Category: Criminal Justice

In this assignment you will investigate emerging use-of-force technologies in law enforcement, and evaluate the effectiveness of simulation technology in use-of-force training.
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin, in Canvas.
From the videos posted in the lecture (not the one about the FAU simulator. Do not include information about that one in this section, it is for the next section. Only use, and incorporate into your answers, the other linked videos) :
You must show evidence from the videos and cite them:
Describe at least three benefits of using simulators for a non-law enforcement audience. Are these useful tools for non-law enforcement? Explain your answer, using information from the videos and notes.
Did the videos change your mind about any police use-of-force issues? If not, can you see how they might for others?
What technologies might be more useful for a non-police audience to learn about police use of force realities?
From the video about the FAU SCCJ/FAUPD simulator:
Again, you must show evidence that you watched the video.
Do you see this as a useful tool for an academic department? Why or why not?
What are some potential groups that might benefit from using this tool? Explain why.
What aspects of this technology do you think are useful for training? Which might not be so useful?
Develop a scenario that you think might be a useful training scenario. Please include the potential audience (police, social worker, community leader, new driver, etc. The sky is the limit). What are some branching options? Tools available (handgun, taser, etc.)?
Given the realities of undergraduate classes at FAU, such as class sizes of 50-70 students being the norm, and a significant proportion offered online, how would you suggest we incorporate this technology in classes so that students might benefit from it?
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin in Canvas.
All links are in document i think but just in case simulation link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X15NjQD9jqc
My grade depends on this pls help me and let me know if you need anything else

Overview
Many issues in the United States are focused on the application of force in the field of law enforcement. Questions have been raised as to whether criminal justice professionals are applying the least amount of force necessary to gain compliance from an unwilling subject. Because of several recent controversies surrounding the use of deadly force and the treatment of individuals in police custody, many members of society have been extremely critical of the use of force. These controversial issues have created a negative public perception of law enforcement officers, and there have been demonstrations and calls for reform in both the training and hiring of police officers.
For this assignment, you will first read and analyze the Graham v. Connor court decision. This decision is the seminal case that articulates when and how use-of-force situations will be reviewed and judged. As you read the case, consider who the key stakeholders are (police officers, police departments, citizens, etc.) in the controversy and how this issue impacts the field of criminal justice.
Prompt
After reading the case, write a brief in which you address the elements listed below. This case brief will help you address the impact of similar decisions in studying your own issue analysis for the final project. Set up your brief as the sample case brief is set up, and include the answers to the questions in the Analysis section of the brief.
Facts: State the facts of the case and why the case went to trial.
Issue: State what is at issue in the case.
Ruling: State the court’s ruling in the case.
Analysis: This section contains the bulk of the brief. In your analysis, address the following:
In this case, what standard did the court use to determine whether the use of force was reasonable? For instance, what did the court say about judging the objective reasonableness of the use of force?
What perspective did the court use in determining whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force? What did the court say about using hindsight to determine objective reasonableness?
What strategies do you believe should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation?
Analyze the connection between the issue of use of force and what criminological theory contributed to the understanding—or misunderstanding—of these issues.
Conclusion: Conclude the case brief by summarizing your analysis.
Reference your textbook reading as well as the case material in your submission. To facilitate this task, refer to the Sample Case Brief document.
What to Submit
Your submission should be at least 1 page in length (in addition to title and reference pages). It should use single spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow APA style for in-text citations and the reference list.

Briefly discuss the effectiveness of consent decrees and Section 14141 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. In doing so, describe the legal provision that allowed the Department of Justice DOJ to intervene when allegations are made that constitutional policing is not followed as a matter of patterns and practices.
Note: The essay response should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing per current APA standards. The essay response is to include in-text citation(s) in proper APA format. In-text citations are to correspond to each listed source in the correct APA format listed after the essay response (APA, 2020).
References
Alpert, G. P., McLean, K., & Wolfe, S. (2017). Consent decrees: An approach to police accountability and reform. Police Quarterly, 20(3), 239-249.
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 

The final report should be a formal research report written in
the format/style traditional of a scholarly empirical paper. The basic outline that students would see in
research articles encountered in their literature review. This paper is scored holistically (as a whole) with close
attention given to the listed parts.
The paper should be a coherent whole that explains the specific subject, especially your dependent concept,
previous research about that concept, the theory you are testing, the variables used to test the theory, the
hypothesis of the relationship between variables, the research method and data source for those variables,
how you analyzed the hypothesis (cross-tabulation), what you concluded about the hypothesis from the
analysis, and what we learn about the theory and general subject from your research. Finally, you should
explain how future research could be done that would improve the testing of your theory in terms of research
design, sampling, and measurement.. In it, you compose a refined
and edited account of your project in a traditional research manuscript format using the information that you
have developed throughout the CIA project. It will be in a form typical for empirical research reports. As you
read research articles for this class, pay attention to the order and content of the various sections so you will
be familiar with this.
Use APA format for the final paper
including cover page style, abstract, tables, and especially citations and references. Double-space the
manuscript (not tables) and use 12 pt font.
Cover Page
• Should include an original title that describes your research topic; then the normal identifying
information for a college paper (author(s), date, class….)
Abstract
• Although first in the paper, the abstract is written last. It is the brief summary of your project,
approximately 100 words.
Introduction
• Generally short, one to two pages. Summarizes the subject, your research question, and why it’s
important.
Literature Review
• Summarizes the past scholarly research most closely related to your own theory and hypothesis. Task
2 should have provided a start, but you may need more or different articles to explain current
knowledge of your topic. Start by explaining how your searched for literature (e.g. the databases that
you searched via the library). Use APA style citation. Summarize in your own words, not copying or
close paraphrasing. Do not rely solely on sequential summaries of the research reports that you
found; instead, synthesize their findings overall. Reading literature reviews in other research articles
should help you understand what this means.
Theory
• Explain the theory that you expect is the best explanation for your subject matter. In particular, what
explains differences or changes in your dependent concept. Be sure to include concepts that will be
represented by your independent variable and your control variable. Your literature review should
help you with a more comprehensive theory, although you are testing just a narrow portion of it.
Place your causal model diagram here as well.
Research Methods
• This section explains in detail how your data was collected and where it came from (sample). Since
you are using a secondary data source, you essentially are using the explanation provided. You should
also explain precisely what questions were asked for your variables, and the responses available. This
section also includes an explanation of how you believe your variables (DV, IV, and CV) represent
major concepts in your theory. Plus, explain to your reader what kind of analysis technique you are
using.
Hypothesis
• This short section should concisely articulate your hypothesis. Your hypothesis is not a generic
statement that may have been used early in the semester. It should be stated in terms of the
categories of your variables. For example, a larger percentage of respondents in one category of your
IV will report higher values for your DV compared to other categories of your IV.
Analysis
• You state again what kind of analysis you are using and the variables. If you recoded the variables,
explain the recoding. Then you provide the descriptive statistics for your variables (e.g. central
tendency, dispersion, or frequency distribution). Next, explain and provide the zero-order
crosstabulation table, and identify whether it supported your hypothesis. Finally, provide the first-
order crosstabulation tables, and identify whether each of those supports the hypothesis.
Discussion of conclusions
• This section should briefly explain three things. (A) Was your hypothesis supported, and if so, strongly
or weakly? Is the conclusion contingent on some values of the control variable? (B) Does it lend
support to the theory or not? (C) What does it suggest in the bigger scheme of science, society, law, or
policy? In other words, why does it matter?
Recommendations for future research (see Task 5, 7, & 8
• Do your findings suggest other research questions that should be pursued in the future to better
understand what this topic in broad terms?
• Because you were constrained to use the GSS data, explain how future research on your theory could
be improved. Refer to your suggestions about design, sampling, and measures for the basis of this
material.
Works Cited
• Using APA style, you will include a works cited list with complete references for the literature review as
well as any other material used in this research document to include a reference for the SDA and GSS.
I included the citations I am supposed to use and also we are used the sda.berkley.edu aka SDA and GSS data sets.
I used natcrime and INCOME as my two variables and did a crosstab narrowing down the income ratios to 0-25,000; 25,001-50,000; and above 50,000.

Identify 3 key areas in which private security differs from public police. Discuss why is it important to distinguish between the two. Explain if you agree private security add value in assisting public law enforcement.

In this assignment you will investigate emerging use-of-force technologies in law enforcement, and evaluate the effectiveness of simulation technology in use-of-force training.
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin, in Canvas.
From the videos posted in the lecture (not the one about the FAU simulator. Do not include information about that one in this section, it is for the next section. Only use, and incorporate into your answers, the other linked videos) :
You must show evidence from the videos and cite them:
Describe at least three benefits of using simulators for a non-law enforcement audience. Are these useful tools for non-law enforcement? Explain your answer, using information from the videos and notes.
Did the videos change your mind about any police use-of-force issues? If not, can you see how they might for others?
What technologies might be more useful for a non-police audience to learn about police use of force realities?
From the video about the FAU SCCJ/FAUPD simulator:
Again, you must show evidence that you watched the video.
Do you see this as a useful tool for an academic department? Why or why not?
What are some potential groups that might benefit from using this tool? Explain why.
What aspects of this technology do you think are useful for training? Which might not be so useful?
Develop a scenario that you think might be a useful training scenario. Please include the potential audience (police, social worker, community leader, new driver, etc. The sky is the limit). What are some branching options? Tools available (handgun, taser, etc.)?
Given the realities of undergraduate classes at FAU, such as class sizes of 50-70 students being the norm, and a significant proportion offered online, how would you suggest we incorporate this technology in classes so that students might benefit from it?
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin in Canvas.
All links are in document i think but just in case simulation link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X15NjQD9jqc
My grade depends on this pls help me and let me know if you need anything else

In this assignment you will investigate emerging use-of-force technologies in law enforcement, and evaluate the effectiveness of simulation technology in use-of-force training.
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin, in Canvas.
From the videos posted in the lecture (not the one about the FAU simulator. Do not include information about that one in this section, it is for the next section. Only use, and incorporate into your answers, the other linked videos) :
You must show evidence from the videos and cite them:
Describe at least three benefits of using simulators for a non-law enforcement audience. Are these useful tools for non-law enforcement? Explain your answer, using information from the videos and notes.
Did the videos change your mind about any police use-of-force issues? If not, can you see how they might for others?
What technologies might be more useful for a non-police audience to learn about police use of force realities?
From the video about the FAU SCCJ/FAUPD simulator:
Again, you must show evidence that you watched the video.
Do you see this as a useful tool for an academic department? Why or why not?
What are some potential groups that might benefit from using this tool? Explain why.
What aspects of this technology do you think are useful for training? Which might not be so useful?
Develop a scenario that you think might be a useful training scenario. Please include the potential audience (police, social worker, community leader, new driver, etc. The sky is the limit). What are some branching options? Tools available (handgun, taser, etc.)?
Given the realities of undergraduate classes at FAU, such as class sizes of 50-70 students being the norm, and a significant proportion offered online, how would you suggest we incorporate this technology in classes so that students might benefit from it?
Submit the assignment as a single Word file through the plagiarism detection software Turnitin in Canvas.
All links are in document i think but just in case simulation link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X15NjQD9jqc
My grade depends on this pls help me and let me know if you need anything else

Please review the attachment of instructions and reference my part 2 for this portion. I have already bolded the possible solution for this part to work on. (5-6 academic sentences) (16 sources: 4 references for each paragraph possible solution) make sure in text citations are included in all paragraphs (2-3). If you have any questions, please reach out to me.

Must be 5 pages with 5 peer academic journals and journals they came from, written in 3rd person, exclusive of textbooks, dictionaries, and encyclopedias or wikipedia, APA format, formal paper,

Intelligence-Led Identity Theft Problem Analysis Scenario
Title: Operation Phantom Mirage
In the bustling city of Metroplex, a sudden spike in identity theft cases has alarmed the local police department. Victims report unauthorized transactions, loans taken out in their names, and even instances of fake IDs and passports being issued. Preliminary investigations reveal a sophisticated operation by an elusive criminal group known as “Phantom Mirage”.
As newly appointed members of the Metroplex Police Department’s Cyber Intelligence Unit, your task is to analyze the digital footprints left by “Phantom Mirage”, understand their tactics and patterns, predict their next moves, and help devise a strategic response.
Assignment
Title: Unmasking Phantom Mirage: An Intelligence-Led Identity Theft Problem Analysis
Understanding the Adversary: Based on the identity theft crimes committed by “Phantom Mirage,” what can we infer about their technical capabilities, modus operandi, and potential motives?
Predictive Analysis: Given their patterns and techniques, what type of individuals or institutions might be their next potential target and why?
Strategic Response: If you were tasked to assist the Metroplex Police Department in countering “Phantom Mirage,” what strategies or preventive measures would you suggest?
Minium 1 Page.
• Must have a separate title and reference page following APA format 7th ed.
• Paper must be supported by a minimum of two scholarly references, cited according to the APA 7th edition guidelines. The textbook counts as one scholarly source. The other scholarly source must be an outside source (i.e., a source outside the regular readings assigned for the week/course). Please make sure to research what a scholarly source is.
• Double spaced.
• An abstract is not required.
Textbook: Understanding the Intelligence Cycle by Mark Phythian