Category: Criminal Justice

Girls Inc. focuses on the intersectional challenges faced by girls and supports their education, health, and independence.FatCamera/iStock
Girls Inc. is a network of over 1,500 nonprofit organizations in the United States and Canada that advocates on behalf of the embetterment of girls’ lives. Its members promote policies and actions that focus on girls’ education, health, and independence. On their website, they describe their focus: “We engage in advocacy that focuses on the needs of girls from low-income communities and girls who face multiple, intersectional challenges such as those based on sex race, religion, ethnicity, immigration status, disability, socioeconomic statue, sexual orientation, and gender identity.”
Girls Inc. lists facts that serve as the fuel behind their many advocacy campaigns: 1 of 4 girls experience sexual abuse or assault by the age of 18 (combatting bullying, harassment, and sexual violence campaign), 1 in 6 girls won’t finish high school (promoting educational opportunities and economic independence campaign), suicide is the third leading cause of death for youth between the ages of 10 and 24 (supporting girls’ mental health campaign), over 1 in 20 teen girls become pregnant each year (advancing reproductive health campaign), 52% of high school girls report being unhappy with their bodies (addressing the prevalence of gender stereotypes in media campaign), and for every child in an afterschool program, 2 more are unable to get in (advocating for strong and growing Girls Inc. local organizations). Girls Inc. works to create mentoring relationships and programming that is culturally and developmentally appropriate and skill building in girl-only convenient and safe spaces. They note that the girls who are involved in their programs are less likely to engage in risky behaviors, as well as more likely to be successful in school and graduate from postsecondary education and generally thrive.
For your discussion: What critical theory or theories of delinquency prevention seem to be reflected in the work done by Girls Inc.? Explain your reasoning.
answer the for your discussion question

Mid Term – Students will select one of the criminology theories identified in the textbook that they believe is the BEST EXPLANATION for criminality. Students will submit an outline/rough draft of a paper that will be used for the Final Assignment. At a minimum, the Mid Term paper should have the Title Page, Abstract, Headings per APA style, including an Introduction, and have a Reference Page. The paper should have content under the Introduction briefly addressing the reasoning for their selection. The rough draft should include a minimum of 4 headings identifying what the final paper will discuss. Students should review the Final Assignment to make sure they are addressing all the areas in their rough draft/outline.
The textbook is Criminological Theory: Past to Present By Cullen, Agnew and Wilcox, Oxford Press, 2022, ISBN: 978-019-761-9315

Both the file (instructions are attached) and the ONLY sources to be used are attached.
No cover page needed.
Created a cited page of the PowerPoints.
Use complete sentences and please be thorough. I echo and reiterate the instructions—please do not copy and paste.
Once the final file is complete, do not submit the file back to me with BOLDED instructions still attached. Delete them leaving only the questions and answers.

This is a research paper about Assessing the Impact of Misinformation on the Criminal Justice System: The Role of Leadership and Accountability within the Republican Party. Please use Peter Northouse’s “Leadership: Theory and Practice” 9th edition as a map for the different leadership styles. This paper is my thesis for grad school. I have attached the problem statement/introduction that I will be using. Please use that as your guide. I have also attached one source that must be used.

Follow the instructions at the document. I have also copied and pasted them below.
Directions: Read and watch the following:
The Political Repression of the Black Panther Party 1966-1971: The Case of the Oakland Bay Area by Charles E. Jones (PDF).
Watch COINTELPRO 101
Afterwards, answer the following questions. Keep in mind the following:
Make sure your answers meet the word count thresholds that appear after the question. Failure to do so will result in a 5 point deduction per question.
Your answers can be free-write reflections. So long as I understand what you are trying to say, you do not need specific formatting and perfect grammar/spelling, though please run your assignments through those checks.
You must clearly demonstrate you read the article and watched the film in your answers.
Reflect on your familiarity (or lack thereof) with the Counterintelligence Program described briefly in the reading and discussed in more detail in the film (answer A or B in 200 words).
If you were already familiar, how did you become familiar and what new things did you learn?
If not familiar, reflect on that unfamiliarity. What was unfamiliar? What did you learn? What stood out most from the film?
What were the various tactics of the FBI used as part of the Counterintelligence Program as outlined in the film and the reading? Reflect on your thoughts regarding these tactics. To what extent do you agree/disagree with these tactics? Why? Answer in 250 words or more, with 125 focused on the tactics and 125 focused on your reflection.
What was the role of race in the FBI’s Counterintelligence Program as outlined in the film and reading? Answer in 100 words or more.
What connections do you see between previous course material and the course material that appears in this module? Please cite at least two other readings (two different chapters from the same book count as two different readings). Answer in 250 words or more.

I have attached the reading and 4 questions that should be answered in 3 to 4 sentences each. Please use the textbook Managing Human Resources 19th Edition by Scott Snell for your reference when answering each question. More instructions can be found below. One Integrative Case will be assigned each week. These cases and the questions will be available via Cengage under the respective chapter but will also be linked in the corresponding weekly module in Canvas. Students should respond to the questions at the end of each assigned case in essay format by typing their answers, citing information from the textbook, and considering possible correlating situations in the field of Criminal Justice. APA style must be utilized for citations. Students will be graded on the thoroughness of answers, sentence structure, proper use of English Grammar, and use of citations

1. What is meant by double jeopardy? Explain your answer.
2. Do you think more money needs to be spent on criminal justice? Why, why not? Explain your answer.
3. Do you think there are ways to get more victims of crime to report more criminal incidents? If so, what would you suggest? Explain your answer.
4. What steps could be taken, if any, to reduce people’s overall fear of crime? Explain your answer.
5. Do you think the United States has too many law enforcement agencies? Why, why not? Explain your answer.
6. Do you consider mass killings such as those at the Boston marathon, The San Bernardino County Department of Public Health, and the gay nightclub in Orlando Florida, terrorist attacks? Why, why not? Explain your answer.
You must restate the question/scenario prior to answering the questions in-depth, not just “one liners.” Your grade will determine on how much information you provide in answering the question. You must use a minimum of four (4) citations and cite them (citations must be in black no other color, and date retrieved/accessed indicated): if not 1- 5 points deducted. You must use times new roman: If not 1-5 points deducted; 12 font: If not 1-5 points deducted; double space: If not 1- 5 points deducted. I will deduct 1-5 points if you do not adhere to the format, and, if you do not restate the question prior to providing your answer: 1-5 points will be deducted. Punctuation, spelling, grammatical errors: 1-5 points deducted.

How do you think U.S. policy makers and practitioners can best counter the narratives put forward by Islamist extremist terrorist organizations via social media networks? Please explain why and support your responses with detailed practical examples.

I attached a file that includes all the instructions. If you need any assistance, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

This discussion centers on Chapter 5: Classification and Correctional Programming. Discuss the following questions:
In prison vernacular, what is a ‘turnout’? Research the meaning of this term outside the text.
In Ruiz v. Johnson (1999), how might this particular security problem be addressed with regard to inmate classification?
Under PREA, how might the perpetrator(s) be dealt with? What has PREA done for the prison setting?
Finally, what is an STG, and describe some administrative responses in addressing problems they cause.
Write a thoughtful and thorough post. There is a minimum 300-word requirement to discuss your response thoroughly. Be sure you properly cite sources with author and year in in-text citations. A bibliography must be included. Consult your syllabus for discussion board guidelines that you must follow. Also, I will be grading your post for grammar, sentence structure, and thoroughness.
Guidelines for Discussion Board Postings.
Grammar problems – Minus 2 to 10 points per post
2. Failure to have the minimum number of words per post (Quotations,references/citings not included in the minimum number of words) – Percentage
penalty
3. Off-topic or non-supportive posts (references/citations) – Minus 2-60 points
4. No post – Zero for the assignment
5. Posting a blank initial post) If it is not corrected and reposted with relevant content
within one minute, it will result in a zero for that discussion. This is to discourage
anyone from accessing the forum to read other students’ posts without first posting.
6. Plagiarism in any post – Minus 20-60 points and one warning for the first violation.
Repeat violations will result in a zero for that week’s discussion and possible formal
action for violating the UHD Academic Honesty policy.
Any combination of the above may result in a cumulative number or additional minus
points for the assignment.