Category: Criminal Justice

Chapter 9 in your text discusses moral arguments advanced about capital punishment. The articles “Killing in Good Conscience: What’s Wrong With Sunstein and Vermeule’s Lesser Evil Argument for Capital Punishment and Other Human Rights Violations?” and How social media is pushing the limits of legal ethics address ethical issues regarding the death penalty (Blumenson, 2007; Harris, 2011). In this discussion, address capital punishment and its implementation in the United States. Examine its use and application against the logical fallacy of “two wrongs make a right.” If capital punishment can be proven to be a logical fallacy, discuss the efficacy of its continued use.

If reducing waste can increase efficiency, why is the output of industrial waste still so great? What is the application of industrial ecology and life-cycle analysis to these problems?

Explain risk assessment and risk management. Discuss how risk management combines science and other social factors.

What are the arguments for and against genetically modified crops? Discuss the scientific, economic, and political issues.

See assignment below for the organization structure. I’m also attaching previous assignment for details

NO AI (DETECTORS IN PLACE)
PART 1 (300-600 words). After participating in this week’s lecture and reading/viewing this week’s material, weigh the benefits and challenges of incorporating, replacing, or excluding restorative justice into, with, or from the existing justice and corrections system, especially given the debate between treatment and punishment. How would your proposed incorporation, replacement, or exclusion work? Feel free to use other sources outside of the video and lecture, but you must cite any sources you use.

1.Discuss the importance of a researcher engaging in field research. Be sure to address how field research differs from other forms of research and what areas of study are best approached through field studies.
2.What is meant by the term “research ethics?” What are some recommendations or guidelines that researchers should adhere to when they are conducting research? How are researchers’ behaviors monitored to ensure adherence to these ethical standards?
3.Provide a research scenario in which a content analysis would be the preferable method of studying the particular phenomenon. (Hint: Be sure to include a detailed discussion of why a content analysis would be preferable to perhaps a survey or field research).
4.Discuss the use of secondary data analysis – data that has been collected by others but may be of use or interest to your research. Be sure to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using secondary data.
iew keyboard shortcuts
EditViewInsertFormatToolsTable
12ptParagraph

In this unit, we have explored time of death and the four stages of decomposition. Based on what you have learned, you are to create a PowerPoint presentation to address these key issues.
You are the chief medical examiner for your county and presenting to new doctors the basics of how to determine time of death based on the landmarks of decomposition. Make sure you address all four stages.
Your PowerPoint presentation should address the following components:
Slide 1: Title
Slide 2: Introduction
Slides 3 and 4: Theory on time of death
Slides 5 thru 8: Each of the four stages of decomposition
Slides 9 thru 11 : Relevant medical scenarios
Slide 12: Conclusion
Slide 13: References
Your PowerPoint presentation must include a title slide (one slide) and a reference slide (one slide), which does not count toward the minimum 11 slides of content. You are required to insert additional information into the notes section in each slide to communicate your thoughts and ideas thoroughly. If you would prefer, audio voiceover can be utilized in place of slide notes.
Images, graphics, smart art, and/or backgrounds that enhance your presentation and make it look professional, clean, and visually attractive are required; however, do not allow images or graphs to dominate the slides.

Instructions attached below. Link to the
documentary/movie can be found within instructions. Below are a few points; they are in the instructions, but bares repeating for emphasis purposes:
– MUST be 2.5 pages long! No more; no less.
– The instructions encourages frequent use of the text (chapters 1-6). Use text as primary source. Additional three sources to follow.
– the requested 3 additional sources are only encouraged to add some additional “spice.” Use the book and if the book is enough and the paper is VERY strong, there’s no need for the additional 3 sources

In each module, specific Learning Objectives were provided in the Module Overviews. Using these as guideposts, please summarize the major themes covered in the Discussions. Begin with a short one-paragraph introduction, then write a single paragraph for each of the paired modules that explains the major issues covered in the Discussions (i.e. one paragraph for D-1 & D-2, one paragraph for D-3 & D-4, and one paragraph for D-5 & D-6). High scores will require students to specifically reference their peers’ work and the assigned readings (e.g., “In D-2, John S. argued that …”; According to Law, …”; etc.). Additionally, you must meaningfully comment on at least one of the videos or other supplemental asynchronous content items provided each module. In the context of “Lessons Learned,” you will also need to include a final paragraph covering THREE (3) points which you feel added to your understanding of the relationship between modernity, political violence, and the power of the state. Choose those themes you felt to be noteworthy, enlightening, interesting, or controversial. Your submission should consist of five (5) paragraphs and be between 1,000 and 1,500 words.