Category: Communication

Guidelines:
1. Focus on Clarity and Conciseness:
o Use concise, precise language.
o Avoid unnecessary repetition but ensure important concepts (e.g., deliberative democracy, inclusivity, ASEAN Communication Master Plan II) are reinforced appropriately.
2. Adhere to Academic Standards:
o Maintain a formal academic tone.
o Use APA, MLA, or the specific citation style required by the target journal.
o Ensure all in-text citations align with the references section.
3. Ensure Alignment with Research Questions (RQs):
o Regularly check that each section addresses the RQs.
o Highlight how the findings relate to the overarching themes: citizen inclusion, communication tools, and governance legitimacy.
4. Emphasize Key Concepts:
o Frame the narrative around core concepts such as deliberative democracy, trust-building, policy learning, and the “ASEAN Way.”
o Link these concepts explicitly to the ASEAN Communication Master Plan II and potential post-2025 developments.
Section-by-Section Instructions:
1. Abstract
• Write an engaging 200–300-word abstract summarizing the research purpose, methods, key findings, and implications.
• Highlight:
o The significance of the ASEAN Communication Master Plan II as the framework.
o The potential of deliberative mechanisms to enhance inclusivity, trust, and governance legitimacy.
o The comparative analysis of EU practices and their selective adaptation to ASEAN.
2. Introduction
• Aim for 800–1,000 words.
• Start Strong:
o Introduce ASEAN’s governance structure and the importance of the ASEAN Communication Master Plan II.
o Contextualize the rising importance of citizen voices beyond CSOs and businesses.
• Explain Relevance:
o Explain why deliberative democracy is needed now, especially as ASEAN approaches key milestones (APA’s 25th anniversary, ASEAN Master Plan II’s conclusion, ASEAN’s 60th anniversary).
• Outline Scope:
o Briefly introduce the research questions and the focus on EU policy learning.
3. Literature Review
• Aim for 1,500–2,000 words.
• Conceptual Clarity:
o Define dialogue vs. deliberation and explain how deliberative democracy strengthens trust and governance.
o Introduce theoretical frameworks (e.g., Habermas’ communicative action, Freire’s participatory communication, trust and legitimacy models).
• Synthesize Evidence:
o Compare ASEAN’s existing platforms (APA, APF, ASEAN-BAC) and structural challenges (politicization, exclusion, lack of follow-up).
o Integrate insights from the EU on citizen assemblies, participatory platforms, and communication tools.
• Identify Gaps:
o Highlight the need for inclusive mechanisms that engage marginalized groups.
o Emphasize gaps in ASEAN’s Track 2 diplomacy and the potential role of digital tools.
4. Methodology
• Aim for 800–1,000 words.
• Explain the Approach:
o Describe the comparative analysis of EU mechanisms and their applicability to ASEAN.
o Outline the case studies (APA, APF, ASEAN Youth Forum) and how they were analyzed to assess their potential for deliberative democracy.
• Tabletop Research:
o Clearly explain the reliance on secondary sources, including peer-reviewed articles, ASEAN reports, and advocacy group publications.
o Justify why this approach is appropriate given the scope of the study.
• Policy Learning:
o Highlight how policy learning informs the adaptation of EU practices to ASEAN’s context.
5. Results
• Aim for 1,000–1,200 words.
• Organize by RQs:
o RQ1: Summarize key lessons from the EU and their relevance to ASEAN.
o RQ2: Highlight the role of tools like multilingual juries, virtual focus groups, and sentiment surveys in enhancing inclusivity.
o RQ3: Discuss how citizen-led deliberation can improve governance legitimacy and policy outcomes.
• Emphasize Opportunities:
o Focus on ASEAN’s rising educational levels, digital connectivity, and upcoming milestones as enablers of deliberative mechanisms.
6. Discussion
• Aim for 1,200–1,500 words.
• Reflect on Findings:
o Analyze how the EU’s practices align with ASEAN’s governance model and principles.
o Discuss how ASEAN’s consensus-driven and non-interference framework affects the adoption of deliberative practices.
• Address Challenges:
o Critically evaluate structural barriers, such as linguistic diversity and resource disparities among member states.
• Recommendations:
o Propose actionable steps for the ASEAN Secretariat, such as piloting deliberative mechanisms and leveraging partnerships with CSOs and businesses.
o Emphasize the significance of aligning new practices with the ASEAN Communication Master Plan II.
7. Conclusion
• Aim for 400–600 words.
• Summarize Key Insights:
o Reiterate the potential of deliberative democracy to address transboundary challenges and enhance inclusivity.
o Highlight the importance of aligning deliberative practices with ASEAN’s principles and cultural diversity.
• Forward-Looking:
o Emphasize the importance of using findings to shape post-2025 communication frameworks.
8. Limitations and Future Directions
• Aim for 300–500 words.
• Acknowledge Limitations:
o Discuss the reliance on secondary sources and the focus on the EU as the primary comparative model.
o Address the theoretical nature of the proposed mechanisms and the need for pilot studies.
• Suggest Future Research:
o Propose studies focusing on implementation challenges in low-resource ASEAN countries.
o Highlight the need to explore other regional governance frameworks (e.g., African Union, Mercosur) for additional insights.
Additional Notes:
1. Formatting and Style:
o Use clear headings and subheadings to structure the manuscriipt.
2. Critical Analysis:
o Where appropriate, critique the EU’s practices and highlight why selective adaptation is necessary for ASEAN.
3. References:
o Ensure all in-text citations are accurate and appear in the reference list.
4. Diagrams and Tables:
o Consider creating summary tables or diagrams to illustrate key concepts, such as:
 A comparison of EU and ASEAN practices.
 A framework for integrating deliberative democracy into ASEAN.
5. Final Review:
o Proofread thoroughly for coherence, conciseness, and academic rigor.
o Ensure the manuscriipt is free of redundancies and clearly aligned with the research questions.

During the first six-weeks you formulated a project plan, researched the content of the plan, and collected quality academic and non-academic sources. For the week 7 Final Project you will create a presentation (CO8) that builds upon the Week 3 Project Plan and the Week 5 Location and Access (Source Organization worksheet) that effectively communicates the knowledge you have gained during COMM120.
Please consider the following:
Presentation will include an introduction, body, conclusion, and properly formatted reference/work cited slide in the citation style of your degree program (APA, MLA, or Chicago).
Clear evidence that the topic was researched and expanded upon the week 2 Project Plan (CO2 & 5).
Presentation provides audience with information to increase their knowledge of the topic presented (CO1).
Presentation engages the audience by using elements such as images, graphs, and charts. Appropriate citations must be included.
Three (3) vetted credible sources. One (1) of the sources must be scholarly and from the library.
Appropriate length 7-9 slides.
If you have multimedia skills and want to add creative content to your presentation, please do! Try to add any of the following enhancements and as you do, think about how it will impact your presentation and improve communication with the intended audience.
Voice narration, closed captioning, scriipt.
Appropriate background music (must be cited on reference page).
Creative use of slide animations and transitions.

After submitting your presentation, review your TurnItIn Originality Report. (Note: Review the individual flags, decide why that text is flagged, and make corrections as appropriate.). Please see the attached rubric for grading guidelines.

Note: The Week 7 Final Project is a presentation and be turned in as a PowerPoint, a Prezi, or a different type of presentation software. If you chose something other than PowerPoint, you have to do the following:
Submit a link to the presentation such as for Prezi.
Ensure that the faculty can open the presentation.
turn in a document with the presentation material so it can go through Turnitin.
Attached are week 3 Project plan and week 5 assignments needed for the Presentation on Pursuing a Career project on pursuing a career as a software engineer.

Identify and describe how a consumer motivation or affect is used in any advertisement for a governmental organization/institution/agency/military branch or any non-profit organization/institution.
Define how the motivation or affect reflects or appeals to a consumer’s self or identity.
Use attached chapter 5 as one reference.
Reference is Solomon, M. (2020). Consumer behavior: Buying, having and being. (13th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Provide link to the advertisement and other references used.

Find two YouTube videos that explain the topic assigned. (Select one number from the topic questions below)
The YouTube videos should be less than 10 minutes (if possible), they need to be interesting and not boring (if possible), they should be understandable in English, and educational.
There are some YouTube videos that, although explain a topic, are boring in the presentation or not interesting. You need to try and use a YouTube video that is interesting the watch, both visually and audio, if possible. The ideal video is about 2-6 minutes.
Once you have selected the two videos:
1- View the videos and prepare a detailed one page summary/outline using bullets,
2- Prepare 5 multiple choice questions with answers bolded for each video.
3- Submit the two video links, summary/outline, and the 5 multiple choice Q/A for each video.
Topics:
1 – What is ARPAnet and What is Web 3.0
2 – Inventor of email, Ray Tomlinson and What is the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee
3 – Positive and negative effects of internet, and What is social media
4 – What is the Digital Divide and What is Net Neutrality
5 – Explain the Industrial Revolution and What are/Rise of digital games
6 – What are Arcades and Classic Video Games, and What are MMORPGs
7 – Regulating video and digital games, and Do games make you violent
Note: You must include a reference from where you obtained the information. An automatic deduction is applied if there is no reference.

Identify and describe how a consumer motivation or affect is used in any advertisement for a governmental organization/institution/agency/military branch or any non-profit organization/institution.
Define how the motivation or affect reflects or appeals to a consumer’s self or identity.
Use attached chapter 5 as one reference.
Reference is Solomon, M. (2020). Consumer behavior: Buying, having and being. (13th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Provide link to the advertisement and other references used.

Find two YouTube videos that explain the topic assigned. (Select one number from the topic questions below)
The YouTube videos should be less than 10 minutes (if possible), they need to be interesting and not boring (if possible), they should be understandable in English, and educational.
There are some YouTube videos that, although explain a topic, are boring in the presentation or not interesting. You need to try and use a YouTube video that is interesting the watch, both visually and audio, if possible. The ideal video is about 2-6 minutes.
Once you have selected the two videos:
1- View the videos and prepare a detailed one page summary/outline using bullets,
2- Prepare 5 multiple choice questions with answers bolded for each video.
3- Submit the two video links, summary/outline, and the 5 multiple choice Q/A for each video.
Topics:
1 – What is ARPAnet and What is Web 3.0
2 – Inventor of email, Ray Tomlinson and What is the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee
3 – Positive and negative effects of internet, and What is social media
4 – What is the Digital Divide and What is Net Neutrality
5 – Explain the Industrial Revolution and What are/Rise of digital games
6 – What are Arcades and Classic Video Games, and What are MMORPGs
7 – Regulating video and digital games, and Do games make you violent
Note: You must include a reference from where you obtained the information. An automatic deduction is applied if there is no reference.

These write-ups should be typed, one-inch margins on all sides; 12 pt. Times New Romans; page numbers; single-space typed; and two pages (maximum length).
This is not to be a review of the case.
In this write-up, you need to be extremely specific. You should not repeat any of the case details.
The format of this case analysis should have the following headings:
Problems/Issues; Possible Solutions; Recommend Solutions; and Expected Outcomes.
These write-ups are designed to be executive decision documents written so that your immediate report-to would be able to read, understand, and implement your decision.
Include APA style references

Instructions
Windshield survey a community assessment strategy: Downtown Promise Heights. Students will participate in debriefing and reflect on the clinical experience as guided by the instructor using the questions in the Debriefing Guide.
Within the virtual clinical experience, students will carry out systematic gathering of data using the traditional windshield survey technique to better understand a community and inform an overall community assessment. Students will then write a 2-page paper that identifies and discusses neighborhood strengths and neighborhood risks based on the data gathered.
Instructions:
Students should complete the virtual windshield survey that is available on thePoint.
Students should then create a 2-page-paper (approximately 500 words) that identifies and discusses 3 neighborhood strengths and 3 neighborhood risks.
The student should use the information gathered during his/her tour of downtown Promise Heights and include, for each strength and risk, the rationale that integrates leading content for this assignment.
Use the link to go directly to CoursePoint.
Due on Oct 27, 2024 11:59 PM
Available on Oct 14, 2024 12:01 AM. Access restricted before availability starts.
Available until Oct 30, 2024 11:59 PM. Submission restricted after availability ends.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Virtual or Real World Experience Written Paper
Criteria
Excellent Work
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
Criterion Score
Content Knowledge
3 points
• Follows all requirements for the assignment.
• Conveys well-rounded knowledge of the topic.
• Excels in fully presenting what is known about the topic.
2 points
• Follows all requirements for the assignment.
• Major points of topic are mostly covered in the required assignment areas.
1 point
• Knowledge of topic is partially covered.
• Key information is missing from 2 or more assignment areas.
0 points
• Knowledge of topic is limited and does not cover the required assignment areas.
Score of Content Knowledge,/ 3
Flow of Content
3 points
• Paper is well-organized with a solid introduction and conclusion.
• Information clearly flows in a logical and interesting sequence.
• Easy to read, follow, and understand throughout.
• Captures the reader’s attention.
2 points
• Paper is organized. Introduction and conclusion are mostly helpful.
• Information flows in a generally logical and interesting sequence.
• Easy to read, follow, and understand most of the paper.
1 point
• The organization, sequence, and flow of paper are difficult to follow at times.
• Introduction and/or conclusion is poorly written.
• Information is difficult to read or understand in a few areas
0 points
Paper is not well-organized.
• Information is difficult to read, understand, and follow throughout most of the paper.
• Introduction and/or conclusion is missing or
lacks clarity and connection with the topic.
Score of Flow of Content,/ 3
Clarity, Critical Thinking
2 points
• Concisely explains the topic.
• Consistently analyzes information, offers insight, and draws conclusions.
• Excels in presentation of ideas. Scholarly work.
1.5 points
• Explains the topic.
• Presents information about the topic.
• Some analysis, insight, and conclusions offered. Mostly scholarly work.
1 point
• Major aspects of the topic are presented, but content lacks insight and analysis. Scholarly work is variable.
0 points
• Information is basic.
• Major aspects of the topic are missing or inadequate.
• Lacks insight, analysis, and conclusions. Reader gains little understanding of the topic.
Score of Clarity, Critical Thinking,/ 2
Writing Composition and Mechanics
1 point
• Spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure are essentially error free. Excellent readability.
0.75 points
• Infrequent, minor errors may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure. Errors do not interfere with the overall readability of the paper. Minor editing would have been helpful.
0.5 points
• Multiple errors occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure; detracts from overall readability of the paper. Significant editing would have been helpful.
0 points
• Numerous errors with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure; difficult to read and understand the information presented. Writing development needed.
Score of Writing Composition and Mechanics,/ 1
References (Sources) and APA Format
1 point
• Utilizes reputable sources that clearly relate to the topic.

AND
• APA format in the paper and the reference list essentially error free.
0.75 points
• Utilizes reputable sources that relate to the topic.

AND/OR
• Some minor errors may occur with APA format in the paper or the reference list; errors are not consistent throughout the paper.
0.5 points
• Sources are not always reputable or do not clearly relate to the topic.

AND/OR
• Frequent errors occur with APA format throughout the paper and/or the reference list.
0 points
well to the topic or sources not identified.

AND/OR
• Numerous errors occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper and/or the reference list. Lacks understanding of APA format.
Score of References (Sources) and APA Format,/ 1

Create non-defensive responses to the following criticisms posed by the person in parentheses: (please see attached docx for detailed instructions) Thankx!

The assignment is to write a speech on who I am as a public speaker, not literally who I am. For reference I am a poor public speaker, I suffered a traumatic brain injury making it hard for me to keep a cognitive thought. Please include these key terms in the paper and how they apply to me as a speaker. LANGUAGE: A system of communication consisting of words, sounds, and gestures used by humans to convey meaning and express thoughts, ideas, and emotions. VOCALIZED PAUSES: Sounds or words, such as “um,” “uh,” or “like,” used in speech as fillers or hesitation markers, often indicating a pause or momentary interruption in thought. KINESICS: The study of body movements, gestures, and facial expressions as a form of nonverbal communication and their role in conveying meaning and emotions. CONCRETE LANGUAGE: Language that refers to specific, tangible objects or experiences that can be perceived by the senses, making it more specific and vivid.
PLEASE DO NOY SUBMIT TO AMY PLAGERISM SITES, I DO NOT WANT IT IN ANY DATA BASE