Assignment purpose: The focus of this assignment is to solidify an understanding of centromeric DNA (centromere), the kinetochore, unduplicated and duplicated chromosomes, and counting chromosomes during different phases of mitosis.
InstructionsComplete the worksheet provided in the assignment. Embedded media is located in the document.Assignment Chapter 12 The Cell Cycle-2.docxDownload Assignment Chapter 12 The Cell Cycle-2.docx
Attempts are unlimited until the due date.
View the grading rubric.
Suggestions:
Word in Office 365 has a drawing tab. Use a stylus (digital pen) so that your work is legible. Another option: You can also upload the file to Windows whiteboard and write on the document there. Another option is to use the text box feature for labeling.
If you choose to print out the file, photograph each page and convert it to a pdf. There are many apps available to do the task. Also, make sure the initial photo is sized and positioned correctly. It must be legible.
Category: Biology homework help
Create a discussion board thread on any scientific observation in everyday li
Create a discussion board thread on any scientific observation in everyday life. Discuss the hypothesis and how you plan to test your hypothesis.
Include any results (based on observations, you can include figures, facts, data whatever is applicable in your case) and, lastly write a conclusion.
Your scientific methods and observation should not include any assumptions or pseudoscience approaches.
Minimum one paragraph
Please note: your thread will be checked for plagiarism and AI-generated content.
APA format you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a t
APA format
you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a topic of your choice related to vegetarianism. You should follow the provided outline to guide your thoughts. Please do not provide information I did not ask for.
APA format quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can t
APA format
quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can to be on any public health topic (remember the interests you expressed in your introduction).
Do according to the guideline provided.
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation th
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation than you did. Respectfully agree or disagree with their analysis of the timing of the process evaluation and their proposal for adjustments. APA CITATION AND REFERANCES
1-IJEOMA-
Identify the process evaluation article that you chose and explain why you selected this example.
I chose the article “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” by Lachman et al. (2018). I selected this study because it offers a comprehensive and practical example of a process evaluation for an intervention to prevent child maltreatment by promoting positive parenting practices. The study is relevant due to its focus on a low-income context where families face numerous social challenges such as violence, poverty, and limited access to resources. The article also employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data, enriching the evaluation by providing diverse insights into program implementation and feasibility. Further, the study’s focus on local cultural contexts makes it a valuable example of how evidence-based interventions can be adapted for different populations.
Describe the purpose of the evaluation, the informants, the questions asked, and the results of the evaluation.
This process evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a parenting program to low-income families in South Africa, focusing on participant involvement, implementation fidelity, and program acceptability (Lachman et al., 2018). The evaluation aimed to determine whether the program was being delivered as intended, how participants received it, and whether adjustments were needed for future program iterations.
The informants for this evaluation were the parents participating in the program, primarily low-income, isiXhosa-speaking caregivers, and the community facilitators responsible for delivering the program (Lachman et al., 2018). The questions during the evaluation addressed vital aspects such as participant involvement, cultural relevance of the program content, barriers to engagement, and the facilitators’ ability to deliver the program effectively.
The evaluation results indicated high levels of participant involvement and engagement, with parents attending an average of 8.58 out of 12 sessions (Lachman et al., 2018). Program fidelity was strong, with facilitators implementing 92.9% of the manualized activities and high participant satisfaction scores (Lachman et al., 2018). However, the evaluation also revealed challenges, such as parents’ initial resistance to new parenting techniques and difficulties sustaining consistent attendance due to external factors like illness and political unrest.
Identify the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation was conducted.
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation phase of the program. Specifically, it occurred while the intervention was actively delivered to participants, allowing the researchers to assess how well the program was functioning in real-time.
Consider why the researchers chose to evaluate at that stage of program implementation. What kind of information would they have received if they had conducted the evaluation earlier or later?
The researchers likely chose to evaluate the program during the implementation stage to identify any immediate challenges or successes while the program was still in progress (Lachman et al., 2018). Evaluating at this stage provided an opportunity to monitor how well the facilitators adhered to the program model, how the participants were engaging, and what adjustments could be made to improve outcomes. This timing was critical because it allowed for ongoing modifications that could enhance the program’s effectiveness before scaling it further.
Had the researchers conducted the evaluation earlier, such as during the planning or early development stages, they would have missed the opportunity to observe real-time program delivery. They would have needed to capture the practical challenges of implementation. Conversely, after the program’s conclusion, conducting the evaluation later would have provided insights into long-term outcomes. However, it would have missed the chance to make real-time improvements that could enhance participant engagement and fidelity to the program model.
If you were to replicate the study, would you adjust it in any way for more optimal results?
If I were to replicate the study, I would include additional follow-up evaluations to assess the long-term sustainability of the program’s outcomes. While the initial process evaluation was thorough, a follow-up evaluation six months or one year after the program’s conclusion would provide valuable insights into whether parents continued using non-violent discipline techniques and other skills they learned. This would help determine the long-term effectiveness of the intervention and whether additional support or booster sessions are necessary to maintain the program’s positive effects. Additionally, I would consider integrating more rigorous strategies for mitigating external factors, such as illness or political unrest, that affected attendance, perhaps through virtual sessions or community support structures.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018). Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
2-MARIA S-
I chose the article by Lachman et al. (2018) titled “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” due to its comprehensive approach to assessing the implementation of a critical intervention aimed at improving parenting practices in a vulnerable population. The article provides valuable insights into the nuances of process evaluation, particularly in how it informs program fidelity and effectiveness. Similarly, the study by Vil & Angel (2018) on a cross-age peer mentoring program offers another perspective on process evaluations, especially within programs targeting vulnerable populations.
Purpose of the Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the fidelity of a parenting program, understand the context of its implementation, and gather feedback from participants to improve the program’s delivery.
Informants
The informants included program facilitators, parents participating in the program, and community stakeholders. This diverse group provided multiple perspectives on the program’s implementation.
Questions Asked
The evaluation addressed several key questions:
How was the program delivered, and did it adhere to the planned curriculum?
What were the participants’ experiences and perceptions of the program?
What contextual factors influenced the implementation of the program?
Results of the Evaluation
The results indicated that while the program was generally implemented as intended, variations in delivery were noted based on facilitator styles and participant engagement. Participants reported positive changes in parenting practices and increased confidence. However, challenges such as logistical issues and varying levels of participant commitment were identified (Lachman et al., 2018).
Stage of Program Implementation
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation stage of the program. This stage is crucial as it allows for real-time feedback, enabling adjustments to be made to enhance effectiveness while the program is still running.
Rationale for Evaluation Stage
Researchers likely chose to evaluate at this stage to capture the immediate effects of the program and to identify any issues as they arose. Conducting the evaluation earlier could have provided insights into planning and design, while a later evaluation might have focused more on outcomes rather than implementation fidelity (Vil & Angel, 2018).
Replication Considerations
If I were to replicate the study, I would consider incorporating more quantitative measures alongside qualitative feedback to assess the program’s impact more systematically. Additionally, I would ensure a more structured follow-up process to track long-term changes in parenting practices among participants.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018).
Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018). A study of a cross-age peer mentoring program on educationally disconnected young adults. Social Work, 63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approac
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approaches to advocacy. Does your method need to change based on the social problem or geographic region? With APA CITATION AND REFRANCES
1-tracy-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the selection is Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social workers are essential because they can support legislation changes and can help implement public policies to address Domestic violence (NASW, n/d). The social justice brief
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
The chosen selection increased awareness of the importance of social workers, complexities, a preventable severe public health problem, and the many forms of abuse. Usually, the perpetrators are in close relations (NASW, n/d). The brief brought back memories of my experiences and depicted great information, adding protective factors essential for families or individuals. As a person who knows all too well what the long-term effects are, I also see the importance of promoting resilience within yourself and the essentials for seeking treatment strategies, which is why I am in the field of study.
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
To advocate for change locally, one would need the essential education and knowledge of the populations they want to assist, whether from cultural diversity, children or adults, and what interventions and resources are available in their surrounding areas. Social workers have moral obligations to clients to advocate to assist with psychological stressors resulting from Intimate Partner Violence (Wilson & Webb, n/d). They can increase awareness with physicians and mental health professionals (Wilson & Webb, n/d). Individuals often hesitate to disclose any negative adverse issues at home or in the environment. Spreading the word so individuals know there are alternatives to escape their situations and the importance to promote prevention strategies and changes to policies. Also, the analysis depicts the need for additional policies and provisions in addition to strengths-based interventions and advocacy to spread the word locally or nationally by joining a local advocate group or national coalition group to promote increased funding and available shelters.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). National Association of Social Workers, Code of Ethics. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Social justice briefsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-BriefsLinks to an external site.
Wilson, M. H., & Webb, R. (n/d). Social Justice Brief, Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social Justice Brief. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
2-kenneth-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the Social Justice Brief I chose is Opiates in Our Backyard: Implications for Drug Policy. This social justice brief provides demographic data on the increases of heroin use by women and males of every population during 2002-2013 (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
I chose this social justice brief because the description of social work states, “The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021) and this social justice brief details the severity for the needs of service as well as reveal dedicated teamwork and comprehensive-integrated care approaches have proven to be successful with transforming females suffering with a substance abuse disorder to living clean and sober lives, and becoming productive minded citizens (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
I would begin by referencing the positive example that a program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston has successfully engaged opiate using patients with support teams which consisted of addiction physicians, a psychiatrist, and a social worker (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). Utilizing a comprehensive-integrated care approach, patients are triaged to other community groups and helping agencies that can help reduce the cost of care while generating positive treatment outcomes for clients (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). My hook would be to describe that both men and women are experiencing higher levels of substance abuse on a yearly average, however, men have more readily accessible long-term drug treatment facilities in our area than women which is unfair and denying females who are wholeheartedly seeking treatment. I would also explain the importance of collaborating a professionally integrated public workforce that includes social workers to monitor a program for single homeless females suffering with substance use disorder is maintaining a high level of care for each client. Also, members of this population will not just be delivered from homeless, but lives are being saved from possible drug overdose and weather-related deaths as well.
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Wilson, M. H., & Dorn, C. (n.d.). Social Justice Briefs. Retrieved from National Association of Social Workers: https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-Briefs
APA format you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a t
APA format
you are supposed to start developing a mini qualitative study on a topic of your choice related to vegetarianism. You should follow the provided outline to guide your thoughts. Please do not provide information I did not ask for.
APA format quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can t
APA format
quantitative research proposal on any issue of your choice. It can to be on any public health topic (remember the interests you expressed in your introduction).
Do according to the guideline provided.
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation th
Respond to at least two colleagues who chose a different process evaluation than you did. Respectfully agree or disagree with their analysis of the timing of the process evaluation and their proposal for adjustments. APA CITATION AND REFERANCES
1-IJEOMA-
Identify the process evaluation article that you chose and explain why you selected this example.
I chose the article “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” by Lachman et al. (2018). I selected this study because it offers a comprehensive and practical example of a process evaluation for an intervention to prevent child maltreatment by promoting positive parenting practices. The study is relevant due to its focus on a low-income context where families face numerous social challenges such as violence, poverty, and limited access to resources. The article also employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data, enriching the evaluation by providing diverse insights into program implementation and feasibility. Further, the study’s focus on local cultural contexts makes it a valuable example of how evidence-based interventions can be adapted for different populations.
Describe the purpose of the evaluation, the informants, the questions asked, and the results of the evaluation.
This process evaluation aimed to assess the feasibility of delivering a parenting program to low-income families in South Africa, focusing on participant involvement, implementation fidelity, and program acceptability (Lachman et al., 2018). The evaluation aimed to determine whether the program was being delivered as intended, how participants received it, and whether adjustments were needed for future program iterations.
The informants for this evaluation were the parents participating in the program, primarily low-income, isiXhosa-speaking caregivers, and the community facilitators responsible for delivering the program (Lachman et al., 2018). The questions during the evaluation addressed vital aspects such as participant involvement, cultural relevance of the program content, barriers to engagement, and the facilitators’ ability to deliver the program effectively.
The evaluation results indicated high levels of participant involvement and engagement, with parents attending an average of 8.58 out of 12 sessions (Lachman et al., 2018). Program fidelity was strong, with facilitators implementing 92.9% of the manualized activities and high participant satisfaction scores (Lachman et al., 2018). However, the evaluation also revealed challenges, such as parents’ initial resistance to new parenting techniques and difficulties sustaining consistent attendance due to external factors like illness and political unrest.
Identify the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation was conducted.
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation phase of the program. Specifically, it occurred while the intervention was actively delivered to participants, allowing the researchers to assess how well the program was functioning in real-time.
Consider why the researchers chose to evaluate at that stage of program implementation. What kind of information would they have received if they had conducted the evaluation earlier or later?
The researchers likely chose to evaluate the program during the implementation stage to identify any immediate challenges or successes while the program was still in progress (Lachman et al., 2018). Evaluating at this stage provided an opportunity to monitor how well the facilitators adhered to the program model, how the participants were engaging, and what adjustments could be made to improve outcomes. This timing was critical because it allowed for ongoing modifications that could enhance the program’s effectiveness before scaling it further.
Had the researchers conducted the evaluation earlier, such as during the planning or early development stages, they would have missed the opportunity to observe real-time program delivery. They would have needed to capture the practical challenges of implementation. Conversely, after the program’s conclusion, conducting the evaluation later would have provided insights into long-term outcomes. However, it would have missed the chance to make real-time improvements that could enhance participant engagement and fidelity to the program model.
If you were to replicate the study, would you adjust it in any way for more optimal results?
If I were to replicate the study, I would include additional follow-up evaluations to assess the long-term sustainability of the program’s outcomes. While the initial process evaluation was thorough, a follow-up evaluation six months or one year after the program’s conclusion would provide valuable insights into whether parents continued using non-violent discipline techniques and other skills they learned. This would help determine the long-term effectiveness of the intervention and whether additional support or booster sessions are necessary to maintain the program’s positive effects. Additionally, I would consider integrating more rigorous strategies for mitigating external factors, such as illness or political unrest, that affected attendance, perhaps through virtual sessions or community support structures.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018). Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
2-MARIA S-
I chose the article by Lachman et al. (2018) titled “Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa” due to its comprehensive approach to assessing the implementation of a critical intervention aimed at improving parenting practices in a vulnerable population. The article provides valuable insights into the nuances of process evaluation, particularly in how it informs program fidelity and effectiveness. Similarly, the study by Vil & Angel (2018) on a cross-age peer mentoring program offers another perspective on process evaluations, especially within programs targeting vulnerable populations.
Purpose of the Evaluation
The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the fidelity of a parenting program, understand the context of its implementation, and gather feedback from participants to improve the program’s delivery.
Informants
The informants included program facilitators, parents participating in the program, and community stakeholders. This diverse group provided multiple perspectives on the program’s implementation.
Questions Asked
The evaluation addressed several key questions:
How was the program delivered, and did it adhere to the planned curriculum?
What were the participants’ experiences and perceptions of the program?
What contextual factors influenced the implementation of the program?
Results of the Evaluation
The results indicated that while the program was generally implemented as intended, variations in delivery were noted based on facilitator styles and participant engagement. Participants reported positive changes in parenting practices and increased confidence. However, challenges such as logistical issues and varying levels of participant commitment were identified (Lachman et al., 2018).
Stage of Program Implementation
The evaluation was conducted during the implementation stage of the program. This stage is crucial as it allows for real-time feedback, enabling adjustments to be made to enhance effectiveness while the program is still running.
Rationale for Evaluation Stage
Researchers likely chose to evaluate at this stage to capture the immediate effects of the program and to identify any issues as they arose. Conducting the evaluation earlier could have provided insights into planning and design, while a later evaluation might have focused more on outcomes rather than implementation fidelity (Vil & Angel, 2018).
Replication Considerations
If I were to replicate the study, I would consider incorporating more quantitative measures alongside qualitative feedback to assess the program’s impact more systematically. Additionally, I would ensure a more structured follow-up process to track long-term changes in parenting practices among participants.
References
Lachman, J. M., Kelly, J., Cluver, L., Ward, C. L., Hutchings, J., & Gardner, F. (2018).
Process evaluation of a parenting program for low-income families in South Africa. Research on Social Work Practice, 28(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516645665Links to an external site.
Vil, C. S., & Angel, A. (2018). A study of a cross-age peer mentoring program on educationally disconnected young adults. Social Work, 63(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swy033
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approac
Respond to at least two of your colleagues and compare your respective approaches to advocacy. Does your method need to change based on the social problem or geographic region? With APA CITATION AND REFRANCES
1-tracy-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the selection is Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social workers are essential because they can support legislation changes and can help implement public policies to address Domestic violence (NASW, n/d). The social justice brief
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
The chosen selection increased awareness of the importance of social workers, complexities, a preventable severe public health problem, and the many forms of abuse. Usually, the perpetrators are in close relations (NASW, n/d). The brief brought back memories of my experiences and depicted great information, adding protective factors essential for families or individuals. As a person who knows all too well what the long-term effects are, I also see the importance of promoting resilience within yourself and the essentials for seeking treatment strategies, which is why I am in the field of study.
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
To advocate for change locally, one would need the essential education and knowledge of the populations they want to assist, whether from cultural diversity, children or adults, and what interventions and resources are available in their surrounding areas. Social workers have moral obligations to clients to advocate to assist with psychological stressors resulting from Intimate Partner Violence (Wilson & Webb, n/d). They can increase awareness with physicians and mental health professionals (Wilson & Webb, n/d). Individuals often hesitate to disclose any negative adverse issues at home or in the environment. Spreading the word so individuals know there are alternatives to escape their situations and the importance to promote prevention strategies and changes to policies. Also, the analysis depicts the need for additional policies and provisions in addition to strengths-based interventions and advocacy to spread the word locally or nationally by joining a local advocate group or national coalition group to promote increased funding and available shelters.
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). National Association of Social Workers, Code of Ethics. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
National Association of Social Workers. (n.d.). Social justice briefsLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.. https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-BriefsLinks to an external site.
Wilson, M. H., & Webb, R. (n/d). Social Justice Brief, Social Work’s Role in Responding to Intimate Partner Violence. Social Justice Brief. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://www.socialworkers.orgLinks to an external site..
2-kenneth-
Identify the title of the Social Justice Brief you selected.
The title of the Social Justice Brief I chose is Opiates in Our Backyard: Implications for Drug Policy. This social justice brief provides demographic data on the increases of heroin use by women and males of every population during 2002-2013 (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Explain why you chose the Social Justice Brief.
I chose this social justice brief because the description of social work states, “The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic human needs of all people, with particular attention to the needs and empowerment of people who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty” (National Association of Social Workers, 2021) and this social justice brief details the severity for the needs of service as well as reveal dedicated teamwork and comprehensive-integrated care approaches have proven to be successful with transforming females suffering with a substance abuse disorder to living clean and sober lives, and becoming productive minded citizens (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.).
Describe how you might advocate for change based on the analysis in the brief.
I would begin by referencing the positive example that a program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston has successfully engaged opiate using patients with support teams which consisted of addiction physicians, a psychiatrist, and a social worker (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). Utilizing a comprehensive-integrated care approach, patients are triaged to other community groups and helping agencies that can help reduce the cost of care while generating positive treatment outcomes for clients (Wilson & Dorn, n.d.). My hook would be to describe that both men and women are experiencing higher levels of substance abuse on a yearly average, however, men have more readily accessible long-term drug treatment facilities in our area than women which is unfair and denying females who are wholeheartedly seeking treatment. I would also explain the importance of collaborating a professionally integrated public workforce that includes social workers to monitor a program for single homeless females suffering with substance use disorder is maintaining a high level of care for each client. Also, members of this population will not just be delivered from homeless, but lives are being saved from possible drug overdose and weather-related deaths as well.
References
National Association of Social Workers. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Wilson, M. H., & Dorn, C. (n.d.). Social Justice Briefs. Retrieved from National Association of Social Workers: https://www.socialworkers.org/Advocacy/Social-Justice/Social-Justice-Issue-Briefs