This assignment requires you to read “Moral Criticisms of the Market” by Ken S.

This assignment requires you to read “Moral Criticisms of the Market” by Ken S. Ewert (found in the Learn section, Read: Moral Criticisms of the Market). Note that in his article, Ewert is defending the free market from “Christian Socialists.” He states their position and then gives a rebuttal.
Do you agree with the critique of the market in Ewert’s article? Why or why not? Read carefully and offer cogent reasons.
Consider the context of the article; the Berlin Wall fell months after the article was published. The USSR followed shortly thereafter.
for each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in APA format. Any
sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the
textbook, online articles for the week, the Bible, and any other pertinent source to the assignment
topic.

Describe the process used to select federal judges, including the role of the pr

Describe the process used to select federal judges, including the role of the president, the Senate, senatorial courtesy, the American Bar Association, and the Judicial Selection Monitoring Project. Examining the nomination of one recent Supreme Court nominee and trace that nomination though the process to the final Senate vote.

For this assignment, you will choose 1 group, organization, etc. that is activel

For this assignment, you will choose 1 group, organization, etc. that is actively involved in engaging the culture. Possible groups include (but are not limited to):
Heritage Foundation
Patriot Academy
Leadership Institute
Liberty Counsel
Live Action
State specific organization such as the Texas Public Policy Foundation
The goal is to explain and analyze what the organization is doing to impact the culture. You can focus on the strengths and accomplishments of the group, or you could focus on its weaknesses and suggest ways the group could be more effective. Cite your information where necessary.
250 word

In this written assignment, you will examine the Constitutional basis of federal

In this written assignment, you will examine the Constitutional basis of federalism. In so doing you will contrast the concept of federalism with the separation of powers and then investigate federalism by examining a topic of your choice, and how it demonstrates the concept of federalism at both the national and state level. In your investigation, make sure to discuss potential points of tension and/or cooperation that can arise between states and the national government on your issue of choice.
TOPIC:
Healthcare
Once you have completed your research and found your examples, write a two- to three-page (five paragraph) paper.
In your paper,
Explain federalism as it is used in the United States, its constitutional basis, and compare it to the separation of powers (one body paragraph)
Examine the legal basis for the federal government and state governments to make laws regarding your topic based upon the examples you chose (one body paragraph)
Examine the way in which federalism impacts the way in which Americans experience the topic you have chosen. Make sure to discuss tensions and/or instances of cooperation that may arise between the federal and state government on this topic (One paragraph)
Clearly identify Constitutional articles, federal or state laws, court cases, government entities or other relevant factors in your paper.

The Federalism vs. Separation of Power paper
Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style
Must use at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed sources

The Reading Summary consists of two parts: 1) a summary of the main arguments in

The Reading Summary consists of two parts:
1) a summary of the main arguments in the readings, assigned for your topic and your own opinion/critical evaluation of these arguments. The summary should be 4 pages long. Your opinion should be about 1-2 paragraphs.
Two readings that should be in the essay
a) http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres67.html
b) Lieven, A. and J. Hulsman, “The Folly of Exporting Democracy,” excerpt from Ethical Realism: A Vision for America’s Role in the World (September 2006).
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=OVIC&u=gale&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CEJ3010110279&asid=1690430400000~3d9f23e2
this assignment based on the following criteria:
a) how well you have understood the readings and the main arguments in them
b) how clearly you have summarized the main points
c) have you included some evidence/examples in order to support or oppose these main arguments
d) have you expressed your own opinion on the topic or any of the most important arguments in it

If you have any questions or issues with the links please let me know.
Thank you.

A More Perfect Union? Have we achieved the Constitution’s goals today? To answer

A More Perfect Union? Have we achieved the Constitution’s goals today? To answer this question, think about the goals expressed in the preamble to the U.S. Constitution:
Form a strong union
Establish equal justice for all
Insure domestic tranquility (that is, peace at home)
Provide for the common defense ( today we might say homeland security)
Promote the general welfare
Secure liberty for ourselves and posterity
With this in mind, and using an A–F (A, B, C, D, & F) grading scale, assign a grade to each area of the preamble. For instance, assign an “A” if you think the U.S. has lived up to its goal of forming a strong union, and so on and so forth. Your effort here must go beyond mere assertion; that is, simply ascribing a grade to each area. You must qualify the rationale behind your evaluation. You accomplish this task with the use of relevant, scholarly data. You should conclude your paper with one recommendation for improvement in your lowest rated area.
include reference page

Use the links as your main sources, use others if you need to. If you have any q

Use the links as your main sources, use others if you need to. If you have any questions let me know, thank you!
Prompt:
Please watch the following videos:
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSZGMthsAxg)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUzoEvSC_AU&t)
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXbWQ6d4hMM&t)
Please discuss the New Deal coalition and how FDR and the Dems held it together. Then discuss the Republican’s effort to win over white southerners after Democrats began to focus on civil rights in the 1960s. (AKA “The Southern Strategy.”) Then discuss the modern version of the Southern Strategy. Explain this all as a coherent narrative. 3,000 words