For PART I, you will write a sentence or two explaining what the criminal case o

For PART I, you will write a sentence or two explaining what the criminal case of ATKINS VS STATE OF VA has to do with our topic of INTELLIGENCE. (5 points)
For PART II, you will write a sentence or two demonstrating your understanding of the term VALIDITY in relationship to the WAIS-R. You will write a sentence or two demonstrating your understanding of the term RELIABILITY in relationship to the WAIS-R.
These sentences will show you know the difference between AND the definition of VALIDITY and RELIABILITY. You will write a final conclusion statement of how the WAIS was used in the trial of ATKINS VS STATE OF VA. (10 points)
For PART III, you will write a sentence or two summarizing the main idea behind Spearman’s concept of intelligence, Thurstone’s concept of intelligence, Gardner’s concept of intelligence, and Sternberg’s concept of intelligence. You will conclude with your final thoughts and preference for a theory on intelligence. Do you tend to agree with one of the theorists listed (choose between Spearman, Thurstone, Gardner, or Sternberg) and say why. Please remember to use your own words in writing this lab. (15 points)
Comments from Customer
OutcomePART I: Explanation of what the trial “ATKINS VS STATE OF VA” (the case is something that the writer will need to find online themselves) has to do with the topic of intelligence
This will be about two- or three- sentences describing what this case has to do with the concept of intelligence.
PART II: Correct usage of the terms VALIDITY and RELIABILITY in describing the WAIS-R. A statement or two demonstrating understanding of how the WAIS-R was used in the case of ATKINS VS STATE OF VA.
This second part will include a sentence or two describing VALIDITY of WAIS, another sentence or two describing RELIABILITY of WAIS. These sentences will show you know the difference between AND the definition of VALIDITY and RELIABILITY. A final conclusion statement of how the WAIS was used in the trial of ATKINS VS STATE OF VA.
PART III: Comparison of differing theories of intelligence, as presented in the text.
In this final part, you will describe the theories of intelligence by Spearman, Thurstone, Gardner, and Sternberg. You will write a brief sentence or two for each theorist. You will conclude with a rationale for which one you favor and why.