Category: Mathematics

We are required to get this proof from a AI software to solve, then explain the proof in words to a younger class of students who have not used proofs. It does not need to be very advanced, just explain it to where they understand. I have attached the proof from the chatGPT. Here are the exact instructions from the instructor, but you obviously dont need to get the proof from the chatGPT, as I attached it below.
For this homework assignment, use ChatGPT (or another AI software) to provide proofs for Problem 1.55 (both parts a & b). Provide these proofs in the homework assignment you turn in.
Your assignment is to write a narrative that explains these proofs (and their logic) to a student in Math 152 (College Algebra). Please assume that this student has NOT taken Math 300 and is unfamiliar with proof.
The goal for this assignment is to assess your ability to explain something to a “lay” audience. This will target abilities to comprehend and communicate your understanding of logic, proof structure, and mathematical syntax. I will use the attached rubric to assess: genre and disciplinary conventions, content development, and context of and purpose for writing.

Correlation or Pearson’s R
…..
Correlation or Pearson’s R
Task…Correlation – Data Analysis — READ..READ…..the attached FILE below
You use Study Time and Grade Point Average for your Correlation analysis.

What level(s) of measurement is/are the variables?—-10%
WHAT WOULD BE YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION?—-20%
What is your H1 and H0?——20%
If your SIGNIFICANT VALUE IS “.04” = WOULD YOU ACCEPT OR REJECT H0 – THE NULL ——10%
WHAT, THEREFORE IS THE FINDING(S) OF YOUR STUDY. —— 40%
This is the file
TEXTING OF HYPOTHESIS
______
Instructor: Steve A. Buddingt0n, Ph.D., MSW, LMSW
Semester: ONLINE CLASS
______
Students, please KEEP THIS DOCUMENT; you will use the information for the REST OF THE SEMESTER – to complete your DATA ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTS. A MORE detailed explanation can be found in other text – simplified for this class and the “virtual teaching/learning” modality.

➢ Two Types of Hypotheses : (a) Research: H1 and (b) Null H0

➢ Research: H1 – is your IDEA of “how the VARIABLES ARE RELATED”

➢ Null: H0 -– is the OPPOSITE RELATIONSHIP OF THE VARIABLES stated in Research: H1”
➢
……..for example, let us look at the Correlational Relationship between “Grade point Average (GPA) and Study Time

…….GPA is defined as a point achieved on a 4.0 quality point scale – Conceptualization
…..Study Time is defined as the number of hours spent studying/day – Conceptualization

➢ Collecting the DATA/NUMBERS for both VARIABLES is called – Operationalization

ACCEPTING OF REJECTING THE NULL HYPOTHESIS
➢ IMPORTANT: The SOLE OBJECTIVE HYPOTHESIS TESTING IS TO REJECT THE NULL, AND THEREFORE YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THE RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS – YOUR IDEA ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE VARIABLES.

➢ HOW DO WE REJECT THE NULL – RESEARCHERS USE WHAT IS CALLED A SIGNIFICANCE LEVEL OR ASEEN IN YOUR TEXTBOOK (Sig Value). The SIG VALUE IN SOCIAL SCIENCES IS… .05. THE .05 MEANS THE NULL HYPOTHESIS IS ONLY RIGHT “5 out of 100 times”, BUT YOUR RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS IS RIGHT “95 out of 100 times”, IT IS THEREFORE LOGICAL TO REJECT THE NULL AND ACCEPT THE RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS.

➢ THE REJECT RULE IS, THEREFORE, IF THE “SIG. VALUE IS “<= .05” – REJECT THE NULL (H0), AND THEREFORE ACCEPT THE RESEARCH (H1) --- if the “sig value” is GREATER THAN .05 ACCEPT THE NULL.

Explain what I got wrong, what is right, and what I need to do to do better in the future in the perspective of an 18 year old freshman in college.
Write notes on the test too. Following the rules that the professor gave, I didn’t understand them too well.
For example: #1 part A has 4 parts, count that as one question, and in this case, I got 2/4 points so 150 words/4 parts(2 parts wrong)= 75 words for part A.

Links needed to be able to complete
https://uah.instructure.com/courses/76658/files/8767588/download?verifier=byZtPuDG8bINIo02lWj8xoRIKH5a46cHd0cMMetP&wrap=1

Article/Video Critique –There are 4 parts to this assignment. 
1. Read the article Even Geniuses Work Hard-2.pdf
2. Watch the TED Talk video, The Power of belief — Mindset and SuccessThe Power of belief — mindset and success | Eduardo Briceno | TEDxManhattanBeach
3. Respond to the discussion board. In your posting include the following:
* List something you learned from the article. (1 points)
* List something you learned from the video. (1 points)
* Write a reflective paragraph about how you are thinking about mindset. (2 points) 
Some questions to guide your reflection might be:
* What do you agree/disagree with? 
* What questions do you have about mindset?
* What parts of the article did you connect with as a learner? 
* Have these texts made you consider something about how you will teach in the future?
 4. Read your peers responses and provide a thoughtful comment to at least one. (1 points)
RUBRIC FOR DISCUSSION BOARD:
New from Article
* Listed/Bulleted and described with details. (1 pts)
* Listed/Bulleted but may be vague or includes a paragraph where I have to guess what is new. (0.5 pts)
* Not included. (0 pts)
New from Video
* Listed/Bulleted and described with details. (1 pts)
* Listed/Bulleted but may be vague or includes a paragraph where I have to guess what is new. (0.5 pts)
* Not included. (0 pts)
Reflection Paragraph Quality
* Paragraph is clearly written and portrays reflective ideas about the content. Some of the questions are addressed. (2 pts)
* Paragraph is included. It addresses some of the questions but lacks details or thoughtful reflection. (1.5 pts)
* Paragraph is brief, addressing only 1-2 questions. May just graze the surface. (1 pt)
* No paragraph is included. (0 pts)
Comment Quality
* A comment is submitted. The comment is thoughtful and adds to the discussion. (1 pt)
* A comment is submitted, but it may just agree or not add much to the discussion. Also, may be vague. (0.5 pts) 
* No Comment is provided. (0 pts)
Total Points: 10

During the global recession of 2008 and 2009, there were many accusations of unethical behavior by Wall Street executives, financial managers, and other corporate officers. At that time, an article appeared that suggested that part of the reason for such unethical business behavior may have stemmed from the fact that cheating had become more prevalent among business students, according to a February 10, 2009, article in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
The article reported that 56% of business students admitted to cheating at some time during their academic career as compared to 47% of nonbusiness students.
Cheating has been a concern of the dean of the College of Business (COB) at Bo Diddley Tech (BDT) for several years. Some faculty members believe that cheating is more widespread at BDT than at other universities, whereas other faculty members think that cheating is not a major problem in the College of Business. To begin to address these issues, the dean of COB commissioned a study to assess the current ethical behavior of business students at BDT. As a former college athlete herself, the dean believed that the spirit of fair play students developed as part of participating in athletics would make them less likely to cheat.
Au saness thients yan ant of wou exer sunty me ude is ted arous questions no oding the sour this college osanes ors, housiness an erene
student was an athlete or a nonathlete. Responses of the various questions were fed into a computer algorithm (advance data analytics) that made a quantitative determination as to whether the student should be considered a “cheater” or not. The results are in the attached Excel spreadsheet,
“Benchmark – Ethical Behavior of Business Students at Bo Diddley Tech.” Utilize the data set in the Excel spreadsheet and select a randomized 100-unit sample from the original 1,440 exit surveys.
You will use the DCOVAS framework. Incorporate references to readings from The Statistician in You: Simple Everyday Life-Hacks (TSIY).
* Define the problem.
* Collect data from the appropriate source(s).
* Organize data using tables.
* Visualize data using a chart or graph.
* Analyze data using a tool and/or calculation(s).
* Solution: Provide a conclusion and solution.
Detailed Directions:
Prepare a managerial report as part of your submission to the dean of the COB that summarizes your assessment of the nature of cheating at BDT. Be sure to include the following items in your written report.
Submit the Excel data calculations (Alpha 0.05).
1.
2. Make a pivot table with “Business Student” (Rows), “Athlete” (Rows), “Cheated” (Columns), and “Cheated” (Summed Value).
3. Create a bar chart showing cheating by athletes and business students.
4. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between nonathlete BDT business students and the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
5. Determine whether there is a statistical significance to business athlete students at BDT cheating less than the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
6. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business students and the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
7. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT nonbusiness students and the national average for nonbusiness students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
8. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business student athletes and nonathletes (test for two sample proportions).
9. Determine whether there is a statistical relationship among the four groups of business athlete students, nonbusiness athlete students, business nonathlete students, and nonbusiness nonathlete students at BDT (chi-square test of independence).
Utilizing the data you have analyzed, write a managerial report of 600-1,000 words for the dean. The managerial report needs to include an introduction, analysis, conclusion, and a minimum of three supporting references. Appropriate headings and subheadings based on the eight sections (as defined below) must be included to organize the report.
1. Introduction (define): In your own words, explain why you are providing this report and the problems) you are trying to solve.
2. Collect: Describe the data set you used.
3. Organize: Describe your pivot table.
4. Visualize: Include and describe your bar chart and initial perceptions of outcomes.
5. Analyze: Provide a summary of your conclusions based on the four population proportion tests, a two-sample proportion test, and test for independence (refer to Chapter 5.2 in TS/Y. Begin with the statement of Ho and Ha and whether it is an upper-, lower-, or 2-tailed test. Use the model results and decide whether to reject Ho using the critical values approach, p-value approach, and confidence interval estimation approach to hypothesis testing. Create a summary table of each the six tests.
6. Ethical Summary: The dean has expressed a concern related to the amount of cheating currently taking place at BDT and has strongly suggested that you “tweak” the statistical data such that they favor the image of the university. Discuss the potential use of unethical manipulation of statistical data to provide a biased outcome. Additionally, offer a counter proposal to the dean using biblical Christian worldview principles that demonstrate the importance of stewardship, social responsibility, justice, or integrity as related to using one’s resources to benefit others and promote the common good.
7. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business student athletes and nonathletes (test for two sample proportions).
8. Determine whether there is a statistical relationship among the four groups of business athlete students, nonbusiness athlete students, business nonathlete students, and nonbusiness nonathlete students at BDT (chi-square test of independence).
Utilizing the data you have analyzed, write a managerial report of 600-1,000 words for the dean. The managerial report needs to include an introduction, analysis, conclusion, and a minimum of three supporting references. Appropriate headings and subheadings based on the eight sections (as defined below) must be included to organize the report.
1. Introduction (define): In your own words, explain why you are providing this report and the problems) you are trying to solve.
2. Collect: Describe the data set you used.
3. Organize: Describe your pivot table.
4. Visualize: Include and describe your bar chart and initial perceptions of outcomes.
5. Analyze: Provide a summary of your conclusions based on the four population proportion tests, a two-sample proportion test, and test for independence (refer to Chapter 5.2 in TSIY). Begin with the statement of Ho and Ha and whether it is an upper-, lower-, or 2-tailed test. Use the model results and decide whether to reject Ho using the critical values approach, p-value approach, and confidence interval estimation approach to hypothesis testing. Create a summary table of each the six tests.
6. Ethical Summary: The dean has expressed a concern related to the amount of cheating currently taking place at BDT and has strongly suggested that you “tweak” the statistical data such that they favor the image of the university. Discuss the potential use of unethical manipulation of statistical data to provide a biased outcome. Additionally, offer a counter proposal to the dean using biblical Christian worldview principles that demonstrate the importance of stewardship, social responsibility, justice, or integrity as related to using one’s resources to benefit others and promote the common good.
7. Conclusion: What advice would you give to the dean based upon your analysis of the data? Include your “SummaryResults” table.
8. Reference page: Include at least three references to support the “Ethical Summary” section of your managerial report.
9. You are required to submit your Excel data analysis along with your written report.
10. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,

During the global recession of 2008 and 2009, there were many accusations of unethical behavior by Wall Street executives, financial managers, and other corporate officers. At that time, an article appeared that suggested that part of the reason for such unethical business behavior may have stemmed from the fact that cheating had become more prevalent among business students, according to a February 10, 2009, article in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
The article reported that 56% of business students admitted to cheating at some time during their academic career as compared to 47% of nonbusiness students.
Cheating has been a concern of the dean of the College of Business (COB) at Bo Diddley Tech (BDT) for several years. Some faculty members believe that cheating is more widespread at BDT than at other universities, whereas other faculty members think that cheating is not a major problem in the College of Business. To begin to address these issues, the dean of COB commissioned a study to assess the current ethical behavior of business students at BDT. As a former college athlete herself, the dean believed that the spirit of fair play students developed as part of participating in athletics would make them less likely to cheat.
Au saness thients yan ant of wou exer sunty me ude is ted arous questions no oding the sour this college osanes ors, housiness an erene
student was an athlete or a nonathlete. Responses of the various questions were fed into a computer algorithm (advance data analytics) that made a quantitative determination as to whether the student should be considered a “cheater” or not. The results are in the attached Excel spreadsheet,
“Benchmark – Ethical Behavior of Business Students at Bo Diddley Tech.” Utilize the data set in the Excel spreadsheet and select a randomized 100-unit sample from the original 1,440 exit surveys.
You will use the DCOVAS framework. Incorporate references to readings from The Statistician in You: Simple Everyday Life-Hacks (TSIY).
* Define the problem.
* Collect data from the appropriate source(s).
* Organize data using tables.
* Visualize data using a chart or graph.
* Analyze data using a tool and/or calculation(s).
* Solution: Provide a conclusion and solution.
Detailed Directions:
Prepare a managerial report as part of your submission to the dean of the COB that summarizes your assessment of the nature of cheating at BDT. Be sure to include the following items in your written report.
Submit the Excel data calculations (Alpha 0.05).
1.
2. Make a pivot table with “Business Student” (Rows), “Athlete” (Rows), “Cheated” (Columns), and “Cheated” (Summed Value).
3. Create a bar chart showing cheating by athletes and business students.
4. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between nonathlete BDT business students and the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
5. Determine whether there is a statistical significance to business athlete students at BDT cheating less than the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
6. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business students and the national average for business students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
7. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT nonbusiness students and the national average for nonbusiness students as reported by the Chronicle of Higher Education (test for a proportion).
8. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business student athletes and nonathletes (test for two sample proportions).
9. Determine whether there is a statistical relationship among the four groups of business athlete students, nonbusiness athlete students, business nonathlete students, and nonbusiness nonathlete students at BDT (chi-square test of independence).
Utilizing the data you have analyzed, write a managerial report of 600-1,000 words for the dean. The managerial report needs to include an introduction, analysis, conclusion, and a minimum of three supporting references. Appropriate headings and subheadings based on the eight sections (as defined below) must be included to organize the report.
1. Introduction (define): In your own words, explain why you are providing this report and the problems) you are trying to solve.
2. Collect: Describe the data set you used.
3. Organize: Describe your pivot table.
4. Visualize: Include and describe your bar chart and initial perceptions of outcomes.
5. Analyze: Provide a summary of your conclusions based on the four population proportion tests, a two-sample proportion test, and test for independence (refer to Chapter 5.2 in TS/Y. Begin with the statement of Ho and Ha and whether it is an upper-, lower-, or 2-tailed test. Use the model results and decide whether to reject Ho using the critical values approach, p-value approach, and confidence interval estimation approach to hypothesis testing. Create a summary table of each the six tests.
6. Ethical Summary: The dean has expressed a concern related to the amount of cheating currently taking place at BDT and has strongly suggested that you “tweak” the statistical data such that they favor the image of the university. Discuss the potential use of unethical manipulation of statistical data to provide a biased outcome. Additionally, offer a counter proposal to the dean using biblical Christian worldview principles that demonstrate the importance of stewardship, social responsibility, justice, or integrity as related to using one’s resources to benefit others and promote the common good.
7. Determine whether there is a statistical difference between BDT business student athletes and nonathletes (test for two sample proportions).
8. Determine whether there is a statistical relationship among the four groups of business athlete students, nonbusiness athlete students, business nonathlete students, and nonbusiness nonathlete students at BDT (chi-square test of independence).
Utilizing the data you have analyzed, write a managerial report of 600-1,000 words for the dean. The managerial report needs to include an introduction, analysis, conclusion, and a minimum of three supporting references. Appropriate headings and subheadings based on the eight sections (as defined below) must be included to organize the report.
1. Introduction (define): In your own words, explain why you are providing this report and the problems) you are trying to solve.
2. Collect: Describe the data set you used.
3. Organize: Describe your pivot table.
4. Visualize: Include and describe your bar chart and initial perceptions of outcomes.
5. Analyze: Provide a summary of your conclusions based on the four population proportion tests, a two-sample proportion test, and test for independence (refer to Chapter 5.2 in TSIY). Begin with the statement of Ho and Ha and whether it is an upper-, lower-, or 2-tailed test. Use the model results and decide whether to reject Ho using the critical values approach, p-value approach, and confidence interval estimation approach to hypothesis testing. Create a summary table of each the six tests.
6. Ethical Summary: The dean has expressed a concern related to the amount of cheating currently taking place at BDT and has strongly suggested that you “tweak” the statistical data such that they favor the image of the university. Discuss the potential use of unethical manipulation of statistical data to provide a biased outcome. Additionally, offer a counter proposal to the dean using biblical Christian worldview principles that demonstrate the importance of stewardship, social responsibility, justice, or integrity as related to using one’s resources to benefit others and promote the common good.
7. Conclusion: What advice would you give to the dean based upon your analysis of the data? Include your “SummaryResults” table.
8. Reference page: Include at least three references to support the “Ethical Summary” section of your managerial report.
9. You are required to submit your Excel data analysis along with your written report.
10. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,

I know…I know, but we need to practice statistical formulas so that we understand the process. Below are 8 statistics questions worth 5 points each. Please complete in a Word document or Excel and show your calculation process. A. Twelve (12) students completed COUN 6083 Research and Program Evaluation with the following grades: 98 96 98 91 87 88 87 93 76 87 86 87 What is the mean of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the frequency or mode of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the median of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the variance and standard deviation of the data set above? (5 pts) B. Nine (9) high school students with high levels of depression were asked the number of hours per day spent on social media. The numbers are as follows: 5, 7, 4, 6, 5, 2, 6, 3, 5 What is the mean of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the frequency or mode of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the median of the data set above? (5 pts) What is the variance and standard deviation of the data set above? (5 pts)

I need week 1, 2, 3 and 4 complete. I will send log in once you accept. Some of them has been complete but the grades are horrible. For the ones that has been complete redo them and get a better grade. Thank you

use the Reductio ad Absurdum method to proof questions in the proof checker. here is the proof checker you need to use. https://proof-checker.org/
hello , here is link of the questions google docs
..https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i2R-3S0m62Qv7D

I need week 1, 2, 3 and 4 complete. I will send log in once you accept. Some of them has been complete but the grades are horrible. For the ones that has been complete redo them and get a better grade. Thank you