Category: Health Care

The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Limited Access to Healthcare o Description: Many individuals face barriers in accessing health services due to factors like location, cost, provider availability, transportation issues, or lack of insurance, leading to untreated conditions and health disparities. o Interventions: Telemedicine, online healthcare information, community health clinics, health policy reforms, in-home healthcare services. o Keywords: Health insurance, rural health, rural nursing, telehealth, online health information seeking, health care access, health information systems, consumer health information, chronic disease, health information search, health seeking behavio Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it. As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2. Identify possible causes for the problem or issue. Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic. You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide helpful in locating appropriate references. You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella library for other articles. You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search. Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following: Assess the credibility of the information sources. Assess the relevance of the information sources. Analyze the health care problem or issue. Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue. Describe why the problem or issue is important to you. Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue. Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue. Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue. Describe what would be required to implement a solution. Describe potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue. Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing. Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if potential solution was implemented. Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution. Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented. Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making. Your assessment should also meet the following requirements: Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance. Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style. References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page. Organize your paper using the following structure and headings: Title page. A separate page. Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper. Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question. Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue. Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers. Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer. Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution. Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution. Conclusion. One paragraph.

As part of an initiative to build effective collaboration at a site where you work as a nurse, you have been asked to: Reflect on an interprofessional collaborative project. Examine what happened during the collaboration. Identify positive aspects and areas for improvement. Research best practice for interprofessional collaboration. Use lessons learned from your research and experience to create a video reflection (5-10 minutes) that share suggestions for improving interprofessional collaboration that can be shared with leadership and colleagues. Using Kaltura, record a video (5–10 minutes) where you reflect on an interprofessional collaboration experience, proposing recommendations for how to improve interprofessional collaboration that can be shared with leadership and colleagues. Support these recommendations with references to the literature. The interprofessional project that you reflect on may be one that you collaborated on at your current or former place of practice, or you may choose to imagine you collaborated on the interprofessional project presented in the Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF] Download Assessment 01 Supplement: Collaboration and Leadership Reflection Video [PDF]resource and reflect on that. Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score: Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes. Explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes. Explain aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved. Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature. Discuss the ways in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively. Discuss the negative implications for the human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole. Cite the literature for support. Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature. Identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals. Identify the strategy and its source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy. Cite the literature for support. Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author. Identify at least one best practice or strategy for interdisciplinary collaboration to help the team achieve its goals and work more effectively together. Identify the strategy, its source, and reasons why you think it will be effective. Communicate in a professional manner, is easily audible, and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style. Submit an APA-formatted reference list for any sources that you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. The Example Kaltura Reflection will show you how to cite scholarly sources in the context of an oral presentation. References: Cite at least 3 professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements. APA Reference Page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video. You may wish to refer to the Campus APA Module for more information on applying APA style. Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

First paper is over ADHD and how it can affect people. The directions are in the paper 1 screenshot. The second paper is strategies to deal with the issue in the classroom and is in the paper 2 screenshot. There needs to be 3 resources used. One needs to be a scholarly research-based article and the others can be journals, non profit websites, etc. In APA format. PowerPoint instructions are in screenshot labeled PowerPoint. Website document is for paper 2 and is for evidence-based strategies and programs

Please see document for step by step instructions. There are examples for both of the tables. Please follow the guidelines and let me know if you have any questions

Please base assignment on a major American (preferably a southern) hospital. Will attach necessary documents below. Please see attached screenshots. Thank you for your assistance.

Discussion post 200-350 word count max. APA format. Post needs two resources published within the last five (5) years. Please see screenshots attached below. Thank you for your assistance. Link to Video mentioned in post: https://youtu.be/lgI2xoUIsp0?si=UdI2qcIvaBsEW2eN

APA format 200-350 word max count. Assignment needs 2 resources APA format within the last 5 years. Please see screenshots attached below.

In my current healthcare organization, I witness technology specialists interacting with multiple professionals each day in a multitude of ways. I work in a busy perioperative setting, and smooth working technology platforms are essential to maintain a smooth flow and ensure patient safety. Within my hospital, technology specialists work with the medical labs, blood bank, administration, physicians, anesthesia personnel and many others. If there is an issue with any software, the IT department is available around the clock to remedy any problems. The perioperative environment is an intricate clinical arena that includes several variables such as a large array of instruments, supplies, and complex care. This in turn can lead to errors including surgical site misidentification, patient misidentification, and medical errors and omissions (Jacques & Minear, 2008). A reliable technological system is essential in this environment.
One way that interactions between technology specialists and professionals within my organization can be improved is to implement multidisciplinary meetings for staff. Multidisciplinary teams (MDT’s) are a crucial factor in the delivery of health care and “the use of health information systems and technology are key enabling factors for building the capacity of MDTs to engage in improvement and implementation projects” (Janssen et al., 2018, para. 1). These meetings provide the opportunity to address any clinical technological challenges, provide updates and devise solutions for any problems to ensure all staff are on the same page.
The continued evolution of new technologies impacts professional interactions in a plethora of ways. I believe there will be increased collaboration with other professions and increased demand for staff training due to new technologies. Healthcare changes drastically due to technological developments, ranging from antibiotics and anesthetics to magnetic resonance imaging scanners and radiotherapy (Thimbleby, 2022). This in turn will broaden professional interactions and hopefully have a significantly beneficial result for both patients and staff.

Please answer assignment number 3. Research Project: Outline Assignment
Please read instructions from attached files. If you have trouble, please inform. Use resources on the attached annotated bibliography.
you can also you the topic proposal to understand what to put in the outline
Please do not use AI. for the instructors do have a way to find that out.
Please let it be original
Thank you.

Introduction
Synopsis: This is a complex situation in an organization that has had a difficult history (e.g., mismanagement, nurses’ strike, low patient satisfaction, problems in the ED-lifeline to the hospital).
Newcastle lacks well-defined organizational and IT strategies. The ED has a unique set of challenges, and it serves as the lifeline to hospital admissions, with over half of all admissions entering through the ED.
Patient satisfaction in the ED is low, patients complain of long waits, physicians have been resistant to change, and the data available within the ED to track performance measures has been either unreliable or non-existent. (Pages 512 through 515, Wager, Lee, and Glaser text)
This case study illustrates a real challenge faced by many hospitals. There are a number of underlying factors that contribute to the perception of poor quality. Some of these issues are captured within the case and will need to be carefully examined.
Unit Learning Outcomes
ULO #1. Differentiate between a centralized and decentralized IT departmental structure as it pertains to customer responsiveness, innovation, functionality, staffing, management of resources, supervisor oversight, and strategic planning. (CLO 1, 3)
ULO #2: Identify and discuss the core IT competencies and capabilities in a typical healthcare organization (based support and service, care improvement, and technical infrastructure).
ULO #3: Evaluate the effectiveness of an IT department with a special emphasis on governance, budget development and resources allocation, systems acquisition, system implementation, IT service level.
ULO #4: Formulate IT strategic and tactical plans that align with the organization’s strategies, plans, and initiatives to ensure congruency.
Directions
The students are expected to carefully read the assigned case study, then thoroughly and explicitly address each component of the corresponding case study questions, which are located on located in the Wager, Lee, and Glaser text.
The submission should reflect higher-level cognitive processing (analysis, synthesis, and evaluation), which is essential for someone being prepared to serve in an operational capacity within the healthcare and related industry. To earn the maximum number of points, the submission should reflect graduate-level execution with clear evidence of critical thinking, synthesis of relevant information from credible sources, and clear mastery of the concepts necessary to successfully execute each component of the assignment.
The submission should not exceed four (4) pages in length, excluding the title and reference list pages, and explicitly address all required components of this assignment. The document must be double-spaced, adhere to the APA writing style (7th ed.), and include at least three (3) references of credible or peer-reviewed sources to support any suppositions and recommendations. Finally, the document should be prepared as a Microsoft Word document and uploaded to Submit Assignment.