Instructions Windshield survey a community assessment strategy: Downtown Promise

Instructions
Windshield survey a community assessment strategy: Downtown Promise Heights. Students will participate in debriefing and reflect on the clinical experience as guided by the instructor using the questions in the Debriefing Guide.
Within the virtual clinical experience, students will carry out systematic gathering of data using the traditional windshield survey technique to better understand a community and inform an overall community assessment. Students will then write a 2-page paper that identifies and discusses neighborhood strengths and neighborhood risks based on the data gathered.
Instructions:
Students should complete the virtual windshield survey that is available on thePoint.
Students should then create a 2-page-paper (approximately 500 words) that identifies and discusses 3 neighborhood strengths and 3 neighborhood risks.
The student should use the information gathered during his/her tour of downtown Promise Heights and include, for each strength and risk, the rationale that integrates leading content for this assignment.
Use the link to go directly to CoursePoint.
Due on Oct 27, 2024 11:59 PM
Available on Oct 14, 2024 12:01 AM. Access restricted before availability starts.
Available until Oct 30, 2024 11:59 PM. Submission restricted after availability ends.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Virtual or Real World Experience Written Paper
Criteria
Excellent Work
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement
Not Acceptable
Criterion Score
Content Knowledge
3 points
• Follows all requirements for the assignment.
• Conveys well-rounded knowledge of the topic.
• Excels in fully presenting what is known about the topic.
2 points
• Follows all requirements for the assignment.
• Major points of topic are mostly covered in the required assignment areas.
1 point
• Knowledge of topic is partially covered.
• Key information is missing from 2 or more assignment areas.
0 points
• Knowledge of topic is limited and does not cover the required assignment areas.
Score of Content Knowledge,/ 3
Flow of Content
3 points
• Paper is well-organized with a solid introduction and conclusion.
• Information clearly flows in a logical and interesting sequence.
• Easy to read, follow, and understand throughout.
• Captures the reader’s attention.
2 points
• Paper is organized. Introduction and conclusion are mostly helpful.
• Information flows in a generally logical and interesting sequence.
• Easy to read, follow, and understand most of the paper.
1 point
• The organization, sequence, and flow of paper are difficult to follow at times.
• Introduction and/or conclusion is poorly written.
• Information is difficult to read or understand in a few areas
0 points
Paper is not well-organized.
• Information is difficult to read, understand, and follow throughout most of the paper.
• Introduction and/or conclusion is missing or
lacks clarity and connection with the topic.
Score of Flow of Content,/ 3
Clarity, Critical Thinking
2 points
• Concisely explains the topic.
• Consistently analyzes information, offers insight, and draws conclusions.
• Excels in presentation of ideas. Scholarly work.
1.5 points
• Explains the topic.
• Presents information about the topic.
• Some analysis, insight, and conclusions offered. Mostly scholarly work.
1 point
• Major aspects of the topic are presented, but content lacks insight and analysis. Scholarly work is variable.
0 points
• Information is basic.
• Major aspects of the topic are missing or inadequate.
• Lacks insight, analysis, and conclusions. Reader gains little understanding of the topic.
Score of Clarity, Critical Thinking,/ 2
Writing Composition and Mechanics
1 point
• Spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure are essentially error free. Excellent readability.
0.75 points
• Infrequent, minor errors may occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure. Errors do not interfere with the overall readability of the paper. Minor editing would have been helpful.
0.5 points
• Multiple errors occur with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence structure; detracts from overall readability of the paper. Significant editing would have been helpful.
0 points
• Numerous errors with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence structure; difficult to read and understand the information presented. Writing development needed.
Score of Writing Composition and Mechanics,/ 1
References (Sources) and APA Format
1 point
• Utilizes reputable sources that clearly relate to the topic.

AND
• APA format in the paper and the reference list essentially error free.
0.75 points
• Utilizes reputable sources that relate to the topic.

AND/OR
• Some minor errors may occur with APA format in the paper or the reference list; errors are not consistent throughout the paper.
0.5 points
• Sources are not always reputable or do not clearly relate to the topic.

AND/OR
• Frequent errors occur with APA format throughout the paper and/or the reference list.
0 points
well to the topic or sources not identified.

AND/OR
• Numerous errors occur with APA format consistently throughout the paper and/or the reference list. Lacks understanding of APA format.
Score of References (Sources) and APA Format,/ 1