Category: Communication

In this assignment, you will write about a communication mishap and evaluate what went wrong, consider why, and think about how this mishap could have been avoided, handled differently, or managed today with hindsight. More specifically, you will write about a situation where there was a misunderstanding due to language barriers.
More details about the topic and instructions are written in the “Instruction” document attached. You will have access to the chapter PowerPoint to see what was covered in each chapter so you can better understand the topic. Overall, please make this as best as possible, and if you have any questions, please let me know as soon as possible.

The Learning Activity titled “Outlining” discusses why outlining is important in helping the speaker have a more organized speech. Describe a speech or presentation you viewed that was not well organized. Why wasn’t it organized? Share an example from the reading to support your rationale, and a tip from reading that could have helped make the speaker’s communication more understandable.
at least 150 words
I have attached the learning activity.

The paper I will upload answers these three questions ( explain why someone would choose textual analysis as a method, and be able to compare it to other methods of analyzing texts (such as critical research or content analysis), and also explain what you can learn from textual analysis that you can’t learn from other methods.)
however, it needs some summarizing to delete the extra information and fix citations
also need to add
1- Identify three studies similar to your topic that used textual analysis as a method.
2- How will their findings help you in your dissertation?
I will send my proposal prospectus so you can take it from the lit review. I will send it a file called media representation. They might use textual analysis. They are the same in my lit review.

Overview
Task descriiption
You are required to write a 1200-word literature review based on the semester topic.
Length
1 200 words (approximately)
Learning outcomes measured
Understand and adhere to the ethical responsibilities required of students in Australian universities
Source, evaluate and synthesise information from a range of academic texts
Critically reflect on academic texts
Produce academic texts which adhere to a required structure and use associated language features
What you need to do
You will produce a 1 200-word literature review based on a topic provided to you and based on your own research. The literature review should include the following:
An introduction that outlines the background to the topic. This should include an explanation of why you are writing a review and the relevance of the topic. You will need to include the scope of the review, which aspects of the topic will be discussed and the criteria used for your literature selection (e.g. type of sources used, date range). You will also need a thesis statement that outlines the organisational structure of the review.
Two sections with subheadings. Each section addresses an aspect of the topic. Each section will contain two paragraphs. You must use a minimum of four sources and 5 citations per body paragraph. All 7 sources must be used. You cannot use secondary sources.
A conclusion that includes the main agreements, disagreements and controversies in the literature, any suggestions for areas for further research, and your overall perspective on the topic.
A reference list. Only 7 sources.
Resources available to complete the task
4 journal articles provide to you in the workshops plus 3 additional journal articles you must source yourself.

Write a moderator guide on a topic of your choosing. There is an example moderator guide on Blackboard. For additional examples of moderator guides make sure to review Appendix A – C within the Garrison et al (1999) article. Note though, the Garrison examples are in a different format to what is required here. There is no universal convention for moderator guide formats. You will use your moderator guide to conduct a real 10 minute FG in class next week within a small group. You will work through this document in class but it is unlikely you will finish all the activities listed here during class time. Deadlines for completion of this document will be announced in the weekly to do email.
Note: You should not feel pressured to make your FG guide interesting to your other group members. If your passion or ideal FG topic is something most other people find boring that is ok. Also, if you desire, you can ask your group members to role-play in the live FG. For example if your FG is about why teenage females use Facebook you can ask your group members to pretend to be teenage females in the FG. You will use the data you collect during your live FG to write your FG paper (to be discussed in more detail next week). However, you can use a FG guide on nearly any topic to achieve a good grade in the Focus Group paper. The only restriction is that your topic should not be something that others might consider offensive. Your topic should also not be something that the typical student in the class does not know about for instance a film most in the class have not seen. Given the time constraints of the FG live session you will likely not have time to ask all of your moderator guide questions during next week’s FG. For this reason you should identify your most important questions and make sure you ask these questions in the live session. You do not need to make any notes on the assignment of what you believe your most important questions are, this task of identifying these questions is an ungraded and unreviewed exercise you complete alone in preparation for next week’s FG.
Make sure to do the following:
• Clearly state the topic and write a 3-4 sentence summary of the problem (real or fictional) and the goal(s) of the FG. This is different from the blackboard examples.
• Indicate who participants would be, how you would screen, and reimbursement participants receive for participation. You will not reimburse participants for the FG you conduct next week but pretend that you will.
• For each key question area, include at least one general probe or one specific probe. Mark these with “General Probe” or “Specific Probe”. Have at least three of each somewhere in your moderator guide.
540: W4 Focus group preparation
Your topic should not be one that other students in the class may consider sensitive or intrusive. Concrete examples would be to avoid topics such as sex, drugs, criminal acts, religion, or politics. Although FGs are very useful in these areas such as testing effectiveness of campaign commercials or determining how to promote safe sex, such topics may be offensive to others in the class.
You should not show videos or play music as part of the FG as this takes up too much of the ten minutes you have available to conduct your FG.

This week, you will plan and outline your choice of a white paper, an e-book, a grant proposal, or instructional materials by using a mind map.
Select a technical writing topic of your choice. You may choose 1 of the case studies or deliverables from Topic 2.4 or 2.5, or you may choose to outline an external deliverable, such as a user manual for a household item that you use regularly or a grant proposal for a cause that you are invested in.

Draft a mind map to help plan the essential areas of your white paper, an e-book, grant proposal, or instructional materials. Map out the following:
Identify your audience.
Identify your communication goals.
Research the approach for the document you want to create.
Identify major topics and subtopics that your material will cover.

Create your mind map using Microsoft PowerPoint, Word, or alternative document software. Review Topic 9 for mind map examples.
After the completion of your mind map, prepare a brief reflection, approximately 350 words or fewer, that analyzes your planning process, by addressing the following:
Explain why you included the elements that you did within your mind map.
Evaluate whether you feel that the process of creating a mind map helped you conceptualize the deliverable that you planned. Explain why or why not.
Explain whether you would utilize this process again for outlining a project in the future. Explain why or why not.
Cite at least 2 sources beyond your textbook to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

500 word essay examining the prospect of a world in which information is limited and at best trivial. Compare the two and discuss how the story has aged and been reinterpreted.
Movie Link: https://archive.org/details/fahrenheit-451-1966-696p and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1n7Q_Uh7J-0

Part I.
Read chapter three and four in United States of Distraction, and describe how misinformation, disinformation, or fake news is used in political campaigns? Use recent examples that you have seen on television or in other forms of media to discredit candidates. What’s missing? What other news on the world stage was happening that day and did it receive as much attention?
Part II.
Who benefits and who loses from “eroding confidence in journalism and news (Higdon and Huff, 2019, p. 113). Where would you go to find a credible source to substantiate the information (AP Newswire, BBC, The Guardian, Poynter Institute, the Annenberg Foundation, or World Health Organization, etc.) Would the remedies that Sinan Aral suggests at the end of his video How We Can Protect Truth in the Age of Misinformation work? One to two pages with in-text citations and references required. Suggest watching videos
Another option: During the recent election, we have had family members or friends perhaps fall into the conspiracy-theory black hole. If that was the case, how would you change the dynamic given what you know now about having conversations that matter. Watch How to Talk Your Uncle Out of QAnon and another recommended video in our weekly lesson. What approach would you take or maybe did take? Perhaps you would find another resource source that deals with cult behaviors and how to rectify political indoctrination. You can add other resources. One-two pages with in-text citations and references required.

Dear writer please read carefully.
I have already given and oral presentation. However I will need my script to be edited as it is produced by AI services. As I’m not allowed to use AI services for my work. Can you please edit to look like more of a human writing?
Cheers
I will attached my written script in the file section. And please read the requirements down below carefully.
30% (20% written; 10% participation)
Students work in small teams to prepare and deliver in-class debate presentations and written summaries of debates. Debaters should present key concepts from the relevant required reading. apply them to the topic, argue for or against the proposal and support their argument with concrete specific examples from media artefacts, production, or reception. Each student participates in one debate to be held in Weeks 3 to 7 and, for this purpose, prepares and delivers a short speech (3 minutes) and contributes to the written summary of the team’s position (300 words per student).
Diverse, Indigenous and multicultural communities should be considered when preparing debate contributions.
300 words (written) and 3 minute class debate presentation (live oral).

Hi. I am currently applying to vet school, and I need to write an essay about the university’s values. I am attaching information about myself so you have an idea of how I am, making the essay as personal as possible. Thank you! lmk if you have any questions.
Essay question file named: University of Arizona values. Everything else is supporting info