My view is white priviledge exist in USA. I want to ties this end to the paper you did for me about the Dutchmans CurveTrain Wreck. How white priviledge prevent whites from being killed because they rode in metal cars. I need 3sources from Tennessee State University Library. I’ve included the sources in the attachment. You may substitute 2 of the sources for another source but I need at least 1 source from TSU in Tennee
1. address a controversial issue currently debated in our society and relevant to the issue raised by your
Rhetorical Analysis;
2. take a position/make a claim very early on that is unambiguous and shall serve as the thesis statement
for the discussion;
3. provide 3 pieces of evidence which are backed up with facts and/or expert opinion, which should
come from research, and your evidence should be clearly identifiable as logos, ethos, or pathos;
4. address opposing viewpoint (also called anticipating objection, making a concession, taking a turn
against);
5. immediately counter-argue the opposing viewpoint with a restatement of your position that targets
specifically the opposing viewpoint you just addressed;
6. resolve with discussion that addresses the public resonance of your issue, utilizing any of the
following strategies: discussion of a recent development; discussion of precedent; proposal of a
hypothetical question/situation; looking to the future using a “what if” approach; perhaps incorporating
a rhetorical question; analysis of a related affective issue; allusion to literary example or a film, etc.;
7. conclude with a perhaps a look to the future of your issue or a final challenge to your audience to do
the right thing by adopting your position, or an urgent appeal to participate in the democratic process in
order to change the behavior, the law, the practice, etc. You may choose to provide a provocative
quotation that you tie in to a restatement of your position, literary allusion, or any other of the ways we
have learned that discussions can be brought to an end other than by blandly summarizing everything
you have already said.
Additionally, it is understood that your discussion has relied on source material support and that you
have documented it according to MLA guidelines. You are required to have at least three scholarly
sources from the TSU Library system, one of which must be a scholarly journal article from one
of the databases available to you through the TSU electronic library. Remember to provide both
in-text citations and a Works Cited page entry for each source that you use.
The MINIMUM WORD COUNT FOR THIS PAPER is 1200 words.
ABOUT QUOTATIONS: Refer to the guidelines established in The Purdue Owl MLA Guide (POMG)
with respect to using signal phrases and quoting effectively. You may have only one block quotation
(more than 4 lines; less than 10) and it must be set up as illustrated in the sample research paper the
POMG under the Resources/Links tab. Altogether, you should plan to have no more than 15 lines of
direct quotation. For the most part, you will be paraphrasing your source material. One important thing
you want to remember about paraphrasing is that even though the source material may be in your own
words, you still have to cite it, with both an in-text citation and a Works Cited page entry.
Your paper should be proofread before submission. Are there typos? Misspellings? Omitted words?
Wrong Words? Are there grammar errors, e.g. CS, FS, FRAG? Are there punctuation errors, e.g.
semicolon errors, apostrophe errors?
Have you stayed in the 3rd person? There should be no use of 1st or 2nd person in this essay.,
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount