• The author places the central point within the top 2% of the document and fron

• The author places the central point within the top 2% of the document and frontloads within sections, paragraphs, and bullet points.
• The argument is deeply issue-focused, delving into the heart of the matter, and is supported by a comprehensive analysis of data and primary sources, showcasing the author’s expertise and thorough research.
• Uses active voice primarily; passive voice is used rarely, and logically visible patterns of sentence construction errors.
• All written units (words, sentences, bullet points, or paragraphs)
• Uses standard written English with correct spelling, punctuation, grammar, mechanics, formatting, and citations without visible mistakes.
Let’s Use General Colin Powell as a key leadership example.

Read Army Design Methodology. Review ATP 5-0.1. Review TR1-11. Review AR 25-50.

Read Army Design Methodology. Review ATP 5-0.1. Review TR1-11. Review AR 25-50. Read Information Paper Assignment Instructions.
You are simply writing facts. That being said, this assignment is not an APA style paper so don’t structure this paper as an essay; no in-text citations, no reference page. Do not be concerned with plagiarism with this assignment so it is ok to extract information verbatim from resources.
Build your paper from scratch (Sterile Word document). Do not use a formatted template.
Ensure you format your Word document like the essay assignment such as the line spacing Before and After; make sure it is set to “0” (zero) for both. Only difference is to set it to single, not double-space. If not, your line spacing will be incorrect for the entire paper.
Spacing after periods/punctuation: AR 25-50 calls for one space, TR 1-11 calls for two spaces. Either is acceptable but it must be consistent.
The center of the paper is at 3.25!
You will have to refer to AR 25-50 for formatting guidelines. Don’t just look at the example in TR 1-11 and “guesstimate” the formatting.
For transparency, the only software tool we use to check for errors and passive voice is via Word. Refer back to the Writing Fundamentals link. There is another error software check tool out there commonly known as Grammarly but we don’t use this because not all students have access or an account to it. Also, there are minor differences or nuances between Word and Grammarly, particularly with passive voice. You should have 0 (zero) passive voice.
Learn from the resources provided to you such as the video and PowerPoint, especially ATP 5-0.1 when answering the question in the assignment instructions. Don’t just throw “fluff” in the content of the paper.
Purpose
An Information Paper is used to provide the reader pertinent facts in a clear and concise format. IAW TRADOC Regulation 1-11 write an Information Paper.
Topic
During ADM, commanders and their staffs use a set of intellectual tools known as the elements of operational art. Commanders and staffs apply these elements to understand an operational environment and problems and to visualize and describe an operational approach.
In your Information Paper, answer:
What are the elements of operational art?
Resource Requirements
Army Design Methodology Lesson
ATP 5-0.1
TRADOC Regulation (TR) 1-11, Chapter 3-6
AR 25-50
Expectations
1. Starting from a sterile MS Word document, write an Information Paper onthe topic above. Your paper must:
-be one full page maximum-follow the formatting guidelines in TR 1-11-follow rules of grammar, spelling, and punctuation (run a spelling and grammar check before submission)-use XXXX-XX for the office symbol-use Colonel Bill E. Pultz for the “Approved by:” nameNote – spacing after punctuation; AR 25-50 calls for once space. TR 1-11 calls for two spaces. Either is acceptable but must be consistent. Note – passive voice is checked via Word software tool.
*This assignment will be evaluated on the expectations above and the rubriccriteria*

Reflect on the articles found in the textbook on coalition building. Which artic

Reflect on the articles found in the textbook on coalition building. Which article do you think is the most important article to follow when building a coalition? What impact does this have on multinational operations?
Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

Examine how and why politics and technology has changed the character of war (pa

Examine how and why politics and technology has changed the character of war (particularly the character of battlefields) in a specific conflict. My conflict is the war on terror. This is the info dump + outline:
Central research problem:
How did the war on terror impact the character of war? A case analysis of the technological impact, political dynamics, and transformation of warfare.
Aim of research:
To explore the impact of politics and technologies on the character of war and the transformation from conventional battlefield to cyber warfare and the use of unmanned systems.
Sub Questions:
What role did Media warfare play in the war on terror?
Why is it important? Because the war on terror is a crucial turning point in how states view and combat terrorism. The use of advanced technologies such as unmanned drones to conduct targeted assassinations has caused significant legal/ethical issues (sovereignty, civilian causality, legality of drone strikes/surveillance). We could identify the different factors that have led to the major change in the character of war, this would help us in determining the trend in which warfare is moving towards. This would allow us to predict and interpret different aspects of war’s character.
Topics:
Autonomous weapons
Precision-guided weapons
Information technology
Stealth technology
What you have to do:
understanding of how technology and politics interact to change the character of war, with sophisticated insights into their complex dynamics.
critical analysis of specific examples where technology and politics have shaped modern warfare, supported by detailed evidence Introduction -350-400:
Origin of the conflict and historical context
Importance of politics and technology and their impact on shaping the nature of the conflict Body 1 -700-800: Analysis of political framework surrounding the conflict (alliances / tensions).
How did political strategies influence military tactics and strategies?
how political factors shape technological development in the military sector.
Body 2 – Done by antoher member but to be considered as transitions from/too:
How did technology interact with politics to impact the character of war?
Autonomous weapons / Precision-guided weapons / information warfare / stealth technology
How technological innovations influence political decision-making in matters of war?
Body 3 -700-800:
The transformation from conventional warfare to unconventional and technology driven Rise of unmanned systems
Conclusion -350-400:
Summary of key findings and analysis that were mentioned before.
Assume that body 2 will be writen by somtone else, do the intro body 1,3 and the conclusion.

PROFESSIONAL MILITARY SUBJECT ESSAY* Q1: “How can you change a culture of substa

PROFESSIONAL MILITARY SUBJECT ESSAY*
Q1: “How can you change a culture of substandard behavior, lack of
standards, and mediocre discipline initiative?”
(1) You will write a two-page (maximum) essay addressing a commandant-selected protessional
milltary subject from the perspective of a corporalsergeant (team leaden). The winner wil be
selected by the commandant and recognized with a certrficate of achievement and colin during
graduation. The recipient of the Commandant’ s Writing Award will have the award annotatea on
their DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report.
(2) The Commandant will provide the essay’s professional military subject there duning B100
Course Overview.
(3) Your essay will be formatted as shown below.
1. Introduction (1-2 paragraphs)
A. Opening statement
B. Background information
5
Purpose statement
Il. Body(2-4 paragraphs)
A: address, (Point supporting A) what What evidence. needs issues does within the the subject Army get and after your orwhy organization does this does issue this occur? subject Include
8 (Point B) Does the Army’s current approach to training improve (or not improve) ths
issue? (Could be tied to point A)
C. (Point C) Expand topic and provide evidence to support your thesis.
D. (Point D) What solutions regarding this issue can improve the Army and your
organization?
Il. Conclusion (1-2 paragraphs)
A. Summarize the main points
B. Make a strong, memorable final statement.
NOTES:
Essay must be 1-2 pages in length (title page does not count as a page)
Essay is an individual activity (although peer editing is allowed).
Essay must contain two references (ARs, personal interviews, per review artick
Essay is due on Day 5 of the course (provide students with exact date and time
Commandant (or designated representative) will choose the best essay.

Please conduct a leadership Case study on The Battle of Carentan, with specific

Please conduct a leadership Case study on The Battle of Carentan, with specific focus on United States Leadership dynamics which led to the successes / failures of that battle . Format is APA 7th. The first paragraph should include a lead-in, the intent of the battle, what actually happned, what went well, and how it could have been improved, and then a thesis. Following paragraphs should each focus on a separate Principle of Mission Command respectively as they pertain to the Battle. These principles are Competence, Mutual Trust, shared understanding, Commander’s Intent, Mission Orders, Disciplined Initiative, and Risk Acceptance. Paragraphs should include shared lessons learned from successes or failures.The final paragraph should be a conclusion Please include in-text citations in APA 7th Standard format and cited sources at the end. I will include a rubric following my order to ensure clarity of requirements.