Category: Engineering

The labs are already completed, and all calculations have been done. I just want you to fill in the missing parts in lab. Please read everything carefully to ensure you don’t miss anything.

Read the background information in Section I. Your paper should address each of the subsections of Section II. Make sure you read each section completely and carefully before preparing your paper.
Section I: Background
Acme General Contractors is the general contractor for a new 20-story commercial building in downtown Centerville, USA. The building will use a rigid-frame structure and reinforced concrete construction. A major subcontractor on the project who will be performing the roofing and interior insulation and drywall installation has hired you as the safety officer.
Section II: Assignment
Analyze the hazards associated with the roofing and the interior work. You should identify at least three hazards for each activity.
Perform a risk assessment on three of the hazards that you identified for each activity (six total) using the 4 X 5 matrix shown in Figure 34-1 on page 492 of the textbook or in the quantitative risk assessment form, which can be accessed by clicking here.
Prioritize the need for controls for the hazards that you selected based on the results of the risk assessment.
Using the hierarchy of engineering controls listed in Figure 3-3 on page 29 of the textbook, recommend a control method for each hazard that you believe would be the most effective in reducing risk to an acceptable level. Explain why you made the choice, and support your decisions with at least one reference other than the textbook.
Use the 4 X 5 matrix or the quantitative risk assessment form to show the reduction in risk for each hazard after the control method has been applied.
For any fall protection that you recommend, be specific about the type of fall protection needed.
Discuss how Prevention through Design (PtD) could be used to reduce the risks associated with these operations.

As the Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) professional for a manufacturing company, you have just completed the quarterly inspections and have found hazards. Because your resources (both financial and human) are limited, you must complete a risk assessment to determine which hazards have a higher priority for mitigation.
Use the quantitative risk assessment method outlined in the unit lesson and explain why this method is the best choice for assessing the risks associated with the hazards and the purpose of your project:
Read the Unit 3 Study Guide and required reading assignment, then review all previous grading feedback and the Writing Style Instructions announcement before drafting your work.
(a) Review each of the hazards identified below and conduct a risk assessment using the quantified method for risk assessment. Click here to access the quantitative risk assessment form and make certain to include the spreadsheet in the appendices. *Delete the sample Condition #1 and sample quantitative values in the risk assessment spreadsheet and replace with Hazard #1 conditions and establish quantitative values, then add the subsequent Hazards (#2 – #7) as to complete the entire risk assessment.
(b) You may modify the risk level in the spreadsheet to meet your level of acceptable risk. Based on this quantified risk assessment, determine the priority of mitigation.
(c) Provide a four-to-eight-page report (not including the required title page and appendices page…see CSU Citation Guide p. 19) detailing your findings. The project report should include the elements listed below:
Summarize the steps you used to determine your risk assessments, including conducting a hazard identification inspection.
Provide an explanation as to why the quantitative risk assessment method is one of the better methods for evaluating risk for this type of hazard.
Discuss the results of the findings, including the priority of mitigations for the identified hazards.
Provide a recommendation as to whether the project mitigations are justified using the William-Fine method (Brauer, 2016, pp. 496-497).

Please see attached. May use outside sources, if prefer to use course content please state that within 72 hours of assignment acceptance thanks.
No more than 8 pages 1.5 spacing (not an option when selecting but did the math.

Please see attached.
If instructions are unclear please reach out within 72 hours of accepting the assignment not close to the deadline. Thanks!

My part in this research is the evaluation.
I wrote the evaluation, but my professor had a lot of comments on it, and I’m not sure how to fix it . so I’ll upload the research. You have to select and edit only the evaluation area, and you can add up to 300 words to the evaluation. The comments from my instructor will be uploaded in different files. I want a great transformation because it’s worth many of my marks. It has to be in IEEE form. I will also upload a Sample of the research from another group. If you need any extra documents, don’t hesitate to contact me. Thankyou.

Hello dear writer
My topic is titled: Turbos in ships
I am a military student at the Naval College
Please follow the example and instructions, but in a simplified manner and not like the attached example from the university. You can follow the example that my friend did on this site.
Please, dear writer, complete the work on the draft that you did and add citations to the sentences that I wrote
I look forward to excellent work from you, and you can increase the number of pages beyond what I requested as much as you wish.
Comments from Customer
Discipline: Marine Science

please note that all the questions are related to engineering (district cooling), please follow them and do it as paragraphs. if you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.
do all parts and questions please

Requirements:
After the collapse of the first Quebec Bridge in 1907, a commission was formed to investigate the failure. Many witnesses were called in to testify, including the engineers who had the most influential positions: Theodore Cooper, John Sterling Deans, and Edward Hoare. Read the transcripts from their testimony (See attached) and reflect on their testimony.
Based on their testimony and your knowledge of the skills, qualities, and rules relating to being an expert witness, evaluate their competence as engineers and expert witnesses. Consider their qualifications for the positions they were assigned to and whether they were qualified for the positions. Discuss how these shortcomings likely played into the failure. Also reflect on the likelihood of this scenario repeating itself in today’s engineering environment.
Write with the analyze of 3 testimonies for Quebec bridge. (please see the sample)
Ideas should be well-defined and appropriate.
All rules of technical writing apply
PLEASE READ ALL TESTIMONIES OF COPPER, DEANS AND HOARE (see instruction below)
LINKS:
The Royal Commission’s report is available from the SJSU library through this link: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Report_and_Plans_Also_Report_on_Design_o/-ci-UpORruUC?hl=en&gbpv=1Links to an external site.
The testimonies of Cooper, Deans, and Hoare are located on the following pages:
COOPER
p343-358
bottom of pg 343
bottom of p357
bottom of p396 – top of p398

DEANS
p8, 15, 306, 319, 369
p8 – Day 1. Deans sworn in
p15 – Day 2. Deans recalled. p22
bottom of p306 – p315 Deans’ recalled
p319 – 321 Supplement to Deans’ earlier testimony (technical info)
bottom of p369 – p378

HOARE
P49, 64, 78, 117, 184, 244, 275, 317, 398
p49 – Day 3. Hoare sworn in.
p64 – Day 4. Hoare recalled. p74
p78 – Hoare recalled (half pg)
p117 – Day 5. Hoare recalled. p119
p184 – Day 7. Hoare recalled (half pg)
p244 – Day 11. Hoare recalled (half pg)
p275 – Day 13. Hoare recalled. p291
p317 – Day 14. Hoare recalled. p319
p398 – Re-examination of Hoare. p403
TEMPLATE:
– Introduction
– Theodore Cooper
– John Sterling Deans
– Edward Hoarse

This paper should be an introduction address how a spectrophotometer works, what’s it for, and how light is absorbed. The usage focus is on how beers laws is used to calculate absorbable of light intensity being transmitted into a concentrated sample.