Make a list of three topics within nonprofit administration that you might be mo

Make a list of three topics within nonprofit administration that you might be most interested in studying. For each, identify the subfield into which it best fits [see example below sub-fields/sub-fields are NTEE codes]. Then, using google scholar and the library, identify a few academic (peer-reviewed) articles or academic press books on the topic and review them briefly. On the basis of your readings, refine your topics, thinking about what we know, what we do not know, and other possible ways the topic could be studied. 
•    Submit an APA formatted word document
•    250 word minimum.
•    You will be graded based on submitting this assignment and receive feedback in selecting your Research Proposal topic
[For example – I want to study financial management (area of nonprofit administration) in an animal-focused (sub-field) nonprofit. Or employee turnover (area of nonprofit administration) within human service (sub-field) nonprofits. You can choose the same sub-field for all three topics you are studying. The goal of this exercise is to help you to narrow the scope of your interests within nonprofit administration.
THREE TOPICS:
1.    I want to study Planning and Evaluation in an Education focused Nonprofit
2.    I want to study Information Management in an Education focused Nonprofit
3.    I want to study Social Entrepreneurship in an Education focused Nonprofit
https://nccs.urban.org/project/national-taxonomy-exempt-entities-ntee-codes
**my goal is to eventually learn/study the cause of college dropout rates among students of color or first-generation students, and how to develop programs to assist or prevent.
Here are the areas of Nonprofit Administration
1.    Advocacy/Public Policy
2.    Marketing/Communications/PR
3.    Financial Management/Social Entrepreneurship
4.    Fundraising and Resource Development
5.    Human Resource Management & Volunteerism
6.    Leadership and Board Governance
7.    Legal and Regulatory
8.    Information Management
9.    Planning and Evaluation

Kevin Whalling, Chief Counsel for the Whalling Law Group, PLLC must present on b

Kevin Whalling, Chief Counsel for the Whalling Law Group, PLLC must present on behalf of Lopes Incorporated, a manufacturer of men’s high-end fashion ties and cufflinks.
Lopes Incorporated recently entered a contract with Thunder Clothing, a retailer of high-end clothing.
At the time of the negotiation for the contract, Lopes Incorporated contacted Thunder Clothing via e-mail and stated, “I have ten thousand ties of assorted patterns with matching cufflinks. I will let you have them for $50 each, F.O.B. destination.” Thunder Clothing replied, “We’ll take them.”
The next day Lopes Incorporated e-mailed the following letter [relevant portion] as a PDF file:
This will confirm our contract for ten thousand ties and matching cufflinks of assorted patterns at $50 each, plus shipping charges. for immediate shipment, payment on delivery. (Signed) Lopes Incorporated.
Thunder Clothing did not reply to this e-mail which was received and read two days after it was e-mailed.  Lopes Incorporated shipped the ties to Thunder Clothing’s place of business and enclosed an invoice that billed Thunder Clothing for $500,000 – ten thousand ties and matching cufflinks, plus $4,000 in shipping charges.
Thunder Clothing accepted the ties, made no complaint about them or the charges, but he has refused to pay anything to Lopes Incorporated. A month later, when Lopes Incorporated complained about not having been paid, Thunder Clothing admitted that Lopes Incorporated was owed $500,000, but contended that he did not owe the $4,000 because “Thunder Clothing never agreed to pay the shipping charges.”
Mr. Whalling has asked you to prepare a Memorandum of Law to describe the basic elements of Uniform Commercial Code Article 2. Further, he wants you to apply U.C.C. contracts principles to the sales situation between Lopes Incorporated and Thunder Clothing and determine whether Lopes Incorporated is owed the $4,000.
Remember that this is an internal memorandum for Mr. Whalling; while his job is ultimately to support Lopes Incorporated, you can provide an objective analysis.
Use the “Topic 2 Memorandum of Law” template to write a memorandum of 750 to 1,000 words. Follow the prompts within brackets in the template to complete the assignment. Be sure to cite three to five relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at the GCU Library, government/legal websites, or those provided in Topic Materials.
Note regarding citations: Because of the practical limitations of the course, you will not be learning legal citation work such as what would be found in the Bluebook, a citation tool utilized by attorneys. Instead, you will follow APA formatting for citation work. Remember to still cite in your legal memorandum (case law, etc.), and create a separate document for citations.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

This Homework Assignment is considered a drafting exercise.  Please draft a case

This Homework Assignment is considered a drafting exercise.  Please draft a case brief for the following case that involves the reasonableness of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract:
Beckman v. Cox Broadcasting Corporation, 250 Ga. 127, 296 S.E.2d 566, 36 ALR4th 1132 (1981).  Click on the following link to access the case:  https://law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-court/1982/39176-1.htmlLinks to an external site. 
You should utilize the following case brief format:
Case name
Citation
Key or Material Facts:
Primary Issue:
Holding of the Court:
Reasoning of the Court (must include the primary legal principle or standard employed by the Court and a summary of the Court’s reasoning and application of the standard to the facts of the case).