Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behav

Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behaviors through development and neuroscience?
Culpability has often been discussed in various circles pertaining to adolescence. What age, if any, do you gauge is a “good” age to state a juvenile is culpable for their actions, particularly delinquent/criminal?
Do you agree that waivers helps decrease criminality among adolescents or does it increase?
Cite sources

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I ne

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I need it revised as the question of topic above was not answered properly before hand, and I need done what he’s asking specifically in citing the page number from the course which I’ll leave the name of below. This is from my professor: “You have less than the required word count and while you missed the correct answer, you also provided a citation from the text which is also incorrect. This in itself can be construed as an issue, for which you must be sure you are citing the correct page and the correct information. You must use the textbook to pass this course. Remember, an essay must include 5 paragraphs starting with the introduction. You identified research instruments used for data collection, but these are not measurement tools. For the measurement of the study, what does the text identify as the tools? Refer to pages 97-100. You are also missing your citations which include the author’s last name, year, and page number.” So with that I need responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability. Use at least a few references from the book and is CORRECTLY CITED as mentioned above after each citing from the book, as that is a big part for the grading. The course book is: “The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice”
Ronet D. Bachman, Russell K. Schutt, 2023 Sage Publishing./
ISBN.13: 978-1-071-85779-3

Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behav

Is there a strong sense of validity in explaining juvenile delinquency and behaviors through development and neuroscience?
Culpability has often been discussed in various circles pertaining to adolescence. What age, if any, do you gauge is a “good” age to state a juvenile is culpable for their actions, particularly delinquent/criminal?
Do you agree that waivers helps decrease criminality among adolescents or does it increase?
Cite sources

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I ne

I’m sending the comments he left for this paper I had previously submitted, I need it revised as the question of topic above was not answered properly before hand, and I need done what he’s asking specifically in citing the page number from the course which I’ll leave the name of below. This is from my professor: “You have less than the required word count and while you missed the correct answer, you also provided a citation from the text which is also incorrect. This in itself can be construed as an issue, for which you must be sure you are citing the correct page and the correct information. You must use the textbook to pass this course. Remember, an essay must include 5 paragraphs starting with the introduction. You identified research instruments used for data collection, but these are not measurement tools. For the measurement of the study, what does the text identify as the tools? Refer to pages 97-100. You are also missing your citations which include the author’s last name, year, and page number.” So with that I need responses typed, using a standard font, 12-point type size, double-spaced, with overall neatness and readability. Use at least a few references from the book and is CORRECTLY CITED as mentioned above after each citing from the book, as that is a big part for the grading. The course book is: “The Practice of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice”
Ronet D. Bachman, Russell K. Schutt, 2023 Sage Publishing./
ISBN.13: 978-1-071-85779-3

Continuing with added page numbers to the revision below, continue on to critiqu

Continuing with added page numbers to the revision below, continue on to critique two more hoax papers (attached) with the same cynicism. Follow these instructions, and you may plagarize the stuff below the instructions to complete the paper….
Review 3 peer-reviewed articles (I am uploading two more) that examine the impact of a particular crime(s) on a community (the Gakirah Barnes/Tooka and King von community of faked deaths from hoax gun violence) All three articles must use the same criminal offense as the point of analysis (gun violence data)
What were the authors’ research questions?
Provide an overview of the independent and dependent variables.
What were the effects of your selected crime on the community?
Discuss the findings and how they compare to the existing body of knowledge. (Look in the discussion section of the articles.)
What were the studies limitations and implications for policy and research?
The article “Accommodating Grief on Twitter: An Analysis of Expressions of Grief Among Gang Involved Youth on Twitter Using Qualitative Analysis and Natural Language Processing (Patton et al., 2018),” delves onto the concept of purported grief expressions, among a group of youth who were related to each-other through policing data and through social media. However, the researchers’ use of qualitative and natural language processing concepts, as a methods of data analysis, were not efficient as result of fraud, in the form of hoax data… intentional hoax data that could have potentially created crime hot spots for… participant and white-collar conspirators. This would be simply due to the potential for fraud, when in the presence of an exacerbated amount of fraud contributing to hoax data in research.
Patton et al., (2018) base their research on various assumptions. Notably, they had grounded their assumption that the available data they had was authentic, especially with a high response to a highly orchestrated hoax for, for potentially hoax gun violence incidents. For example, their research was not genuinely indicative of lived gang-related violence. Certainly, the highlighted assumptions to gun violence especially, should be important to invalidate inaccuracy with. The qualitative variables, such as grief designs established about emotional behaviors from social media, were used (Patton et al. 2022). However, a fabrication or stage management of the reported deaths as established would mean that the research findings and conclusions are not credible.
Regarding the concept of gang-related aspect, the authors heavily stress the concept of gang dynamics which overlook other crucial indicators… such as the ability to interpret meaning. From this point, a methodological gap is established because of hoax data. The study fails to cross-verify every information and data to enhance the findings. This calls for a thorough cross examination and data verification even from the offline systems to enhance credibility.
Further, some ethical considerations are not effected at all. For instance, Patton et al. (2022), support a concept with identity and claiming media had previously covered it. However, this fails them to consider identity, by ensuring that every piece of information they use has been verified and is accurate for use (Morse et al., 2002). Contrastingly, hoax data could be mis-used for rationalizing error in other research about group dynamics for celebrity identities within one community in Chicago… to have faked their deaths. The celebrities of interest to the researchers, had hailed from a series of alleged community incidents (Patton et al., 2018). However, the researchers fail to face the realities of faked deaths plaguing gun violence data. Because the researchers take advantage of potentially fraudulent and white-collar data, as their only control data for emotional variables, they become highly unreliable.
According to Morse et Al., (2002), it is imperative to use verified data to support the study findings on a case by case basis.
References
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 1(2), 13-22.
Patton, D. U., MacBeth, J., Schoenebeck, S., Shear, K., & McKeown, K. (2018). Accommodating grief on Twitter: an analysis of expressions of grief among gang involved youth on Twitter using qualitative analysis and natural language processing. Biomedical informatics insights, 10, 1178222618763155.

I completed the outline and I have the sources and annotated bibliography there

I completed the outline and I have the sources and annotated bibliography there attached—Students are required to produce a compelling assessment of a theoretical case of a juvenile defendant. The student will assume the role of a forensic clinician who is evaluating a detained juvenile’s biological, psychosocial, and socioeconomic needs, and will present this information in the format of a letter to a criminal court judge advocating for the defendant’s diversion from jail and into an alternative to incarceration program. The case facts will be provided to students. Based on this framework, students will ultimately formulate a forensic assessment with recommendations to the court for a treatment-focused disposition. The assessment will be a minimum of ten pages typed, double-spaced with one-inch margins. Students must incorporate a minimum of eight scholarly references, at least four of which are not on the syllabus; assessments must include a list of works cited, formatted in APA style. Students will be evaluated out of 100 points for the following: Demonstration of an understanding of criminal procedures and laws (10 points); biopsychosocial assessment and diagnostic impressions (25 points); description of ATI program as relevant to client’s needs (25 points); persuasiveness of proposed disposition (25 points); and integration of scholarly research and clarity of writing (15 points).

Research Paper Assignment: 8-full page (top to bottom) research paper, excluding

Research Paper Assignment: 8-full page (top to bottom) research paper, excluding the title page, abstract page, and reference page. The paper must be in APA Format (7th Edition). Topic: implementing community-oriented policing. Please identify the issue, provide examples and statistics to demonstrate the extent of the issue, and provide solutions and implementation strategies. Use 8 scholarly references, peer-reviewed articles published within the past 5-10 years that support this topic. Note that references used for this research need to be government documents and/or websites, weekly course material, and peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. The paper will automatically be evaluated by Turnitin, which will assess the paper for originality and detect plagiarism. To minimize high originality scores, you are to paraphrase and cite as opposed to using direct quotes. High originality scores are typically indicative of plagiarism. If you must quote, do so sparingly and limit the quote to a few words. If you quote, you must include the page/paragraph number of where the quote originated. You must submit an original paper. Recycled work is prohibited, plagiarism, and the use of AI are not authorized.

Research Paper Assignment: 8-full page (top to bottom) research paper, excluding

Research Paper Assignment: 8-full page (top to bottom) research paper, excluding the title page, abstract page, and reference page. The paper must be in APA Format (7th Edition). Topic: implementing community-oriented policing. Please identify the issue, provide examples and statistics to demonstrate the extent of the issue, and provide solutions and implementation strategies. Use 8 scholarly references, peer-reviewed articles published within the past 5-10 years that support this topic. Note that references used for this research need to be government documents and/or websites, weekly course material, and peer-reviewed/scholarly journals. The paper will automatically be evaluated by Turnitin, which will assess the paper for originality and detect plagiarism. To minimize high originality scores, you are to paraphrase and cite as opposed to using direct quotes. High originality scores are typically indicative of plagiarism. If you must quote, do so sparingly and limit the quote to a few words. If you quote, you must include the page/paragraph number of where the quote originated. You must submit an original paper. Recycled work is prohibited, plagiarism, and the use of AI are not authorized.