, mindfulness, communication strategies.

---

19. Conclusion

• Summarize key findings.
• Emphasize the importance of motivation, emotion, and related psychological processes in human behavior.

---

Final Steps Before Submission

✅ Proofread for grammar and clarity.
✅ Ensure citations follow the required format (APA, MLA).
✅ Review assignment guidelines for completeness.

By following this structured guide, you’ll have a well-organized and comprehensive paper. Happy writing! 😊

This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text.  At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps.
First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.
Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.
Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:
What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

---

Step-by-Step Guide for Analyzing an Ethical Debate

This assignment asks you to explore a moral controversy, evaluate it from two ethical perspectives, and discuss professional codes of ethics relevant to your chosen topic. Here’s a clear breakdown of how to complete each part of the assignment:

---

Step 1: Select Your Topic

• Choose a Topic of Moral Controversy:
  Pick a topic that has sparked moral debate or disagreement in society. Some examples include:

  • Euthanasia
  • The death penalty
  • Abortion
  • Cloning
  • Animal rights
  • Genetic engineering
  • Capital punishment
  • Gun control

  Tip: Choose a topic that you feel comfortable analyzing from multiple ethical perspectives and that has enough resources to support your evaluation.

---

Step 2: Detail the Positions of Each Side

• Identify the Two Sides of the Debate:
  For any moral controversy, there are typically two (or more) sides. For instance, in the case of abortion, the two sides are pro-choice and pro-life.

  For each side, identify at least two moral reasons that support their stance. These reasons could be based on values, beliefs, or outcomes they believe are important.

  • Example for abortion:
    • Pro-choice: Women have the right to make decisions about their bodies; ensuring legal abortion protects women’s health.
    • Pro-life: Abortion is morally wrong because it ends a potential life; all life is sacred and must be protected.

---

Step 3: Evaluate the Positions Using Ethical Theories

• Ethical Egoism:

  • What would an Ethical Egoist say?
    Ethical Egoism is the belief that individuals should act in their self-interest. Consider how this theory would address the topic you’ve chosen.
  • Which side would an Ethical Egoist take?
    Would they favor one side over the other? What reasoning would they provide based on their own interests or well-being?
  • Justifying the Moral Position:
    What would the Ethical Egoist’s reasoning be for their stance? How does self-interest guide their position on the issue?
  • Conflict between Loyalty to Self and Community:
    Does this topic present any issues about balancing individual desires versus what’s best for society or community? If so, how does the Ethical Egoist resolve this?

  Example: An Ethical Egoist might support abortion rights if they believe a woman’s autonomy and personal choice should come first in terms of her well-being.

• Social Contract Ethics:

  • What would a Social Contract Ethicist say?
    The Social Contract theory suggests that moral and political obligations are based on agreements made by individuals within a society. How would this theory evaluate your topic?
  • Which side would a Social Contract Ethicist take?
    Would they prioritize individual rights or societal rules and norms? How would they justify their stance on the issue?
  • Collision Between Personal and National Obligations:
    Does your topic create a conflict between personal obligations (like individual rights) and national or societal obligations (like laws or regulations)? Discuss how Social Contract theory addresses this.

  Example: A Social Contract Ethicist might weigh the collective good of society, advocating for laws that limit abortion but also recognizing a person’s autonomy in specific cases.

---

Step 4: Discuss Relevant Professional Codes of Ethics

• Identify Professional Codes of Ethics: Depending on your topic, there may be professional codes of ethics that are relevant. For example, medical professionals have codes of ethics that guide decisions on controversial issues like euthanasia or abortion.

  Examples:

  • The AMA Code of Ethics (for doctors) may provide guidance on ethical issues like euthanasia or abortion.
  • The ANA Code of Ethics (for nurses) may address ethical dilemmas in healthcare.
  • Other professional codes (such as those for lawyers, social workers, or bioethicists) may also be relevant to your topic.

• Address Conflicts Between Professional and Familial Duties: Consider whether your topic presents any conflicts between professional duties and familial or personal obligations. For example, a doctor’s duty to save a life may conflict with their personal belief system.

  • Example: A physician who is against abortion may face a conflict when asked to provide counseling or treatment related to abortion services.

---

Step 5: Summarize and Discuss the Best Course of Action

• After evaluating both sides of the ethical debate and considering the perspectives from Ethical Egoism and Social Contract Ethics, conclude with what you feel is the best course of action. This should be based on your analysis and how each theory and professional code aligns with the issue.

  Tip: Consider practical implications, societal impact, and how both theories and professional ethics guide real-world decisions.

---

Step 6: Review the Rubric and Proofread

• Check Your Work Against the Grading Rubric:
  Before submitting, review the grading rubric to ensure your work meets all requirements, especially the clarity and depth of analysis.

• Proofread for Grammar and Clarity:
  Ensure that your reasoning is clear, your arguments are well-supported, and your paper flows logically.

Define your professional brand. Explain how you will fulfill your responsibility as a scholar, practitioner, and leader. Summarize how this course has impacted your expectations for pursuing your DHA

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand Your Assignment Requirements

• Carefully review the prompt: “Define your professional brand. Explain how you will fulfill your responsibility as a scholar, practitioner, and leader. Summarize how this course has impacted your expectations for pursuing your DHA.”
• Identify the key components:
  1. Professional Brand – Your unique identity and values in the healthcare field.
  2. Scholar, Practitioner, and Leader (SPL) Role – How you integrate research, practice, and leadership.
  3. Course Impact – How this course has shaped your expectations for your Doctor of Health Administration (DHA) journey.

Step 2: Create an Outline

Introduction:

• Start with a hook (a quote, statistic, or personal insight on professional growth).
• Clearly define what a professional brand means in the healthcare field.
• Provide a thesis statement outlining the main discussion points.

Body Paragraphs:

1. Defining Your Professional Brand

• Explain your core values, expertise, and leadership philosophy in healthcare.
• Discuss how your experience and education have shaped your brand.
• Provide specific examples of how you demonstrate your brand in professional settings.

2. Fulfilling Your Role as a Scholar, Practitioner, and Leader

• Scholar: Discuss your commitment to research and evidence-based practice.
• Practitioner: Explain how you apply knowledge to improve healthcare outcomes.
• Leader: Highlight leadership principles you follow to inspire change.
• Use real-life examples to support each aspect.

3. Course Impact on Your DHA Journey

• Reflect on key lessons from this course.
• Discuss how your expectations for pursuing a DHA have evolved.
• Explain how this course has influenced your career goals and leadership approach.

Step 3: Write Your Draft

• Use formal, academic language.
• Provide clear explanations and examples.
• Ensure logical flow between sections.

Step 4: Edit and Proofread

• Check for clarity, coherence, and grammar issues.
• Ensure all points align with your thesis.
• Verify APA formatting (if required).

Step 5: Final Review and Submission

• Read your paper aloud to catch any awkward phrasing.
• Ensure citations and references are correctly formatted.
• Submit your assignment before the deadline.

By following this step-by-step guide, you will create a well-structured and insightful paper that effectively presents your professional brand, SPL role, and DHA expectations.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts who chose key articles different than you did. For each, explain how your understanding of risk and/or threat assessment in subject-based profiling has changed based on the information they shared.
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts. For each, explain one or more additional similarities or differences between risk and threat assessments in subject-based profiling that your colleague may not have considered, or one or more additional situations in which risk or threat assessment might be used and why.
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial (250 words minimum), supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.

Respond by Day 6 to at least one of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.

 
ritical Reading, Thinking, and Analysis for Forensic Psychology Graduate Students
As a graduate student in forensic psychology, developing strong critical reading, thinking, and analysis skills is paramount for success in both academic pursuits and professional practice. These skills empower you to effectively evaluate research, theoretical frameworks, and case studies, ultimately enabling you to make informed decisions and contribute meaningfully to the field.
This response will explore these crucial skills through the lens of the “Critical Reading, Thinking and Analysis Checklist” provided in this week’s Learning Resources, along with insights from Walden University’s Writing Center resources on discussion posts and responses (Walden University Writing Center, n.d.a, n.d.b).
Critical Reading

Identify the Main Idea and Supporting Evidence: A core aspect of critical reading involves pinpointing the author’s central thesis and the arguments used to substantiate it (OASIS, n.d.). When evaluating research articles, focus on the research question, methodology, results, and discussion sections to grasp the main thrust and supporting data.

Evaluate Source Credibility: Critically assess the credibility of sources you encounter. Consider the author’s expertise, publication source, and potential biases (Walden University Doctoral Capstone Form and Style, n.d.). Scholarly journals with peer-review processes typically hold higher credibility compared to non-academic websites.
Critical Thinking

Analyze Assumptions and Biases: Recognize and critically analyze the underlying assumptions and potential biases within the text (OASIS, n.d.). Explore alternative perspectives and consider how these might influence the interpretation of the information presented.

Identify Strengths and Weaknesses: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments or research presented. Are the methodologies sound? Are the conclusions logically drawn from the evidence? Engaging in this analysis fosters a deeper understanding of the material.
Critical Analysis

Synthesize Information: Critically analyze information from various sources and synthesize them to form a comprehensive understanding of a topic. Integrate your analysis with your existing knowledge base to generate new insights and connections.

Apply to Real-World Scenarios: Consider how the information you have critically analyzed can be applied to real-world forensic psychology scenarios. Can the research findings inform assessment practices? Can the theoretical frameworks guide interventions with specific client populations?
Evaluating Discussion Posts
By applying these critical reading, thinking, and analysis skills to your discussion posts and responses in this course, you can elevate the quality of your contributions. Here’s how to leverage the “Critical Reading, Thinking and Analysis Checklist” for this purpose:

Actively Engage with the Topic: Demonstrate a thorough understanding of the course topic and critically engage with the ideas presented by your peers.

Provide Evidence-Based Support: Substantiate your arguments with relevant research findings, theoretical concepts, or case studies. Utilize proper APA citations to acknowledge your sources (OASIS, n.d.).

Offer Diverse Perspectives: Consider alternative viewpoints and respectfully acknowledge potential limitations in your own thinking.

Advance the Conversation: Strive to move the discussion forward by posing insightful questions, building upon the ideas of others, and offering unique perspectives.
Conclusion
By actively honing your critical reading, thinking, and analysis skills, you will be well-equipped to navigate the complexities of forensic psychology research, theory, and practice. By consciously applying these skills to your academic discussions, you can foster a more enriching learning experience for yourself and your peers.
Remember, critical thinking is an ongoing process. Embrace the opportunity to continuously refine your abilities as you progress through your graduate studies and into your professional career as a forensic psychologist.
References
OASIS. (n.d.). Paraphrase and summarize information. [Interactive guide]. Walden University. https://academics.waldenu.edu/writing/paraphrase-summarizeLinks to an external site.
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.a). Common assignments: Writing a successful discussion post. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/discussionpost/writingLinks to an external site.
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.b). Common assignments: Writing a successful response to another’s post. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/discussionpost/responseLinks to an external site.
Walden University Doctoral Capstone Form and Style. (n.d.) Reading to write: Home. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/formandstyle/writing/readingLinks to an external site.

Reply to post from Elizabeth WaltonReply

Mark as UnreadMark as Unread

 After reading through this week’s resources and reflecting on my previous discussion posts, I am able to identify what I did well in my past discussion posts and also areas where I need to improve. When answering discussion prompts I feel as if I always consider my intended audience and the intended purpose. Although considering your audience is important, considering my audience has also contributed to my weaknesses because most times I assume that because my classmates are my audience, they know everything about my topic. Another thing I need to work on is formatting. A critique I’ve received in past discussion posts is sticking to APA guidelines and citations. Walden’s writing center suggests creating a draft and reviewing your draft before posting. I tend not to create drafts nor review and that is a way that can help me improve significantly. In preparing for this discussion post I have read the reading to write steps by the Walden’s Writing Center and I hope to implement them when preparing for my discussion posts in order to write successful responses to discussion prompts. 
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Writing a successful discussion post. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter//assignments//discussionpost/writingLinks to an external site.

8-10 pgs
Due Sunday December 29th @3pm 
Please follow the rubric to provide the best quality work 
APA format 7th edition 
Reference pg (use references from previous reference list