practice. Using the CINAHL database in the Chamberlain Library, search for and l

practice. Using the CINAHL database in the Chamberlain Library, search for and locate a scholarly professional nursing journal article that meets these criteria:
Full-text
English language
Peer-reviewed
NOT an Evidence-Based Care Sheet or CINAHL Guide
Published in the past five years
Contains evidence to support a nursing practice in your practice area
Summarize this article in one paragraph. Explain why you selected this article. Provide an APA reference for this article.
Reply to a peer who has selected a different article. Provide feedback on that peer’s article choice and APA reference format. Your peers will also provide feedback on your article choice and APA reference format.
NOTE: Be sure to review the grading rubric on this page (click on the three dots on top right of this page). Both a scholarly outside source (scholarly professional nursing journal article described above) AND use and crediting of at least one Assigned Reading or Lesson are required.
RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
RNBSN_50_Point_Discussion_Rubric_1_21
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
16 pts
12 pts
14 pts
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Answer Post
•Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner, and
•Demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts
16 pts
100% Excellent
Answers the discussion question(s) in a detailed manner and demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
14 pts
88% Good
Answers the discussion question(s) but detail is lacking, and demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
13 pts
80% Fair
Partially answers the discussion question(s) and partially demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
6 pts
38% Poor
Minimally answers the discussion question(s) and minimally demonstrates knowledge and understanding of course concepts.
0 pts
0% Missing
Does not answer the discussion question(s).
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Scholarly Sources
•Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson,
•Integrates evidence from at least one outside scholarly source,
•All sources are credited within the body of the post,
•Evidence supports the discussion, and
•APA format is not required but is encouraged.
12 pts
100% Excellent
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson AND from at least one outside scholarly source. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
11 pts
88% Good
Integrates evidence from assigned reading OR lesson only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
10 pts
80% Fair
Integrates evidence from outside scholarly source only. All sources are credited within the body of the post. Evidence supports the discussion.
5 pts
38% Poor
Lists sources at conclusion of post but does not integrate/credit evidence into body of post OR integrates evidence but evidence does not support the discussion.
0 pts
0% Missing
Does not integrate any evidence.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reply Post
•Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post,
•Reply post provides additional information or clarification, and
•Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
14 pts
100% Excellent
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds excellent depth to the discussion.
12 pts
88% Good
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post by providing additional information or clarification. Reply post adds good depth to the discussion.
11 pts
80% Fair
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Limited information or clarification provided. Brief reply post adds fair depth to the discussion.
5 pts
38% Poor
Replies to a classmate’s and/or instructor’s post. Reply does not provide additional information or clarification. Brief reply post does not add depth to the discussion.
0 pts
0% Missing
No reply post to classmates or instructor.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Communicates Professionally
All posts:
•are clear and concise,
•are respectful, civil, and caring, and
•contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
8 pts
100% Excellent
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain excellent English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
7 pts
88% Good
All posts are clear, concise, respectful, civil, and caring. Posts contain good English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
6 pts
80% Fair
All posts are respectful, civil, and caring but are not clear or concise. Posts contain fair English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
3 pts
38% Poor
All posts are not clear and concise, AND contain poor English grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
0 pts
0% Missing
All posts are not respectful, civil, and caring.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Participation
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):
•Posts in the discussion at least two times, and
•Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
No Points Deducted
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Posts in the discussion at least two times, and •Posts in the discussion on two different days
0 pts
Points Deducted (-5 Points)
During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week): •Does NOT post in the discussion at least two times AND/OR •Does NOT post in the discussion on two different day