Category: Law homework help

Task:
Respond to the following questions in four short paragraphs, one dedicated to each question.
As you moved through this course, you were asked to complete various portions of research: proposal, outlines, annotated bibliography, and the research itself. These were designed to facilitate the process of learning about research and the steps that could/should be undertaken in order to stay organized and moving forward in the writing. Which did you find most beneficial to your progress? Overall, what surprised you the most about the research process?
What do you still need to complete when it comes to your research paper in this course? What feedback has been most helpful, either from your instructor or your peers, in helping you identify necessary changes to make as you have moved toward completion of this project?
What type of writing do you anticipate doing in the near future? How will research be a part of that?
What “conversations” in your field do you plan to continue to take part in? Why? How will you do so? For instance, someone may be going into Criminal Justice but be particularly interested in conversing about the use of technology such as body cams to improve community-police relationships.

Watch the movie: Anatomy of Murder 
NOTE: As of Nov 14, 2022, Anatomy of a Murder is available for rent on Amazon prime for $3.99. Alternatively, the Miami-Dade Public Library has a DVD of Anatomy of a Murder. You can check it out for free with a library card. A documentary on the OJ Simpson Trial is currently available on Investigation Discovery (ID Channel) for free. You would need to sign in with your cable provider to stream it for free. Finally, if you have exhausted alternative ways of accessing these electronic documents, you can seek advice on how to access it by emailing the philosophy librarian Lauren Fralinger at: l.fralinger@miami.edu.
Which form of homicide is the theme of the movie? Summarize some of the arguments made in connection with the homicide.

Judicial Process – Week 1 Assignment
Intersection of Law and Politics
Using the Internet locate the case Obergfell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015).
(The full-length opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court is attached, you do NOT have to read the dissenting opinions). For your convenience I have also attached the Slip Opinion.
1.  In one page, summarize the Court’s decision and reasoning for the decision.
2.  How does the Court’s decision illustrate the intersection of law and politics?
3.  What are the legal ramifications of the Court’s decision? What about the political ramifications?
Your submission should adhere to the following guidelines:
·  The total length of your paper should be a minimum of 3 full pages in length.
·  Use APA style for general formatting, including margins, font type and font size, spacing, and cover page.
·  Include Bluebook formatted citations within the body of the paper and on the References page.
View your assignment rubric.

Watch the movie: Anatomy of Murder 
NOTE: As of Nov 14, 2022, Anatomy of a Murder is available for rent on Amazon prime for $3.99. Alternatively, the Miami-Dade Public Library has a DVD of Anatomy of a Murder. You can check it out for free with a library card. A documentary on the OJ Simpson Trial is currently available on Investigation Discovery (ID Channel) for free. You would need to sign in with your cable provider to stream it for free. Finally, if you have exhausted alternative ways of accessing these electronic documents, you can seek advice on how to access it by emailing the philosophy librarian Lauren Fralinger at: l.fralinger@miami.edu.
Which form of homicide is the theme of the movie? Summarize some of the arguments made in connection with the homicide.

Judicial Process – Week 1 Assignment
Intersection of Law and Politics
Using the Internet locate the case Obergfell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015).
(The full-length opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court is attached, you do NOT have to read the dissenting opinions). For your convenience I have also attached the Slip Opinion.
1.  In one page, summarize the Court’s decision and reasoning for the decision.
2.  How does the Court’s decision illustrate the intersection of law and politics?
3.  What are the legal ramifications of the Court’s decision? What about the political ramifications?
Your submission should adhere to the following guidelines:
·  The total length of your paper should be a minimum of 3 full pages in length.
·  Use APA style for general formatting, including margins, font type and font size, spacing, and cover page.
·  Include Bluebook formatted citations within the body of the paper and on the References page.
View your assignment rubric.

Discussion post 1: 
300 Word minimum, You must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations in current Bluebook format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include Scholarly sources and the Bible.
Explain when patent protection arises and identify what rights it provides to a patent owner. Further identify and discuss the moral philosophies you have learned and explain how they might justify patent protection. Be sure to identify and discuss the predominant moral justification in the U.S. Constitution for patent protection. For that moral justification, explain whether it is consistent with a Biblical worldview, and compare it with the other justifications and explain whether some other justification is more consistent with a Biblical worldview.
Be sure to consider the costs of developing patent protectable material and examine whether that consideration is important to a Biblicalworld view of patent protection. You may use any material from the Bible to support your explanation.
Discussion Post 2: 
400 word minimum, you must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly sources in
Bluebook format. Acceptable sources include the Bible, law review articles, or other articles that include
legal sources as reference.
In the landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court invalidated its first Congressional statute. In doing, so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion established the principle that the federal courts have the power to review the constitutional validity of government actions. This power is known as judicial review. Discuss whether the federal courts should have the power of judicial review.

Discussion post 1: 
300 Word minimum, You must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly citations in current Bluebook format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include Scholarly sources and the Bible.
Explain when patent protection arises and identify what rights it provides to a patent owner. Further identify and discuss the moral philosophies you have learned and explain how they might justify patent protection. Be sure to identify and discuss the predominant moral justification in the U.S. Constitution for patent protection. For that moral justification, explain whether it is consistent with a Biblical worldview, and compare it with the other justifications and explain whether some other justification is more consistent with a Biblical worldview.
Be sure to consider the costs of developing patent protectable material and examine whether that consideration is important to a Biblicalworld view of patent protection. You may use any material from the Bible to support your explanation.
Discussion Post 2: 
400 word minimum, you must support your assertions with at least 3 scholarly sources in
Bluebook format. Acceptable sources include the Bible, law review articles, or other articles that include
legal sources as reference.
In the landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court invalidated its first Congressional statute. In doing, so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion established the principle that the federal courts have the power to review the constitutional validity of government actions. This power is known as judicial review. Discuss whether the federal courts should have the power of judicial review.

 
Why is agenda-setting important to the mediation process? 
What are some benefits of structuring the negotiation and setting an agenda?

 
Discuss the concept of “negotiation Jujitsu,” how it might work, and its appropriateness in mediation, as opposed to a negotiation setting. Is it appropriate in mediation; why or why not?
Take any one of the “ten questions people ask about getting to YES” and explain how that concept interacts (positively or negatively) with biblical principles. Be sure to cite specific scriptures. Label these two posts as your “primary” posts.

 
Question 1: After reading all of Chapter 7, please give an example of a situation in which “T-Funneling” has been or might be helpful in your life, at work, with family, wherever you think it might apply. 
I’ll give you an example to illustrate:  My son, Cam, and daughter, Katie, had a fight that left him angry and her crying.  My goal was to determine what the problem is and how I could guide them toward peaceful interaction for the rest of the day. 
I began by asking both the open-ended question:  What happened? 
After getting each child’s answer I learned generally that Cam kicked Katie out of the playroom. 
I then drilled down by asking closed-ended questions of each child:  To Cam:  Why did you kick her out?  Would you prefer to play alone with your friends? Was she doing something to annoy you?  Were you angry because she disrupted your game?
To Katie:  Why are you crying?  Are you frustrated that he kicked you out of the room?  Are you sad because you feel like he rejected you?  Did you get enough sleep last night?
The answers to these questions helped me understand some of the important logistical, emotional and environmental factors underlying the problem and helped determine how to move forward to solve the conflict:  Cam wanted to play PS4 with his friends.  Katie wanted to play with him and needed a nap, so she overreacted to his asking her to leave, which made him even more angry.  He apologized for hurting her feelings. She apologized for barging in on his time with his friends. (The apologies might not have been sincere, but at least they both felt heard if not genuinely validated).  We agreed that he could play with his friends for a set time frame, then they could play together, and each would get more sleep that night.  Then there was peace (for a few minutes anyway).
Question 2: Please answer the questions on p. 219 from video clip 7-K.