How might a dialogue be affected between persons of differing moral connections era as there is recognition of fundamental differences?

In a number of ethical issues, we can see a marked contrast between a Christian perspective and approach to the moral questions at hand and a non-religious approach and stance on the issue. Selecting 2 examples of these morally challenging issues (eg. Abortion, euthanasia, marriage, homosexuality, war & peace etc.) Show where there may be points of convergence between a Christian ethic and non-religious or secular humanistic ethic, and where there are clear and possibly irrevocable differences. What are the sources of the irreducible differences? How might a dialogue be affected between persons of differing moral connections era as there is recognition of fundamental differences?
Use the following books for reference only: 1) William C. Mattison III, Introducing Moral Theology: True Happiness and the Virtues (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2008). 2)Richard Gula, Reason Informed by Faith: Foundations of Catholic Morality (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1989). Must be 4-5 pages in length Must be original.
DO NOT POST THIS QUESTION TO THE INTERNET OR ASK ANOTHER SERVICE TO COMPLETE (I’VE HAD THAT DONE BEFORE AND IT DIDNT END WELL).

Posted in Uncategorized