Category: Health Care

Write a *Search strategy *Rationale for Literature selection for the above PICO question. It cannot be AI Generated

Health behavior theories can be applied in various ways in public health research and practice. They can be used as frameworks to explain behavior and serve as tools for the development, implementation, and evaluation of public health interventions. For this assignment, create an annotated bibliography analyzing the application of a health behavior theory used in three different peer-reviewed research articles pertaining to public health. An annotated bibliography is used to critically analyze, interpret, and relay information to the reader about what was found in a peer-reviewed research article. This type of analysis requires a higher level of comprehension that involves paraphrasing information. Direct quotes are not permitted for this assignment. Refer to “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies” resource, located in the Student Success Center for assistance in completing this assignment. This resource provides criteria for other types of scholarly writing, so make sure you follow the instructions for the APA style. Complete the following steps: Step 1 Select one of the following health behavior theories: Health Belief Model, Theory of Reasoned Action, Theory of Planned Behavior, Integrated Behavioral Model, Transtheoretical Mode, or Stages of Change. Conduct a search for three peer-reviewed public health research articles published within the last 5 years that utilize the theory you selected. If applicable, you may use the peer-reviewed article that you selected for Topic 3 DQ 2. Step 2 For each article, write an annotation. Each annotation should be 150-250 words, not including your APA reference for the article at the beginning. Include the following: Background of the author(s) Conclusions made by the author(s) Summary of the content or scope of the text Outline of the main argument Intended audience Research methodology Reliability of the text Type of health behavior theory and how it was applied in the research You may use any relevant resources from your completed Annotated Bibliography in your upcoming Connecting Theory to Practice assignment in Topic 7. Be sure to incorporate your instructor feedback prior to submitting. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

The final deliverable for this assessment will be a PowerPoint presentation with detailed presenter’s notes representing the material you would deliver at an in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative focusing on a specific patient safety issue and to explain the need for such an initiative. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative. Be sure that your presentation addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score. Describe the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient safety issue. Explain to the audience their role and importance of making the improvement plan successful. Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative. Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement. There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example: Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes. Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away. Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan. Give an overview of the current problem focusing on a specific patient safety issue, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address. Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation. Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance. Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan. Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan focusing on a specific patient safety issue. Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan. Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice. Explain new processes or skills. Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these new processes and skills. In the notes section of your PowerPoint, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns. Part 5: Soliciting Feedback. Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service. Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it. Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question. If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document (accessible from the “Create PICO(T) Questions” page in the Capella library’s Evidence Based Practice guide) might be helpful. In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria: Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.). Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue. Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style. Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like: Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Length of submission: Create a 3-5 page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style. Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Write a paper (1,200-1,400 words) that examines how to address a problem within the health care environment, including risk mitigation and implementation of new compliance requirements. Describe how you would go about establishing that a potential concern is a problem that should be further investigated. Discuss any specific triggering event you should use in order to initiate the continuous quality improvement process. Explain what tools that would be utilized to identify the problem, develop the solution, track the implementation, and summarize the findings (i.e., benchmarking). Once you have established that the identified concern is an issue worth addressing, discuss how you would you go about prioritizing this problem compared to other problems. Consider the scarcity of resources, labor costs, capital investment needs, the approval process within your organization, and where you are in the budget cycle. Discuss how you intend to mitigate risk when implementing new compliance requirements. Who would be considered stakeholders or vested parties during this implementation? You are required to reference a minimum of five peer-reviewed articles to support your argument. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Techni

The assignment details are shown in the screenshot I shared. Just so you know, I’m looking for a presentation about a local hospital (in Saudi Arabia) or at least a hospital in the Arabian Gulf. (The deadline is at 7p.m, a bonus will be given for solid work finished before the deadline)

Attached are the assignment instructions and the paper that I have been working on so far. In the instructions, topics and questions highlighted in yellow are the ones that i need help with.

AssignmentsGrading Rubric for R Assignments
Each Review (R) assignment involves reading and reviewing ALL of the exam questions for this chapter that were written by your peers.

Then, you will be asked to perform the following tasks:

Best Question
Pick the best question from all of your peers’ submitted exam questions.
Show the chosen question in its entirety, including the 4 answer choices and the highlighting of the correct answer choice.
Do not pick a question that contains less than four answer choices.
The question you choose must have the answer choice highlighted.
Do not pick a question that used “catch-all” answer choices (e.g., “both a and b” or “all of the above”).
Do not pick a question that would be considered a “true/false” question.
After showing your chosen question, write one paragraph that contains 55-65 words explaining why it is the best question.
Your word count must be shown in yellow highlighting.

2nd Best Question
Pick the 2nd best question from all of your peers’ submitted exam questions.
Show the chosen question in its entirety, including the 4 answer choices and the highlighting of the correct answer choice.
Do not pick a question that contains less than four answer choices.
The question you choose must have the answer choice highlighted.
Do not pick a question that used “catch-all” answer choices (e.g., “both a and b” or “all of the above”).
Do not pick a question that would be considered a “true/false” question
After showing your chosen question, write one paragraph that contains 55-65 words explaining why it is the 2nd best question.
Your word count must be shown in yellow highlighting.

Suggested Changes
From all of the exam questions that were written by your peers, pick one question that you would edit to make it a much better question.
Show the chosen question in its entirety, including the 4 answer choices and the highlighting of the correct answer choice.
Do not pick a question that contains less than four answer choices.
The question you choose must have the answer choice highlighted.
Do not pick a question that used “catch-all” answer choices (e.g., “both a and b” or “all of the above”).
Do not pick a question that would be considered a “true/false” question
After showing your chosen question, write one paragraph that contains 55-65 words explaining why you think the question needs to be edited.
Your word counts must be shown in yellow highlighting.

Our Discussion this week is based on either our observation or from practical experience based on our professional environments. Discuss a large project your organization took up to a year to complete, please keep comments generic. Why was this project initiated? What role did you in the planning or implementation phase (or both). Describe some of the pre-initiating and initiating tasks completed for the project. Remember, as members of organizations, we all play a role.
Your response should be a minimum of 250 words. Respond to the initial discussion by Thursday, September 26 by 9 PM, and respond to a minimum of three classmates by Sunday, September 29 at 11 PM.

Pick a repetitive activity in the healthcare setting done by healthcare professionals using their upper body (arms and hands). Conduct an Ergonomics risk assessment. Using the Assessment of repetitive tasks (ART) tool, what are the top three Ergonomic risk factors? Post your score sheet in your response.
Here is access to the tool: Assessment of repetitive tasks of the upper limbs (the ART tool).
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.