Case Study: Gun Control Assignment – case study is attached – YOU MUST USE THAT

Case Study: Gun Control Assignment – case study is attached – YOU MUST USE THAT CASE STUDY
This Case Study Assignment is designed to help you make application of course content to current issues facing public administrators.
Research the case and related topics (online research is sufficient), then write an essay of at least 750 words, addressing the salient points of the Case Study and your suggested solutions (not just solutions given in the article/case study you are responding to) to the problems presented in it.
Each Case Study must be completed with at least 2 scholarly references cited in accordance with current APA formatting.
There must also be a scriptural or biblical worldview application. Review the Case Study Grading Rubric for specific content- and presentation-related criteria.
For each Case Study, assume you are a state or local public administrator when you formulate your Alternative Solutions recommendations
This needs to be written by someone who has great English
I will run this through the plagiarism checker

Literature Review Assignment Description: For this assignment, you will choose a

Literature Review Assignment
Description:
For this assignment, you will choose a topic pertaining to one of the variables selected for your research report and write a 4-5 page literature review. You are required to cite 5-8 sources scholarly sources. Build upon your previous assignments (Bibliography, Literature Map). Sources should be documented with in-text citations, and a bibliography in ASA format should be provided (note: this does not count towards your page limit).
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is a literature review?
A literature review is a survey of scholarly articles, books, and other sources such as dissertations and conference proceedings that are relevant to a particular topic. A literature review has a specific organizational pattern that combines summary (a recap of information) and synthesis (a sketch of connections). The main objective of a literature review is to provide your audience with an overview of what the experts in a particular field say. In completing a literature review you will:
Survey the literature in a particular area
Synthesizes information
Critically analyzes information
Presents information in an organized manner
How is a literature review different from an academic research paper?
A literature review is often a component of an academic research paper. The literature review is intended to summarize and synthesize existing research whereas a research paper contributes new and novel ideas to the existing body of knowledge.
How do I start?
Choose a topic related to social inequality. Topics can include but are not limited to income and wealth inequality, gender inequality, sexuality, health and well-being, criminal justice. Consider the extent to which your topic of inequality organizes our society and/or the conditions which can reduce your topic of inequality. You might also begin by imagining that you work for a non-profit seeking to secure funding to reduce a social inequality.
Next visit the resources at the FSU library. Visit the sociology LibGuide at http://libguides.uncfsu.edu/sociologyLinks to an external site.. The library has subscriptions to many databases that you may use to complete keyword searches relevant to your topic. You may also complete keyword searches related to your topic on Google Scholar.
How do I choose which sources to use?
First and foremost, you want to ensure that you are using scholarly sources (see the attached guide on distinguishing between popular and scholarly journalsLinks to an external site.). Next, you can begin by readings the abstract of articles you’ve identified. You can also ask yourself the following questions:
Is it accurate?
Is it complete?
Is it up-to-date?
Is it supported by strong evidence?
Is it clearly relevant to my topic?
How do you synthesize information?
You can begin to synthesize information by looking for patterns and developing themes. Pay attention to things such as common findings, major debates or findings that are contested, the most influential theories being used; gaps or directions for future research. A good way to begin synthesis is to write a one or two-sentence statement that summarizes the major trends and developments you’ve noticed during your reading.
Where do I go if I need more help?
Please visit office hours schedule an appointment to meet with me. You may also visit these resources:
https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/literature-reviews/Links to an external site.
https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/write-a-literature-reviewLinks to an external site.
https://emedia.rmit.edu.au/learninglab/sites/default/files/Writing_a_Literature_review_assignment_2015_Accessible.pdfLinks to an external site.
Rubric
Literature Review
Literature Review
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Focus
10 to >8.0 ptsExemplary
Clearly states position and provides rationale.
8 to >7.0 ptsProficient
States position and provides rational, but may lack some clarity
7 to >3.0 ptsApprentice
States position but limited evidence of rationale
3 to >0 ptsIncomplete/Missing
Does not clearly state position and provides rationale.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of Sources
10 to >8.0 ptsExemplary
The literature review demonstrates an exceptional ability to judge arguments and evidence.
8 to >7.0 ptsProficient
The literature review demonstrates an ability to judge arguments and evidence.
7 to >3.0 ptsApprentice
The literature review demonstrates a superficial command of the topic.
3 to >0 ptsIncomplete/Missing
There is no indication that there is an understanding of the subject matter.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis of Sources
10 to >8.0 ptsExemplary
Information is presented content clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and effective supporting evidence.
8 to >7.0 ptsProficient
Information is presented most of the content with a logical progression of ideas and supporting evidence.
7 to >3.0 ptsApprentice
Presented content which failed to maintain a consistent focus, showed minimal organization and effort, and lacked an adequate amount of supporting evidence.
3 to >0 ptsIncomplete/Missing
Presented content which was unfocused, poorly organized, showed little thought or effort and lacked supporting evidence.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInternal Referencing and Bibliography
10 to >8.0 ptsExemplary
Information is gathered from 5-8 academic sources. Applies ASA referencing system with no major errors.
8 to >7.0 ptsProficient
Information is gathered from 5-8 academic sources. Applies ASA referencing system with minor errors.
7 to >3.0 ptsApprentice
Information is gathered from fewer than 5 sources. Applies ASA referencing system with several major errors.
3 to >0 ptsIncomplete/Missing
Information is gathered from fewer than 5 sources. The document has major citation errors and many instances where work was not cited.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics/Language
10 to >8.0 ptsExemplary
No spelling &/or grammar mistakes. Cited all sources of information accurately to demonstrate the credibility and authority of the information presented.
8 to >7.0 ptsProficient
Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes. Cited most sources of information in proper format and documented sources to enable accuracy checking.
7 to >3.0 ptsApprentice
Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes. Cited most sources of information improperly and provided little or no supporting documentation to check accuracy.
3 to >0 ptsIncomplete/Missing
Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Created citations which were incomplete or inaccurate, and provided no way to check the validity of the information gathered.
10 pts
Total Points: 50

Network Evaluation Report Overview How do you become good at any skill? You prac

Network Evaluation Report
Overview
How do you become good at any skill? You practice it over and over until it becomes second nature. Troubleshooting computer and network problems is a skill that evolves over your career. Through the practice of identifying and troubleshooting network issues, you will continue to develop a mindset that is attuned to finding problems and developing solutions. This is a critical component of systems thinking and the adversarial mindset.
Cybersecurity analysts and network engineers work side by side to build the strongest network defense possible. It is possible that you as a security analyst might be asked to help with the networking protection from time to time. Having the fundamental skills to understand and troubleshoot problems that emerge is key to continued protection of a system.
For this project, you will assume the role of a job candidate on an interview. As part of the interview process, you will be asked to troubleshoot hypothetical issues in a network. You will create a network evaluation report that documents your findings for your interviewers.
The project will be submitted in Module Six.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:
Identify and troubleshoot deficiencies related to network security
Scenario
You are in an interview for a cybersecurity analyst position. As part of the interview process, the company tests all candidates’ troubleshooting capabilities. You are asked to solve hypothetical challenges based on a network diagram. Review the list of challenges and network diagram below. Select two challenges and provide recommendations for how to address the challenges.
Challenges:
Network_1 segment needs to have all access to the Network_3 segment
The workstations on Network_2 cannot access The_Internet
Remote administrators need access to the server in Network_4
Any requests for access to an SSH console need to be directly routed to Network_3
Network Diagram
Prompt
You must address the critical elements listed below. The codes shown in brackets indicate the competency to which each critical element is aligned.
Network Evaluation ReportChallenge OneIdentify the potential cause of the selected challenge.
Explain your approach for resolving the challenge. Justify your response.
Challenge TwoIdentify the potential cause of the selected challenge.
Explain your approach for resolving the challenge. Justify your response.
What to Submit
Your submission should be 2 to 3 pages in length. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use a file name that includes the course code, the assignment title, and your name—for example, CYB_123_Assignment_Firstname_Lastname.docx.
Project One Rubric
CriteriaExemplary (100%)Proficient (85%)Needs Improvement (55%)Not Evident (0%)Value
Challenge One: Potential CauseMeets “Proficient” criteria and addresses critical element in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies the potential cause of the selected challengeAddresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detailDoes not address critical element, or response is irrelevant22.5
Challenge One: ApproachMeets “Proficient” criteria and addresses critical element in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains approach for resolving the challenge and justifies responseAddresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detailDoes not address critical element, or response is irrelevant22.5
Challenge Two: Potential CauseMeets “Proficient” criteria and addresses critical element in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies the potential cause of the selected challengeAddresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detailDoes not address critical element, or response is irrelevant22.5
Challenge Two: ApproachMeets “Proficient” criteria and addresses critical element in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains approach for resolving the challenge and justifies responseAddresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detailDoes not address critical element, or response is irrelevant22.5
Articulation of ResponseSubmission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read formatSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organizationSubmission has some errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas10
Total:100

Selecting a Business Entity Business entities are an integral part of business p

Selecting a Business Entity
Business entities are an integral part of business practice and economic productivity. An effective business practitioner must understand the characteristics of the major types of business entities, as these attributes can dramatically affect the nature of the business’s relationships. Choosing the right entity is an exciting and important step in the lifecycle of a business. The entity a business owner chooses helps outline roles and responsibilities among owners, guides in conducting the business, and provides exit options, among other things. Understanding business entity characteristics includes becoming familiar with the ownership structure, organizational structure, potential liability, compensation methods, and tax laws applicable to the business entity.
Your Assignment for this week is to analyze the three business scenarios below. Based on what you have learned in this week’s reading and video lecture, advise the potential entrepreneurs on which business entity they should form. Be sure to discuss why you are making that recommendation, and include a discussion of both the advantages and disadvantages of the business entity you have recommended.Business Advice (Scenario #1)
Luke, Austin, and R.J. have been close friends since high school, and even went to college together. All three graduated last year; Luke with a degree in Computer Science, Austin with a degree in Graphic Design, and R.J. with a degree in Business Administration. All three self-proclaimed “computer geeks” and have worked part-time through high school and college fixing computer problems. Each has approximately $50,000 in savings for this business venture. They have been talking about starting a computer company in their local town to help businesses and individuals with computer problems or those who need help developing and designing web sites. In doing research, Justin found that there are only two other computer companies in their town of 100,000 people, and neither one will do both web design and computer hardware/software troubleshooting.
What type of business organization should Luke, Austin, and R.J. adopt? Why?
Business Advice (Scenario #2)
Tyler, a 27-year-old married man, just completed his fifth year as a journeyman carpenter with John Casey Homebuilders, a small homebuilder 25 miles from his hometown. Tyler has just received an inheritance of $100,000 from his favorite aunt. During the past five years, Tyler has been able to purchase many of the tools and equipment that he needs to be a good finish carpenter. He has not been satisfied working for John the past couple of years and has talked with his wife about starting his own business. Tyler’s wife, Esther, agrees that in order to be happy, and fully supports him in opening his own business. Esther graduated from the local university with a degree in liberal arts but stays at home with the kids.
What type of business organization should Tyler adopt? Why?
Business Advice (Scenario #3)
Troy and Tristan have decided to open a competitive Cheer and Dance business. Troy’s expertise is in business. He has a degree in Business Administration with a minor in Underwater Basket Weaving. Tristan, on the other hand, has a degree in Sports Management and has been coaching the Tesoro cheerleading team, while his girlfriend, Beatrix, has been coaching the dance team. The problem is that no one has much capital to invest. In fact, both are having a little trouble figuring out how they will be able to get the startup capital for the business. Fortunately, there are no other competitive Cheer and Dance companies in the area. Unfortunately, the potential buildings they have found to lease costs over $7,000 per month and they expect that utilities and water will cost approximately $650 per month. Liability insurance is expensive as well, estimated to be $2,000 per month due to possible injuries.
What type of business organization should Troy and Tristan adopt? Why?
Rubric
Assignment: Business Entity Advice
Assignment: Business Entity Advice
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the business organization type.
5 ptsFull Marks
Identified the type of business organization for each of the 3 business scenarios.
2.5 ptsPartial marks
Addressed some, but not all of the scenarios.
0 ptsNo Marks
No answer provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvide support for selection of business type.
5 ptsFull Marks
Explained why you chose the particular business organization for each scenario.
2.5 ptsPartial Marks
Addressed some, but not all of the scenarios.
0 ptsNo Marks
No answer provided.
5 pts
Total Points: 10

Overview Previously in this course, you considered how to comprehensively approa

Overview
Previously in this course, you considered how to comprehensively approach network assessment. This activity will continue to expand your perspective by letting you address how to comprehensively approach a security assessment at the enterprise level. This can include, but is not limited to, the security of the network and physical security concerns, as well as the behavior of the employees at the organization.
When do you need to complete an enterprise-wide security audit? There are two main motivators for this organization-wide effort— identifying organizational risks and assessing for compliance. This course will focus on how to assess compliance to organizational standards. CYB 410 will focus on identifying organizational risks.
Prompt
For this activity, you are part of a team that is assessing your enterprise. After reviewing the module resources, address the critical elements listed below.
Enterprise Assessment ApproachExplain how you would approach assessing the enterprise.
Explain how you would account for people, process, and technology.
Describe the information you would need to collect to put the big picture of enterprise security together.
Explain what you see as the biggest challenge to this effort.
What to Submit
Your submission should be 2 to 3 pages in length. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Any references should be cited according to APA style. Use a file name that includes the course code, the assignment title, and your name—for example, CYB_123_Assignment_Firstname_Lastname.docx.

For this week’s assignment, please do the following: Watch the 1995 Pepsi commer

For this week’s assignment, please do the following:
Watch the 1995 Pepsi commercial below.
Read the Fact Pattern Download Fact Patternand decide whether you will act as the attorney for Leonard or the attorney for Pepsi. *Fun fact: this case inspired a recent Netflix documentary called “Pepsi, Where’s my Jet?” If saw it, you probably already have an opinion 🙂
Select and complete one of the Questionnaires (Plaintiff or Defendant) following the Fact Pattern. I have attached a pdf and word version below the video – please use whichever one is easier for you.
Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise.pdfDownload Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise.pdf
Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise (Word version)Download Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise (Word version)
Rubric
Leonard v. Pepsico – Was a Contract Formed?
Leonard v. Pepsico – Was a Contract Formed?
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete Plaintiff or Defendant Questionnaire
10 ptsFull Marks
Completed Questionnaire (answered all 4 prompts).
5 ptsPartial Marks
Responded to some but not all prompts.
0 ptsNo Marks
No responses provided.
10 pts
Total Points: 10

Topic: Should the age of contractual capacity be raised? For this week’s Discuss

Topic: Should the age of contractual capacity be raised?
For this week’s Discussion, you will share your your response to the following prompt with your Discussion Group. This is a group discussion, so be sure to reply to at least one other student.
Background: In most states, including California, the contract age of majority is currently age 18. As you’ve learned in this unit, contracts entered into by minors under this age are generally voidable at the minor’s option. This contract doctrine of capacity is based on the policy of protecting minors from their own poor financial decisions and lack of adult-like judgment. Until comparatively recently, the age of contract majority had been 21, and some argue that the law should return to that standard.
Discussion Prompt: Please take one of the following positions: (1) the age of contractual capacity should remain at 18 years old; or (2) why you believe that another age–or another standard, besides age–would be more appropriate for the state to determine that an individual can agree to a legally binding agreement. In crafting your argument for the change, or for maintaining the status quo, you may want to consider biology, changes in culture, or the ability to purchase cigarettes or alcohol have any bearing on this change. Provide two arguments in support of your position.
After you’ve posted your response, please reply to at least one of your classmates. For example, did their argument(s) make you rethink your position? Or did their response give greater strength to your argument?
Directions:
Post your initial reply (10 points) to the topic above.
Read through the other entries and reply (5 points) to at least one classmate.
Please make a substantive contribution to the discussion; short replies such as “I agree” will not earn full points. When you reply, make sure to use professional grammar and punctuation.

Extra Credit Assignment: The Guitar Lessons Bill decides that he wants to learn

Extra Credit Assignment: The Guitar Lessons
Bill decides that he wants to learn to play the guitar. He’s not good with instruments, so he wants someone to teach him. He’s also low on cash, so he’s hoping to get guitar lessons in exchange for a service. He puts signs up all around town that say:
“Wanted: Guitar Lessons. Beginning guitar student will mow your lawn in exchange for lessons. Prefer experienced teacher. Call Bill – 555-5555.”
Jessie sees Bill’s ad. She teaches guitar lessons to a few other students as well. She is currently paying a lawn service to mow her lawn and thinks this arrangement sounds like a good plan – she could drop the lawn service. She calls Bill and says, “sounds like a good plan. I’m in. Let’s start on Monday at 5 pm.”
Answer the following four questions for up to 5 extra credit points:
Is this contract oral or written?
Identify the offer, acceptance and consideration.
Is this contract enforceable?
Do you see any potential problems with this contract?

For this week’s assignment, please do the following: Watch the 1995 Pepsi commer

For this week’s assignment, please do the following:
Watch the 1995 Pepsi commercial below.
Read the Fact Pattern Download Fact Patternand decide whether you will act as the attorney for Leonard or the attorney for Pepsi. *Fun fact: this case inspired a recent Netflix documentary called “Pepsi, Where’s my Jet?” If saw it, you probably already have an opinion 🙂
Select and complete one of the Questionnaires (Plaintiff or Defendant) following the Fact Pattern. I have attached a pdf and word version below the video – please use whichever one is easier for you.
Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise.pdfDownload Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise.pdf
Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise (Word version)Download Leonard v. Pepsi Class Exercise (Word version)
Rubric
Leonard v. Pepsico – Was a Contract Formed?
Leonard v. Pepsico – Was a Contract Formed?
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComplete Plaintiff or Defendant Questionnaire
10 ptsFull Marks
Completed Questionnaire (answered all 4 prompts).
5 ptsPartial Marks
Responded to some but not all prompts.
0 ptsNo Marks
No responses provided.
10 pts
Total Points: 10