Category: Criminal Justice

Week three paper topic: Although economists disagree on the impacts of deficits, they have become a major policy issue. Balanced budgets, although a rarity at the national level, are more common among the individual states. Balanced budgets are perceived by some as effective management and restraint on the government, as well as lessening the burden on future generations. Write a paper on the pros and cons of a balanced budget at the federal level. Be sure to include a recommendation on what the U.S. policy should be and why.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide to Writing Your Paper

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Prompt

• Carefully read the prompt to ensure you address all parts: the pros and cons of a balanced budget at the federal level and your recommendation for U.S. policy.
• Note key elements: “pros and cons,” “federal level,” “recommendation,” and “why.”

Step 2: Conduct Research

• Gather credible sources, including government websites, academic journals, and expert opinions, on balanced budgets.
• Focus on finding information about economic impacts, historical examples, and opposing viewpoints.

Step 3: Create an Outline
Organize your paper using the following structure:

1. Introduction
   • Briefly introduce the concept of a balanced budget.
   • Highlight its importance as a policy issue and preview your discussion points.
   • End with a clear thesis statement summarizing your recommendation.
2. Body
   • Section 1: Pros of a Balanced Budget
     • Discuss advantages, such as fiscal responsibility, reduced debt, and potential economic stability.
     • Use examples or data to support these points.
   • Section 2: Cons of a Balanced Budget
     • Explore disadvantages, including potential cuts to essential programs, economic inflexibility, or slower responses during recessions.
     • Provide evidence or examples illustrating these challenges.
   • Section 3: Evaluation of Both Sides
     • Compare the pros and cons.
     • Discuss how different economic conditions might influence the effectiveness of a balanced budget.
3. Recommendation
   • State your recommendation for U.S. policy.
   • Justify your choice by tying it to evidence from your research and the evaluation in the previous section.
4. Conclusion
   • Summarize the main points of your paper.
   • Restate your recommendation and its importance for the U.S. economy.

Step 4: Write the First Draft

• Use your outline as a guide to write a coherent and well-organized paper.
• Avoid overly complex sentences; aim for clarity and conciseness.

Step 5: Cite Your Sources

• Use APA, MLA, or another required citation style to credit all your references.
• Include a reference page listing all sources used.

Step 6: Revise and Edit

• Review your draft for logical flow, grammar, and adherence to the prompt.
• Ensure your recommendation is well-supported and clearly explained.
• Ask a peer or tutor to review your paper for feedback.

Step 7: Finalize and Submit

• Ensure all formatting requirements (font, spacing, margins) are met.
• Double-check your citations and references.
• Submit your paper confidently!

This guide should help you approach the assignment step by step, making the process more manageable. Happy writing!

In this discussion, we will discuss the spectrum of societal needs and what needs are addressed by policy and what needs are not. We will also discuss the reasons behind this reality.
Policy itself can be a scarce resource with many competing for policy that addresses their specific needs. Whether policy is created is often determined by the power possessed by those who support the policy.
For this discussion, focus on the question of who has the power when it comes to policy, and how and why that influences what policy is created or not created.
Examine what constitutes the power for those who seem to get their needs addressed and expand on why some consistently have their needs addressed and others do not. After a careful review of the textbook readings for this module, in your initial post:
Identify a societal need that seems to regularly be addressed by policy and identify the power base (e.g., a political or demographic group) that ensures this.
Identify a societal need that seems to consistently go unaddressed and explain the lack of a power base that you believe allows this to happen.
Video link
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526420008

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

For this discussion, you’re asked to focus on the spectrum of societal needs and the role of policy in addressing or failing to address those needs. Specifically, you need to identify one societal need that is consistently addressed by policy, and one that remains unaddressed. Then, you need to examine the power dynamics behind why some needs are met, and others are neglected.

Step 2: Review the Textbook Readings and Video

Before writing, review the textbook readings and the video linked in the prompt. Focus on understanding the factors that contribute to which needs are addressed by policy. Consider the roles of political, economic, and demographic groups in shaping policy. In particular, pay attention to who has power in the policymaking process and how that power influences which needs are prioritized.

Step 3: Choose Your Examples

Now, think about two societal needs:

1. Societal Need Addressed by Policy: Identify a need that is consistently addressed by policy. For example, you might choose healthcare, education, or infrastructure. Consider the political or demographic groups (power base) that push for policies in these areas and influence the creation of these policies.
2. Societal Need Not Addressed by Policy: Identify a need that often goes unaddressed. Examples could include issues like poverty, homelessness, or environmental justice. Discuss why this need remains unaddressed, focusing on the lack of a strong power base advocating for the issue.

Step 4: Analyze the Power Dynamics

Once you’ve identified the societal needs, reflect on the reasons why these needs are or are not addressed. Analyze the power base behind the policies that address certain needs. This could include:

• Political influence: How do lawmakers or political parties support certain needs?
• Economic influence: How do businesses or wealthy individuals impact policy decisions?
• Demographic influence: How do voting populations or interest groups shape which policies are prioritized?

Also, consider why some groups or needs are consistently ignored. Is it because they lack representation, funding, or visibility?

Step 5: Organize Your Post

Now, structure your post in a clear, organized manner. Here’s a suggested outline:

1. Introduction:
   • Briefly introduce the concept of societal needs and how policy addresses (or doesn’t address) them.
2. Societal Need Addressed by Policy:
   • Identify a societal need that is regularly addressed by policy.
   • Discuss the power base responsible for ensuring that this need is met.
   • Provide examples or evidence from the readings, video, or your own knowledge.
3. Societal Need Not Addressed by Policy:
   • Identify a societal need that seems to go unaddressed.
   • Explain why this need remains unaddressed, focusing on the lack of a power base advocating for it.
   • Discuss the consequences of this neglect.
4. Analysis of Power Dynamics:
   • Analyze how power influences which needs are addressed and why some are neglected.
   • Reflect on the political, economic, and demographic factors that contribute to this reality.
5. Conclusion:
   • Summarize your key points and suggest how power dynamics could be shifted to better address unmet needs.

Step 6: Review and Revise Your Post

Once you’ve written your post, review it for clarity and coherence. Make sure your argument flows logically and that you’ve supported your points with evidence from the readings and video. Check for spelling and grammar errors, and revise any areas that need more depth or explanation.

Step 7: Finalize Your Post

Once you’re satisfied with your post, make sure it follows any formatting guidelines provided (e.g., word count, citations). After finalizing your post, submit it for discussion.

Discuss the video’s factors that most clearly identify who becomes a believer in conspiracy theories.
The assignment will be One -two pages. Provide relevant points with your critique.This paper will discuss an issue related to the video and readings. The critiques will include questions about the videos’ content and an individual assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the video.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Requirements

Begin by thoroughly reading the assignment instructions. In this case, you’re tasked with writing a one-to-two-page paper discussing an issue related to the video and readings. Specifically, you need to critique the video’s content, assess its strengths and weaknesses, and include questions about the video. Also, focus on analyzing the factors that clearly identify who becomes a believer in conspiracy theories.

Step 2: Watch the Video Carefully

Before you begin writing, take the time to watch the video closely. Pay attention to the arguments, claims, and evidence presented. As you watch, take notes on the key points that address who is more likely to believe in conspiracy theories. This is the focus of your critique, so identify any underlying themes, psychological factors, or specific examples given in the video.

Step 3: Organize Your Thoughts

Once you’ve watched the video and reviewed your notes, start organizing your paper. A clear structure will help you present your ideas effectively. Here’s how you can break down your paper:

1. Introduction:
   • Start with a brief overview of the video, including the main topic and purpose.
   • Present a thesis statement outlining what the paper will discuss (e.g., the factors that influence belief in conspiracy theories).
2. Body:
   • Point 1: Identify a key factor discussed in the video that determines who believes in conspiracy theories (e.g., cognitive biases, social influences, or emotional appeal). Discuss how this factor is presented in the video.
   • Point 2: Present another factor, providing examples from the video to support your points (e.g., personal experiences or lack of trust in authorities). Analyze the strength and relevance of these factors.
   • Critique: Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the video’s content. Are the factors clearly explained? Are there any gaps in the arguments or data presented? Do you agree with the video’s conclusions?
3. Conclusion:
   • Summarize your analysis of the video, highlighting the key points.
   • Conclude by stating your overall assessment of the video’s argument and its relevance to understanding belief in conspiracy theories.

Step 4: Include Questions for Further Exploration

In your critique, you’ll need to propose questions that challenge the video’s content or offer a new perspective. These questions should be thoughtful and engage with the video’s arguments.

Step 5: Review and Revise Your Paper

After writing your first draft, take a break, then return to your paper with fresh eyes. Look for areas where you can clarify your points or add more depth to your analysis. Check for grammar and spelling errors, and ensure your paper flows logically from one point to the next.

Step 6: Finalize Your Paper

Once you’re satisfied with your revisions, format your paper according to any guidelines provided (e.g., font size, margins, etc.). Proofread one final time to ensure your paper is polished and ready for submission.

SEO-friendly Title:
Analyzing Belief in Conspiracy Theories: A Video Critique and Discussion

Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behaviors through development and neuroscience?
Culpability has often been discussed in various circles pertaining to adolescence. What age, if any, do you gauge is a “good” age to state a juvenile is culpable for their actions, particularly delinquent/criminal?
Do you agree that waivers helps decrease criminality among adolescents or does it increase?
Cite sources

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I need it revised as the question of topic above was not answered properly before hand, and I need done what he’s asking specifically in citing the page number from the course which I’ll leave the name of below. This is from my professor: “You have less than the required word count and while you missed the correct answer, you also provided a citation from the text which is also incorrect. This in itself can be construed as an issue, for which you must be sure you are citing the correct page and the correct information. You must use the textbook to pass this course. Remember, an essay must include 5 paragraphs starting with the introduction. You identified research instruments used for data collection, but these are not measurement tools. For the measurement of the study, what does the text identify as the tools? Refer to pages 97-100. You are also missing your citations which include the author’s last name, year, and page number.” So with that I need responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability. Use at least a few references from the book and is CORRECTLY CITED as mentioned above after each citing from the book, as that is a big part for the grading. The course book is: “The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice”
Ronet D. Bachman, Russell K. Schutt, 2023 Sage Publishing./
ISBN.13: 978-1-071-85779-3

Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behaviors through development and neuroscience?
Culpability has often been discussed in various circles pertaining to adolescence. What age, if any, do you gauge is a “good” age to state a juvenile is culpable for their actions, particularly delinquent/criminal?
Do you agree that waivers helps decrease criminality among adolescents or does it increase?
Cite sources

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I need it revised as the question of topic above was not answered properly before hand, and I need done what he’s asking specifically in citing the page number from the course which I’ll leave the name of below. This is from my professor: “You have less than the required word count and while you missed the correct answer, you also provided a citation from the text which is also incorrect. This in itself can be construed as an issue, for which you must be sure you are citing the correct page and the correct information. You must use the textbook to pass this course. Remember, an essay must include 5 paragraphs starting with the introduction. You identified research instruments used for data collection, but these are not measurement tools. For the measurement of the study, what does the text identify as the tools? Refer to pages 97-100. You are also missing your citations which include the author’s last name, year, and page number.” So with that I need responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability. Use at least a few references from the book and is CORRECTLY CITED as mentioned above after each citing from the book, as that is a big part for the grading. The course book is: “The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice”
Ronet D. Bachman, Russell K. Schutt, 2023 Sage Publishing./
ISBN.13: 978-1-071-85779-3

Summarize all the key points of this article (attached)
Use exact page numbers whenever paraphrasing and quoting

Continuing with added page numbers to the revision below, continue on to critique two more hoax papers (attached) with the same cynicism. Follow these instructions, and you may plagarize the stuff below the instructions to complete the paper….
Review 3 peer-reviewed articles (I am uploading two more) that examine the impact of a particular crime(s) on a community (the Gakirah Barnes/Tooka and King von community of faked deaths from hoax gun violence) All three articles must use the same criminal offense as the point of analysis (gun violence data)
What were the authors’ research questions?
Provide an overview of the independent and dependent variables.
What were the effects of your selected crime on the community?
Discuss the findings and how they compare to the existing body of knowledge. (Look in the discussion section of the articles.)
What were the studies limitations and implications for policy and research?
The article “Accommodating Grief on Twitter: An Analysis of Expressions of Grief Among Gang Involved Youth on Twitter Using Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing (Patton et al., 2018),” delves onto the concept of purported grief expressions, among a group of youth who were related to each-other through policing data and through social media. However, the researchers’ use of qualitative and natural language processing concepts, as a methods of data analysis, were not efficient as result of fraud, in the form of hoax data… intentional hoax data that could have potentially created crime hot spots for… participant and white-collar conspirators. This would be simply due to the potential for fraud, when in the presence of an exacerbated amount of fraud contributing to hoax data in research.
Patton et al., (2018) base their research on various assumptions. Notably, they had grounded their assumption that the available data they had was authentic, especially with a high response to a highly orchestrated hoax for, for potentially hoax gun violence incidents. For example, their research was not genuinely indicative of lived gang-related violence. Certainly, the highlighted assumptions to gun violence especially, should be important to invalidate inaccuracy with. The qualitative variables, such as grief designs established about emotional behaviors from social media, were used (Patton et al. 2022). However, a fabrication or stage management of the reported deaths as established would mean that the research findings and conclusions are not credible.
Regarding the concept of gang-related aspect, the authors heavily stress the concept of gang dynamics which overlook other crucial indicators… such as the ability to interpret meaning. From this point, a methodological gap is established because of hoax data. The study fails to cross-verify every information and data to enhance the findings. This calls for a thorough cross examination and data verification even from the offline systems to enhance credibility.
Further, some ethical considerations are not effected at all. For instance, Patton et al. (2022), support a concept with identity and claiming media had previously covered it. However, this fails them to consider identity, by ensuring that every piece of information they use has been verified and is accurate for use (Morse et al., 2002). Contrastingly, hoax data could be mis-used for rationalizing error in other research about group dynamics for celebrity identities within one community in Chicago… to have faked their deaths. The celebrities of interest to the researchers, had hailed from a series of alleged community incidents (Patton et al., 2018). However, the researchers fail to face the realities of faked deaths plaguing gun violence data. Because the researchers take advantage of potentially fraudulent and white-collar data, as their only control data for emotional variables, they become highly unreliable.
According to Morse et Al., (2002), it is imperative to use verified data to support the study findings on a case by case basis.
References
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Patton, D. U., MacBeth, J., Schoenebeck, S., Shear, K., & McKeown, K. (2018). Accommodating grief on Twitter: an analysis of expressions of grief among gang involved youth on Twitter using qualitative analysis and natural language processing. Biomedical informatics insights, 10, 1178222618763155.

I completed the outline and I have the sources and annotated bibliography there attached—Students are required to produce a compelling assessment of a theoretical case of a juvenile defendant. The student will assume the role of a forensic clinician who is evaluating a detained juvenile’s biological, psychosocial, and socioeconomic needs, and will present this information in the format of a letter to a criminal court judge advocating for the defendant’s diversion from jail and into an alternative to incarceration program. The case facts will be provided to students. Based on this framework, students will ultimately formulate a forensic assessment with recommendations to the court for a treatment-focused disposition. The assessment will be a minimum of ten pages typed, double-spaced with one-inch margins. Students must incorporate a minimum of eight scholarly references, at least four of which are not on the syllabus; assessments must include a list of works cited, formatted in APA style. Students will be evaluated out of 100 points for the following: Demonstration of an understanding of criminal procedures and laws (10 points); biopsychosocial assessment and diagnostic impressions (25 points); description of ATI program as relevant to client’s needs (25 points); persuasiveness of proposed disposition (25 points); and integration of scholarly research and clarity of writing (15 points).