Blog

The Hidden Epidemic: Exploring Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

Watch VideoThe Hidden Epidemic: Exploring Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
Duration: 49:39
User: n/a – Added: 2/24/22
Watch VideoWord Prematurity Day 2020 – Ten key concepts in Neonatal Nutrition, by Nicholas Embleton
Duration: 28:12
User: n/a – Added: 11/17/20

Watch VideoClearing the Air: THC & Pregnancy
Duration: 50:38
User: n/a – Added: 4/25/23
1. View these three media selection and discuss new learning for you.9 sentences or more
2. Locate a video of a gentle birth experience and discuss why you selected it. 4 sentences or more make sure to place the location so that it may be viewed
3. If you needed to prepare an informational lecture for new parents on physical growth and development, and fine and gross motor development, discuss what you would want to include in your lecture. 8 sentences or more
4.
Watch VideoPatricia K. Kuhl – The Baby Brain
Duration: 11:50
User: n/a – Added: 4/10/20
Global investigation: after viewing Dr. Kuhl’s video, select a different country other than the United States, unless you select a tribal nation, and explore infant brain development. Discuss differences and similarities that may exist due to culture, nature and nurture. 8 sentences or more

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step 1: Break Down the Assignment

This assignment consists of four main parts:

  1. Reflecting on three specific videos.
  2. Locating and discussing a gentle birth experience video.
  3. Preparing an outline for an informational lecture on child development.
  4. Conducting a global investigation of infant brain development based on Dr. Kuhl’s video.

Step 2: Review the Provided Videos

Before you begin writing, watch the following videos:

  1. The Hidden Epidemic: Exploring Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
  2. Word Prematurity Day 2020 – Ten Key Concepts in Neonatal Nutrition
  3. Clearing the Air: THC & Pregnancy

Take notes on key points, focusing on:

  • New concepts or facts you learned.
  • Key takeaways that stood out to you.
  • Real-world implications or applications of the information presented.

Step 3: Writing About New Learnings (9 Sentences or More)

  • Start with an introductory sentence that identifies the three videos you watched.
  • Dedicate at least two sentences to each video. Summarize the main topic and discuss what you learned.
  • Conclude with a sentence summarizing your overall thoughts or connecting the themes across all three videos.

Step 4: Find and Discuss a Gentle Birth Experience Video (4 Sentences or More)

  • Search for a video online, such as on YouTube. Use search terms like “gentle birth experience” or “natural home birth.”
  • Write the title of the video, its duration, and a link (if required).
  • Discuss:
    • Why you chose this video.
    • How it represents a gentle birth.
    • What stood out to you about the environment or process.

Step 5: Outline an Informational Lecture (8 Sentences or More)

In your paper:

  1. Start with an introduction stating why it’s important for parents to understand physical growth and motor development.
  2. Discuss growth milestones (e.g., weight, height).
  3. Explain fine motor skills, giving examples such as grasping or pointing.
  4. Cover gross motor skills, such as crawling and walking.
  5. Highlight activities that help parents support their child’s development (e.g., tummy time, sensory play).
  6. Mention the role of proper nutrition and when to consult a pediatrician.
  7. Include an emphasis on individual developmental timelines.
  8. Conclude by encouraging parents to engage in safe, supportive play.

Step 6: Global Investigation of Infant Brain Development (8 Sentences or More)

  1. Watch Patricia K. Kuhl – The Baby Brain and note key points about infant brain plasticity and early language development.
  2. Choose a country or tribal nation for comparison (e.g., Japan, Sweden, or Navajo Nation).
  3. Research and note cultural practices that influence infant brain development, including parenting styles, early education, and language exposure.
  4. Compare similarities, such as biological processes of brain development, and differences, such as cultural values and environmental factors.
  5. Conclude with a discussion on how culture, nature, and nurture work together to shape development.

Step 7: Format Your Paper

  • Use clear headings for each section (e.g., “New Learnings,” “Gentle Birth Video,” “Lecture Outline,” “Global Investigation”).
  • Write in paragraphs with proper transitions.
  • Proofread for grammar and flow.

Step 8: Final Review

  • Check the assignment instructions to ensure all parts are addressed.
  • Ensure you’ve written the required number of sentences for each section.
  • Submit your paper as per the instructor’s requirements.

Silent Invaders: Asian Carp

Watch the video in YuJa Media channel for this class: “Silent Invaders, Asian Carp” If you have problems viewing it there, try a different browser or look for it in YouTube. Here is the link:https://youtu.be/rPeg1tbBt0A Use the textbook and any other sources including Youtube videos after you have watched “Silent Invaders…” answer these questions while considering the three pillars of sustainability – social, economic, and environmental factors and concepts from the course materials (readings, PowerPoints). Don’t just use the information from the video! Paragraph format, listing, bullet points, whatever you prefer. Individual Assignment submission.
Identify one issue, concern, or cause of the problem with Asian Carp using each of the 3 pillars of sustainability. (total 9 points)
Secondly, identify one solution for Asian Carp for each of the three pillars of sustainability. (2 points each for total of 6 points)
Be creative, but support your choices and statements!

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step 1: Watch the Video

  • Begin by watching the video “Silent Invaders: Asian Carp” on the YuJa Media Channel or YouTube.
  • Pay attention to the environmental, economic, and social issues caused by Asian Carp, as well as any solutions discussed.

Step 2: Review Course Materials

  • Read through your textbook, PowerPoints, and any assigned readings for concepts related to the three pillars of sustainability:
    1. Environmental: Impact on ecosystems, biodiversity, water quality.
    2. Economic: Costs to industries, damage to local economies, control methods.
    3. Social: Effects on local communities, recreation, and public awareness.

Step 3: Address the Issues by Pillar

Write one issue caused by Asian Carp for each pillar of sustainability. Be specific, citing examples from the video and other sources.

  • Environmental Issue:
    • Example: Asian Carp outcompete native species for resources, disrupting ecosystems and biodiversity.
  • Economic Issue:
    • Example: The fishing industry suffers financial losses due to declining native fish populations.
  • Social Issue:
    • Example: Recreational boating and fishing are negatively impacted by the invasive species’ aggressive behavior.

Step 4: Propose Solutions by Pillar

Suggest one creative solution for each pillar. Support your ideas with evidence.

  • Environmental Solution:
    • Example: Implement biological controls, such as introducing natural predators or sterilization programs, to limit Asian Carp reproduction.
  • Economic Solution:
    • Example: Develop a commercial market for Asian Carp, such as exporting them as a food source.
  • Social Solution:
    • Example: Launch public awareness campaigns encouraging community-led carp removal events.

Step 5: Organize Your Response

Choose your preferred format: paragraph, bullet points, or a mix. Ensure you:

  1. Clearly explain each issue and solution.
  2. Tie each to the respective pillar of sustainability.
  3. Incorporate concepts from the course materials and cite external sources where applicable.

Example Response (Bullet Format):

Issues:

  • Environmental: Asian Carp dominate waterways, pushing out native species and disrupting the food web.
  • Economic: Commercial fishermen lose revenue as native fish populations decline.
  • Social: The threat of leaping carp endangers recreational boaters and deters tourism.

Solutions:

  • Environmental: Fund research into genetic modifications to limit carp reproduction.
  • Economic: Incentivize carp fishing by creating partnerships with restaurants and food processors.
  • Social: Organize local fishing derbies to remove carp while engaging communities.

Step 6: Proofread and Submit

  • Review your work for clarity and grammar.
  • Ensure all sources are cited (e.g., textbook, video, YouTube).
  • Submit the assignment according to your instructor’s guidelines.

By following these steps, you’ll create a comprehensive response addressing the problem of Asian Carp through the lens of sustainability.

Mastering Error Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide to Reviewing Faulty Student Work

CHOOSE PROBLEM #4
Analyzing erroneous student work can improve your own understanding and ability to explain the steps for solving an equation.
For this group discussion, you will review the provided faulty solutions and hypothetical student work within your group. The seven questions address the learning objectives from Modules 1 and 2. Each group member should analyze a different question, so be sure to communicate in your group who is taking which question.
The document is hand-written, similar to the Show Work documents you are required to submit in Modules 5 and 9. If a screen-reader-accessible document is required, please refer to the following Module 2 Student Show Work Typed document.
Module 2 Student Show Work (PDF)Download Module 2 Student Show Work (PDF)
Module 2 Student Show Work Typed (DOCX)Download Module 2 Student Show Work Typed (DOCX)
Analyze the work to determine:
What error(s) did the student include?
Why the student may have made each error.
Rework the problem so that it is correct

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your analysis easily!

In this group discussion, you’ll need to carefully analyze the provided faulty solutions and hypothetical student work. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you break down the process and understand how to address the errors in the student’s work effectively:

Step 1: Review the Provided Problem and Student Work

Before analyzing, make sure you understand the question and the problem that the student is trying to solve. Read through the student’s work thoroughly and pay attention to each step they took in attempting the solution.

  • Understand the equation or concept involved: This is crucial to identifying where the student made the mistake.
  • Focus on the student’s reasoning: What were they trying to do in each step? Did they use the correct operations or make an incorrect assumption?

Step 2: Identify the Error(s) in the Student’s Work

Examine the student’s solution to pinpoint exactly where the error occurred. Common errors can include:

  • Misapplication of math rules (e.g., distributive property, factoring errors, sign errors).
  • Incorrect operations (e.g., multiplying when they should add or subtract).
  • Incorrect steps or skipped steps (e.g., forgetting to apply the order of operations).

Ask yourself these questions:

  • What is the first step the student performed incorrectly?
  • Did they make a calculation mistake?
  • Did they forget a necessary step or misinterpret a rule?

Step 3: Analyze Why the Error Occurred

Reflect on why the student made the error. Errors can stem from various misunderstandings or lapses in the following:

  • Misunderstanding of math concepts: They may have misunderstood the rule or operation required for that step.
  • Mistakes from rushing or skipping steps: The student might have been too quick and neglected to check their work.
  • Lack of familiarity with the method: The student might not have had enough practice with a particular strategy or equation-solving technique.

This step helps you understand the student’s thought process and how they arrived at the mistake.

Step 4: Rework the Problem Correctly

Now that you’ve identified and understood the error, it’s time to fix it. Here’s how you can do it:

  • Follow the correct steps: Go through the solution from start to finish and apply the right methods.
  • Write out every step: This will help you ensure accuracy and provide clear reasoning.
  • Check the final answer: Make sure your final solution makes sense and is consistent with the rules of the problem.

For example, if the error was in simplifying an equation, walk through the correct method for simplifying and solving that equation, checking at each step for accuracy.

Step 5: Communicate the Error and Correct Approach

When sharing your analysis with the group, make sure to clearly explain:

  • Where the student went wrong: Briefly explain the error.
  • Why the mistake was made: Offer a reasonable explanation for the student’s error (based on the steps they took).
  • How to solve it correctly: Walk through the correct process to help your group members understand how to reach the solution.

Step 6: Submit Your Work

Once you’ve reworked the problem and are confident with your analysis, compile your findings and submit them to your group or instructor according to the assignment guidelines.

 

Exploring Six Sigma: Core Concepts, Evolution, and Comparison with TQM

Write a 3-5 page paper that identifies quality improvement processes and methodologies using industry standards. You paper should be APA formatted and a minimum of 3 references are required. You should have four sections that address the following questions:
What are the core concepts of the Six Sigma philosophy?
Describe the evolution of quality management and how it influenced the Six Sigma philosophy.
How does Six Sigma differ from TQM (total quality management)? How is it similar?
Explain the definitions of quality from an operations management perspective, and from a customer perspectives.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your paper easily!

Writing this paper will require you to analyze and describe the core concepts of Six Sigma, its evolution, and its relationship to other quality management methodologies. Here’s a detailed, step-by-step guide to help you structure and write your paper effectively:

Step 1: Understand the Paper’s Structure and Requirements

Your paper must be organized into four sections, each addressing a specific question:

  1. Core Concepts of Six Sigma Philosophy
  2. Evolution of Quality Management and Its Influence on Six Sigma
  3. Comparison of Six Sigma and Total Quality Management (TQM)
  4. Definitions of Quality: Operations Management vs. Customer Perspective

Each section should be clearly labeled and include a thoughtful response to the questions. The paper should follow APA formatting, with a minimum of 3 references (new, credible sources), and should be between 3-5 pages in length.

Step 2: Research and Gather Sources

To support your paper, you will need to conduct research and gather at least three references. These could include:

  • Scholarly journal articles on Six Sigma and TQM.
  • Books or industry reports on quality management methodologies.
  • Case studies or articles that explain the evolution of Six Sigma and quality management in real-world contexts.

Be sure to focus on recent, credible sources and take note of specific details you can use in your analysis of Six Sigma, TQM, and quality management.

Step 3: Plan the Structure of Your Paper

Here’s how to break down each section:

Introduction

In your introduction, briefly introduce the topic of quality management and its importance in various industries. Include a thesis statement that outlines what you will cover in the paper.

Section 1: Core Concepts of Six Sigma Philosophy

This section should focus on explaining Six Sigma. Be sure to:

  • Define Six Sigma as a methodology aimed at reducing defects and improving process quality.
  • Explain key terms like “DMAIC” (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), “defects per million opportunities (DPMO),” and “process improvement.”
  • Discuss the role of data-driven decision-making and the focus on continuous improvement.

Section 2: Evolution of Quality Management and Its Influence on Six Sigma

In this section, describe the history and evolution of quality management. Discuss:

  • The development of quality control practices and their transformation into more systematic methodologies.
  • Key figures and milestones in quality management history, such as W. Edwards Deming and Joseph Juran, and how their work influenced Six Sigma.
  • The shift from quality control to quality management and the eventual introduction of Six Sigma.

Section 3: Six Sigma vs. Total Quality Management (TQM)

Here, compare and contrast Six Sigma and TQM. Consider the following:

  • How Six Sigma focuses on statistical data and reducing process variation, while TQM focuses on continuous improvement and customer satisfaction.
  • The similarities, such as both methodologies focusing on quality improvement and engaging employees at all levels.
  • Differences, such as the emphasis on measuring defects (Six Sigma) vs. improving customer satisfaction (TQM).

Section 4: Definitions of Quality: Operations Management vs. Customer Perspective

In this section, provide definitions of quality from two perspectives:

  • Operations Management Perspective: Define quality as the conformance to specifications, efficiency, and minimizing defects in the production process.
  • Customer Perspective: Define quality as the ability to meet customer needs and expectations, often focusing on subjective factors like satisfaction and experience.

Step 4: Write the Paper

Now that you have a structure in place, begin writing the paper:

  • Introduction: Clearly state the purpose of the paper and outline the main points you will discuss.
  • Body Sections: Write each section based on the research and the details you have gathered.
  • Conclusion: Summarize the main points and offer a final takeaway on how Six Sigma has influenced modern quality management.

As you write, remember to:

  • Use APA-style in-text citations to reference your sources.
  • Keep a formal, academic tone throughout the paper.
  • Ensure that each section flows logically to the next, with clear transitions.

Step 5: Format the Paper

Ensure that your paper follows APA formatting:

  • Title Page: Include the title of your paper, your name, course title, instructor’s name, and date.
  • Font: Use a standard font like Times New Roman, size 12.
  • Spacing: Double-space the entire paper, with no extra spaces between paragraphs.
  • Page Numbers: Include page numbers in the header.
  • References: Create a separate reference page with at least three sources, properly formatted in APA style.

Step 6: Edit and Revise

After writing your paper, review it carefully:

  • Check for clarity and coherence in your argument.
  • Ensure that each section addresses the question thoroughly and that your analysis is well-supported by evidence.
  • Proofread for grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and APA formatting issues.

Step 7: Submit Your Paper

Once you are satisfied with your revision, finalize your paper and submit it. Double-check that all formatting, citations, and references are correct.

Mastering Your Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Now that you have selected your text and practiced identifying and analyzing rhetorical situations, it is time to complete a rough draft of your Rhetorical Analysis Essay. Review the Module 1 Heads-Up: Rhetorical Analysis Essay page for full instructions.
Your essay should include the following:
An introduction identifying the text and previewing the major points of your analysis
A body with several paragraphs of analysis
A conclusion wrapping up your main ideas and leaving your reader with an overall takeaway
Your essay should be at least 750 words in length (not including title or reference pages) and should follow APA guidelines for formatting student papers (double-spaced, standard font, page numbers, and a title page following the student paper format). You do not need an abstract. On your reference page, provide a link to the text you are analyzing.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your Rhetorical Analysis Essay easily!

Writing a rhetorical analysis essay can seem challenging at first, but by breaking it down into steps, you can approach it with confidence. Here’s a detailed guide to help you structure and write your essay:

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of the Rhetorical Analysis Essay

A rhetorical analysis essay asks you to examine how an author or speaker uses various rhetorical strategies to persuade or inform an audience. Your task is to identify the strategies used, evaluate their effectiveness, and discuss the intended impact on the audience.

Step 2: Choose Your Text

Make sure you’ve selected a text to analyze. This could be a speech, article, advertisement, or any other piece that uses rhetorical strategies to communicate a message. Be sure to:

  • Choose a text that provides clear examples of rhetorical strategies like ethos, pathos, and logos.
  • Ensure you have access to the full text, and be ready to cite it on your reference page.

Step 3: Review the Rhetorical Situation

Before writing, review the rhetorical situation of your text. This includes:

  • Author: Who is the author, and what are their credentials? Why are they credible in discussing this topic?
  • Audience: Who is the intended audience for the text? How does the author tailor the message to this group?
  • Purpose: What is the author’s goal in creating this text? Are they trying to persuade, inform, entertain, or something else?
  • Context: What are the circumstances surrounding the creation of the text? Is it a response to a particular event or issue?
  • Message: What is the central message or argument of the text?

Understanding these elements will help you effectively analyze how the author uses rhetorical strategies.

Step 4: Plan the Structure of Your Essay

Your essay will be divided into three main sections: the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Here’s how to approach each:

Introduction

  • Identify the text you are analyzing (provide the title, author, and a brief description of the content).
  • Preview the major points you will discuss in your analysis. This can include a brief mention of the rhetorical strategies used by the author and how they contribute to the overall message.

Body Paragraphs

  • Divide your body into several paragraphs, each focusing on one major rhetorical strategy or one aspect of the rhetorical situation.

For example:

  • Ethos (Credibility): Discuss how the author establishes their credibility and authority on the topic.
  • Pathos (Emotion): Analyze how the author appeals to the audience’s emotions and whether it’s effective.
  • Logos (Logic): Examine how the author uses logical arguments, facts, and reasoning to persuade the audience.
  • Style and Tone: Consider the author’s choice of language and tone. How does it impact the message and audience?
  • Audience and Purpose: Explore how the text addresses the needs and interests of the intended audience.

Each paragraph should include:

  • Topic sentence: A clear statement of what the paragraph will discuss.
  • Evidence: Specific examples from the text that demonstrate the rhetorical strategies.
  • Analysis: Explain how the examples you provided contribute to the effectiveness of the overall argument or message.

Conclusion

  • Summarize your main points from the body paragraphs.
  • Provide an overall takeaway: How effective was the author in using rhetorical strategies to achieve their goal? Consider the impact of the text on the intended audience.

Step 5: Write the Essay

Now that you have a clear structure, start writing your essay. Ensure that each section flows logically from one to the next. For each rhetorical strategy, provide concrete examples from the text and explain how they work.

Step 6: Format Your Essay

Follow the APA guidelines for formatting your paper:

  • Title Page: Include the title of your essay, your name, course name, instructor’s name, and the date.
  • Font: Use a standard font like Times New Roman, size 12.
  • Spacing: Your paper should be double-spaced throughout, with no extra spaces between paragraphs.
  • Page Numbers: Include page numbers in the header of your paper.
  • References: List your sources in APA format on the reference page. Include a link to the text you are analyzing.

Step 7: Edit and Revise

Once you’ve written your essay, take time to revise. Here’s what to look for:

  • Clarity: Are your ideas presented clearly? Have you explained how the rhetorical strategies work in the text?
  • Flow: Does each paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
  • Grammar and Spelling: Proofread for any grammatical or spelling errors.
  • Word Count: Ensure your essay is at least 750 words (not including the title or reference page).

Step 8: Submit Your Essay

Once you’re satisfied with your revisions, finalize your paper and submit it according to your course’s guidelines. Double-check that you’ve met all requirements, such as word count, APA formatting, and providing a link to the text.

Mediation: Key Considerations for Company Participation in Legal Disputes

Suppose that you are the HR manager for a company. The judge in a current law suit by a former employee has ordered mandatory pre-suit mediation. Your boss is unfamiliar with mediation and she asks you to advise her as to several issues regarding the upcoming mediation. Draft a memo thoroughly discussing, at minimum, the following questions:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of mediation? Is it likely to be successful? Is it likely to make the parties more or less hostile toward one another? How do the costs in terms of time and money compare with litigation?
If your boss has no interest in mediation, does she really have to be there? Can she send her attorney instead? If so, are there any conflicts of interest with respect to attorney advocate representation of which she should be aware?
Must the company actually participate in the mediation? Can your boss (or her attorney) just sit there and refuse to speak?
If your boss (or her attorney) does decide to engage in dialogue during the mediation, what are the risks concerning information that might be disclosed? If the mediation fails, can the former employee use such information at trial?
Although this assignment is completed in Week 3, students should refer to information in Lessons 3, 4, and 7 for relevant information.
Submission Instructions:
This assignment should at a minimum contain 1,000 words of content (there are four parts, so this is ~250 words each). Word count does not include headings, cover pages, references, or question text (if you choose to include it in your paper); I am looking for 1,000 words of substance. Your paper should be in APA format including a properly formatted cover page (abstracts are optional) and a reference page with at least three (3) NEW references (“new” here means references that you have not already used in previous assignments in this course). Providing additional references to your assignments demonstrates your desire to conduct additional research on the topic area, and can improve your research skills.
With all assignments, include properly formatted in-text citations within the body of your work for each of your listed references so the reader can ascertain your original thoughts or ideas as well as the portion of your work that is credited to credible sources. It is very important to identify work from other sources to ensure that proper credit is provided to researchers in the field. This assignment uses Turn It In for originality verification.
Submit the weekly written assignment as an MS Word attachment (.doc or .docx format). A recommended font is 12pt Times New Roman.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Writing this memo requires you to break it down into manageable steps. Here’s a detailed, step-by-step guide to help you structure and write your paper effectively:

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of the Memo

You are drafting a memo to advise your boss on the upcoming mediation. The memo needs to address several questions regarding the advantages, disadvantages, and processes involved in mediation, and how it compares to litigation. Understanding each question is crucial to developing clear, well-supported responses. The goal is to educate your boss, provide a balanced view, and offer practical advice.

Step 2: Analyze the Questions

The assignment outlines several questions you must cover in your memo. It is important to address each question thoroughly, providing a detailed analysis of the topic.

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of mediation?
    Research the benefits (such as cost and time savings) and drawbacks (such as limited enforcement power or risk of non-resolution) of mediation.
  • Is mediation likely to be successful?
    This involves discussing the circumstances where mediation works well and factors that could influence its success.
  • Is mediation likely to make the parties more or less hostile toward one another?
    Explore whether mediation generally improves relationships between the parties or exacerbates conflicts.
  • How do the costs in terms of time and money compare with litigation?
    Discuss the cost-effectiveness of mediation in comparison to the potentially higher costs and longer timeframes of litigation.
  • Does your boss need to be present? Can she send an attorney instead?
    This requires researching the requirements for a company’s representation in mediation and any potential conflicts of interest with attorney representation.
  • Must the company participate in mediation? Can your boss refuse to speak?
    Look into the legal obligations surrounding participation in mediation, and what could happen if your boss or attorney remains silent.
  • What are the risks regarding information disclosed during the mediation?
    Identify risks related to confidentiality, such as whether information shared in mediation could be used later in court if the mediation fails.

Step 3: Research and Gather Sources

Next, conduct research to support each part of the memo. You will need to find at least three new references (these should be articles, books, or other credible sources that have not been used in your previous assignments). Be sure to:

  • Use academic or legal sources that provide reliable, evidence-based information.
  • Gather references on topics like mediation processes, its advantages and disadvantages, cost comparisons with litigation, and ethical/legal considerations during mediation.

Step 4: Structure Your Memo

The memo should be clearly structured with distinct headings for each question. Here’s how you can organize the content:

  1. Introduction:
    Briefly introduce the purpose of the memo and outline the topics you will cover.
  2. Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation:
    Discuss both sides of mediation—its benefits and drawbacks.
  3. Likelihood of Mediation Success:
    Offer insights on when mediation is likely to succeed, supported by examples or case studies.
  4. Impact on Hostility Between Parties:
    Address whether mediation tends to reduce or increase hostility, providing arguments for both sides.
  5. Cost Comparison with Litigation:
    Present a comparison of costs, including time and financial considerations.
  6. Required Participation in Mediation:
    Clarify your boss’s role in the mediation process, and if she can send an attorney instead.
  7. Information Disclosure Risks:
    Discuss the risks of revealing too much information during the mediation process.
  8. Conclusion:
    Summarize the key points and offer your recommendation regarding participation in the mediation process.

Step 5: Write the Memo

Now that you have a clear structure, start writing the memo. For each section:

  • Be concise, clear, and factual.
  • Use APA in-text citations to credit your sources within the body of your work.
  • Maintain a formal, professional tone throughout the memo.

Step 6: Format Your Paper

Ensure the paper follows proper APA format:

  • Title page: Include the title of your memo, your name, course title, and date.
  • References: List your sources on a separate page in APA format.
  • Use in-text citations wherever you mention information from your sources.

Step 7: Review and Edit

Once you have written the memo, review it for clarity, coherence, and completeness. Check for any grammatical or spelling errors. Ensure you have:

  • Addressed all the questions.
  • Cited all sources correctly.
  • Met the word count requirement of 1,000 words (excluding cover page, references, and question text).

Step 8: Submit Your Paper

After reviewing, finalize your paper and submit it according to the course instructions. Be sure to check the word count to ensure that you’ve met the requirement and that everything is formatted correctly.

Choosing the Right Research Paradigm for My Dissertation: A Guide to Qualitative Design

In this assignment, you will write a paper no longer than 1500 words on your research paradigm/interpretive framework and theoretical perspective(s). You will provide a description of your chosen paradigm that will guide your dissertation research and a rationale for choosing the paradigm. You will also describe the ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions of the paradigm, providing 1-2 examples on how your dissertation research reflects each dimension. (if you are reimagining your topic with a qualitative design you will complete this exercise with that lens in mind, rather than the paradigm that would go with your quantitative study). Be sure to include your word count at the end (references are not included in your word count). You do not need to submit a cover page or abstract for this assignment. You may find our January Griffin day readings and class session materials helpful in supporting the completion of this assignment. I’ve also included a brief description of my dissertation topic and a summary of my research topic for your reference in completing this assignment. Finally, I’ve also attached examples provided by the instructor for the course for your review.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

For this assignment, you’ll be tasked with identifying the research paradigm that best aligns with your dissertation research and explaining the underlying philosophical assumptions behind it. Since you’re considering a qualitative design, you will focus on a qualitative paradigm, providing a clear rationale for your choice and exploring its ontological, epistemological, and axiological dimensions.

Here’s a structure to guide your response:

1. Introduction:

  • Topic Introduction: Briefly introduce your dissertation topic to set the context for the discussion of the research paradigm. For example, if your dissertation explores the impact of a certain intervention on patient care, introduce the topic in a few sentences.
  • Research Paradigm Selection: State the qualitative research paradigm that you will adopt, such as constructivism, interpretivism, or phenomenology.

2. Description of the Chosen Paradigm:

  • Overview of the Paradigm: Provide a concise explanation of the selected paradigm. For instance, if you choose constructivism, explain how it focuses on the subjective meanings individuals give to their experiences, and how knowledge is co-constructed between the researcher and participants.
  • Rationale for Choosing the Paradigm: Explain why this paradigm is appropriate for your dissertation. Why does this paradigm align with your research questions, goals, and the nature of the phenomenon you are studying? For example, if your research focuses on understanding the lived experiences of healthcare workers, a phenomenological approach might be ideal because it focuses on exploring how individuals perceive and make sense of their experiences.

3. Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Dimensions:

  • Ontological Dimension (Nature of Reality):
    • Definition: Ontology deals with questions about the nature of reality—what exists and how we understand it.
    • Example: If you are exploring the perceptions of healthcare workers regarding a new policy, your ontological stance may be that reality is subjective and constructed from the personal experiences and beliefs of the participants.
    • Reflection on Research: Explain how your research assumes that reality is fluid and subjective, meaning that each participant’s experience of the policy will be different and co-created during the research process.
  • Epistemological Dimension (Nature of Knowledge):
    • Definition: Epistemology deals with the nature and scope of knowledge—how we know what we know.
    • Example: If you adopt an interpretivist stance, you might argue that knowledge is constructed through the interaction between the researcher and the participants, where the meaning of experiences is co-constructed through dialogue.
    • Reflection on Research: For example, you might note that in interviews, the researcher and participants collaboratively construct meaning about healthcare policies and practices, which can then be interpreted to build knowledge on how to improve patient care.
  • Axiological Dimension (Role of Values):
    • Definition: Axiology deals with the role of values in research—how researchers’ values influence the research process and outcomes.
    • Example: In a qualitative study, the researcher’s values may influence how they interpret data, as well as the relationship they establish with participants.
    • Reflection on Research: For example, you could discuss how your own values around the importance of equitable healthcare may shape the questions you ask participants, the interpretation of their responses, and the way you present the findings.

4. Conclusion:

  • Summary: Provide a brief conclusion that reiterates the importance of the selected research paradigm for your dissertation. Emphasize why it’s the best fit for your study and how it supports the exploration of your research questions.
  • Word Count: Don’t forget to include your word count at the end (excluding references).

Example: If you are studying healthcare worker experiences with burnout, your paradigm might be constructivism because it allows you to explore how individuals construct their understanding of burnout through personal experiences and social contexts. Your ontology might be subjective, as burnout is experienced differently by each individual. Epistemologically, you might take a co-constructivist approach, where you work closely with participants to understand their experiences, and your axiological stance might be rooted in the values of promoting mental health and supporting work environments for caregivers.


This exercise helps you solidify your approach to research and clarify your philosophical stance, which will guide your entire dissertation process. Let me know if you need help narrowing down the specific paradigm or any other details!

Exploring Newton’s 3 Laws: A Cosmic Journey into Motion

You are going to create a Podcast/Vidcast about Newtons 3 Laws and share it with the world!
NASA’s DIY Podcast Instructions.pdf Download NASA’s DIY Podcast Instructions.pdfwill take you to NASA’s instruction’s on “Do-It-Yourself Podcasts”.
NASA videosLinks to an external site. will take you to the videos you will use to create your Podcast!
It can be just audio or both audio and video.
Have fun!!
Submit the finished project here! (Either the link to the RSS feed or the audio/video file itself)
Reference the RUBRIC Download RUBRICfor more details on grading!
I provided the links, I’ll just need a transcript written for the “podcast” thanks so much

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Creating a podcast or vidcast about Newton’s 3 Laws is a fantastic project! Here’s a step-by-step guide based on NASA’s DIY Podcast instructions:

 

1. Plan Your Content:

  • Introduction: Start with a brief introduction to Newton’s 3 Laws of Motion and their importance in understanding how objects move. Mention that your podcast/vidcast will explain each law with examples from everyday life and science.
  • Newton’s First Law (Law of Inertia): Explain that an object at rest will stay at rest, and an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by an external force. Use an example like a car coming to a sudden stop and how passengers lurch forward.
  • Newton’s Second Law (F=ma): Explain how force is related to mass and acceleration. For example, use a car pushing a lighter object versus a heavier one. You can also describe how rockets launch into space by applying force to overcome the Earth’s gravity.
  • Newton’s Third Law (Action and Reaction): Discuss how every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A fun example is the launch of a balloon (when air is pushed out, the balloon moves in the opposite direction).
  • Conclusion: Wrap up by summarizing the laws and explaining their relevance in fields like space travel, sports, and even our everyday activities.

2. Format:

  • Audio-Only Podcast: If you’re going for an audio podcast, you can use sound effects or music to make the experience engaging. NASA’s sound resources (like rocket launches or space sounds) could be great additions!
  • Vidcast (Audio + Video): For a vidcast, consider using visuals or animations to illustrate each of Newton’s Laws. You can integrate clips from NASA’s videos to show real-world applications of the laws in space missions or everyday situations.

3. Gather Resources:

  • Review the NASA DIY Podcast Instructions to help with structure, recording tips, and technical details. They might include how to edit, upload, and share your podcast.
  • Check out NASA Videos for content that showcases Newton’s Laws in space. You could use these clips as examples or visual aids in your vidcast.

4. Record Your Podcast/Vidcast:

  • Use a microphone or your phone to record the audio. If you’re creating a vidcast, use video editing software like iMovie, Adobe Premiere, or Windows Movie Maker to combine your narration with visuals.
  • Be clear and engaging! Speak at a comfortable pace, and consider adding a little humor or fun facts to keep your audience interested.

5. Editing:

  • Once your content is recorded, listen through to ensure clarity. Edit out any mistakes or awkward pauses.
  • Add transitions or sound effects, such as the whoosh of a rocket or the sound of a car’s brakes, to reinforce the concepts.
  • If you’re making a vidcast, sync the visuals to your audio.

6. Upload and Share:

  • Follow NASA’s instructions for uploading your podcast or vidcast. Share it with the world on platforms like YouTube, Spotify, or even a personal website.
  • Consider creating a social media post or a blog entry to promote your podcast/vidcast. Use hashtags like #NewtonsLaws #SciencePodcast #SpaceScience to reach a wider audience.

7. Engagement:

  • Encourage your listeners or viewers to share their thoughts. You could ask questions or prompt them to think about how they see Newton’s Laws in their daily lives.

This project is an opportunity to combine your knowledge of Newton’s Laws with creativity and technology to reach an audience that might be curious about physics! Let me know if you need help with anything specific while creating your podcast/vidcast!

Filling Out the DSM-5 Intervention Matrix for ASD Treatment Planning

For this assignment, you will fill out the DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template [DOCX], as a foundation for your ASD treatment plan you will complete in the Weeks 7 and 9 assignments.
Download and save DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template [DOCX] to your computer.
Review the Core Autism Symptoms and Behavior Analytic Intervention table in this template.
Define operationally one behavior that would fall under each category.You may review the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-2 (GARS-2) Sample Results [DOCX] (or other resources) for some possibilities.
Behaviors can be something you are actually seeing as a clinician (remember to leave out all names and identifying information), or can be hypothetical behaviors or behaviors you find in a case study.
Make sure definition is observable and measurable, clearly stated, and includes examples and non-examples.
Review the peer-reviewed literature to find behavior analytic intervention that would be appropriate for that particular behavior.You might start your search by reviewing evidence-based practices in this week’s readings.
Week 5: DSM-5 Potential Intervention MatrixLinks to an external site. reading list.
Make sure the intervention is behavior analytic and has a strong scientific evidence base.
Review the literature to find at least two peer-reviewed journal articles that support that intervention. One must have been written in the last 5 years. (Contact instructor if you are unable to find this.)
Be sure to consider functions (hypothetically if needed) when reviewing the literature, if you are targeting a challenging behavior.
Fill out the remainder of the DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template.Write an ABA intervention strategy you could use, and cite your chosen journal articles. (This should be 2-4 paragraphs.) Remember that you could combine several strategies (you don’t have to for purposes of this assignment), or you can use the same strategy for different behaviors (differences would be found as you develop your comprehensive plan).Note: This should be written below the table in the template, after the “ABA Intervention Strategy” header.
Overall, your assignment submission will be assessed based on the following criteria:
Define at least one behavior for each of the seven DSM-5 criteria: Deficits.
Identify at least one behavior analytic intervention for the defined behavior for each of the seven DSM-5 criteria: Deficits.
Describe an ABA intervention strategy that is supported by specific evidence from credible and relevant sources.
Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.
Additional Requirements
Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:
Template: You must submit your completed DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template [DOCX] for this assignment.
References: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence. At least one of the resources should be no more than five years old.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

This assignment involves filling out the DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template to define behaviors related to ASD, identify appropriate interventions, and provide evidence-based support for those interventions. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you complete the task effectively:


Step 1: Download the DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template

  • Locate and download the [DSM-5 Intervention Matrix Template DOCX] to your computer.
  • Familiarize yourself with the structure of the template, particularly the Core Autism Symptoms and Behavior Analytic Intervention table.

Step 2: Define Operational Behaviors for Each DSM-5 Criteria

For each of the seven DSM-5 deficits, define one specific behavior:

  1. Use the GARS-2 Sample Results or other case studies for inspiration.
  2. Ensure your definitions are operational:
    • Observable: Focus on actions you can see.
    • Measurable: Include criteria such as frequency, duration, or intensity.
    • Clear: Provide examples and non-examples to avoid ambiguity.

Example:

  • Deficits in Social-Emotional Reciprocity: A child does not respond to greetings, such as “Hi,” from peers but instead looks away or remains silent.
    • Example: The child does not respond when a teacher asks, “How are you?” in a group setting.
    • Non-Example: The child responds with, “I’m fine,” even if the answer is brief.

Repeat this process for all seven categories.


Step 3: Identify Behavior Analytic Interventions

For each behavior:

  1. Search the literature for evidence-based ABA interventions. Use databases like PubMed, PsycINFO, or Google Scholar.
  2. Choose interventions that are:
    • Grounded in behavior analysis (e.g., discrete trial training, naturalistic teaching strategies).
    • Supported by strong scientific evidence.
  3. Cite at least two peer-reviewed journal articles per intervention, ensuring one is from the last five years.

Example for Deficits in Social-Emotional Reciprocity:

  • Intervention: Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NTS) to encourage reciprocal communication during play.
    • Supporting Article: Example articles could include research on the effectiveness of NTS for improving verbal responses in children with ASD.

Step 4: Write the ABA Intervention Strategy

Below the table in the template, compose a 2–4 paragraph explanation of your intervention strategy. Include:

  1. Overview: Summarize the intervention(s) and how they address the behavior(s).
  2. Scientific Evidence: Reference the peer-reviewed studies you found, explaining how they support your strategy.
  3. Hypothetical Functions: Address the possible functions of the behavior (e.g., attention, escape, sensory stimulation) and how the intervention aligns with these functions.

Example:

To address deficits in social-emotional reciprocity, the intervention will use Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NTS) during playtime to encourage verbal responses to greetings. NTS involves embedding learning opportunities into naturally occurring activities, such as asking, “How are you?” during snack time or while playing games. Smith et al. (2020) found that NTS significantly improved verbal reciprocity in children with ASD within two months. This strategy will focus on attention as the hypothesized function of the behavior.


Step 5: Complete the Matrix

Fill out the matrix with your operational behavior definitions, corresponding interventions, and citations. Double-check for:

  • Clarity: Ensure definitions and interventions are easy to follow.
  • APA formatting: Properly format all in-text citations and references.

Step 6: Apply APA Style and Finalize References

  • Add at least four scholarly sources to your reference list, formatted in APA style.
  • Include peer-reviewed journal articles and reputable books or resources.

Step 7: Review and Submit

  • Proofread your completed template for grammatical errors and organization.
  • Submit the document per your instructor’s instructions.

Final Tip:

By clearly defining behaviors, supporting your interventions with credible evidence, and aligning everything with ABA principles, you’ll create a strong foundation for the Week 7 and 9 treatment plans.