Category: Communication

make slides and give scriipt to me
Video: Final Presentation Assignment (LO1) (LO2) (LO3) (LO4) – 150 points
Video: Final Presentation Assignment (LO1) (LO2) (LO3) (LO4) – 150 points
Due Date: Sunday, October 6, 2024, 11:59 PM
Cut-off date: Sunday, October 6, 2024, 11:59 PM
Converting Executive Communication Formal Report into a Video Presentation
Background: In the modern business landscape, effective communication takes various forms. As an extension of your formal report on a critical business topic, this assignment aims to enhance your communication skills by transforming the written report into a dynamic and engaging video presentation. The ability to convey complex information through visuals, audio, and concise narration is a valuable skill for professionals at all levels.
Assignment Objective: Your objective is to convert your existing executive communication formal report into a compelling video presentation. By doing so, you will demonstrate your proficiency in summarizing key points, visual storytelling, and adapting your content for different communication mediums.
Instructions:
Content Review and Adaptation:
Review your formal report and identify the main points, key findings, and supporting evidence.
Condense the content to ensure it fits within a reasonable time frame for a video presentation (8-10 minutes).
Storyboard and Visual Elements:
Create a storyboard outlining the flow of your video presentation. Each section of your report should translate into a corresponding segment in the video.
Select and design visual elements (such as slides, graphics, charts, images) that enhance the understanding of your content. Ensure visuals are clear, concise, and directly support the narration.
Narration Script:
Develop a clear and concise narration scriipt that complements the visuals. Your scriipt should provide context, explain complex concepts, and highlight key takeaways.
Aim for a conversational tone while maintaining professionalism. Practice reading the scriipt aloud to ensure it flows naturally.
Engagement and Impact:
Incorporate engagement techniques to maintain the viewer’s interest throughout the presentation. This could include rhetorical questions, real-world examples, or thought-provoking statements.
Pay attention to pacing, avoiding information overload, and allowing viewers to absorb the information.
Technical Production:
Record your video presentation using appropriate recording equipment, ensuring good audio and video quality.
Edit the video to synchronize the narration with the visuals, and add any necessary transitions or effects.
Note: Remember that effective communication involves tailoring your message to your audience. Adapt your tone, language, and content to suit the medium of video presentation while retaining the professionalism required for executive communication.
Essential Activities:
Reading Module 7 will assist you in your presentation.
Watching the video, “How to speak so that people want to listen” will assist you in your presentation.
Notes:
Please refer to the presentation rubric on the Start Here tab for this assignment.
This presentation is due by Sunday at 11:59 PM EST.
This presentation should include a visual aid and audio of you presenting.
You should create 8-10 slides and provide at least 5 references

Purpose:
Fordism is a founding capitalistic approach to organizational communication management. From this framework, the classical theories of management (scientific management, bureaucratic theory, human relations theory, and human resource management) are all key to managing and maintaining Fordism at the organizational level; each of these theories reflects different efforts to construct and manage the Fordist worker.
Directions:
In this assignment, you will examine aspects of the foundational organizational management theories by addressing the classic Fordist model and describing the following four theories:
Taylor’s scientific management
Weber’s bureaucratic theory
Human relations theory
Human resource management
Use the assignment template to complete this assignment. Details on length and writing requirements are included in the template directions (attached).
Mumby, D. K., & Kuhn, T. R. (2018). Organizational Communication: A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. (US). https://purdueuniversityglobal.vitalsource.com/books/9781544357515

Good morning Writer,
Thank you for taking the time to assist me with this. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
I want to emphasize that it’s crucial not to use AI or plagiarize, as the university has a zero-tolerance policy for these practices. The assignment will be submitted through Turnitin. If you need my field notes to complete the assignment, just let me know when you’d like me to send them.
I also need to submit a 10-page research paper by the end of the semester. My research will focus on community banking, specifically whether customers prefer face-to-face service or digital banking options. Depending on my professor’s guidance, I may narrow the focus to gender or age. I haven’t finalized my research question yet, but it will be related to those themes.
This assignment, due on Sunday, is part of the overall research paper, so everything is interconnected. If you’d like to see a copy of the syllabus for better context, just let me know.
Thank you again for your help!Good morning, Writer,
Thank you for taking the time to assist me with this. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
I want to emphasize that it’s crucial not to use AI or plagiarize, as the university has a zero-tolerance policy for these practices. The assignment will be submitted through Turnitin. If you need my field notes to complete the assignment, just let me know when you’d like me to send them.
I also need to submit a 10-page research paper by the end of the semester. My research will focus on community banking, specifically whether customers prefer face-to-face service or digital banking options. Depending on my professor’s guidance, I may narrow the focus to gender or age. I haven’t finalized my research question yet, but it will be related to those themes.
This assignment, due on Sunday, is part of the overall research paper, so everything is interconnected. If you’d like to see a copy of the syllabus for better context, just let me know.
Attached you will find the instructions.
Thank you again for your help!
M

BIG IMPORTANT NOTE: It’s very important to me, that you learn how to do this properly….IT COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE! Seriously! 🙂
So, before this assignment due date, the close of this assignment, you can submit your work here for your persuasive speech repeatedly as many times as you like for review and help. Not only can this help you earn 100%, but more importantly this will help you learn!
ADVICE – Send me your outline early for review, before you commit to composing the complete draft! One of the many purposes of this assignment, is to illustrate the “crystal clear connection between the outline and the completed draft.” An outline is simply the structure. Your foundation! The completed draft is the same structure with the content added. Not only does this process (tool) help people to structure — very quickly — speeches, but also, any type of paper that requires structured organization (Remember my video about Dr. Olson…?). This process can greatly help you to work smarter rather than harder! I encourage you to, not just use this system in this class, but all classes that required structured writing.
PLEASE, again, really consider sending me your outline early for review, before you do your complete draft, to ensure your foundation is set up properly! Then composing your final draft will be much easier! Like with everything in class, the Monday-Friday, prior to being due – you can repeatedly submit for early review, as many times as needed!
…Always try to work smarter…and not harder! It’s a choice!
Review the Persuasive Speaking directions in Empowering Speech, page 19-20:
EMP SPCH CONTENT 2023 2024 PDF-5.pdfDownload EMP SPCH CONTENT 2023 2024 PDF-5.pdf
1) 5 POINTS
Submit a works cited with 8, 2020-2024 sources. Use easybib.com for help with this. It makes it very easy.
2) 5 POINTS
Submit an outline for your speech that reflects the Instant Structure, and Persuasive Speech in the attached directions. NOTE: All you are doing is the content to your outline, maturing it into a complete speech scriipt!
3) 10 POINTS
Submit a fully written speech draft, reflecting the instant outline. And like with the outline, label all the parts of the instant structure: intro, thesis, preview, body-points, transitions, re-stated thesis, summary, and conclusion. This is to ensure you leave nothing out, and earn the best possible grade. And, that when you stand up to speak, you fully employe the instant structure, as you address a problem, its causes, and the solutions. Let it be as simple as it is! All you are doing, is adding content to your outline!

I have attached my previous paper that was completed by you. i am looking to have it turned into a speech template. i am attaching the template for that also.

Please no AI or Chat GPT . If you have any questions, please let me know. Please see attached file. Part 1 of this assignment has been answered. Please answer Part 2.
Develop a Research Plan
Moving from the visual brainstorming and concept mapping phase of topic selection to a more structured phase where you are thinking about main points and subpoints helps you also begin to envision your speech in an outline form. This format is also important because it will start to serve as a research guide we can use to build out each main point of the speech.
Questions to Ask Yourself While Researching for a Speech
What types of support do I want to include in this speech?
Theories, research studies, expert testimony, statistics, personal anecdotes, quotations, analogies, visual imagery or data visualizations, etc.
What are the most well-known, reputable publications or organizations related to my speech topic?
If I were an audience member who knew very little about this topic, what information would I need to understand the general ideas in the rest of the speech?
Consider the who, what, where, when, why, how elements of your topic
Given the organizational format I chose for this speech, what types of support should each main point have?
Common Research Mistakes
1. Relying on Outdated Evidence: I once listened to a speech in which the student proclaimed, “President Bush is deliberating with top military officials whether to withdraw troops from Afghanistan.” The problem with this statement is that my student delivered this speech in 2017. George W. Bush was no longer in office. Neither was Barack Obama. This may be an extreme example, but it nevertheless illustrates why it’s critically important for speakers to reference the most up-to-date information possible in their speeches: so audience members know you’ve done a good job of researching timely information that is still relevant in our present context. Citing outdated sources is a quick way to ruin your credibility.
2. Searching for the General Topic Instead of Specific Information: If you’re presenting a speech about a gun control topic, Googling the broad term “gun control” will lead to too many results that cover a vast array of issues. To make your research process more efficient, identify specific terms and/or arguments you want to make in the speech. For example: “landmark Supreme Court cases about the Second Amendment,” “how many firearms are there in the U.S.,” “safe storage gun laws,” etc.
3. Relying on Excessively Biased Sources: I once listened to a persuasive speech arguing that vaping should be banned in the U.S. The topic wasn’t the issue, but the speaker only cited sources like the American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, and FightFlavoredECigs.org. While these may sound like reasonable sources to cite for this topic, the problem is that these websites and organizations exist for a single purpose: to influence the passage of anti-smoking, anti-vaping laws in the U.S. In the student’s speech, it may have been appropriate to cite one of these more biased sources in conjunction with other, more credible sources like the Centers for Disease Control, Food & Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, the peer-reviewed New England Journal of Medicine, etc.
4. Only Using Google: It is okay to use general search engines or Wikipedia when you are just getting started on a research topic. However, the limitation of Google is that it has no filter: You are more likely to get hits from conspiracy theorists writing blogs than you are to run across credible information.
Important note about research for your speeches:
Inspiration Speech (speech #1) requires the use of at least one source.
Informative Speech (speech #3) requires the use of at least three different sources.
Persuasive Speech (speech #4) requires the use of at least five different sources.
Evaluating Sources
It is essential that the information you share in your speeches comes from credible sources. Credible sources can be found both online and in print, but you must evaluate each source for its credibility. Review the resources below for some information about how to evaluate the credibility of sources.
Citing Sources
Why to Cite Sources
From PCC’s Library website: Plagiarism is the use of words and ideas written by others without giving credit to the authors of those words. You should cite the sources of information you use in your academic work because:
Citing makes your work more credible.
Citing tells your reader where you found your information.
Citing allows your reader to learn more, beginning with your sources.
Citing gives credit to the people whose words or ideas you are using.
Citing protects you from plagiarizing.
When to Cite Sources
Whenever you directly quote evidence (copy/paste text), you must give credit to the original source.
Whenever you paraphrase information you learned elsewhere, you must give credit to the original source.
Whenever you cite statistical information such as dollar figures, percentage results from a survey, population data, etc. (here are some examples from the News Literacy Project), you must give credit to the original source.
Whenever you use specific terminology and/or definitions, you must give credit to the original source.
If you’re citing “common knowledge” information (e.g., “Salem is the capital of Oregon” or “The Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776”), you do not need to cite a source.
If you’re citing generally observable and/or widely accepted facts (e.g., “Climate change has led to more extreme weather trends” or “Smoking can be dangerous for your lung health”), you do not need to cite a source.
How to Cite Your Sources
In this class, you may compose your bibliography using any standardized style guide, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago. We call come from different disciplines and might be accustomed to using differing style guides.
During your speeches, you should verbally cite the following information for your sources:
Date of Publication
Source, Publication, or Organization Name
Source Qualification Statement
For example:
“According to a 2023 study [date] published in the peer-reviewed medical journal [qualification statement] Pediatrics [publication]….
“According to data published last year [date] by the U.S. government’s [qualification statement] Bureau of Land Management [organization name]….”
“The Yale researcher Dr. Jessica Taylor [source], who is widely recognized as a leading expert on domestic violence [qualification statement], said in a 2023 [date] New York Times [publication] interview that….”
Important Note on Author’s Names: Authors names are usually only relevant when you are using expert testimony as supporting evidence. When using names as expert testimony, it is critical to briefly provide your audience with the expert’s credentials, as in the example above (so that your audience can distinguish real experts from the misinformation of crackpots). For statistics and studies, the author’s name is not usually helpful since audience members are more likely to recognize the name of a source (organization, business, or publication) than the name of an individual author.
Examples of Correct Speech Citations:
“According to The Atlantic – a left-leaning political commentary magazine – in November 2019…”
“The nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank Pew Research Center in December 2020 reported that 86% of US adults are familiar with streaming services like Netflix and Hulu.”
“Oregon Public Broadcasting – a nonpartisan, nonprofit media organization in the Pacific Northwest reported in April 2022 that federal funds enabled Oregon school districts to purchase new technologies and build new infrastructure on campuses…”
Examples of Incorrect Speech Citations:
Only citing the author’s name without specifying her credentials or the publication source: “Dr. Luna Spaniel said in an interview published in March of 2021…”
Citing an academic database instead of the article’s publisher: “According to EBSCO in January 2021…”
“EBSCO” is a research database. Avoid citing databases by checking the “About” page for each non-scholarly source you cite in a speech.
Including just a URL link in a bibliography: For example, https://www.journalism.org/2020/12/08/measuring-news-consumption-in-a-digital-era/
Citing the Source After Explaining the Evidence: “86% of US adults are familiar with streaming services like Netflix and Hulu. That number comes from Barthel.” This makes sense when you’re writing an essay and need to follow APA formatting for in-text citations in parentheses at the end of a sentence. For speeches that are orally delivered to an audience however, it’s important to reveal details about the source upfront, so your audience will know that the information following your source citation is trustworthy and credible. Since your outline will be integral to how you orally deliver the speech, you should cite sources before the evidence in both your speech outline and presentation itself.
Helpful Hints for Developing Source Qualification Statements (SQS)
Why Include an SQS: In public speaking, your audience should be fully engaged in listening to your presentation, which means they don’t have the opportunity to quickly search for your sources to evaluate their credibility (like they could if reading a paper instead of listening to a live speech). Since there are innumerable sources out there – not just academic journals and newspapers but also blogs, podcasts, magazines, TV news, newsletters, etc. – your audience members may not be familiar with all of your sources. For this reason, speakers must reinforce their credibility by articulating to the audience why their sources should be considered trustworthy. Thus, you’ll be citing most sources with a source qualifications statement (SQS) for speeches in this class.
Ask Yourself: What makes this source credible on this subject, and why should my audience trust its information?
Is it right/left-leaning or nonpartisan?
If you can’t find the source on Ad Fontes Media’s interactive bias chart, review the language on the source’s homepage and use AllSides’ Red Blue Dictionary to decipher the potential political leanings of a source.
Is it for-profit (if so, what industry) or is it a nonprofit organization?
Is this source partnered with other credible individuals or organizations?

This is NOT a quiz. Rather, this activity is the third assignment that moves you toward completing your final project that is due in Module 08 (the next module). When you analyze your movie, you are going to rely upon many of your own ideas as they are growing based upon the concepts in this course and textbook. You will also need to gather some others’ ideas to include alongside your own. In other words, you will need to do a bit of research and integrate sources in your final project. This Prep Step helps you start thinking about answers to the final project questions–and continues to help you identify sources that will help you answer some of those questions.
Assignment Summary
* Answer the sets of questions that help you create the last three paragraphs (or sections) of your final content analysis of a film project. 
* Find at least one source that you will quote, summarize, or paraphrase as part of your answers to paragraphs (or sections) 4-6.
* Prepare an APA citation for the source that you found.
* As you are answering the questions, also use your textbook. In your answers, include page numbers for where you got some of your ideas. Do not quote the textbook; use your own words.
Question 1 Write a 3-5 sentence paragraph answering the following questions. This helps you start thinking about SECTION 4 for your final project.
* As we know, language is a big factor in interpersonal communication. Give at least 3 examples of language use in the movie between some of the main characters.
* While language is important, we also know that nonverbal communication plays a major role in how we communicate (content vs. relational message). There are likely many facial expressions in the movie, among other nonverbal expressions, that say a lot more than words.  Give at least 3 examples of nonverbal communication in the movie.
Important Note: This question is worth quite a few points. Make sure that you use full sentences and thoughtfully cover the questions.
Question 2: Write a 3-5 sentence paragraph answering the following questions. This helps you start thinking about SECTION 5 for your final project.
* How do the main characters portray their emotions? Give three examples.
* As we know, conflict is a big part of our interaction with others. Give two examples of how conflict was displayed in the movie.
Important Note: This question is worth quite a few points. Make sure that you use full sentences and thoughtfully cover the questions
Question 3: Write a 3-5 sentence paragraph answering the following questions. This helps you start thinking about SECTION 6 for your final project.
* Explain why you believe two of the main characters formed a relationship, from the beginning of chapter 10. What was at least one aspect of their interpersonal attraction? Or, explain how Knapp’s Relational Stages are portrayed.
* Were the main characters friends, family or in a romantic relationship? Explain at least one relationship type and what characteristics made you determine the relationship type. How does the communication between the characters affect the story and the relationships portrayed in the movie?
Important Note: This question is worth quite a few points. Make sure that you use full sentences and thoughtfully cover the questions.
Question 4: Identify a source of information that will help you answer some or part of the final Content Analysis of a Film Project questions.
* What is another source that you think you will quote or paraphrase or summarize in your final project for one of the final three paragraphs or sections of your project? State the title and type of the source or include a direct link to that source. Clearly state what portion of the content you are planning to connect it with. 
* Sample answers: I plan to refer to the online article “When Your Feelings Conflict with your Leadership Role” in my final project. OR I plan to use this online article in my final project: https://hbr.org/2023/01/when-your-feelings-conflict-with-your-leadership-role 
Important Note: This question is worth quote a few points. Make sure that you use full sentences and clearly identify a useful source in a way that shows you took some time to find a source that will help you answer analysis questions for the final project.
Question 5: Prepare an APA reference citation for your source.
When you quote, summarize, or paraphrase information from a source in your final project, you will need to show that you used the source in your paper or project. Following APA format, create the full information others can use to find the source you found.
* What will the reference list full citation be for the source you are using?
* For assistance, you can use a tool like the Purdue Owl “Cite your source automatically in APA” tool located on the “Reference List: Basic RulesLinks to an external site.
” page.
Important Note: This question is worth multiple points. Check your reference citation for accuracy. You will have to reference your source in the final paper. Text book is interplay by Adler

Assignment 1: Critical review article
(including draft and revision)
The end product of assignment will be a 750-word critical review article on a topic of your choice, relevant to your study programme. The writing process will consist of several stages:
 write an initial, but complete draft of the article for peer review
 send in the draft together with a cover sheet to tell your reviewers what you’re
aiming to do, and where you might need advice
 revise and edit your draft based on your peer reviewers’ comments and your own reassessment of what you’ve written
 formally submit the revised final version, together with the initial draft and the cover sheet.
What counts as a “critical review”?
What we’re looking for is an essay focused on one particular piece of work (see below) that describes what it covers, analyses what it is trying to do and how it does it, and evalutates its usefulness, relevance or value for a particular audience.
You should not simply produce a judgment on the quality of the work, although you may find you need to do so as part of your analysis. You will need to produce evidence for your interpretations of the work: this may include examples from the work itself, responses from other critics or researchers who have also dealt with the work, or research literature that’s focused on other topics but makes relevant points.
Choosing a topic
The focus needs to be on a single piece of work of some kind, rather than a general topic area: for instance, The Selfish Gene would qualify but “genetics” would not. You can take a broad definition of “Piece of work”: it doesn’t have to be a publication. It’s a good idea to choose something that interests you personally, and that will give you some useful practice in an area you’re likely to be working on later on:
HSTM students who are interested in going on to research might want to choose a history monograph or journal article. Alternatively, you could choose a museum gallery or exhibition, a TV documentary, a popular history book, a podcast series, or a historical fiction novel, TV series or film.
SHC students might choose a research article or a museum or science centre exhibition, a public engagement event, a radio or TV show, podcast or social media channel, a popular science book, or a novel or fiction TV show or film that features science (or engineering, medicine, healthcare, etc) in some meaningful way.
If you’re not sure whether what you’re planning is appropriate, ask the course co- ordinator for advice.
Audience
The intended audience for the critical review article is fellow professionals: either history researchers or science communicators, as appropriate. Think about what these people already know, what else they will need to know to understand your source, and what they might find particularly useful, interesting, important, annoying, or harmful from your source.
Step 1: the draft and cover sheet
You will need to submit the initial draft by Friday 4 October at 10:00.
This is not an official coursework submission: we just need to collect it electronically in time to circulate to the other students for the peer review stage. We won’t be using the Turnitin system that’s used for assessment submissions: details of how to submit will be available on the Blackboard site for this course.
The draft doesn’t need to be technically polished but it should be complete, covering all the ideas you expect to address in the final version. It should be at or near the same length as the final version – 600 to 750 words – and written as full paragraphed prose, not an outline or notes.
The first page of the draft document should be a cover sheet, filled in to explain some features of the review that your peer reviewers need to know about. Copy the cover sheet questions from the template available on Blackboard and include them at the top of the draft document, separated by a page break.
page 14
Step 2: peer review
During Week 2, all students will be arranged into small groups to provide peer review comments for each other’s work. After the drafts have been submitted, you will be given online access to the drafts submitted by the other students in your group.
You will need to review the drafts and complete the feedback in the online system before the Week 3 class on Wednesday 9 October, when we’ll be discussing the results and how you can use them to improve your draft.
You don’t need to do technical copy-editing as part of the review: we’re not looking for corrections on grammar, typographical errors, etc. The only time you should suggest a correction is if you’ve found a factual error, or an argument that doesn’t work.
Instead, you need to be giving your peers feedback on how well their critical review is constructed, how convincing their critique is, and how it could be improved. Do they need more examples? Clarification of terms? More evaluative statements? Reorganisation of the structure?
Step 3: revision and final submission
After the peer review and our class discussion on revising and editing, you’ll have the chance to go back and revise your review based on the feedback you’ve received.
This does not mean you have to integrate every bit of feedback, but your revision needs to show that you’ve considered the feedback and edited the draft to improve it.
The maximum length is 750 words, excluding the title and any references. 750 words is the upper limit: there is no “10% rule or other leeway.
The deadline for submission is Thursday 17 October at 14:00 (2pm). Submission will be via the Turnitin system used for most assessed coursework at this university: full details will be in the course area online.
You should submit a single document in .docx format, containing
1. your initial draft
2. your cover sheet with information for peer reviewers
3. your final version after revision
in that order, separated by page breaks.
My notes:
1) use as many sources as needed
2) pick from SHC students because that is my course.
3) stick to 750 word limit Max

The goal of Method Activity 2 is to advance the skills developed in the first method activity by
incorporating more complex research analysis, deepening your engagement with the scientific
method, and synthesizing concepts from Chapters 6 and 7. By now, you should be more familiar
with the research process, particularly in terms of methodology and data collection. This
assignment requires you to critically reflect on your research, describe how it is evolving, and
articulate the direction your research is heading as it connects to your overall project.
This activity will also serve as a foundational step toward your Literature Review project. You
will demonstrate mastery in discussing the methods you are employing, reflect on data
collection, and consider how these contribute to answering your research questions. Pay special
attention to the terminologies and methodologies discussed in Chapters 6 and 7 and
synthesize them into your ongoing research process
Structure of Structure of Method Activity 2:
1. Introduction
○ Briefly introduce your research topic, including your research questions and
hypotheses.
○ Provide an overview of where you are in your research process.
2. Data Collection and Methodology
○ Describe in detail your data collection methods. What tools are you using, and
why?
○ Reflect on any challenges or adjustments made to your original data collection
plan.
○ Explain how your methods connect to either qualitative or quantitative
approaches.
3. Scientific Method in Action
○ Outline how you are applying the scientific method to your research.
○ Discuss how you are formulating hypotheses, identifying variables (both
independent and dependent), and testing your research questions.
○ Evaluate the successes and challenges you have encountered in applying this
method.
4. Synthesis of Chapters 6 & 7
○ Reflect on key concepts from Chapters 6 and 7 of the textbook.
○ Discuss how the reading informs your current research methods and data
collection process.
○ Integrate relevant terms and theories from these chapters into your analysis.
5. Reflection on Research Progress
○ Provide a critical reflection on where your research is heading. What have you
learned so far?
○ How are your findings shaping your understanding of your research questions?
○ Discuss how your research methods are contributing to the overall project and
future directions, including the upcoming Literature Review.
6. Conclusion
○ Summarize your progress, noting any significant adjustments made along the
way.
○ Discuss the next steps in your research and how you will address any remaining
challenges.
Expectations: William H. Hannon Library Search: Students should use ProQuest and other
academic databases from the William H. Hannon Library to find peer-reviewed journal
articles and primary sources relevant to their research. They should identify the
databases they use and explain why these resources are important for their research
goals
Primary Data and Research Significance: Identify the primary data being collected
and discuss how this data is central to the research. Explain how this data serves the
overall study and its potential contribution to the field.
● Variables and Depth of Analysis: Analyze the variables (independent and dependent)
at play in their research and how these are measured. Take the paper further by (cont’d)

This log should be based on concepts from chapter 4.
Submit an Application Log of at least 250 words in which you articulate applications of concepts, covered in Chapter 4, that you have either (1) personally experienced in a place of current or past employment, or (2) potentially could experience in your chosen career field after graduation. To receive credit, your weekly Application Log must:
refer to specific terms and concepts from Chapter 4
include multiple citations (with page number) of the reading
be at least 250 words