Johns Hopkins Hierarchy of Evidence Explained for Nursing Practice

Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals Hierarchy of Evidence Guide Appendix D

© 2022 Johns Hopkins Health System/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing P a g e | 1

Note: Refer to the appropriate Evidence Appraisal Tool (Research [Appendix E] or Nonresearch [Appendix F]) to determine quality ratings.

Evidence Level Types of Evidence

R es

ea rc

h E

vi de

nc e

(A pp

en di

x E

)

Level I • Experimental study, randomized controlled trial (RCT) • Explanatory mixed methods design that includes only a Level I quaNtitative study • Systematic review of RCTs, with or without meta-analysis

Level II • Quasi-experimental study • Explanatory mixed methods design that includes only a Level II quaNtitative study • Systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis

Level III

• Nonexperimental study • Systematic review of a combination of RCTs, quasi-experimental and nonexperimental studies, or nonexperimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis. • Exploratory, convergent, or multiphasic mixed methods studies • Explanatory mixed methods design that includes only a Level III quaNtitative study • QuaLitative study • Systematic review of quaLitative studies with or without meta-synthesis

N on

re se

ar ch

E vi

de nc

e

(A pp

en di

x F)

 

Level IV Opinion of respected authorities and/or nationally recognized expert committees or consensus panels based on scientific evidence. Includes:

• Clinical practice guidelines • Consensus panels/position statements

Level V

Based on experiential and non-research evidence. Includes: • Scoping reviews • Integrative reviews • Literature reviews • Quality improvement, program or financial evaluation • Case reports • Opinion of nationally recognized expert(s) based on experiential evidence

 

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!


Step-by-Step Guide to Understanding and Using the Johns Hopkins Hierarchy of Evidence

Step 1: Understand the Purpose of the Hierarchy

The Johns Hopkins Hierarchy of Evidence helps you:

  • Rank research and nonresearch evidence by strength and reliability

  • Support evidence-based clinical decisions

  • Select appropriate sources for nursing assignments and practice

Higher levels generally provide stronger evidence for practice decisions.


Step 2: Identify Whether Your Source Is Research or Nonresearch

Before assigning a level, determine:

  • Research evidence → involves systematic investigation and data analysis

  • Nonresearch evidence → based on expert opinion, reviews, or experiential knowledge

This step ensures you use the correct appraisal tool (Appendix E or F).


Step 3: Classify Research Evidence (Levels I–III)

  • Level I (Strongest Evidence)
    Use this when your source is an RCT or a systematic review of RCTs. These studies minimize bias and provide high confidence in outcomes.

  • Level II
    Choose this level for quasi-experimental studies where randomization is not used but an intervention is still tested.

  • Level III
    Apply this level to nonexperimental, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies that explore relationships, experiences, or perceptions.

💡 Tutor tip: Qualitative studies are valuable for understanding patient experiences, even though they are not experimental.


Step 4: Classify Nonresearch Evidence (Levels IV–V)

  • Level IV
    Includes evidence from expert panels, clinical guidelines, and consensus statements grounded in scientific literature.

  • Level V (Lowest Level)
    Includes experiential knowledge such as case reports, quality improvement projects, and narrative reviews.

💡 These levels are still useful, especially when higher-level evidence is unavailable.


Step 5: Apply the Hierarchy to Assignments

When writing papers or care plans:

  • Clearly state the level of evidence

  • Justify why the source fits that level

  • Prioritize Level I–III when possible


Step 6: Avoid Common Student Errors

  • ❌ Confusing literature reviews with systematic reviews

  • ❌ Assuming guidelines are Level I evidence

  • ❌ Ignoring qualitative research value

Always evaluate study design, not just the topic.


Helpful Academic Resources

Use these links to strengthen understanding and citation accuracy:

Posted in Uncategorized

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount