Category: Engineering

Contemporary issues essay 20 Possible Points
12/8/2023
Add Comment
Details
Research four or more contemporary, primary-research, scholarly articles on a subject of engineering that you find interesting (It does not have to be electrical engineering per se, but should be related to electrical engineering). At least three articles must be IEEE publications. Write a 2-page literature review based on those articles (10-12 point font with a line spacing of about 16 points). Your report will be graded based on the rubric below. (Note: the results of the 100-point rubric are divided by 5 to get a score in the range 0-20 points).
Criterion
Poor (1-3 points)
Fair(4-7 points)
Good (8-10 points)
Subject Matter 20%
(double points)
Has no scholarly articles, or all scholarly articles are over 3 years old.
Has a contemporary scholarly article, but it is not primary research or not from a major publication.
Has one or more scholarly, primary- research articles from major publication(s).
Paragraph and Section Structure 10%
Paragraphs and sections are poorly organized and hinder document navigation.
Paragraphs and sections and are generally well organized and do not hinder navigation.
Paragraphs and sections are all well organized and aid document navigation.
Clarity 10%
The report is unclear and the reader has difficulty understanding the points.
The report is mostly understandable but some sentences must be reread to clarify points.
The report is clear and can be understood after a single reading.

Conciseness 10%
The report contains a substantial amount of unnecessary or redundant verbiage.
The report contains little unnecessary or redundant verbiage.
The report contains no unnecessary or redundant verbiage and sentences get right to the point.
Completeness 10%
The report leaves many unanswered question.
The report leaves few unanswered question.
The report leaves no unanswered questions.
Figures, Tables and Equations 10%
The report contains less than 2 figures, tables or equations, or the figures tables and equations are unclear and do not support the text.
The report contains at least two figures, tables or equations which are either clear or support the text.
All figures, tables and equations are clear, labeled and support the text.
Mechanics 10%
Sentences are poorly written with numerous errors in spelling, word choice, punctuation or grammar.
Sentences are generally well written with a few errors in spelling, word choice, punctuation or grammar.
Sentences are all well written with almost no errors in spelling, word choice, punctuation or grammar.
Citations 10%
None of the statements or non-original figures in the text have citations.
Some of the statements or non-original figures in the text have citations.
All statements and figures have citations where appropriate.
References 10%
The report fails to cite any sources, does not use an acceptable citation format or references Wikipedia.
Most but not all sources are correctly cited or cited using an unacceptable format.
All sources are cited correctly using an appropriate format.

Hello, I was looking for some help with this networking assignment. I attached the instructions and also a pdf copy of the book we use if you need to refer to anything from the book. We are not allowed to use AI / Chat GBT

I am attaching the instructions. I am also attaching the questions and answers, but I need them reworded because it is only 196 words and I need to make it 300-500 words. Please also attach 3 reputable references to it and cite them APA style in the answers.

In a section named “Architecture”:
Include an illustration or diagram of the Portfolio Project’s MVP. This should include an end-to-end map for the data flowing through your system. Each part of the diagram should be clearly labeled.
Here are some resources to learn more:
Web Architecture 101
List of tools to create architecture diagrams
Web Application Architecture

All Applicants In a concise statement, please explain the following: Your educational and professional goals; The factors and experience that led you to choose your field of study; How working as part of the DoD civilian workforce will further your technical and professional goals; and How your experience, interests, and goals will further the DoD mission.
In your response, discuss any specific challenges or problems in your field that most interest you as well as why you want to work for the DoD. Your response must be between 3,500 and 7,000 characters, including spaces. All applicants must answer the initial prompt. There are additional questions for those applying as graduate students and retention applicants. Be sure to save your work offline for your records and to prevent losing content due to a session timeout. Please cite any sources used in your statement. There is no preferred format for citations. Please avoid using special characters such as: < or >. Citations will be included in the character count.
In addition to the questions above, elaborate on the kinds of research you have engaged in or would like to engage in during your studies as well as during your expected tenure with the DoD. Please discuss these research interests in sufficient detail for an expert who is technically competent in your field to judge your understanding of the questions to be addressed, relevant hypotheses and approaches one might take to answering the questions, and other research principles required to investigate in the research area you identify.

I am a Mechanical engineer PhD student
*Please no AI work
This term paper well act as a life cycle analysis for the electrical vehicles, we will be comparing the carbon emissions with that of internal composition engines car. Therefore, we will be considering different energy sources to charge the EV.
I was thinking of a similar work to:
1-Ahmed, A. A., Nazzal, M. A., Darras, B. M., & Deiab, I. M. (2022). A Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, and Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles through a Comparative Circular Economy Assessment Approach. Sustainability, 15(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010171
2-Wilken, D., Oswald, M., Draheim, P., Pade, C., Brand, U., & Vogt, T. (2020). Multidimensional assessment of passenger cars: Comparison of electric vehicles with internal combustion engine vehicles. Procedia CIRP, 90, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.101
If we could use GREET program and sharing the data with me. It will be amazing
I need 3-4 charts at least that compare. I will be attaching the term paper format were you will be able to see all request. Moreover, I will attach another file were I tried to fill with my own thoughts, two gradings with notes for the work.

What is Lifecycle Engineering (LCE) ( Definition)?
Key processes/steps of LCE
What is US Army doing currently regarding LCE?
What is US Army not doing currently regarding LCE that industry is doing?
Aspects of it that US Army should be doing but maybe are not?
Questions you would like to have answered to know what an organization/company is doing regarding LCE?
What is the matrix/Return of Investment (ROI) determination process for an organization to know where it currently stands regarding LCE?
What is Reimbursable Process (RP) ( Definition)?
Key process/steps of RP
Questions you would like to have answered to know what an organization/company is doing regarding RP?
Aspects of it that US Army should be doing but maybe are not?
Questions you would like to have answered to know what an organization/company is doing regarding RP?
What is the matrix/Return of Investment (ROI) determination process for an organization to know where it currently stands regarding RP?
What and how LCE is or can be related to RP?

1. Brief introduction of your organization and issues (based on previous assignments) (Max 1.5 point)
2. Identify two bottlenecks (Constraints) in your organization, provide the workaround bottlenecks (Constraints), one at the time. (Max 3 points)
3. Define what is TOC (for your organization), and apply the 5 Focusing Steps (for your identified constraints) clearly explaining YOUR Thinking Processes for each step to address first constraint). (Max 2 points)
4. Apply the 5 Focusing Steps (for your identified constraints) clearly explaining YOUR Thinking Processes for each step to address second constraint). (Max 2 points)

1. Brief introduction of your organization and issues (based on previous assignments) (Max 1.5 point)
2. Identify two bottlenecks (Constraints) in your organization, provide the workaround bottlenecks (Constraints), one at the time. (Max 3 points)
3. Define what is TOC (for your organization), and apply the 5 Focusing Steps (for your identified constraints) clearly explaining YOUR Thinking Processes for each step to address first constraint). (Max 2 points)
4. Apply the 5 Focusing Steps (for your identified constraints) clearly explaining YOUR Thinking Processes for each step to address second constraint). (Max 2 points)

I would you to create a Theories of operations paper based on the project charter attached
Please include diagrams like function block diagram or OV1